Jump to content

T20 Finals Rose Bowl


manji

Recommended Posts

Guest Dark Sotonic Mills
when is it?,,,i quite fancy going to watch cricket and get p1shed!!:thumbup:

 

Next Saturday and it's completely sold out. Best to get a case in and watch it on Sky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3rd test v Pakistan starts on 18th so on that basis I'd not imagine England wanting to risk players in a 20/20 match or 2. However, I'm not aware of anything definite on this, more than likely Flower and Co will maybe want a few players to get some extra match time ( though playing 20/20 is useless in terms of Test match preparation) and expect the Counties to dance to their tune. Thankfully Hants took a view not to play Pietersen v Kent and would surely do the same again.

As stated we are looking at Broad and Swann for Notts, Cook for Essex and that's all isn't it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy Flower has just said on Sky, that Broad, Swann, Cook and KP are all free to play on Finals Day.

 

Nasser Hussein has supported Hants in not selecting him. "Playing for your County is a two-way thing and Kevin hasn't done anything for Hants in the last 4 years, so he cant turn round and say ' Let me come down for finals day.' It's not a one-way door."

 

Good on Nasser. Although he might not want KP playing against Essex. ;)

 

Warney then said " It would be nice if KP went and supported Hants even if he wasn't selected." When asked if he would be selected, or if not, turn up and support, he said " Neither."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy Flower has just said on Sky, that Broad, Swann, Cook and KP are all free to play on Finals Day.

 

Nasser Hussein has supported Hants in not selecting him. "Playing for your County is a two-way thing and Kevin hasn't done anything for Hants in the last 4 years, so he cant turn round and say ' Let me come down for finals day.' It's not a one-way door."

 

Good on Nasser. Although he might not want KP playing against Essex. ;)

 

Warney then said " It would be nice if KP went and supported Hants even if he wasn't selected." When asked if he would be selected, or if not, turn up and support, he said " Neither."

 

Didnt hear that. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're going and can't wait. Membership tickets in Block V

 

I've been to three finals days before (two at Edgbaston and one at Trent Bridge) and they are always good fun.

 

Great that Hampshire have made it finally and will add something extra to the day. Especially if we get to the final.

 

I think Notts will win though as they'll be too strong for everyone else. Swann, Broad, Sidebottom, Hussy, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No KP again...must say I whole heartedly agree....why should players like Vince lose out when he has done so well this season.

 

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/cricket/8321825.Hants_set_to_ignore_KP___again/?ref=twt

 

But would you play Lumb? Coming back to form but didn't really contribute towards getting to finals day, so someone would have to give way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course Lumb should be selected ahead of Pietersen, regardless of his poor form a while back he is 100% a Hampshire player, in spite of KP saying "I'll be cheering on the lads !" does anyone really care about someone for whom Hants are not even in his list of priorities. Good riddance to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not think Hughes is here yet. I hope Razzak is available,never thought I would say that.

 

Well Hughes could only play anyway if Christian or Razzaq were not in the team, I am hoping McKenzie is still free. Anyone know for sure ? Why would Razzaq not be available?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pietersen should be made to turn up and be the waterboy. Too far to travel from Chelsea is he having a laugh!!

 

I'm going with my nipper a bit gutted that I'll miss our away game at Franchise.

 

Lol, but with so many injuries he could still end up playing:(

I'm struggling to pick eleven fit players. Assuming Cork and Ervine miss out though that isn't certain then even though Tomlinson is generally not played in 20/20 I would pick him:

 

Carberry, Adams, Vince, McKenzie, Christian, Razzaq, Bates, Briggs, Jones, Tomlinson, Wood,

+ Balcombe, Dawson, Riazhuddin. Anyone who is fit I have missed ?

 

I suspect from reports bowling is the problem for Ervine so play him as a batsman only ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope Corky does play, as it is 20/20 the risk is of course less ( aside from the frantic fielding at times). I hope Ervine makes it as well, whatever happens we surely wouldn't pick Pietersen especially as it is our all rounder/bowlers who are mainly suffering and with Carberry, Adams, Vince and McKenzie that fills our top 4 at least and hopefully Ervine at 5 even if he doesn't bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All things considered we are heading for a reasonable draw v Somerset. Without Cork and Ervine for most of the Somerset innings Tomlinson bowled 32 overs( excellent 7-85), Christian 22.1 and Briggs 27.5. Even McKenzie weighed in with 10 tidy overs, 0-24.

132 behind on 1st innings Hants are 177/3 at tea with McKenzie on 40 and Christian 26. Of course Lumb hasn't batted and I doubt Ervine/Cork will be allowed to bat above 7 having been off the field for much of the Somerset Innings ( we had 3 substitute fielders at one point including physio Craig DeWeymarn who confused a lot of people by wearing Cork's shirt and this developed into a real farce when for some reason Christian wore Ervine's sweater when he went off :D ).

If this is the case then Bates, Briggs or Tomlinson will have to bat at 6 which would seem totally unreasonable to me and I'm wondering if this is the case then surely this rule about players being off the field batting no higher than 7 needs to be looked at as our disadvantage is enough already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank frack for that !

 

Yes, imagine the possibility of having to beg KP to play as we didn't have enough players ! A few Sky pundits ( who should know better) were saying he should be selected even if only Lumb was out. Why ? Do we really need him so much, he's in poor form anyway despite 80 v Pakistan, was a very scratchy innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, imagine the possibility of having to beg KP to play as we didn't have enough players ! A few Sky pundits ( who should know better) were saying he should be selected even if only Lumb was out. Why ? Do we really need him so much, he's in poor form anyway despite 80 v Pakistan, was a very scratchy innings.

 

I would they were hoping KP would play to add to their viewing figures !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would they were hoping KP would play to add to their viewing figures !

 

They should get more than enough anyway ! As for Ervince I think it was maybe to do with the fact that with so many players wearing different players shirts and sweaters he had on his own sweater but Vince's shirt and it proved all too confusing for the Echo reporter:D

Or maybe it was Vince wearing the wrong shirt/sweater !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost lost another one it seems :

 

http://www.skysports.com/cricket/match_report/0,19822,11066_85254,00.html

 

"there was a nasty moment when Christian had the grille of his helmet penetrated by a Zander de Bruyn (1-17) bouncer.

Blood was pouring from the bridge of the Australian's nose but, after several minutes of treatment, he bravely continued."

 

 

Not sure I have ever known one team have so many injuries in the same match !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our (ahem) good friends at the Echo had a back page headline "Cork and Ervince at centre of injury scares."

 

Ervince?? Some kind of scientific hybrid? What next, Brams? Work? Carson?

 

Maybe cloning is the way to go for Hampshire. We either sign em and they get called up or injured and sometimes both......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So chuffed for em. We've got in the final the right way. Some young local players. Sme old knckered players, and it's justified not picking Peterson, and we didn't sign a star player for 1 game only. Great achievement. have to win the final now though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...