saint_bert Posted 9 June, 2010 Posted 9 June, 2010 http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Sarah-Payne-Murderer-Roy-Whiting-Has-His-Minimum-Jail-Term-Reduced-To-40-Years/Article/201006215646126?lpos=UK_News_First_Home_Article_Teaser_Region_2&lid=ARTICLE_15646126_Sarah_Payne%3A_Murderer_Roy_Whiting_Has_His_Minimum_Jail_Term_Reduced_To_40_Years Bloke is scum. Pure and simple. I just dont see the need for it to be dragged up all over again. 40 years 50 years whats the point? Thoughts?
bridge too far Posted 9 June, 2010 Posted 9 June, 2010 He's never ever going to come out, is he. And rightly so. I think it was done because the sentencing protocols had changed and a precedent needed to be set. It only means that his case for parole will be reviewed after 40 years instead of 50, not that he will be automatically released. I can't imagine any review board would grant him parole so yes, you're right, it doesn't make any difference.
View From The Top Posted 9 June, 2010 Posted 9 June, 2010 He'll never be let out. The 40 years is the minimum he can serve.
buctootim Posted 9 June, 2010 Posted 9 June, 2010 he should be put down I dont think that is an option in the sentencing guidelines.
bridge too far Posted 9 June, 2010 Posted 9 June, 2010 he should be put down I'd rather he had to endure 40 years worth of whatever treatment is meted out to him than for him to have a quick way out.
buctootim Posted 9 June, 2010 Posted 9 June, 2010 I'd rather he had to endure 40 years worth of whatever treatment is meted out to him than for him to have a quick way out. I'd rather he was sentenced to death and the £700,000 saved was used for health or education services.
St Landrew Posted 9 June, 2010 Posted 9 June, 2010 I'd rather he had to endure 40 years worth of whatever treatment is meted out to him than for him to have a quick way out. Yep, same here. I wouldn't prevent him if he decided to end it all, in his cell, though.
rocknrollman no2 Posted 9 June, 2010 Posted 9 June, 2010 As been said before,this scum will have to serve 40years before hes even allowed to go before a parole board.Then he has to prove hes no longer a threat to anyone.Its all just legal talk to make sure the law is seen to be done. I will bet a weeks wages he never comes out.
for_heaven's_Saint Posted 10 June, 2010 Posted 10 June, 2010 As been said before,this scum will have to serve 40years before hes even allowed to go before a parole board.Then he has to prove hes no longer a threat to anyone.Its all just legal talk to make sure the law is seen to be done. I will bet a weeks wages he never comes out. TBF though, he'll be 91 by then, so, assuming he's still alive, he may well be no longer seen as a threat to society and therefore be released and able to die at home; a luxury he should not be allowed.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now