doubleonothing Posted 5 June, 2010 Posted 5 June, 2010 unless it alters course and heads to a port in Israel they have said they will board it http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/10244301.stm
bridge too far Posted 5 June, 2010 Posted 5 June, 2010 (edited) They've boarded apparently - with the agreement of the Rachael Corrie ship. Edited 5 June, 2010 by bridge too far found the full name
doubleonothing Posted 5 June, 2010 Author Posted 5 June, 2010 You're right they have. And the BBC have updated their homepage http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/10245176.stm Irish owned ship this time.
Saint_clark Posted 5 June, 2010 Posted 5 June, 2010 Northern or Republic? Surely if it's Northern that's an act of war against the United Kingdom, and we should respond in kind?
Sheaf Saint Posted 5 June, 2010 Posted 5 June, 2010 I see from the article that the Israelis are claiming they will transfer the aid to Gaza by land after they have checked it for weapons. If that's the case then I can't fault them, but given their previous form I have serious doubts that the aid will ever make it to Gaza.
doubleonothing Posted 5 June, 2010 Author Posted 5 June, 2010 Northern or Republic? Surely if it's Northern that's an act of war against the United Kingdom, and we should respond in kind? Republic of Ireland. It is actually owned by the "Free Gaza" movements Irish arm but registered in Cambodia (most definatly a Flag of Convienience) The Irish government said on 1st June that they wanted it let through. The Irish Taoiseach Brian Cowen TD said "If any harm comes to any of our citizens, it will have the most serious consequences". The demand for safe passage was reiterated by Minister for Foreign Affairs Micheál Martin TD on 2 June 2010. Mr Martin warned the Israelis he would take "appropriate diplomatic action" if the ship was not allowed through. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/01/irish-aid-boat-gaza-israel-warning
Saint in Paradise Posted 5 June, 2010 Posted 5 June, 2010 Well Mr Martin, Israel has ignored several U.N. Resolutions over the years so be prepared to be ignored as well.
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 5 June, 2010 Posted 5 June, 2010 I see from the article that the Israelis are claiming they will transfer the aid to Gaza by land after they have checked it for weapons. If that's the case then I can't fault them, but given their previous form I have serious doubts that the aid will ever make it to Gaza. My thoughts precisely.
tombletomble Posted 5 June, 2010 Posted 5 June, 2010 I see from the article that the Israelis are claiming they will transfer the aid to Gaza by land after they have checked it for weapons. If that's the case then I can't fault them, but given their previous form I have serious doubts that the aid will ever make it to Gaza. If the Israelis were providing the correct amount of aid then this flotilla would not have been necessary anyway.
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 5 June, 2010 Posted 5 June, 2010 If people on both sides stop carrying out attacks then sanctions wouldn't exist, thats far too simple I know.....
Thedelldays Posted 5 June, 2010 Posted 5 June, 2010 (edited) Northern or Republic? Surely if it's Northern that's an act of war against the United Kingdom, and we should respond in kind? boarding a ship is not an act of war....if done legally..even then, would you be happy for the UK (or any country) to declare war on any nation who embarks on a ship for checks..? you do realise that the RN boards ships almost daily around the world..? is THAT an act of war..? Edited 5 June, 2010 by Thedelldays
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now