Jump to content

Next Labour leader


TopGun
 Share

Recommended Posts

Your own quote says Balls worked for Gordon Brown, not Tony Blair.

 

He wasn't in a position to influence the outcome of the debate on the war. You might as well argue that the Tories were complicit in the war too, since they voted for it - something that Balls and E. Milliband couldn't do.

 

Like the Tories and many other Labour MPs, they might have believed the 'lies' but they were in no position of power. And, as I said before, Balls was a Civil Servant at the time and, therefore, apolitical.

 

It is quite apparent to me that you don't understand how government, cabinet etc. works.

 

Balls/E. Miliband were special advisors - as special advisors, they work in an unashamedly political and partisan capacity. While employed as civil servants, different rules apply to them - they were certainly not bog-standard civil servants as you imply - they would have been in the engine room of the party machine all the time.

 

See what happened to Damian McBride - once he started overstepping the mark as a civil servant and doing Brown's political bidding, he was converted to a special advisor - to release him from the normal protocols of war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep Mr D Milliband voted for it..

 

It is E Miliband we're talking about.

 

I'll allow you some little ground - Ed Balls was just on the news saying, had he been an MP at the time, he would have voted for the war on the available evidence.

 

Many MPs voted for the war on the available eidence - MPs of all political persuasions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is E Miliband we're talking about.

 

I'll allow you some little ground - Ed Balls was just on the news saying, had he been an MP at the time, he would have voted for the war on the available evidence.

 

Many MPs voted for the war on the available eidence - MPs of all political persuasions.

no..you are on about E Milliband...I was not..hence my link to which this convo started

 

http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/articles.aspx?cp-documentid=153477702

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no..you are on about E Milliband...I was not..hence my link to which this convo started

 

http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/articles.aspx?cp-documentid=153477702

 

Your link quotes Ed Balls and David Miliband. David Miliband is quoted as saying it was time to move on. I'm not quite sure how that can be construed as 'slime'. I'm not defending him at all but he's no more slimy than politicians from other parties looking to move on.

 

Lots of Tories say it's time to move on when the question of Thatcher is raised.

 

But I'm comfortable that, so far, my choice (E Miliband) wasn't in a position of power or influence at the time. Yes maybe he should have resigned his party membership, as I did, but it was easier for me to do so - it didn't affect my career.

 

Somebody asked you why you didn't resign from your career on principle if you thought the war was so wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote

Somebody asked you why you didn't resign from your career on principle if you thought the war was so wrong.

 

Have to say BTF I think that is an outrageous thing to say; especially to somebody who ultimately would put their life on the line on behalf of your nation.

 

I didn't ask him the question - it was another poster.

 

Happy to receive your apology when you have a moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By repeating the question you were indeed asking it to be answered.

 

I think you should be apologising to DD. As I am sure you are aware the way the military works is you cannot question orders other wise the whole system breaksdown. You should be supportive of the people who put their lives on the line but ask your questions of those that make the decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By repeating the question you were indeed asking it to be answered.

 

I think you should be apologising to DD. As I am sure you are aware the way the military works is you cannot question orders other wise the whole system breaksdown. You should be supportive of the people who put their lives on the line but ask your questions of those that make the decisions.

 

Rubbish. The debate had moved to resignation as a matter of principle. I had said, quite truthfully, that I resigned from the Labour Party as a matter of principle but then my career wasn't on the line and I could afford to do so.

 

I simply reiterated what someone else had said as an illustration of how difficult it can be to abide by principles when a career is at stake.

 

I have family in the forces so don't talk to me about being supportive of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By repeating the question you were indeed asking it to be answered.

 

I think you should be apologising to DD. As I am sure you are aware the way the military works is you cannot question orders other wise the whole system breaksdown. You should be supportive of the people who put their lives on the line but ask your questions of those that make the decisions.

 

I asked the question. Actually I think killing people for a cause you dont believe in is infinitely worse than going along with a political decision you cant change. Like the Sun and Mail, a lot of finger pointing and hypocrisy on this thread.

http://www.wri-irg.org/node/5877

Edited by buctootim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting to see that Ed Miliband has way more nominations than the other declared candidates put together and has more than the required 33 nominations to be able to stand officially.

 

Both Southampton MPs have nominated him.

 

I think a lot of the Labour party realise they need to distant themselves from the right wing 'New Labour'/Tories and go to the left, especially after how well the Lib Dems came across just before the election

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would love to see Labour lurch back towards the left...

 

Labour doesn't need to change its position at all really. Now that Clegg and co are fully signed up members of the Tory agenda I think there'll be plenty of LDs who will sign up to New New Labour under whichever Miliband!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two interesting climb-downs yesterday, I thought.

 

Vince Cable (I had a lot of respect for him - not any more) wriggling very uncomfortably when interviewed by Paxman last night about his 'change of heart' about cuts.

 

David Chameleon bowing to pressure re the 1922 Committee.

 

Is the CleggOn love-in struggling already?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asked the question. Actually I think killing people for a cause you dont believe in is infinitely worse than going along with a political decision you cant change. Like the Sun and Mail, a lot of finger pointing and hypocrisy on this thread.

http://www.wri-irg.org/node/5877

 

It is a fair point and that is why you are not in the forces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...