Something very different to usual threads

[Saint in Paradise]

http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2004/067/moon-towers.htm

 

 

A quote from the article :-

 

"I suspect that some of you have strong fairly entrenched assumptions about what is acceptable to be considering as being on or not being on the Moon.

After all, generations have grown up thinking of the Moon a certain way and that it is a dead airless place inhospitable to life as we know it

and the only way human life as we know it could live there is in protected and even armored environments on the surface or underground.

 

If thought about at all, this concept is so deeply entrenched in the public psychology and reinforced by a perception of familiarity with

the Moon (warranted or not), that evidence such as you see here is probably going to be perceived by some as too fantastic and perhaps

even too disturbing and therefore rejected emotionally as outright impossible".

[skintsaint]

[CHAPEL END CHARLIE]

So we are asked to believe that there are large artificial structures built on the surface of the moon (by Space Aliens presumably) that have inexplicably escaped humanity's notice before , and that the US industrial/military complex are now conspiring to conceal this information from us for some unknown reason ? The body of evidence for this absurd proposition being nothing more substantial than a few blurred sections on some digital images of the Lunar surface .

Just use your intelligence and think just how ridicules that is

 

I have not the slightest doubt that there will be some dull technical explanation for the 'blurs' (or 'obfuscations' as this nonsense has it) - a fault with the experimental cameras employed or some telemetry problem with the images being infinitely more likely than this pile of horsesh1t I would suggest . If your really wanted to hide something as significant as this (why?) it would be extremely easy to manipulate the images in a much more effective and undetectable way , or simply not publish them at all .

 

I'm reminded of that (long discredited) theory that the Apollo landings on the Moon never actually happened , and that it was all some vast conspiracy by NASA to fool the public . Buzz Aldrin said that if anyone dared to say that to his face he'd punch them in the mouth - I'm starting to know how he felt .

 

PS - if you really are interested in the truth , then the magnificent results of the 'Clementine' mission are freely available to the public , and this will prove a rather more reliable guide :

 

http://www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil/clementine/

[buctootim]

Amazing isnt it? NASA have the technology to fly to the moon, send probes to saturn, but can only operate the smudge icon on photoshop, when an average idiot could have doctored it seamlessly.

 

Someone is pulling your plonker op and it isnt the US government.

[Saint137]

I'm reminded of that (long discredited) theory that the Apollo landings on the Moon never actually happened , and that it was all some vast conspiracy by NASA to fool the public . Buzz Aldrin said that if anyone dared to say that to his face he'd punch them in the mouth - I'm starting to know how he felt .

 

Buzz did exactly that...

 

Calling a Korean war vet who saw three of his buddies burnt to a crisp in Apollo 1 a coward is not the brightest thing to do:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOo6aHSY8hU