JustMike Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 seems as though they are all messing up today. "Tory Says Gay People Are Not 'Normal' A Conservative Party candidate has been suspended after writing on his website he will "not accept" the behaviour of gay people" [url=http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/video/David-Cameron-Tory-Leader-Gay-Times-Interview-Blunders/Video/201003415580944?lpos=video_Article_Related_Content_Region_5&lid=VIDEO_15580944_David_Cameron_Tory_Leader%3A_Gay_Times_Interview_Blunders][/url] and the Cameron tries to respond... http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/video/David-Cameron-Tory-Leader-Gay-Times-Interview-Blunders/Video/201003415580944?lpos=video_Article_Related_Content_Region_5&lid=VIDEO_15580944_David_Cameron_Tory_Leader%3A_Gay_Times_Interview_Blunders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 as long as he says "sorry" for this..then no problem...right..? after all, we all say things we dont really mean..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 I prefer Bigotgate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 hmmmm what is bigger news.. tory candidate or the Prime Minister of one of the worlds most influential nations.. hmmmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 hmmmm what is bigger news.. tory candidate or the Prime Minister of one of the worlds most influential nations.. hmmmmm The American stations covered bigotgate live in the US. I bet the Tories are chuffed Clown gave them such a good day to bury bad news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 hmmmm what is bigger news.. tory candidate or the Prime Minister of one of the worlds most influential nations.. hmmmmm is homophobia not important then DD? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 is homophobia not important then DD? of course it is...but I dont make the news..I simply read/watch/hear it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 I'm sure this story will be covered in the "in other news" section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 seems as though they are all messing up today. "Tory Says Gay People Are Not 'Normal' A Conservative Party candidate has been suspended after writing on his website he will "not accept" the behaviour of gay people" He is not even an MP and was standing in a seat where he was unlikely to ever get elected. Add to the fact that he has been sacked, problem solved. and the Cameron tries to respond... http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/video/David-Cameron-Tory-Leader-Gay-Times-Interview-Blunders/Video/201003415580944?lpos=video_Article_Related_Content_Region_5&lid=VIDEO_15580944_David_Cameron_Tory_Leader%3A_Gay_Times_Interview_Blunders Cameron's response appears to have been over a month ago. Try to deflect the **** from Calamity Clown as much as you like, but you are going to have to do better than that, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 He is not even an MP and was standing in a seat where he was unlikely to ever get elected. Add to the fact that he has been sacked, problem solved. Cameron's response appears to have been over a month ago. Try to deflect the **** from Calamity Clown as much as you like, but you are going to have to do better than that, It dosen't take much digging to find the real face of the Tories. Some people have short memories about the last Tory government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 It dosen't take much digging to find the real face of the Tories. Some people have short memories about the last Tory government. obviously, he has been sacked would you say that the real face of Nu Labour was one that thinks anyone who dares brings up immigration is a BIGOT...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 obviously, he has been sacked would you say that the real face of Nu Labour was one that thinks anyone who dares brings up immigration is a BIGOT...? Indeed, can we sack Brown now? Actually, no don't, we've got at least one more week of this. Re-runs will be on Comedy Gold for years to come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 obviously, he has been sacked would you say that the real face of Nu Labour was one that thinks anyone who dares brings up immigration is a BIGOT...? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 No. righty ho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustMike Posted 28 April, 2010 Author Share Posted 28 April, 2010 He is not even an MP and was standing in a seat where he was unlikely to ever get elected. Add to the fact that he has been sacked, problem solved. Cameron's response appears to have been over a month ago. Try to deflect the **** from Calamity Clown as much as you like, but you are going to have to do better than that, not deflecting nothing from no-one, i dont want either of them in power. merely just pointing out that its not just labour who mess up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 Indeed, can we sack Brown now? Actually, no don't, we've got at least one more week of this. Re-runs will be on Comedy Gold for years to come. It'll all be forgotton about in a couple of weeks. Oh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponty Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 There are plenty of people who won't disagree with that though. Just like there are plenty of people who won't disagree that a woman banging on about immigration is bigotted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mao Cap Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 Would mean f*ck-all even without the thing in Rochdale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 Well, everyone is ****ing up today. I'm awaiting the story of Lib Dem candidates smoking crack on the campaign trail... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 28 April, 2010 Share Posted 28 April, 2010 While we are on the subject of parliamentary candidates, this has just come out: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8650411.stm Whoops!! :smt043:smt043:smt043:smt043:smt043 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MongoNeil Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 is homophobia not important then DD? I wouldn't call his comments homophobic, depends on whether you think not being normal is derogatory in some way. FWIW, I'm not homophobic, I have gay friends in fact but it's not normal is it. Man & woman is normal, sexual reproduction and all that. Man & man is not normal but no-one's suggesting there is anything wrong with not being normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenevaSaint Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 and the Cameron tries to respond... http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/video/David-Cameron-Tory-Leader-Gay-Times-Interview-Blunders/Video/201003415580944?lpos=video_Article_Related_Content_Region_5&lid=VIDEO_15580944_David_Cameron_Tory_Leader%3A_Gay_Times_Interview_Blunders Well his response was very clear there wasn't it :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 Well his response was very clear there wasn't it :-) Indeed, his response was over a month before yesterday :rolleyes: :rolleyes: You've got to give it to the guy. To come up with a response 1 month before the event is pretty spectacular. Some people call him visionary whilst others prophetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff leopard Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 I'm sure this story will be covered in the "in other news" section. I know what you mean, that fact a Tory is homophobic is common knowledge, new born babies have this kind of info hard-wired into them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenevaSaint Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 Indeed, his response was over a month before yesterday :rolleyes: :rolleyes: You've got to give it to the guy. To come up with a response 1 month before the event is pretty spectacular. Some people call him visionary whilst others prophetic. Sorry, should've been clearer, his response to the question posed by the Gay Times, whatever it was. Something about party whip or free votes on Gay rights issues I'd guess. Dave (god I hate that call me Dave stuff) looked a little flustered there is all I was saying. Nice to see something not choreographed for once, just like Bigotgate to cheer you up again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Duckhunter Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 Didn't a Labour candidate get sacked for making obscene comments on Twitter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 Didn't a Labour candidate get sacked for making obscene comments on Twitter? ...and you forget the other Labour candidate that was arrested under suspicion of drink driving having crashed her car yesterday. Thankfully, no one innocent was hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 ...and you forget the other Labour candidate that was arrested under suspicion of drink driving having crashed her car yesterday. Thankfully, no one innocent was hurt. Is that part of the new Tory crime and justice policy? The guilty will be rammed and maimed by drunken MPs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 Is that part of the new Tory crime and justice policy? The guilty will be rammed and maimed by drunken Labour MPs. Now there's an idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperMikey Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 I wouldn't call his comments homophobic, depends on whether you think not being normal is derogatory in some way. FWIW, I'm not homophobic, I have gay friends in fact but it's not normal is it. Man & woman is normal, sexual reproduction and all that. Man & man is not normal but no-one's suggesting there is anything wrong with not being normal. Reading that out loud it sounded like something this guy would say... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 I wouldn't call his comments homophobic, depends on whether you think not being normal is derogatory in some way. FWIW, I'm not homophobic, I have gay friends in fact but it's not normal is it. Man & woman is normal, sexual reproduction and all that. Man & man is not normal but no-one's suggesting there is anything wrong with not being normal. LMFAO - The ****ing arrogance of that post! Who are we as a species to decide what is 'normal'? In ancient Greece, men had sex with each other to prove they were real men and had reached maturity for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergei Gotsmanov Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 LMFAO - The ****ing arrogance of that post! Who are we as a species to decide what is 'normal'? In ancient Greece, men had sex with each other to prove they were real men and had reached maturity for example. No, normal is a word defined in the dictionary and under that definition homosexual is not the norm. It is whether we respect people who are not normal. That is tolerance and tolerance is a very British trait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesaint sfc Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 a gay person voting conservative is like a black person voting BNP. They were all homophobic not long ago. They voted against allowing children to be taught the meaning of 'gay' in school, they voted against gay equality, they voted against equalling the age of consent between straight couples and gay couples, they voted against gay people adopting. Now it has become more accepted they have suddenly changed their views. Fundamentally they are a homophobic party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 29 April, 2010 Share Posted 29 April, 2010 LMFAO - The ****ing arrogance of that post! Who are we as a species to decide what is 'normal'? In ancient Greece, men had sex with each other to prove they were real men and had reached maturity for example. LMFAO - the ****ing ignorance of that post! Not knowing what "normal" means or appreciating that it will be culturally relative (although actually espousing a correct premise in a round-about way but getting the conclusion messed up). In ancient Greece, men knew what words meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 1 May, 2010 Share Posted 1 May, 2010 It dosen't take much digging to find the real face of the Tories. Some people have short memories about the last Tory government. In the interests of balance, perhaps they need reminding of the many good things they did, as well as the ones considered to be bad. And some have got short memories of the Labour governments of Wilson and Callaghan too. And if you say that was a very long time ago, it is all relative. Many of the voters in this election were too young to remember the eighties. I can well remember when inflation reached over 25% under Healey, when we went cap in hand to beg the International Monetary Fund to bail out our "sick man of Europe" economy. I can remember the Wilson devaluation of the Pound, Red Robbo ruining British Leyland, the inefficiency of the nationalised industries, the Winter of discontent, etc. Naturally, not many can remember when the Liberals were last in government, but many still remember when they propped up a dead duck Labour administration in the Lib/Lab pact. Perhaps they will prostitute themselves again if there is a hung Parliament. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 1 May, 2010 Share Posted 1 May, 2010 In the interests of balance, perhaps they need reminding of the many good things they did, as well as the ones considered to be bad. And some have got short memories of the Labour governments of Wilson and Callaghan too. And if you say that was a very long time ago, it is all relative. Many of the voters in this election were too young to remember the eighties. I can well remember when inflation reached over 25% under Healey, when we went cap in hand to beg the International Monetary Fund to bail out our "sick man of Europe" economy. I can remember the Wilson devaluation of the Pound, Red Robbo ruining British Leyland, the inefficiency of the nationalised industries, the Winter of discontent, etc. Naturally, not many can remember when the Liberals were last in government, but many still remember when they propped up a dead duck Labour administration in the Lib/Lab pact. Perhaps they will prostitute themselves again if there is a hung Parliament. thats simple to address, if you cant remember the last time the libs were within sniffing distance of downing st (outside of the lib/lab coalition) just google jeremy thorpe trial, and marvel at why they havent been in power since..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 1 May, 2010 Share Posted 1 May, 2010 thats simple to address, if you cant remember the last time the libs were within sniffing distance of downing st (outside of the lib/lab coalition) just google jeremy thorpe trial, and marvel at why they havent been in power since..... On this thread about gays not being normal, are you suggesting that the homophobic electorate have held that against them ever since? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiltshire Saint Posted 1 May, 2010 Share Posted 1 May, 2010 seems as though they are all messing up today. "Tory Says Gay People Are Not 'Normal' A Conservative Party candidate has been suspended after writing on his website he will "not accept" the behaviour of gay people" [url=http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/video/David-Cameron-Tory-Leader-Gay-Times-Interview-Blunders/Video/201003415580944?lpos=video_Article_Related_Content_Region_5&lid=VIDEO_15580944_David_Cameron_Tory_Leader%3A_Gay_Times_Interview_Blunders][/url] and the Cameron tries to respond... http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/video/David-Cameron-Tory-Leader-Gay-Times-Interview-Blunders/Video/201003415580944?lpos=video_Article_Related_Content_Region_5&lid=VIDEO_15580944_David_Cameron_Tory_Leader%3A_Gay_Times_Interview_Blunders This is outrageous and exactly why I won't be voting Tory. Who the hell do these people think they are? Our amred forces and navy do a difficult job, giving their all for the safety of people in this country, and all this tory tw*t can do is have a pop at them. I'd like to see him repeat those comments at that rugby match between the Army and the Navy. Get your bigoted face between the thighs of those strapping men as they huddle in the scrum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 2 May, 2010 Share Posted 2 May, 2010 It dosen't take much digging to find the real face of the Tories. Some people have short memories about the last Tory government. They were that bad the electorate kept them in office for 18 years... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuengirola Saint Posted 2 May, 2010 Share Posted 2 May, 2010 In the interests of balance, perhaps they need reminding of the many good things they did, as well as the ones considered to be bad. And some have got short memories of the Labour governments of Wilson and Callaghan too. And if you say that was a very long time ago, it is all relative. Many of the voters in this election were too young to remember the eighties. I can well remember when inflation reached over 25% under Healey, when we went cap in hand to beg the International Monetary Fund to bail out our "sick man of Europe" economy. I can remember the Wilson devaluation of the Pound, Red Robbo ruining British Leyland, the inefficiency of the nationalised industries, the Winter of discontent, etc. . I can remember inflation being down to 8.9% in 1979 before Labour left office, being over 10% when they took over in 1975 and rising fast because of the Barber boom and the oil crisis, and rising to 20% in 1980 under her Ladyship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergei Gotsmanov Posted 2 May, 2010 Share Posted 2 May, 2010 I can remember inflation being down to 8.9% in 1979 before Labour left office, being over 10% when they took over in 1975 and rising fast because of the Barber boom and the oil crisis, and rising to 20% in 1980 under her Ladyship. I think you could put down high inflation in 1980 to Labour's legacy. They always leave the country skint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuengirola Saint Posted 2 May, 2010 Share Posted 2 May, 2010 I think you could put down high inflation in 1980 to Labour's legacy. They always leave the country skint. What about the high inflation in 1975 down to the Tories legacy? The inflation in 1980 was caused by Thatcher abandoning collective bargaining, increasing VAT to 12.5%, petrol duties and other indirect tax rises Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 2 May, 2010 Share Posted 2 May, 2010 I think you could put down high inflation in 1980 to Labour's legacy. They always leave the country skint. Indeed, inflation jumped by 1% between May 1979 (when labour left office) and June 1979 (when the first MT budget was held) from 8.9% to 9.9%. By July it had hit 14.7%. So inflation went up 6% in the 8 weeks after Labour left office. Looks like legacy to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuengirola Saint Posted 2 May, 2010 Share Posted 2 May, 2010 Indeed, inflation jumped by 1% between May 1979 (when labour left office) and June 1979 (when the first MT budget was held) from 8.9% to 9.9%. By July it had hit 14.7%. So inflation went up 6% in the 8 weeks after Labour left office. Looks like legacy to me. Nowt to do with the budget raising indirect taxation then? I think you´ll find that when you increase VAT by about 80% it will have a detrimental and rapid effect on inflation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 2 May, 2010 Share Posted 2 May, 2010 What about the high inflation in 1975 down to the Tories legacy? The inflation in 1980 was caused by Thatcher abandoning collective bargaining, increasing VAT to 12.5%, petrol duties and other indirect tax rises Oh, those golden days of Thatcher and Clarke as probably the best Chancellor in recent British political history. VAT at only 12.5%, petrol duties at a much lower level than they are now, the level of indirect taxes a mere pin ***** compared to those that were introduced by Brown, surrepticiously from our back pockets, hoping that nobody would notice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 2 May, 2010 Share Posted 2 May, 2010 Nowt to do with the budget raising indirect taxation then? I think you´ll find that when you increase VAT by about 80% it will have a detrimental and rapid effect on inflation OK, yes the jump in July was partially down to a hike in VAT, but had the economy been in the state handed to Brown by Clarke, would this have been necessary???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 2 May, 2010 Share Posted 2 May, 2010 Indeed, his response was over a month before yesterday :rolleyes: :rolleyes: You've got to give it to the guy. To come up with a response 1 month before the event is pretty spectacular. Some people call him visionary whilst others prophetic. I'll not vote Tory because they're all prophetic (sp) in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuengirola Saint Posted 2 May, 2010 Share Posted 2 May, 2010 OK, yes the jump in July was partially down to a hike in VAT, but had the economy been in the state handed to Brown by Clarke, would this have been necessary???? Of course, to pay for the top rate income tax cut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuengirola Saint Posted 2 May, 2010 Share Posted 2 May, 2010 Oh, those golden days of Thatcher and Clarke as probably the best Chancellor in recent British political history. VAT at only 12.5%, petrol duties at a much lower level than they are now, the level of indirect taxes a mere pin ***** compared to those that were introduced by Brown, surrepticiously from our back pockets, hoping that nobody would notice. Could you remind me again who raised VAT first from 7% to 12.5% then to 15% and finally to 17.5%? Also could you furnish me with the details as to who raised VAT on electricity and gas to 17.5% and who was it that introduced the Fuel Duty escalator? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 2 May, 2010 Share Posted 2 May, 2010 Of course, to pay for the top rate income tax cut So nothing to do with the structural Budget deficit then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now