Gasmi and Pulis?

[simo]

Will these two make any difference?

[Glasgow_Saint]

not likely

[saint_ed]

Pulis, no.

 

Gasmi, hard to say seeing as none of us have seen him play.

[Ivan Katalinic's 'tache]

I doubt it. It's looking a great idea to sign two injured players when parts of the rest of the team needed strengthening.

[ladysaint]

They are both injured I think so couldnt do any worse.

[ottery st mary]

Both injured and even if injury free in October will not be up to speed until Nov/Dec just look at Skacel who is just not able to get up to any form of fitness.

As for Pulis you just as well play him in goal. Nothing personal he would normally be on the field but is better as a non playing sub.

[St Marco]

Gasmi has a broken leg (another amazing decision by Lowe) and Pulis i believe has hamstring problem? Not sure why we couldn't of got 2 players who wern't injured in to be honest. Maybe they cost more then injured players?

[saint_ed]

Gasmi has a broken leg (another amazing decision by Lowe) and Pulis i believe has hamstring problem? Not sure why we couldn't of got 2 players who wern't injured in to be honest. Maybe they cost more then injured players?

 

Gasmi has a broken metatarsal.

[Doctoroncall]

Gasmi has a broken metatarsal.

 

which one?

[saint_ed]

which one?

 

5th I believe.....the "usual" one.

[Ponty]

How the hell could anyone know the answer to that?

I know. The answer is "Yes", obviously. Whether it's a positive difference is anyone's guess.

[Doctoroncall]

5th I believe.....the "usual" one.

 

oh dear, the worst one... stress fractures of the base of the Fifth Metatarsal sometimes show a poor healing capacity.

 

Do you know if he has been under the knife or had a cast on his foot?