SuperMikey Posted 17 March, 2010 Posted 17 March, 2010 He is, without doubt, one of the biggest tosspots in the universe. Sh!t footballer, sh!t pundit and he's such a smug little cvnt too. Evidence:
Saint_Jonny Posted 17 March, 2010 Posted 17 March, 2010 When you see him on Sky Sports these days he barely has the ability to smile he's had so much botox stuffed into his inbred face.
bridge too far Posted 17 March, 2010 Posted 17 March, 2010 And I do wish he wouldn't wear shiny mohair suits that have incredily tight trousers. I don't want to see his vegetables
keithd Posted 17 March, 2010 Posted 17 March, 2010 ruin his mrs tho. spaff in her hair and everyfink. annoys her no end it does
Dog Posted 17 March, 2010 Posted 17 March, 2010 (edited) In that film Louise looks like she has down syndrome 00:37 - 00:40 secs, and Jamie is laughing at the end at the thought of raping her last night. Edited 17 March, 2010 by Dog
Crab Lungs Posted 17 March, 2010 Posted 17 March, 2010 Whilst he undoubtedly likes the sound of his own voice, I don't mind JR. Thought that although his legs had gone whilst he was with us, he was still a good player and gave it his all..
South City Si Posted 17 March, 2010 Posted 17 March, 2010 Thinks he turned to a half decent pundit. Agree on the trouser issue thoug, come on Jamie mate, put 'em away!
swannymere Posted 17 March, 2010 Posted 17 March, 2010 Don't see any reason to dislike Redknapp Jr. and i'd like to see any of you turn down £1/2M for acting like a ponce!
mack rill Posted 17 March, 2010 Posted 17 March, 2010 I would be a smug knut if i had his Wad and Louise hanging off my helmet;)
OldNick Posted 17 March, 2010 Posted 17 March, 2010 I would be a smug knut if i had his Wad and Louise hanging off my helmet;)but Louise is a woman, you do realise that I suppose Mack
SuperMikey Posted 17 March, 2010 Author Posted 17 March, 2010 Don't see any reason to dislike Redknapp Jr. and i'd like to see any of you turn down £1/2M for acting like a ponce! Wonder how much he got for this then?
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 17 March, 2010 Posted 17 March, 2010 Wonder how much he got for this then? They're all so 'mockney cheeky chappies' arn't they!? - ****s!
Kadeem Hardison Posted 18 March, 2010 Posted 18 March, 2010 And I do wish he wouldn't wear shiny mohair suits that have incredily tight trousers. I don't want to see his vegetables I do. I agree with you that he shouldn't wear anything.
Badger Posted 18 March, 2010 Posted 18 March, 2010 He seemed to be a bit of a "forum darling" when he played for us as I remember,and as someone said further up the thread he did give it his all in trying to keep us up. In reality I suspect most Saints fans now just have an inbuilt hatred of anything "Redknapp". Despite his time with us,I still regard him as a smug tosser who will probably be best remembered as an injury prone underachiever and one of the football "spice boys" from the mid90's.
SuperMikey Posted 18 March, 2010 Author Posted 18 March, 2010 **** footballer? Really? Perhaps not sh!t, but not as good as everyone else seems to think he was tbh. IMHO anyway.
Crab Lungs Posted 19 March, 2010 Posted 19 March, 2010 I thought Redknapp was an excellent player - far better than the likes of Paul Ince and David Batty. The thing that help Redknapp back was his injuries. He could be as combative as Ince and Batty without the 'guvnor' swagger, he had a fantastic range of passing (unlike the above) and could also a hit a ball as well. IMHO ;-) Right, I'm off to pump Louise.
stardustonmyfeet Posted 23 March, 2010 Posted 23 March, 2010 I wonder who his mum ****ged to conceive him, cos it certainly wasn't Harry.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now