offix Posted 21 September, 2008 Share Posted 21 September, 2008 If I understand correctly, Ru**rt does not personally own a very large percentage of the shares in the club, however he REPRESENTS a significant percentage of shares by virtue of other investors who have placed their trust in him to represent their interests. So I have a question for those of you with REAL knowledge of the world of investments and finance; Would it be possible to weaken that support for Ru**rt from the other investors, and if so what would it take to do that? It seems to me that Ru**rt losing that support would be the only way to get rid of Ru**rt and save what's left of the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 21 September, 2008 Share Posted 21 September, 2008 i wonder who Guy has left his shares to in his will ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowballs2 Posted 21 September, 2008 Share Posted 21 September, 2008 If I understand correctly, Ru**rt does not personally own a very large percentage of the shares in the club, however he REPRESENTS a significant percentage of shares by virtue of other investors who have placed their trust in him to represent their interests. So I have a question for those of you with REAL knowledge of the world of investments and finance; Would it be possible to weaken that support for Ru**rt from the other investors, and if so what would it take to do that? It seems to me that Ru**rt losing that support would be the only way to get rid of Ru**rt and save what's left of the club. His personal shareholding is I believe 6% of the shares, the major single biggest shareholder is Wilde. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowballs2 Posted 21 September, 2008 Share Posted 21 September, 2008 i wonder who Guy has left his shares to in his will ? Why is he departing this mortal world willingly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
offix Posted 21 September, 2008 Author Share Posted 21 September, 2008 His personal shareholding is I believe 6% of the shares, the major single biggest shareholder is Wilde. yes, but his 6% plus the traitor's shares would not have put them in control. There must be a significant portion of shares from others that has been proxied to Ru**rt, or he has been given control/management over them by some other means? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowballs2 Posted 21 September, 2008 Share Posted 21 September, 2008 yes, but his 6% plus the traitor's shares would not have put them in control. There must be a significant portion of shares from others that has been proxied to Ru**rt, or he has been given control/management over them by some other means? Askams and one or two others have proxied thier shares to Lowe, he can call on about 24% . The only way to get rid is an alliance of Wilde and Crouch...that just will not happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 21 September, 2008 Share Posted 21 September, 2008 yes, but his 6% plus the traitor's shares would not have put them in control. There must be a significant portion of shares from others that has been proxied to Ru**rt, or he has been given control/management over them by some other means? Lowe's cabal consists of something like: Lowe = 5.6% Askham = 4.8% (if you include his wifes) Withers = 4% Richards = 3.1% Windsor-Clive = 1.7% Cowen = 1.5% That's about 21%, so there's about another 5% out there he has somehow managed to get control of (balance of his his fathers?? Marlands???? Whatever happened to Anthony Dye's??? etc etc etc). As all of these give Lowe his power, they are as responsibe as he is for this "revolutionary new coaching set up", along with Wilde of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
offix Posted 21 September, 2008 Author Share Posted 21 September, 2008 Lowe's cabal consists of something like: Lowe = 5.6% Askham = 4.8% (if you include his wifes) Withers = 4% Richards = 3.1% Windsor-Clive = 1.7% Cowen = 1.5% That's about 21%, so there's about another 5% out there he has somehow managed to get control of (balance of his his fathers?? Marlands???? Whatever happened to Anthony Dye's??? etc etc etc). As all of these give Lowe his power, they are as responsibe as he is for this "revolutionary new coaching set up", along with Wilde of course. Thanks Um. I was just wondering if there is a way to weaken the 'trust' those other investors have put in him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole1 Posted 21 September, 2008 Share Posted 21 September, 2008 We the "customers" have the power now. In the SKY days Lowe could afford to call fans "Clingons" and "Lunatics". Not any more. Lowe needs us DESPERATELY. Just continue not to go and that will see off Lowe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 21 September, 2008 Share Posted 21 September, 2008 Thanks Um. I was just wondering if there is a way to weaken the 'trust' those other investors have put in him. Sit back and watch. I'm sure he's doing more than enough to weaken the trust all on his own Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 22 September, 2008 Share Posted 22 September, 2008 [quote=Mole;53846 Just continue not to go and that will see off Lowe. Great plan, dumbass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now