Jump to content

BA Trolly Dollys on strike again


dune

Recommended Posts

Does that include bank holidays though? You are correct though BTF, 20 days minimum was implemented recently.

 

I think it does include bank holidays but it's at the discretion of the employer as to whether TOIL is included.

 

My other half works shifts, gets a shift enhancement because he has to work BHs if they fall within his shift. For example he is working all over Easter and won't get time off in lieu for that. :(

 

However, I used to get x days holiday PLUS BHs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but you're an overpaid bank worker whose employer contributed to the fiasco that has f*cked it up for everyone else. If I were you I'd keep schtum. Not many people would sympathise if overpaid parasites went on strike.

 

I'm not a parasite, I didn't cause the banking crisis, I'm just a pathetically small cog in the machine thanks! We're all entitled to opinions, mine is this strike is wrong. They have hugely different pay for people doing the same job in Gatwick and Heathrow for the same company.

 

As for the Tory jibe, you know where I come from and background. I'd never vote Tory and never would.

 

I was just pointing out, I have no recourse for pension plan changes. No opportunity to withdraw labour.

 

And not everyone at my company earns 100k+, there are thousands of people who are affected on 20 or 30k per year, far less then the BA staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You make a fair point.

 

Geneva just gets my goat when he goes on about the sacrifices he makes in his job.

 

Never voted Tory, never will, and any way I'm able to make my own decisions in life. I don't need anyone to tell me how to think or vote. Unlike union members.

 

BTW, interesting end to the Royal Mail strike. The unions basically settled for £1400 with some allowances rolled into based pay. Suddenly, the job protection line is out of the window. Bought out for a lump sum of £1400. LOL. Talk about short term thinking!

Edited by GenevaSaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding is that EVERYONE these days is entitled to 20 days paid holiday a year as a minimum.

 

Correct. That means she is er, lying, hence the 'I dont want my face shown' charade - and you should take the rest of what she said with a big pinch of salt too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding is that EVERYONE these days is entitled to 20 days paid holiday a year as a minimum.

wish I was entitled, sadly self employed earn nothing during sick days and holiday/leisure time.

Strangley enough the self employed dont have many sick days. perhaps all the public services should be made self employed, that might make the sick days the Government want to reduce happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have hugely different pay for people doing the same job in Gatwick and Heathrow for the same company.

.

 

Exactly and yet its the Heathrow staff who are strike. For what its worth the Gatwick staff generally despise the Heathrow staff. In company they are known as the FFFs (Fat, Forty and Frumpy).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wish I was entitled, sadly self employed earn nothing during sick days and holiday/leisure time.

Strangley enough the self employed dont have many sick days. perhaps all the public services should be made self employed, that might make the sick days the Government want to reduce happen

 

No doubt you price your 'non-earning' time into work you quote for. That's what most self-employed people do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly and yet its the Heathrow staff who are strike. For what its worth the Gatwick staff generally despise the Heathrow staff. In company they are known as the FFFs (Fat, Forty and Frumpy).

 

It's the same at most bases, that's a very accurate jibe. Heathrow tend to see themselves as the 'elite', they remind me of that Virgin ad, where all the world stops as the trolley dolleys walk through the airport - except they are mutton dressed as lamb in most cases. They really did look down their nose at other staff, I have no idea why as most of the, 'snobs without the class' as we used to call them, were all nicking the beer/small bottles of gin etc that were supposed to be given free to passengers, it's these sort that are the striking ones, on better contracts, usually number ones and usually lazy fat oafs.

 

Right, off for a night on the Marstons Smooth, then up at 7 for Wembley!!!!:smt038

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No doubt you price your 'non-earning' time into work you quote for. That's what most self-employed people do.

 

Is that right?

 

I must try that - trouble is I'd price myself out of the market and not get any work at all.

 

It's tough out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that right?

 

I must try that - trouble is I'd price myself out of the market and not get any work at all.

 

It's tough out there.

 

Turn it on its head then. If you take time off (sick / holiday) you won't LOSE money. Most successful self-employed project their annual earnings to include time off, e.g. you might decide you need to earn £52K a year. You'll spread that £52K over 52 weeks even if you don't work 52 weeks.

 

In exactly the same way as an employed person might be paid £26K a year but only work 48 of the 52 weeks. Their cost is spread over 52 weeks.

 

Oh and I have been self-employed so I do know how it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do like the way that in your world the self-employed earn twice as much as the employed.

 

Damn - you noticed my political spin :D

 

However, it is possible to legitimately avoid tax by paying yourself dividends instead of salary so there are advantages not available to we minions.

 

I'm pushed to think of any of my self-employed friends who are strugging to be honest - even in these 'difficult times'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh - and there's no way I can 'project' earnings.

 

My earnings depend entirely on how much work comes in - if I don't get the work I earn nothing.

 

Simple as that.

 

There's self-employed and there's self-employed.

 

When I was a union member in the 60's and 70's I was, like most people in this country MUCH better off in real terms than I am now.

 

Before Thatcher destroyed British industry.

 

And oiks on this thread are blaming the unions.

 

Ye gods

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn - you noticed my political spin :D

 

However, it is possible to legitimately avoid tax by paying yourself dividends instead of salary so there are advantages not available to we minions.

 

I'm pushed to think of any of my self-employed friends who are strugging to be honest - even in these 'difficult times'.

 

You might avoid NI but you can't avoid tax. HMRC are very hot on this sort of thing these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never voted Tory, never will, and any way I'm able to make my own decisions in life. I don't need anyone to tell me how to think or vote. Unlike union members.

BTW, interesting end to the Royal Mail strike. The unions basically settled for £1400 with some allowances rolled into based pay. Suddenly, the job protection line is out of the window. Bought out for a lump sum of £1400. LOL. Talk about short term thinking!

 

You seem ignorant to the democratic workings of a Trade Union. They don't tell people what to do, they do what their members tell them. Maybe if you didn't look down on people, with that myopic view you have, you would understand that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Superb, straight into the arms of the Tories. What a stupid comment, if true.

 

Unions, gotta love em eh!

 

I'm not the only one myopic one here either Wade. Maybe you ought to try and sit on the other side of the fence and look at it from BA's perspective. And I notice you skirted round the issue of two people at different airports having vastly different pay rates. How can we ever have equality in gender pay when BA can't even pay people the same money for the same job?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unions, gotta love em eh!

 

I'm not the only one myopic one here either Wade. Maybe you ought to try and sit on the other side of the fence and look at it from BA's perspective. And I notice you skirted round the issue of two people at different airports having vastly different pay rates. How can we ever have equality in gender pay when BA can't even pay people the same money for the same job?

 

I can see both points of view. In my opinion, if Walsh had a deal on the table that could stop this he is foolish to take it off the table while the airline is dying a death. The union, and members, were daft to go straight to strike action while the deal was there. Both sides need their heads banging together, but I must say it seems to me that Walsh is being the most pig-headed.

 

I don't know about the different pay in different airports, and equality in gender pay is a whole different argument.

 

I am annoyed at your perception of unions bullying their members into strike action. It is the members who vote for it (thinking for themselves when they cast their vote).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am annoyed at your perception of unions bullying their members into strike action. It is the members who vote for it (thinking for themselves when they cast their vote).

 

Unions and bullying are synonomous. Non union members who flew during the last strike were severely harassed. The union take a stance on bullying when its done by the management, but when they do it, its OK. ****ing hypocrites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...