doddisalegend Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 With the news that we might of signed another player today, do you think the club will start off loading some of the dead wood soon? Our squad is huge and there are lots of players who are either old, injury prone or just not good enough. We don't seem to be shifting much out this tranfer window ( although Saga has gone) so come the summer it must be time for AP to be brutal and get rid of the dead wood. I'd like to see a first team squad of 24 with two decent players in each postion. But which players should go? and who should stay? interested in peoples thoughts.
Thedelldays Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 Perry wotton molly Poolis olly 4-cast how does pards get rid of dead wood if no one wants them..? I wonder who is out of contract this summer that we wont renew..? waigo..?
ottery st mary Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 Reserves did not do so well against those ruffy tuff Guz boyzz...could be a few more added to a long list of Dear Johns.....
Windmill Arm 2 Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 reserves did not do so well against those ruffy tuff guz boyzz...could be a few more added to a long list of dear johns..... green armeeeeeeeeee!!!!!
ottery st mary Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 green armeeeeeeeeee!!!!! That advert makes me laugh......:p:p:p
S-Clarke Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 Forecast Molly Pulis Lancashire Gillett White Gobern could all do with moving on and having a fresh start IMO.
krissyboy31 Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 Forecast Molly Pulis Lancashire Gillett White Gobern could all do with moving on and having a fresh start IMO. I'd keep Gobern, reckon he'll be a decent player but agree on the rest.
Arizona Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 Pulis, Molyneux, Forecast, Perry, Wotton and probably Gillett and Lancashire. Semi is only on a sixth month contract, so it depends whether he can impress.
Matthew Le God Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 (edited) Including the academy, Saints have 58 players. Which is a HUGE amount for a League One side. Would be large in the Premiership. Staplewood must be very crowded for training each day. A Summer clear-out is definitely needed! 1. Fonte, Jose 2. Lambert, Rickie 3. Lee Barnard 4. Lallana, Adam 5. Papa Waigo 6. Hammond, Dean 7. Connolly, David 8. Schneiderlin, Morgan 9. Jaïdi, Radhi 10. Davis, Kelvin 11. Harding, Dan 12. Otsemobor, Jon 13. Murty, Graeme 14. James, Lloyd 15. Gillett, Simon 16. Thomson, Jake 17. Perry, Chris 18. Holmes, Lee 19. Thomas, Wayne 20. Bialkowski, Bartosz 21. Wotton, Paul 22. Mclaggon, Kayne 23. Antonio, Michail 24. Lancashire, Oliver 25. Poke, Michael 26. Mills, Joseph 27. Gobern, Oscar 28. Seaborne, Danny 29. Forecast, Tommy 30. Pulis, Anthony 31. White, Jamie 32. Molyneux, Lee 33. Boyle, Jack 34. Martin, Aaron 35. Pernecky, Andrej 36. McNish, Callum 37. Racine, Aarran 38. Saville, Jack 39. Garrod, Tony 40. Tafazolli, Ryan 41. Argent, Sam 42. Doble, Ryan 43. Dunford, Tom 44. Harper, Ciaran 45. Keegan, Jordan 46. Mclean, Daryl 47. Preen, Garyn 48. Reeves, Ben 49. Dovey, Jack 50. Foot, Lloyd 51. Holder-Spooner, Jordace 52. Hoskins, Sam 53. Isgrove, Lloyd 54. Martin, Ben 55. Nicholas, Lee 56. Oxlade-Chamberlain, Alex 57. Robinson, Andy 58. Scott, Bobby Edited 28 January, 2010 by Matthew Le God
doddisalegend Posted 27 January, 2010 Author Posted 27 January, 2010 Perry how does pards get rid of dead wood if no one wants them..? Release them I suppose pay up their contracts and get rid, some will find new clubs although probably not Pulis:cool:.
Saint_clark Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 13. Murty, Graeme 15. Gillett, Simon 17. Perry, Chris 18. Holmes, Lee 21. Wotton, Paul 24. Lancashire, Oliver 25. Poke, Michael 27. Gobern, Oscar 29. Forecast, Tommy 30. Pulis, Anthony 32. Molyneux, Lee 33. Boyle, Jack 34. Martin, Aaron 38. Saville, Jack Get rid of that lot IMO. Didn't count the youth team players as they aren't first team squad.
Arizona Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 Perry wotton molly Poolis olly 4-cast how does pards get rid of dead wood if no one wants them..? I wonder who is out of contract this summer that we wont renew..? waigo..? Someone will take them off our hands on a free, even if it means paying a portion of their wages for the remainder of the time left on their contracts. Pulis is out of contract anyway, as is Perry. Lowe decided Forecast needed a five year deal unfortunately, when everyone else knew we didn't need him at all. C'est la vie.
John D Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 13. Murty, Graeme 15. Gillett, Simon 17. Perry, Chris 18. Holmes, Lee 21. Wotton, Paul 24. Lancashire, Oliver 25. Poke, Michael 27. Gobern, Oscar 29. Forecast, Tommy 30. Pulis, Anthony 32. Molyneux, Lee 33. Boyle, Jack 34. Martin, Aaron 38. Saville, Jack Get rid of that lot IMO. Didn't count the youth team players as they aren't first team squad. Have you even seen martin play? Didn't we only sign him a few months ago? I'd also keep holmes if and its a big if he can stay fit. Otherwise agree with you
Saint_clark Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 Have you even seen martin play? Didn't we only sign him a few months ago? I'd also keep holmes if and its a big if he can stay fit. Otherwise agree with you No, but Lancashire has been picked ahead of him recently. And Holmes' ability seems to have increased since he got injured in some peoples eyes. I don't think he's that great. Certainly not good enough for where we want to be.
SNSUN Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 13. Murty, Graeme 15. Gillett, Simon 17. Perry, Chris 18. Holmes, Lee 21. Wotton, Paul 24. Lancashire, Oliver 25. Poke, Michael 27. Gobern, Oscar 29. Forecast, Tommy 30. Pulis, Anthony 32. Molyneux, Lee 33. Boyle, Jack 34. Martin, Aaron 38. Saville, Jack Get rid of that lot IMO. Didn't count the youth team players as they aren't first team squad. I'd keep Poke for another season IMO, losing Forecast and Poke could find us scratching around for keepers next season. Gobern could potentially have a future with us, and Holmes seems currently back in favour, but I agree with the rest. I'd be suprised if Perry and Wotton were kept on next season even if they don't retire, for that matter will Jaidi have another season?
Saint_clark Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 (edited) I'd keep Poke for another season IMO, losing Forecast and Poke could find us scratching around for keepers next season. Gobern could potentially have a future with us, and Holmes seems currently back in favour, but I agree with the rest. I'd be suprised if Perry and Wotton were kept on next season even if they don't retire, for that matter will Jaidi have another season? I meant to take Gobern off the list. I like Poke but I think Davis and Bart are better than him, and we have Pernecky who is still only 19 as our third keeper. Edited 28 January, 2010 by Saint_clark
Gordon Mockles Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 FFS, has Skacel signed yet? Is that suppose to be funny? I know it was a forum "in joke" & you mean well (& I'll come across as grumpy) but it was never that funny. Certainly not after the 65th time, after the over-rated money grabber drew every last pound he could before slumping back to the never regions of European Football...or wherever he went! No offence!
Saint_clark Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 Is that suppose to be funny? I know it was a forum "in joke" & you mean well (& I'll come across as grumpy) but it was never that funny. Certainly not after the 65th time, after the over-rated money grabber drew every last pound he could before slumping back to the never regions of European Football...or wherever he went! No offence! I take it we didn't sign him then?
Panda Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 I saw on the Echo site a list of seventeen players who are out of contract or their loans end in May. There will be mass exodus that will leave those we have recently brought in on permanent deals. I don't know why we all so worried about this. ML/NC/AP will worry about it if it needs to be worried about. However I am sure they will have a pretty clear picture of how much it will cost to sustain the current playing staff through to the end of the season and whether that presents a problem or not. The only people that need to worry are the seventeen who will be released, the prospects on the job market for them at the moment are not good. There are very few clubs buying and a lot needing to sell. Very few are likely to walk straight in to new clubs.
Huntingdon Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 Including the academy, Saints have 59 players. Which is a HUGE amount for a League One side. Would be large in the Premiership. Staplewood must be very crowded for training each day. A Summer clear-out is definitely needed! 39. Garrod, Tony Do you know how Garrod is progressing? The reason I ask you is because on FM2009 he became a really good player
saints_is_the_south Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 Otsemobor, Jon Gillett, Simon Thomson, Jake Perry, Chris Thomas, Wayne Wotton, Paul Mclaggon, Kayne Lancashire, Oliver Poke, Michael Forecast, Tommy Pulis, Anthony White, Jamie Molyneux, Lee Boyle, Jack IMO.
Minsk Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 Including the academy, Saints have 59 players. Which is a HUGE amount for a League One side. Would be large in the Premiership. Staplewood must be very crowded for training each day. A Summer clear-out is definitely needed! 1. Fonte, Jose 2. Lambert, Rickie 3. Lee Barnard 4. Lallana, Adam 5. Papa Waigo 6. Hammond, Dean 7. Connolly, David 8. Schneiderlin, Morgan 9. Jaïdi, Radhi 10. Davis, Kelvin 11. Harding, Dan 12. Otsemobor, Jon 13. Murty, Graeme 14. James, Lloyd 15. Gillett, Simon 16. Thomson, Jake 17. Perry, Chris 18. Holmes, Lee 19. Thomas, Wayne 20. Bialkowski, Bartosz 21. Wotton, Paul 22. Mclaggon, Kayne 23. Antonio, Michail 24. Lancashire, Oliver 25. Poke, Michael 26. Mills, Joseph 27. Gobern, Oscar 28. Seaborne, Danny 29. Forecast, Tommy 30. Pulis, Anthony 31. White, Jamie 32. Molyneux, Lee 33. Boyle, Jack 34. Martin, Aaron 35. Pernecky, Andrej 36. McNish, Callum 37. Racine, Aarran 38. Saville, Jack 39. Garrod, Tony 40. Tafazolli, Ryan 41. Argent, Sam 42. Doble, Ryan 43. Dunford, Tom 44. Harper, Ciaran 45. Keegan, Jordan 46. Mclean, Daryl 47. Preen, Garyn 48. Reeves, Ben 49. Tafazolli, Ryan 50. Dovey, Jack 51. Foot, Lloyd 52. Holder-Spooner, Jordace 53. Hoskins, Sam 54. Isgrove, Lloyd 55. Martin, Ben 56. Nicholas, Lee 57. Oxlade-Chamberlain, Alex 58. Robinson, Andy 59. Scott, Bobby We've got two players on our books called Ryan Tafazolli? I could understand it they were both called something like John Smith but very strange with such an unusual name. Also, I don't think we can really count the academy guys. There is a set amount of academy players which wouldn't change no matter how many other players were on our books.
Minsk Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 No, but Lancashire has been picked ahead of him recently. And Holmes' ability seems to have increased since he got injured in some peoples eyes. I don't think he's that great. Certainly not good enough for where we want to be. I believe you will find that Lancashire was on the bench ahead of Martin because the latter was cup-tied. There is no way AP will off-load a CB in the summer who he has only just signed. That is something reserved for the other end of the M27.
Bucks Saint Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 I saw on the Echo site a list of seventeen players who are out of contract or their loans end in May. There will be mass exodus that will leave those we have recently brought in on permanent deals. I don't know why we all so worried about this. ML/NC/AP will worry about it if it needs to be worried about. However I am sure they will have a pretty clear picture of how much it will cost to sustain the current playing staff through to the end of the season and whether that presents a problem or not. The only people that need to worry are the seventeen who will be released, the prospects on the job market for them at the moment are not good. There are very few clubs buying and a lot needing to sell. Very few are likely to walk straight in to new clubs. Agreed. We will need plenty more new, better, players for the assault on the Championship table
alpine_saint Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 13. Murty, Graeme 15. Gillett, Simon 17. Perry, Chris 18. Holmes, Lee 21. Wotton, Paul 24. Lancashire, Oliver 25. Poke, Michael 27. Gobern, Oscar 29. Forecast, Tommy 30. Pulis, Anthony 32. Molyneux, Lee 33. Boyle, Jack 34. Martin, Aaron 38. Saville, Jack Get rid of that lot IMO. Didn't count the youth team players as they aren't first team squad. Agree with all but highlighted.
VectisSaint Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 how does pards get rid of dead wood if no one wants them..? Thats simple. Pay up their contract and make them free agents. It may cost but it means he doesn't have to include them in training which I understand is AP's primary concern. Given that some of our deadwood did not even make the ressies last night I would imaging this is what is happening.
Thedelldays Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 Thats simple. Pay up their contract and make them free agents. It may cost but it means he doesn't have to include them in training which I understand is AP's primary concern. Given that some of our deadwood did not even make the ressies last night I would imaging this is what is happening. why not do that now..?
Arizona Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 why not do that now..? What's the point. If you're going to be paying them, might aswell have them in the squad.
Thedelldays Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 What's the point. If you're going to be paying them, might aswell have them in the squad. or pay up their contract..as suggested..?
saint_stevo Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 Gillett, Simon Thomson, Jake Perry, Chris Holmes, Lee Wotton, Paul Mclaggon, Kayne Antonio, Michail Lancashire, Oliver Poke, Michael Forecast, Tommy Pulis, Anthony White, Jamie Molyneux, Lee See you late
jam Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 What's the point. If you're going to be paying them, might aswell have them in the squad. Pardew sees having surplus players hanging around the training ground as disruptive.
Arizona Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 Pardew sees having surplus players hanging around the training ground as disruptive. How do you know that? or pay up their contract..as suggested..? Then you end up paying them exactly the same amount of money, the difference being you cannot call upon them for cover.
Matthew Le God Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 How do you know that? Pardew has said so in interviews on Saints player. Doesn't take a genius to work out have large numbers of professionals not playing will dampen moral. Also harder to train such a large number. Then you end up paying them exactly the same amount of money, the difference being you cannot call upon them for cover. When you mutually agree to pay up a players contract it is very often for less than the value of the wages as the player can have a fresh start and find a club that will pay him for the same period. So it would save Saints a little money.
david in sweden Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 Otsemobor, Jon - just arrived as cover for Murty, and only here till May (do you condemn playesr after ONE GAME ?) Gillett, Simon - is he STILL here? (soon to Donnie) Thomson, Jake - good junior, but no place for him in the present set-up. Perry, Chris - excellent as cover - if he isn't out of contract keep him 1 yr. Thomas, Wayne -ditto - unless wants a move to get regular games Wotton, Paul -ditto - -ditto- Mclaggon, Kayne injured just now - good prospect and still young Lancashire, Oliver - agreed Poke, Michael should stay - if Forecast were to go Forecast, Tommy - agreed Pulis, Anthony - agreed White, Jamie great scorer as a junior - twice injured - no match practice Molyneux, Lee who knows?.... no-one's seen him play! Boyle, Jack watched a lot before being signed - must give him a chance IMO. I agree that some of the others seem surplus to requirements but you can't just axe people because they are not getting regular games. There aren't so many Reserve games in this league and so the seniors don't get match practice, but are good to have as cover. The U18's may be good at that level but look what happened when we put out half a team of teenagers v. Plymouths reserves :smt088
Arizona Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 Pardew has said so in interviews on Saints player. Doesn't take a genius to work out have large numbers of professionals not playing will dampen moral. Also harder to train such a large number. When you mutually agree to pay up a players contract it is very often for less than the value of the wages as the player can have a fresh start and find a club that will pay him for the same period. So it would save Saints a little money. You can only terminate by mutual consent if both parties agree. With players like Molly and Pulis, I doubt they would get a better deal elsewhere and would probably be happier staying put. Also, I'd say there were quite a few players likely to be leaving in summer, but most of whom I'd say are still willing to play if called upon. I would like rid of Wotton for example, but we might as well hang on to him for now for when Hammond and Morgan are unavailable.
suspect everyone Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 One aspect I'm a little worried about is that this continued infulx of players bears a resemblance to some of the criticisms that came out of Pardew's reign at Charlton. Now I am fully behind Pardew and think he is doing a pretty good job in his first season. I also accept that sometimes, for whatever reason, managers just dont work out at a club, as with Pardew at Charlton, but this doesnt mean he can't go on to have a good career at Saints as long as he learns from his mistakes. However the feedback from Charlton fans when we appointed him was that during his reign he brought in a vast number of players, at great expense, without any clear strategy or logic. It seems to me there is whiff of that happening at the moment here with our squad. Examples Ostemeboor - no better than what we already have Seaborne - see above Waigo - sparingly used Barnard - looks to be a good signing, but we already have a number of forwards on the books, not to mention others such as Antonio and Lallana who can also play up front. Couple this with Pardew's favoured formation of 4-5-1, you can see Barnard on the bench in the future Now we're being linked with Puncheon, a winger. Where exactly will he fit in our current sqaud? Perhaps I'm being overreactive, but when Lambert, Connolly, Jaidi etc were brought in there were obvious holes to fill in our squad. I get the feeling that Pardew is not just buying for the sake of it, leaving us with a bloated squad.
david in sweden Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 (edited) One aspect I'm a little worried about is that this continued infulx of players bears a resemblance to some of the criticisms that came out of Pardew's reign at Charlton. Now I am fully behind Pardew and think he is doing a pretty good job in his first season. I also accept that sometimes, for whatever reason, managers just dont work out at a club, as with Pardew at Charlton, but this doesnt mean he can't go on to have a good career at Saints as long as he learns from his mistakes. However the feedback from Charlton fans when we appointed him was that during his reign he brought in a vast number of players, at great expense, without any clear strategy or logic. It seems to me there is whiff of that happening at the moment here with our squad. Examples Ostemeboor - no better than what we already have Seaborne - see above Waigo - sparingly used Barnard - looks to be a good signing, but we already have a number of forwards on the books, not to mention others such as Antonio and Lallana who can also play up front. Couple this with Pardew's favoured formation of 4-5-1, you can see Barnard on the bench in the future Now we're being linked with Puncheon, a winger. Where exactly will he fit in our current sqaud? Perhaps I'm being overreactive, but when Lambert, Connolly, Jaidi etc were brought in there were obvious holes to fill in our squad. I get the feeling that Pardew is not just buying for the sake of it, leaving us with a bloated squad. but only until May. If (it) works then we'll have bought the right players... if it doesn't they'll be some sort of big clear out. Right now having spare bodies around is useful, I don't think we'll have any more midfielders left if we get another injury. Edited 28 January, 2010 by david in sweden
forestroad saint Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 off load wotton and bring prutton back
Matthew Le God Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 off load wotton and bring prutton back Prutton went to Colchester about a week ago.
Saint_lambden Posted 28 January, 2010 Posted 28 January, 2010 I would keep Perry on in a player/coaching role so he only played if we were really short at the back. IMO he would be ideal to go into coaching.
rooney Posted 29 January, 2010 Posted 29 January, 2010 It is in the Players own interests to find another club if AP has told them they will not feature in his plans. The reason being is if they sit tight and just take the money, there will be loads of players coming onto the market at the end of the season, and thus, they may never find another club when their contracts expire.
david in sweden Posted 29 January, 2010 Posted 29 January, 2010 I would keep Perry on in a player/coaching role so he only played if we were really short at the back. IMO he would be ideal to go into coaching. eventually yes, but i'm not prepared to write him off yet. If he did go I'm sure an L1/ L2 side would take him for another year, he has good skills and he's not that slow either. I bet he's enjoying these cup games
Window Cleaner Posted 29 January, 2010 Posted 29 January, 2010 Prutton went to Colchester about a week ago. And scored for them in midweek. We could have used him but I suspect that our league position disserved us yet again.
Avenue Saint Posted 30 January, 2010 Posted 30 January, 2010 Forecast Lancashire pulis mollyneux wotton
suewhistle Posted 30 January, 2010 Posted 30 January, 2010 However the feedback from Charlton fans when we appointed him was that during his reign he brought in a vast number of players, at great expense, without any clear strategy or logic. Possibly, although I feel that now at Saints the higher management will be asking those good but awkward questions good managers have the knack of asking as to why we are signing particular players. As Pulis and Forecast prove we haven't had that recently... The various length of the contracts new players are signing seems to suggest there is now an element of slightly longer term manpower planning going on.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now