Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
is he better than Patterson?

 

at the moment, yes. Barnard is a proven player at this level (has scored double figures at this level for the past 2 years) and is at a good age.

 

Patto may turn into that - but who knows? he's not quite ready for us. He's still got alot to prove to be compared with barnard.

Posted

Not sure he was worth the money and Paterson in the long run.

 

He doesn't have the pace we so desperately need either.

 

Still in the short term he can play tomorrow (I think) - and he will be an alternative to playing Lambert every game.

Posted

Looking at his stats on Wiki, he hardly ever played a first team game for his previous sides (mainly loans from spurs). What suddenley made him prolific at Southend?

 

Anyway, good signing.

Posted
Not sure he was worth the money and Paterson in the long run.

 

He doesn't have the pace we so desperately need either.

 

Still in the short term he can play tomorrow (I think) - and he will be an alternative to playing Lambert every game.

 

he's a snip! 175k for a player who has hit 17 goals this year (14 last year).

 

still can't get over how cheap he was tbh.

Posted
he's a snip! 175k for a player who has hit 17 goals this year (14 last year).

 

still can't get over how cheap he was tbh.

 

He would have been free in June. Also its £175k + Patterson.

Posted
he's a snip! 175k for a player who has hit 17 goals this year (14 last year).

 

still can't get over how cheap he was tbh.

 

And if he scores the winner tomorrow it gets us £90k in prize money alone.

Posted

Does the 2 and a half year deal suggest that Pardew thinks he can do a job for us in this league, and possibly in the Championship, but doesn't have the quality to step up to Premiership level? As far as I'm concerned thats fine - if we got him for £175k (plus Patterson), its a punt worth taking. Good signing.

Posted

Do you think there will be some strings to the Patterson deal ? Ie first dibs if he turns into the complete striker in the next couple of years, or a large sell on ??

 

Either way looks good business for the play off push....Just that dominating center mid to go then !!

Posted
Southend OS says Paterson was a separate deal, so not a part exchange.

 

I know but it must have been tied in somehow otherwise why didn't we simply loan him to them?

Posted

Very good signing. Should mean Lambert can get a much needed rest.

 

We now have a very very good looking squad. If we can a midfielder in, Stock or Danns perhaps & move a few players on now it will be a perfect transfer window.

 

If we can get rid of Lancashire, Molyneux, Gillett, Pulis & Saga our squad will look something like this:

 

GK: Davis, Bart, Forecast

RB: Murty, Ostemobor

LB: Harding, Mills

CB: Fonte, Jaidi, Seaborne, Perry, Thomas

RM: Antonio, Papa

LM: Holmes

CM: Schneiderlin, Wotton, Hammond, James

AM: Lallana

ST: Lambert, Barnard, Connolly

Posted
nice one..

 

what sort of striker is he..? more of a big player or a nippy one..?

 

with antonio and waigo we already have options to have real pace at the top of the formation..

 

From what I've read about him he's like Lambert-lite just with added work rate.

Posted
I know but it must have been tied in somehow otherwise why didn't we simply loan him to them?

 

Because with Barnard joining he is a long way from ever starting for Saints.

 

If he was included in the deal the transfer fee would come down. Southend wouldn't bother saying it was a separate deal if it wasn't.

Posted

Good signing. Welcome to the Saints, Lee.

 

This is a good statement of intent from us. We can now rotate between Connolly, Lambert and Barnard, still retaining some decent quality up front and allowing for injuries or suspensions.

 

We just need that midfield playmaker/General and we will just about have the complete set-up.

Posted (edited)
what number is he..?

 

Would be surprised if he didn't take over Paterson's number which was 17, failing that the lowest available one is 41, which is frankly rrrrrubbish.

 

Hold on, who is/was number 27? Oh yeah, Jamie White.

Edited by The9

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...