Jump to content

'Arry's in the Poo - Triffic


RonManager
 Share

Recommended Posts

A person guilty of the offence is liable, on summary

conviction, to imprisonment for a maximum of six months or to a fine not

exceeding the statutory maximum or both and on conviction on

indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years or both.

 

 

:smt023:smt039:prayer::prayer::prayer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A person guilty of the offence is liable, on summary

conviction, to imprisonment for a maximum of six months or to a fine not

exceeding the statutory maximum or both and on conviction on

indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years or both.

 

 

:smt023:smt039:prayer::prayer::prayer:

 

So in other words, if found guilty he'll just get a fine and a slap on the wrists.

 

His mates in the media will bleat about what an injustice it all is to poor old 'Arry, salt of the earth guv'nor that he is. Then it'll all be swept under the carpet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dark Sotonic Mills
A person guilty of the offence is liable, on summary

conviction, to imprisonment for a maximum of six months or to a fine not

exceeding the statutory maximum or both and on conviction on

indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years or both.

 

 

:smt023:smt039:prayer::prayer::prayer:

 

That is for the Statutory offence of Fraudulent Evasion of Income Tax Fraud Act 2000 s144.

 

However the offence of cheating the revenue is "... punishable with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think his intention, according to his lawyer, to plead Not Guilty will not help his sentence/punishment when he is found guilty.

 

I say when because they do not take things like this to Court unless 100% sure.

 

I bet Storrie, Mandric and 'arry will run one hell of a protection racket on the inside ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think his intention, according to his lawyer, to plead Not Guilty will not help his sentence/punishment when he is found guilty.

 

I say when because they do not take things like this to Court unless 100% sure.

 

I bet Storrie, Mandric and 'arry will run one hell of a protection racket on the inside ;)

 

Quite agree, and even more so after an exhaustive 26 month investigation, I wouldn't think for a minute they would waste their time collecting evidence over this period of time just to see their man walk away with a 'Not Guilty' verdict... surely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The length of the sentence will depend on a number of factors including:

*the amount of tax evaded;

*the period of time during which the evasion took place;

*the effort made to conceal the fraud;

*whether others were drawn in and corrupted;

*the character of the offender;

*the extent (if known) of his personal gain;

*whether the offender pleaded guilty;

*the amount recovered.

 

40k isnt the biggest TAX dodge ever, its only 2 cases being brought against him. Did he corrupt Mandaric? (or other way round). Admittedly he is ****ed on the character aspect. He will pay the money back from a weeks wages and if he pleads guilty he will get quite a short sentence if anything at all. Now if he were to kill MM before the hearing :smt023

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...