Matthew Le God Posted 14 January, 2010 Posted 14 January, 2010 I think he has Lloyd James will now be in midfield A player already at the club is not a replacement signing which is what Pardew said. James is also a very different type of midfielder to Mellis.
hypochondriac Posted 14 January, 2010 Posted 14 January, 2010 I think he has Lloyd James will now be in midfield He said he was going to sign someone to replace Melis. How is James a Melis replacement in any way?
John B Posted 14 January, 2010 Posted 14 January, 2010 He said he was going to sign someone to replace Melis. How is James a Melis replacement in any way? Wait and see
Window Cleaner Posted 14 January, 2010 Posted 14 January, 2010 He said he was going to sign someone to replace Melis. How is James a Melis replacement in any way? Neither will be in the starting 11 on Saturday, how about that for a reason.
david in sweden Posted 14 January, 2010 Posted 14 January, 2010 He said he was going to sign someone to replace Melis. How is James a Melis replacement in any way? ..maybe he will sign someone else, give him a chance - it's only Thursday
yorkie Posted 14 January, 2010 Posted 14 January, 2010 More signings this week blimey what happens when we run out of money? At this rate a player a day and we'll have a bigger squad than all the division put together! Not knocking it - but another player tomorrow, a win at Millwall, followed by yet another player on Monday. Blimey this is worswe than when we were specualting who was going to leave last year!
thorpie the sinner Posted 14 January, 2010 Posted 14 January, 2010 More signings this week blimey what happens when we run out of money? At this rate a player a day and we'll have a bigger squad than all the division put together! Not knocking it - but another player tomorrow, a win at Millwall, followed by yet another player on Monday. Blimey this is worswe than when we were specualting who was going to leave last year! who said we were getting a player tomorrow?
RedAndWhite91 Posted 14 January, 2010 Posted 14 January, 2010 who said we were getting a player tomorrow? There was a statement on twitter BEFORE the Otsemobor signing saying we'd have another player before Friday midday. Whether or not they meant Otsemobor I don't know.
pilsburydoughboy Posted 14 January, 2010 Posted 14 January, 2010 I will feel gutted if i do not see a "Player Signs" sticky when i log on at work tomorrow.
Smirking_Saint Posted 14 January, 2010 Posted 14 January, 2010 I believe he is still looking for a midfielder, i am not sure we will see him tommorow though. The 'we will sign another player before friday' tweet was posted before the otsemobor signing was even released, before the news of any signing was released.
saintray Posted 15 January, 2010 Posted 15 January, 2010 I think we can all rule this one out for the time being, according to danns twitter he is on the team bus on the way up to plymouth for tommorows game. Oh well!!
StuRomseySaint Posted 15 January, 2010 Posted 15 January, 2010 I just asked him whether he is joining Southampton, his response was... ha ha I said reasonable questions, here's an answer tho I'm not saying yes I'm not saying no and I'm not saying maybe ha ha Make of that what you will, I would suggest that means talks are ongoing, if he had no intention of coming here I am pretty sure he would rule it out.
John B Posted 15 January, 2010 Posted 15 January, 2010 I believe he is still looking for a midfielder, i am not sure we will see him tommorow though. The 'we will sign another player before friday' tweet was posted before the otsemobor signing was even released, before the news of any signing was released. I thought the Twitter came at 10.30 saying there was a signing to be announced at 11am
Channon's Sideburns Posted 15 January, 2010 Posted 15 January, 2010 I just asked him whether he is joining Southampton, his response was... ha ha I said reasonable questions, here's an answer tho I'm not saying yes I'm not saying no and I'm not saying maybe ha ha Make of that what you will, I would suggest that means talks are ongoing, if he had no intention of coming here I am pretty sure he would rule it out. Haha..he got the same sort of question from me.
Andy Durman Posted 15 January, 2010 Posted 15 January, 2010 ..maybe he will sign someone else, give him a chance - it's only Thursday Actually its Friday
Matthew Le God Posted 15 January, 2010 Posted 15 January, 2010 Actually its Friday It was Thursday when he posted that.
NickG Posted 15 January, 2010 Posted 15 January, 2010 I just asked him whether he is joining Southampton, his response was... ha ha I said reasonable questions, here's an answer tho I'm not saying yes I'm not saying no and I'm not saying maybe ha ha Make of that what you will, I would suggest that means talks are ongoing, if he had no intention of coming here I am pretty sure he would rule it out. or maybe means -nothing to do with you!
StuRomseySaint Posted 15 January, 2010 Posted 15 January, 2010 ha ha your questions are entertaining lol love the banter He loves me. xxx
Smirking_Saint Posted 15 January, 2010 Posted 15 January, 2010 I thought the Twitter came at 10.30 saying there was a signing to be announced at 11am I am not exactly sure but the new signings tweets were definately after they said there would be another signing before friday.
Window Cleaner Posted 26 January, 2010 Posted 26 January, 2010 going cheaply? did we sell players cheaply the instant we went into admin? not as far as I can recall.
krissyboy31 Posted 26 January, 2010 Posted 26 January, 2010 going cheaply? Not if Mark Fry is involved!
NickG Posted 26 January, 2010 Posted 26 January, 2010 player more likely to want to leave due to -10, and they will need money in. Reading reports, (although I have no idea if there was any substance to the rumour) think he would be a great addition
Matthew Le God Posted 26 January, 2010 Posted 26 January, 2010 I think a major factor in them wanting to leave would be to get wages paid on time.
Block 5 Posted 26 January, 2010 Posted 26 January, 2010 Danns was interviewed on TalkSport yesterday. Apparently he fancies himself as a bit of a producer (of music).
Barry the Badger Posted 26 January, 2010 Posted 26 January, 2010 did we sell players cheaply the instant we went into admin? not as far as I can recall. Wasn't that just because they were all ****?
saintmonkey1979 Posted 26 January, 2010 Posted 26 January, 2010 Wasn't that just because they were all ****? and we were outside the transfer window
RinNY Posted 26 January, 2010 Posted 26 January, 2010 did we sell players cheaply the instant we went into admin? not as far as I can recall. Once the season ended & transfers were possible, we sold some players: do the names Surman and McGoldrick ring a bell? Money kept SFC afloat long enough for Liebherr to be able to save the club.
NickG Posted 26 January, 2010 Posted 26 January, 2010 http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/2820855/Dannzys-right-on-track.html
NickG Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 to plymouth? http://forums.cpfc.org/showthread.php?t=193881&page=9
LeBenali Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 His latest Twitter is that he's "very disappointed", possibly jumping the gun here but lets hope it's not due to the deal to us falling through!
Saints67 Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 His latest Twitter is that he's "very disappointed", possibly jumping the gun here but lets hope it's not due to the deal to us falling through! maybe he's disappointed he's had to leave Palace?
ohwhenthesaints Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 Isn't that just his reaction to Palace going into admin?
St Chalet Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 His latest Twitter is that he's "very disappointed", possibly jumping the gun here but lets hope it's not due to the deal to us falling through! He could have joined us, it was his choice not to agree our offer.
Dr Who? Posted 27 January, 2010 Posted 27 January, 2010 His latest Twitter is that he's "very disappointed", possibly jumping the gun here but lets hope it's not due to the deal to us falling through! Perhaps he was at Griffin Park last night!!
saint77 Posted 29 January, 2010 Posted 29 January, 2010 ive heard we are back in talks with danns the best option imho
Under Weststand Posted 29 January, 2010 Posted 29 January, 2010 ive heard we are back in talks with danns the best option imho Agree with that would be better long term bet IMHO than Puncheon. Danns has better long term prospects & longevity if as we all hope we start to climb back up the leagues. Here's hoping.
Glasgow_Saint Posted 29 January, 2010 Posted 29 January, 2010 ive heard we are back in talks with danns the best option imho Just the player we need. Far too good for L1 - so should make us a very very good side.
The Fat Controller Posted 29 January, 2010 Posted 29 January, 2010 Sky Sports now reporting that Saints want Danns on bottom of Puncheon article
AK Posted 29 January, 2010 Posted 29 January, 2010 I am told Danns is a done deal but I'd wait to see it on the OS before i get too excited.
S-Clarke Posted 29 January, 2010 Posted 29 January, 2010 danns is a quality player, i guess that means we'll go back to get Puncheon in the summer. i always thought it would be too complicated to sort it in january.
SNSUN Posted 29 January, 2010 Posted 29 January, 2010 He's a right midfielder than can play in central midfield, and he's hugely influential for Palace. He's the sort of player that can come straight intothe team and have a big impact, according to my (ever so gutted Palace supporting) mate.
saintrich Posted 29 January, 2010 Posted 29 January, 2010 Good news if this goes through, much rather sign Danns than Puncheon.
S-Clarke Posted 29 January, 2010 Posted 29 January, 2010 He's a right midfielder than can play in central midfield, and he's hugely influential for Palace. He's the sort of player that can come straight intothe team and have a big impact, according to my (ever so gutted Palace supporting) mate. he's the sort of midfielder we're crying out for...someone who can pass it and dictate play from the middle..and get himself into goal scoring positions. i expect we'll now get him for a complete snip as well. excited by this one, another ''headline'' signing.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now