Micky Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 No brown bag jokes, please... http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Tottenham-Manager-Harry-Redknapp-Facing-Proceedings-Over-A-Tax-Issue/Article/200912315504712?lpos=UK_News_Carousel_Region_3&lid=ARTICLE_15504712_Tottenham_Manager_Harry_Redknapp_Facing_Proceedings_Over_A_Tax_Issue
saint_mears Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 I presume Mandaric will be charged as he gave him the money via offshore account.
The Kraken Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 He's going down, he's going down, Droopy's going down...
saint_stevo Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 been nibbling at him for a long time.....wonder what will come of it
brianoneils slidingtackle Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Dont think he will get away with it this time :-)
Saintandy666 Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 You have to assume there is something seriously dogey going on when the finger keeps coming back and pointing to him over and over.
beatlesaint Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Oh dear, how sad, never mind. A guy who works for my wife used to work in the local tax office and he has said on several occasions that they were watching Mr Redknapp's activities very closely over the years. Looks like the chickens have finally come home to roost
Tom Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 They wont bring it to court without sufficient evidence. So doesnt sound good for Mr. Knobknapp.
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Couldn't have 'appened to a nicer bloke !! him & story sharing a cell, "you wanna be the wife or the husband arry"...."I'll be the Husband Pete"...."ok, well be a good husband, come over ere and suck your wife's co**"
hamster Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 "In November 2007 when he was arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to defraud and false accounting. The High Court ruled that officers who raided Redknapp's home in connection with that inquiry had acted unlawfully. From what I have been told, at the time (2007) am I correct to assume that any evidence collected would have be deemed inadmissable, hence the police had to start from scratch to catch him out? If for example they had found loads of incriminating info on the conputer that they may or may not have taken it would have had to be returned to the accused and disregarded?
Glasgow_Saint Posted 20 December, 2009 Posted 20 December, 2009 Money talks and bagpuss has bundles - he will escape without punishment (maybe a fine)
sadoldgit Posted 20 December, 2009 Posted 20 December, 2009 If they didn't think that they had a case against him they would have dropped it by now. But it is one thing to have a case and another to have enough evidence of a realistic conviction.
Block 5 Posted 20 December, 2009 Posted 20 December, 2009 Money talks and bagpuss has bundles - he will escape without punishment (maybe a fine) Not when it comes to the taxman.....
Coastal Saint Posted 20 December, 2009 Posted 20 December, 2009 Isn't that how they got Al Capon in the end (Tax Evasion)
Foxstone Posted 21 December, 2009 Posted 21 December, 2009 Isn't that how they got Al Capon in the end (Tax Evasion) Thought it was syphilis !
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now