RedAndWhite91 Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 What's smart about pointing out the fact that stupid ginger virgins that wear santa hats, and have great big man boobs get the words to the songs wrong? "Alan pardew's red army" is harder to sing than red and white army. I think you might be one of the pork pork brigade come to think of it. LOL@you The pedantic correction was the smart-arse bit, not your sweeping generalisations. I can assure you I've never shouted 'pork' at a football match, never worn a santa hat at a game and I have brown hair. Nice try, but you're wrong, LOL@you. I think you might be one of these people who are bitter at everyone else, judging by your last few posts. Or you are just trying to get noticed on an internet forum by calling everything under the sun a mongtard.
Andy_Porter Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 we do have some mongs that sing turgid songs at sms....about 4 songs in total Generally if you get a collection of 20,000 people somewhere there will be some mongs yes...
hypochondriac Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 If we play James at RB then we will lose.
Saint_clark Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 If we play James at RB then we will lose. It's not guaranteed, but he will have to put the game of his life in.
hypochondriac Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 It's not guaranteed, but he will have to put the game of his life in. Well nothing is ever guaranteed but it's going to happen.
S-Clarke Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 It's not guaranteed, but he will have to put the game of his life in. i've got a hunch that Morgan will miss out and we'll end up seeing James in midfield, with Thomas played at RB. maybe a blessing in disguise?
Andy_Porter Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 It's not guaranteed, but he will have to put the game of his life in. Absolute rubbish. We've played plenty of good teams with James at right back and won without him putting in the performance of his life, don't really understand why Leeds would have to be any different. If we play James at RB then we will lose. How can you be so sure exactly? Did they sign Messi without me noticing?
hypochondriac Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 Absolute rubbish. We've played plenty of good teams with James at right back and won without him putting in the performance of his life, don't really understand why Leeds would have to be any different. How can you be so sure exactly? Did they sign Messi without me noticing? I can't be sure but I'd be willing to put money on it.
hypochondriac Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 i've got a hunch that Morgan will miss out and we'll end up seeing James in midfield, with Thomas played at RB. maybe a blessing in disguise? I would be happy with that.
Evil Monkey Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 Absolute rubbish. We've played plenty of good teams with James at right back and won without him putting in the performance of his life, don't really understand why Leeds would have to be any different. How can you be so sure exactly? Did they sign Messi without me noticing? I can't be sure but I'd be willing to put money on it. That Leeds have signed Messi? I'll have some of that.
Andy_Porter Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 I can't be sure but I'd be willing to put money on it. I'm sure you will get a chance tomorrow, I can't see Pardew dropping James for Thomas. Maybe if Schneiderlin is fit Thomas will play there, otherwise James seems to be Pardews choice.
hypochondriac Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 I'm sure you will get a chance tomorrow, I can't see Pardew dropping James for Thomas. Maybe if Schneiderlin is fit Thomas will play there, otherwise James seems to be Pardews choice. I know and I don't even like Thomas, but too many games this season I have seen us concede when James gets skinned time and time again.
hypochondriac Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 That Leeds have signed Messi? I'll have some of that. You know what I mean Tim.
up and away Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 Originally Posted by Saint_clark It's not guaranteed, but he will have to put the game of his life in. i've got a hunch that Morgan will miss out and we'll end up seeing James in midfield, with Thomas played at RB. maybe a blessing in disguise? He can do it, he clearly showed that at the end of last season. Seems to Have gone back to his old ways to a certain extent. If he can sort his positioning out, that's where 90% of his trouble originates. I don't know why Pardew has not tried Thomas at RB and James in front, Thomas was not that bad previously in that position? Pardew seems gung ho about this game, so I get the feeling he knows something or has something particular in mind. Either way, I feel Leeds have the edge after resting so many players in midweek. Given a choice I would far prefer to take the points off Colchester than Leeds, but it really would be a big step forward to take points from both. The way Pardews talking it sounds something like (without Schniederlin), will be very interested to see the strarting line up. Bart Thomas Perry/Trotts Jaidi Harding Waigo James Hammond Lallana Lambert Connolly
Evil Monkey Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 You know what I mean Tim. Do I know you?
hypochondriac Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 He can do it, he clearly showed that at the end of last season. Seems to Have gone back to his old ways to a certain extent. If he can sort his positioning out, that's where 90% of his trouble originates. I don't know why Pardew has not tried Thomas at RB and James in front, Thomas was not that bad previously in that position? Pardew seems gung ho about this game, so I get the feeling he knows something or has something particular in mind. Either way, I feel Leeds have the edge after resting so many players in midweek. Given a choice I would far prefer to take the points off Colchester than Leeds, but it really would be a big step forward to take points from both. The way Pardews talking it sounds something like (without Schniederlin), will be very interested to see the strarting line up. Bart Thomas Perry/Trotts Jaidi Harding Waigo James Hammond Lallana Lambert Connolly That's my team too without Morgan.
Andy_Porter Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 He can do it, he clearly showed that at the end of last season. Seems to Have gone back to his old ways to a certain extent. If he can sort his positioning out, that's where 90% of his trouble originates. I don't know why Pardew has not tried Thomas at RB and James in front, Thomas was not that bad previously in that position? Pardew obviously likes footballers so prefers to play James, I can see where people are coming from when they think we should play Thomas at right back but I just don't agree, we gain a bit of mettle in defence and lose a lot of attacking emphasis. We go long too often as it is, with Thomas in the side it would be ten times worse. His positioning and aerial ability are both poor, his distribution is like Beckham's compared to Thomas. Hopefully next month we will see a proper right back come in and James can start fighting for one of the midfield spots.
hypochondriac Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 Pardew obviously likes footballers so prefers to play James, I can see where people are coming from when they think we should play Thomas at right back but I just don't agree, we gain a bit of mettle in defence and lose a lot of attacking emphasis. We go long too often as it is, with Thomas in the side it would be ten times worse. His positioning and aerial ability are both poor, his distribution is like Beckham's compared to Thomas. Hopefully next month we will see a proper right back come in and James can start fighting for one of the midfield spots. Well that I can agree with.
up and away Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 Pardew obviously likes footballers so prefers to play James, I can see where people are coming from when they think we should play Thomas at right back but I just don't agree, we gain a bit of mettle in defence and lose a lot of attacking emphasis. We go long too often as it is, with Thomas in the side it would be ten times worse. His positioning and aerial ability are both poor, his distribution is like Beckham's compared to Thomas. Hopefully next month we will see a proper right back come in and James can start fighting for one of the midfield spots. The problem is that we have very little options in that position without Murty. You are forced by exclusion with James or Thomas. I really do not know which would be better in that position, but I have a very definite bias for having James in midfield, especially without Schniederlin. I thought Thomas was acceptable at RB previously, but obviously others and Pardew saw something different. Not long back, I remember Pardew raving about James to Coppell, so he obviously see's a lot in the lad, but I can't think that applies to RB? I fully take your point with Thomas, but the issues James creates there at the present, are you going to be any better off? The alternative would be James with Waigo / Antonio giving cover in front, now that looks like suicide against Leeds?
Rasiak-9- Posted 18 December, 2009 Posted 18 December, 2009 Fuels my belief that if we're gonna beat this team we really need to attack them. Sitting back against Beckford and co. would be suicide, really having a go at them will hopefully take them and the crowd by suprise
Saint_clark Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Absolute rubbish. We've played plenty of good teams with James at right back and won without him putting in the performance of his life, don't really understand why Leeds would have to be any different. How can you be so sure exactly? Did they sign Messi without me noticing? No, but the best winger in the football league plays on the left for Leeds (Snodgrass).
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 This is ****e. I've spoken to both National Rail and Highways agency and they've decided that it is not safe to travel tomorrow...apparently, all lines between London and Colchester today were suspended due to frozen track!
Saint_clark Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 This is ****e. I've spoken to both National Rail and Highways agency and they've decided that it is not safe to travel tomorrow...apparently, all lines between London and Colchester today were suspended due to frozen track! Ouch.
Gemmel Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 This is ****e. I've spoken to both National Rail and Highways agency and they've decided that it is not safe to travel tomorrow...apparently, all lines between London and Colchester today were suspended due to frozen track! Unions said it wasnt safe to work
Saint_clark Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Unions said it wasnt safe to work Wow. Couple this with BA, and the Unions seem to be doing everything they can to p*ss people off over xmas.
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Wow. Couple this with BA, and the Unions seem to be doing everything they can to p*ss people off over xmas. I doubt it was the unions, more likely that common sense prevailed. Anyway, regardless, COME ON YOOOOOUUUUU REDS!!
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Ouch. Trains were starting(!!!!) from Ipswich to get to Norwich/Felixstowe. Mental.
Gemmel Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 I doubt it was the unions, more likely that common sense prevailed! LOL.... thorpe... read that back to yourself..........pure quality, as i said before, you fight my corner far better than i can ( And by the way it was the unions )
Saint_clark Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Trains were starting(!!!!) from Ipswich to get to Norwich/Felixstowe. Mental. F*cking annoying, is that.
shurlock Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Saw them crooked vultures@the hammersmith apollo last night - excellent gig but only starters ahead of today's main course. Getting the 11.10 from Kings X - no problems as far as I can see if you're travelling via London. safe trip up everyone.
St.Patrik Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 -19 in Sweden at the moment - imagine to play footie in that weather : / Come on Saints - a win would at least make me warm on the inside !
dubai_phil Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Was 21C but raining at 4:30 this morning when I landed back here, then had a thunderstorm about 6am, effing flight was "fuller than a binge drinkers' bladder" last night. Badly bruised ribs from the a**hole next to me who decided to spend all the flight stretching his elbows sideways. I won though, made sure he knocked my mini bottle of red wine into his own lap. Sweet Hope EoA doesn't freeze to death up there today. Not sure about the anti-freeze capabilities of Old Speckled Hen. For us southern softies down here, Norwich was ridiculously freezing and it's got a lot cold colder there since. Not easy finding thermals to buy down here. Will they turn on their undersoil heating to give the players warm puddles? Will we get away with playing football like we did against Norwich that ended with looping balls in to the box? or will we learn to get more dangerous crosses in? One & only time I went to Leeds was the LC semi first leg, it was sub zero that night and snow everywhere as well. Tough call, but a repeat of that draw would be a great result, hope I can stay awake until 7pm local time today
dubai_phil Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Hour-by-Hour Forecast View All Hourly Details 10:00 -1° Chance of Precip. 10% Partly Cloudy 11:00 0° Chance of Precip. 10% Partly Cloudy 12:00 1° Chance of Precip. 20% Partly Cloudy 13:00 1° Chance of Precip. 20% Partly Cloudy 14:00 2° Chance of Precip. 20% Partly Cloudy 15:00 2° Chance of Precip. 20% Partly Cloudy 16:00 2° Chance of Precip. 60% Light Snow 17:00 2° Chance of Precip. 60% Light Snow
Legod Third Coming Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Hour-by-Hour Forecast View All Hourly Details 10:00 -1° Chance of Precip. 10% Partly Cloudy 11:00 0° Chance of Precip. 10% Partly Cloudy 12:00 1° Chance of Precip. 20% Partly Cloudy 13:00 1° Chance of Precip. 20% Partly Cloudy 14:00 2° Chance of Precip. 20% Partly Cloudy 15:00 2° Chance of Precip. 20% Partly Cloudy 16:00 2° Chance of Precip. 60% Light Snow 17:00 2° Chance of Precip. 60% Light Snow In all my experience of Dubai, that is the strangest weather forecast I have ever seen. Is it something to do with going bust Phil?
Thedelldays Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 my mate is stationed in Dubai and emailed me to tell how much warmer it is compared to the UK... fukker
Yorkshire Saint Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 In Leeds ....-2 ..but the sense of victory is sweet in the air !
locks heath saint 2 Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 55miles away in a service station no problems with the weather snow on the fields not nothing on the roads bright sunshine coyr
Window Cleaner Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 In all my experience of Dubai, that is the strangest weather forecast I have ever seen. Is it something to do with going bust Phil? Yep they haven't paid the sun bill so they got cut off.
SaintRobbie Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 If we play James at RB then we will lose. If we play James we will be weaker, but not lose.
NickG Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Colchester v Carlisle off - if we win we go above Carlisle now.
Bad Wolf Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Had a dream last night. Was 1-1, they scored on about 66 minutes and we made it 1-1 on 92 minutes with a minute to play. Was either Lallana or James that got ours
Thedelldays Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 a few games being called off...hope not this one also, anyone know what the score is if a game is called off and is part of your accumalator..?
Saint_clark Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 a few games being called off...hope not this one also, anyone know what the score is if a game is called off and is part of your accumalator..? Leeds have undersoil heating so it shouldn't be.
oxfordshire_saint Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Anyone know if it's being streamed on t'internet anywhere? Surely if a game as obscure as us vs Bris Rovers was, then this one should be?
oxfordshire_saint Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 also, anyone know what the score is if a game is called off and is part of your accumalator..? It's void and just the other results count. I only found this out the other week when I had Stockport vs Swindon on a slip and it got called off, I just got a reduced payout on the other 4 results I had which came in.
Thedelldays Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 It's void and just the other results count. I only found this out the other week when I had Stockport vs Swindon on a slip and it got called off, I just got a reduced payout on the other 4 results I had which came in. cheers..as I have the ipswich game on my labrokes millionaire stake
Saint_clark Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 Anyone know if it's being streamed on t'internet anywhere? Surely if a game as obscure as us vs Bris Rovers was, then this one should be? Rovers was the FA cup, that's the difference.
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 19 December, 2009 Posted 19 December, 2009 A bit late in the day, but a word of warning to those that have driven up/gone on the bingo buses. The BBC is predicting hazardous driving conditions Saturday afternoon/evening as snow and ice hit the north. Here is the link...(6th paragraph) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8422048.stm
Recommended Posts