Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looks like they have had their plans for a 50,000 stadium at Kirkby (part funded by Tesco's) turned down (by our own John Denham)

 

Meanwhile Liverpool are struggling to fund their new ground at Stanley Park

 

Begs the question, should two club cities in places such as Liverpool, Bristol,Nottingham,Edinburgh etc share the cost of a bigger capacity and better stadium or plough on playing in their spiritual home?

 

Stadium sharing works well on the continent but our football history is more pronounced.

 

I think the latter is very important but personally see the merits of ground sharing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...