Jump to content

QPR v Saints - 2nd Half Chat

exit2

By exit2
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Crouchie's Lawyer

Crouchie's Lawyer

Posted
Posted
Let's see where we are after 10 games when the luck and hard done by scorelines even themselves out then we should worry. I for one believe that with some continuity, our fortunes will turn. Lowe said all along there was no quick fix. We seem to be expecting one.

 

I for one was looking forward to the implementing total football with the youth players we have. However, I think people's concerns are with the fact that Rudi, Stern and Perry should have started today and it could be argued, should start most games, with the kids around them

Guest Hacienda

Guest Hacienda

Posted
Posted
You are a plant! we are far better than QPR they have had luck (Lancashire being dismissed and an off-side goal) yet, to me, we are the better (footballing) side.

 

Have you looked at the league table?

 

You get points for winning, not playing pretty football.

 

Anything above 3rd from bottom is a success this season.

Crouchie's Lawyer

Crouchie's Lawyer

Posted
Posted
If we had a point or I had a quid for every time we have played well and havent won, I would be minted and Saints would be champions of the world!

 

I'd take a Derby or Stoke style of play with success over pretty football with no end result any day!

 

You are a plant! we are far better than QPR they have had luck (Lancashire being dismissed and an off-side goal) yet, to me, we are the better (footballing) side.

 

I accept cash, cheque's visa or paypal

Guest Hacienda

Guest Hacienda

Posted
Posted
I for one was looking forward to the implementing total football with the youth players we have. However, I think people's concerns are with the fact that Rudi, Stern and Perry should have started today and it could be argued, should start most games, with the kids around them

 

It's really a no brainer.

 

We need a mix of youth and experience. Without it we will go down.

Crouchie's Lawyer

Crouchie's Lawyer

Posted
Posted
You are a plant! we are far better than QPR they have had luck (Lancashire being dismissed and an off-side goal) yet, to me, we are the better (footballing) side.

 

Also, I dont mean to pick on you again, but if you say something retarded, you have to expect to be picked up on it.

 

1) Calling someone a plant for an opinion goes to show how unintelligent some people on this forum really are.

 

2) You need to remember you are a Saints fan, so a lot of your opinions will be bias. You cannot truely think we have outplayed them today. If you do then you are truely mess up in the head.

alpine_saint

alpine_saint

Posted
Posted
It's really a no brainer.

 

We need a mix of youth and experience. Without it we will go down.

 

I for one thought both JP and Lowe had emphasised this themselves. Perhaps they were only paying lip service and should now practice what they preach.

Under Weststand

Under Weststand

Posted
Posted
You are a plant! we are far better than QPR they have had luck (Lancashire being dismissed and an off-side goal) yet, to me, we are the better (footballing) side.

Whilst we have played some nice football today our defence is a complete shambles & who is the man of the match today Kelvin Davis oh look the best team is now loosing 4-1

1965onwards

1965onwards

Posted
Posted

In case anyone has not noticed,we do not have the players to play any other way than what we are doing.

 

When we had the players last season who could play the usual non-premiership way,they were crap at it.

 

For the second season running we have started the season without a proper defense,which means that most of the good work going forward will be wasted.

 

I know it is still early days,but i am prepared to stick my neck out and state that playing midfielders at fullback in an English league is as about as stupid as it can get.

Saints67

Saints67

Posted
Posted
Men against boys, my three goal deficit prediction has been proved in 4-1 rather than 3-0.

 

We are going down.

 

Still Lowe has a smug look on his face

 

Thanks ref ! (and linesman)

master

master

Posted
Posted

Sky keep banging on about us taking positives from the game.

How can we take positives when we are 3 goals behind and we have lost?

We look good atacking, although we are not really converting all the chances, but our defence badly needs some older, more experienced players.

Saint Martini

Saint Martini

Posted
Posted

We don't deserve this scoreline and in the end I blame the lino. We were at 1-1 and we were the better side until that goal, even with 10 men. After that we had to push for a goal again and it opened up at the back for QPR. But without that goal we could have played a bit more conservative. This results doesn't say a whole lot about the rest of our season IMHO.

John B

John B

Posted
Posted
Men against boys, my three goal deficit prediction has been proved in 4-1 rather than 3-0.

 

We are going down.

 

Still Lowe has a smug look on his face

 

He maybe thinking why was Dexter Blackstock not playing for us.

 

We bought BWP and sold Dexter someting wrong there.

Crouchie's Lawyer

Crouchie's Lawyer

Posted
Posted
In case anyone has not noticed,we do not have the players to play any other way than what we are doing.

 

When we had the players last season who could play the usual non-premiership way,they were crap at it.

 

For the second season running we have started the season without a proper defense,which means that most of the good work going forward will be wasted.

 

I know it is still early days,but i am prepared to stick my neck out and state that playing midfielders at fullback in an English league is as about as stupid as it can get.

 

I would suggest you read the pre match and first half threads. We have Rudi, Perry and John who were all not used

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...