Pancake Posted 10 November, 2009 Posted 10 November, 2009 Despite the fact they have been **** since they released Nine Lives, you just wouldnt want to see a band billed as Aerosmith without Tyler: http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2009/11/10/joe-perry-says-aerosmith-not-breaking-up-confirms-band-will-replace-steven-tyler/
saint_bert Posted 10 November, 2009 Posted 10 November, 2009 It takes an awfull lot for a band to continue if a lead singer departs. Especially one so high profile So we shall see
RonManager Posted 10 November, 2009 Posted 10 November, 2009 It takes an awfull lot for a band to continue if a lead singer departs. Especially one so high profile So we shall see AC/DC did it as did New Order, albeit with a change of name. If the music is good, people will buy it.
saint_bert Posted 10 November, 2009 Posted 10 November, 2009 AC/DC did it as did New Order, albeit with a change of name. If the music is good, people will buy it. I didnt say it was not possible just very hard. After seeing AC/DC this year at Wemberlee I know how good they still are. Even if I do prefere the Bon Scott stuff
Pancake Posted 11 November, 2009 Author Posted 11 November, 2009 Its a ****ing soap opera. http://www.musicradar.com/news/guitars/video-steven-tyler-tells-joe-perry-hes-not-quitting-aerosmith-226376?cpn=RSS&source=MRNEWS One HUGE publicity stunt IMHO.
Rattlehead Posted 11 November, 2009 Posted 11 November, 2009 This has been going on for ages on Blabbermouth. Complete b*llocks but then they've been rubbish since Pump IMO.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now