Jump to content

Marlon King


slickmick

Recommended Posts

Come on then, I'll bite. Give us your very own diatribe justifying your assertion that Leicester have a rogue manager.

 

I'm sure that it will make interesting reading.

 

 

I'll have a guess, its because he said Leicester only went up last year because of the financial backing he got and that the boot boy would get found out in the Championship.

Like some ex chairman, he doesn't like to admit he is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Find it quite hard to believe that Talksport have been castigating Mr King for what he has done in between advertising the Call Collymore show. Now there is double standards for you.

Mr King is obviously a **** alongside Mr Collymore in the belting woman stakes but Talksport feel it is alright to employ one on mega bucks and then slag the other one off all weekend?

 

i've never understood how he's managed to get job after job in football,especially given rodney marsh's situation...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Club could possibly sue for Breach of Contract and endeavour to have some of his assets 'sequestered'. However, (isn't there always an however?) it would depend on what the players wages are. £5000 not much hope. But £35,000? They'd get their money back by not having to pay them. As I said earlier. I'd like to see his contract as it would certainly contain his terms and conditions of employment AND reference to both the Grievance and Disciplinary Procedures.

PS. I still wouldn't want him at St Marys

 

But that's not really getting the 3m transfer fee back is it?

 

You'd hope that perhaps a clause might be included in such contracts to the effect that if you are sacked through gross misconduct you will have to pay back the transfer fee in proportion to the time that would otherwise have been left on the contract.

 

That might focus their attention, and give some power to the employer to insist on better behaviour.

 

I actually think "refusing to play (cos I want a better deal somewhere else)" sometimes could be treated as gross misconduct and incur similar a penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you really post that ? I had to read it twice, just to take in its crassness.

 

No real Saints fan would compare Marlon King to MLT.

 

Alpine I was not comparing or suggesting that MLT's activities were the same as King but discussing the issue of context and in the context of our club and the level of adoration he received his alleged crime was not justifiable IMHO. Dyer and BWP were rounded on for being arrested for petty theft and yet MLT's activities can be overlooked?

 

I was simply asking if you read my post before the one you refer to, how bad a crime hypothetically speaking would MLT have to be convicted of before he received comments being rightly reserved for King? Or could we forgive him anything? If so some clubs for whatever reason may be able to do the same for King no matter how distasteful that may seem, am I right or wrong?

 

I don't agree with the argument put forward on here that if the likes of Merson, Gazza and Adams can be forgiven so those who commit crimes can. However those with alcohol issues, for example, are likely to have their problems stemmed from an addiction, an illness, and as such people who have lost the ability to think rationally prior to treatment. IMO I don't think MLT, Dyer, BWP, Lundekvam or worse of all King can blame their 'mistakes' on mental illness but that is just my IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It must really wrankle that he is doing well in the champ chump

 

Oh yes, it's taken over my life and I cannot think of anything else but Nigel Pearson. In any event it doesn't wrankle as bad as it wrankles you that I post opinions and questions that you don't agree with. You don't even understand irony and the occassional tongue in cheek comment. Even caught Wes out which is a rare beast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really need to get your psychiatrist to change your medication, if you truly believe that b*ll*cks.

 

.

 

You really need to be careful what you post. I have no issue with general insults and banter but posting alleged private details about a poster of which you have no knowledge and state it as if it was fact, is slanderous at best (from your perspective).

 

Am I currently on medication? Am I currently seeing a psychiatrist? If so perhaps you would like to share details of the medication and the doctor and/or treatment centre or hospital I attend. If you knew I was suffering from Cancer would you ask me to change my chemo or radiotherapy?

 

Bottom line is you don't know so don't make up stories about posters that may have a damaging affect on them personally. And no it's not the same as me questioning the behaviour of some of our 'Saints' past and present as I am not making up stories about their private life but offering an opinion on what is already in the public domain and / or asking questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really need to be careful what you post. I have no issue with general insults and banter but posting alleged private details about a poster of which you have no knowledge and state it as if it was fact, is slanderous at best (from your perspective).

 

Am I currently on medication? Am I currently seeing a psychiatrist? If so perhaps you would like to share details of the medication and the doctor and/or treatment centre or hospital I attend. If you knew I was suffering from Cancer would you ask me to change my chemo or radiotherapy?

 

Bottom line is you don't know so don't make up stories about posters that may have a damaging affect on them personally. And no it's not the same as me questioning the behaviour of some of our 'Saints' past and present as I am not making up stories about their private life but offering an opinion on what is already in the public domain and / or asking questions.

 

TBF he is commenting on your internet persona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes, it's taken over my life and I cannot think of anything else but Nigel Pearson. In any event it doesn't wrankle as bad as it wrankles you that I post opinions and questions that you don't agree with. You don't even understand irony and the occassional tongue in cheek comment. Even caught Wes out which is a rare beast.

 

Caught me out? How? I said that I'd take the bait, so most would say that I was totally aware that you were fishing. But presumably you have no explanation to justify why you called Pearson a rogue manager.

 

As usual, all p*ss and wind. Unless of course you can come up with an intelligent reason for saying that. If you cannot, then what was the point in saying it? It just makes you look stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...