Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

for some reason have the urge to learn how to play the guitar..

 

I have never picked one up in my life but fancy getting a 'starter kit'...if such one exists...

 

anyone else done anything like this..?

Posted

Anyone who plays did something like that ;)

 

Get a cheapie guitar starter pack. Most come with a DVD, CD and booklet nowadays. You'll be Jimmy Page in a fortnight.

 

Whatever you do, don't spend much cash on your first guitar.

Posted

i decided the same thing 18months ago. Guitar still remains mostly untouched, other than snapping a string on the day i took delivery. Got lessons for xmas last year but were cancelled as they were group lessons and not enough take up....maybe one day

Posted

Got a cheap guitar a few years ago but couldn't get to grips with it, and so gave up, one thing led to another and I became a bassist in a short-lived band even though I hadn't picked up a bass guitar before, but now over 2 years later I am still playing the bass and really enjoy it.

Posted (edited)

I'll give you the same advice I gave someone earlier this year. Get some lessons. To start with, get some online lessons at:

 

www.justinguitar.com for the home page.

 

and here's where to start:

 

http://www.justinguitar.com/en/BC-000-BeginnersCourse.php

 

It's free, unless you want to donate. He's very clear with his advice, and it is up to you to practice. I'm still useless at playing, because that's how I am. I don't practice enough, and stopped playing in early summer, when I got the beaut in the avatar. I've played tunes on that since. But autumn is here and with winter coming on, I will step it up again until late spring.

Edited by St Landrew
Posted

You should be able to get a cheapo electric with amp and all the starter stuff for under £150.

 

http://www.guitar.co.uk/electric_guitar_starter_packages

 

I've used these guys loads of times and they're pretty good. You could do acoustic cheaper (under £70) but IMO electric is easier and more fun to start on. However, as Ponty says, don't spend too much on it - most people give up. If you don't give up, it will arguably be the best money you've ever spent. I've been playing for nearly 20 years and have like 10 guitars now. I'm still rubbish though.

Posted
I don't know much about Matt Freeman, but I'm guessing a beginner would probably be more Duff McKagan. And that is easy.

 

Ironically apart from the intro to "It's So Easy"...

Posted
It's only two notes, how hard can that be?

 

Hammering on on the 14th fret of a bass guitar at that tempo isnt easy (well, for me at least). I always **** it up.

Posted

any of you wouldnt happen to have a second hand bass kicking around to sell? The ****ty one I use for home recording is on its last legs and as a guitarist, I really can't force myself to spend any decent money on something ill probably only pick up once a week.

Posted
any of you wouldnt happen to have a second hand bass kicking around to sell? The ****ty one I use for home recording is on its last legs and as a guitarist, I really can't force myself to spend any decent money on something ill probably only pick up once a week.

 

'Fraid knot Bajjer, mine is used most weeks.

Posted
Just buy a cheap one and see what sounds it makes when you mess around with it. Lessons are for chumps.

 

I cant see TDD being the next Lee Ranaldo TBF.

Posted
I cant see TDD being the next Lee Ranaldo TBF.

 

Might as well aim for the stars though, rather than have some dullard school him in Jeff Beck. Go for it, TDD! If you can make it sound like a steam locomotive crashing into a cathedral, you've won.

Posted

so...acoustic or electric to start

 

been asking mates and they all say acoustic to start with...dont go to argos to get a "starter pack"..go to a proper music shop and get a cheapo one from there..

 

is this sound advice..?

Posted
so...acoustic or electric to start

 

been asking mates and they all say acoustic to start with...dont go to argos to get a "starter pack"..go to a proper music shop and get a cheapo one from there..

 

is this sound advice..?

 

Sod that, get a drum kit - go bonkers!!!!

Posted
so...acoustic or electric to start

 

been asking mates and they all say acoustic to start with...dont go to argos to get a "starter pack"..go to a proper music shop and get a cheapo one from there..

 

is this sound advice..?

 

Up to you, but there's a better than evens chance you'll be wasting whatever money you spend as you just won't be able to play to your own satisfaction quickly enough.

 

I bought electric first, they're more forgiving of amateur status and power chords are a piece of ****, meaning you feel there's a reason to push on with the learning of proper chords and licks. Accoustic guitars need more finesse and talent to sound 'right' IMO and mine gets played far less than any of the electrics because, even after 20 years, I still don't consider myself to be any good.

 

You pays your money, you takes your choice.

Posted
so...acoustic or electric to start

 

been asking mates and they all say acoustic to start with...dont go to argos to get a "starter pack"..go to a proper music shop and get a cheapo one from there..

 

is this sound advice..?

 

Funnily enough, most advice I received from people was to choose an electric. Not because the guitar could make easy pleasing sounds, but because generally the action [distance of strings to fretboard] of an electric guitar is lower than on a cheap acoustic one, and hence is slightly easier on the fingers. Of course, you'll have to buy an amp/speaker if you want to make more sound than plinkety-plink. I've got an old Epiphone acoustic from 1974, which nobody has ever managed to learn on because the action was incredibly high and the strings were very heavy. Hence it was too painful for the beginner to practice on. I lowered the action, and put lighter strings on. Yes, the tone suffered a bit, but at least I can play the bloody thing, and I'm super crap. ;)

Posted
any of you wouldnt happen to have a second hand bass kicking around to sell? The ****ty one I use for home recording is on its last legs and as a guitarist, I really can't force myself to spend any decent money on something ill probably only pick up once a week.

 

I have an Aria SLB II in white. Dunno if I wanna sell it though. Depends what the offer was... :)

Posted (edited)

definitely electric first.

 

A Yamaha Pacifica is an excellent first guitar that will be better than the usual Squire rubbish and will almost allow you to mix it with the big boys when you get a bit better.

 

ps ... it's the pacific 112 you want http://uk.yamaha.com/en/products/musical_instruments/guitars_basses/el_guitars/pacifica112v_old_violin_sunburst/?mode=overview

 

fret music always used to do them and they could be had for about £180.

Edited by sotonjoe
Posted

I'd say acoustic first actually, cos once you can play that, electric is easy. Do it the other way and you'll find acoustic hard. It depends what you want to play ultimately. If you wanna play chords and strum out a song, then acoustic is great cos you can just pick it up and play it. That's what I love about it.

 

If you wanna play like The Edge or whatever, then electric will be your ultimate path.

Posted
I'd say acoustic first actually, cos once you can play that, electric is easy. Do it the other way and you'll find acoustic hard.

 

You are right on which is easier, of course, but surely it is better to learn the easier one first? If you can do that, and enjoy it, then it isn't that difficult to make the progression to acoustic. Surely you're more likely to 'get there' than starting on the 'more difficult one'? Perhaps I am missing something.

 

I still recommend starting on electric (if you the higher cost can be justified).

Posted
You are right on which is easier, of course, but surely it is better to learn the easier one first? If you can do that, and enjoy it, then it isn't that difficult to make the progression to acoustic. Surely you're more likely to 'get there' than starting on the 'more difficult one'? Perhaps I am missing something.

 

I still recommend starting on electric (if you the higher cost can be justified).

 

Each to their own, but I disagree. If you start with the electric, it's still hard (of course), but then if you wanna play acoustic you'll find it really hard cos of the strings and the higher action. Do it the other way and switching to electric from acoustic will be a doddle. Just my opinion.

Posted

it's a rather odd debate tbh because you're only really learning to play rhythm if you're learning rock tunes or similar on an accoustic. Ideally, you should be using an electric if you want to be playing all the extra licks that make up the lead guitar parts. Trying to do lots of hammer ons, pull offs and bends etc on an acoustic just sounds silly and you need an electric with amp to get any kind of exhilerating noise.

Posted

@webby: Would you agree that someone not necessarily committed to learning the instrument long term from the outset is more likely to give up acoustic than electric (because it is more difficult)? In fairness, I suspect the difference is possibly marginal but I think electric will keep people trying that little bit longer until that magic moment when you think you've got enough to keep at it.

 

In terms of a challenge, I do agree with you but in terms of getting people continuing to play, I don't. Just my opinion.

Posted

I like playing the guitar but I have fat sausage fingers so my fingers always press on other strings as well as the strings I went to press on. Can you get a guitar with wide fret board to account for fat, stumpy fingers?

Posted
@webby: Would you agree that someone not necessarily committed to learning the instrument long term from the outset is more likely to give up acoustic than electric (because it is more difficult)? In fairness, I suspect the difference is possibly marginal but I think electric will keep people trying that little bit longer until that magic moment when you think you've got enough to keep at it.

 

In terms of a challenge, I do agree with you but in terms of getting people continuing to play, I don't. Just my opinion.

 

I certainly agree with that. The only advantage acoustic has over electric is that you can pick up an acoustic guitar on a whim and start strumming.

Posted
@webby: Would you agree that someone not necessarily committed to learning the instrument long term from the outset is more likely to give up acoustic than electric (because it is more difficult)? In fairness, I suspect the difference is possibly marginal but I think electric will keep people trying that little bit longer until that magic moment when you think you've got enough to keep at it.

 

In terms of a challenge, I do agree with you but in terms of getting people continuing to play, I don't. Just my opinion.

 

I understand what you're saying. That's fair enough. Personally, when I started out, I had an acoustic at first, then both, but I preferred the acoustic purely because I could just pick it up and get a lovely sound out of it as opposed to the electric which needed an amp etc etc.

 

As I say, it depends what the OP wants out of it.

Posted
I certainly agree with that. The only advantage acoustic has over electric is that you can pick up an acoustic guitar on a whim and start strumming.

I have a tiny amp and headphone arrangement for those moments. It's basic and only gives an undistorted sound (Just volume, no overdrive, reverb, sustain, etc.) but it's about the size of a cigarette packet and runs for months on one of those 9v batteries.

Posted

Of course, you can also just pick up an electric and just strum along fine on that without an amp. Ok not as nice sounding as an acoustic but I can hear it and everything.

Posted

My 2p worth (I dont know why, but hey why not) is that acoustic is the way to start. The neck is wider and the action higher, so you rally have to teach your fingers well. Then move onto an electric if you want, or even an electro-acoustic.

Posted
I have a tiny amp and headphone arrangement for those moments. It's basic and only gives an undistorted sound (Just volume, no overdrive, reverb, sustain, etc.) but it's about the size of a cigarette packet and runs for months on one of those 9v batteries.

 

A mate of mine has a tiny Marshall replica amp and speaker which he puts on his jeans belt and plays electric guitar with. He uses it just for the occasional practice. I had forgotten that. Perhaps there is very little advantage for an acoustic at all, unless it all about preference of sound. The acoustic sound, played well, is very beguiling. I can't play well, so there's an end to that. ;)

Posted
I have a tiny amp and headphone arrangement for those moments. It's basic and only gives an undistorted sound (Just volume, no overdrive, reverb, sustain, etc.) but it's about the size of a cigarette packet and runs for months on one of those 9v batteries.

 

Or get yourself one of these

 

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/VOX-AMPLUG-AC30-BRAND-NEW_W0QQitemZ380167059583QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_MusicalInstr_Amplifiers_RL?hash=item5883b8f87f

Posted

If you have a mac (or macbook of course) you can input the guitar directly into the mic socket, chuck a pair of headphones on and use garageband to model any amp or effect you like. The results are utterly utterly amazing and I use it for song demos for my band.

Highly recommend anyone who has a mac and garageband does this.

Posted
Can anyone tell me anything about a Rockwood HOhner LX90L please?

 

Cheers

 

It will be sh*te but cheap.

 

Might it suit Delldays requirements iyho? There's one on freecycle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...