J Bizzle Posted 19 August, 2009 Posted 19 August, 2009 Baj deletes my tread so he doesn't have to hand infractions out to his little cronies.
Baj Posted 19 August, 2009 Posted 19 August, 2009 Actually, professor, I didn't delete your thread, and according to your profile, you have 18 infraction points, bit odd how the forum didnt automatically ban you. Want to take this opportunity to say goodbye to all your friends first? (Ironic that if you hadn't started this thread, I probably wouldnt have manually checked your infraction points)
J Bizzle Posted 19 August, 2009 Author Posted 19 August, 2009 Actually, professor, I didn't delete your thread, and according to your profile, you have 18 infraction points, bit odd how the forum didnt automatically ban you. Want to take this opportunity to say goodbye to all your friends first? (Ironic that if you hadn't started this thread, I probably wouldnt have manually checked your infraction points) Who did then? I hope you ensured Robsk was infracted? I would have been. I had a ban because I explained my reasons to why muslims were not a race, they were a religion and DSM seems to think that I was racist by saying they were not a race and those points have not expired. Think they expire in January. At the moment, I believe I have 4 infraction points after the ban after the gong thread.
J Bizzle Posted 19 August, 2009 Author Posted 19 August, 2009 You should be in jail. Reason being? I have never commited a crime.
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 19 August, 2009 Posted 19 August, 2009 LOL @ poor old bizzle What goes around.
Dog Posted 19 August, 2009 Posted 19 August, 2009 Reason being? I have never commited a crime. 12 months in Wandsworth for lunatic behavour. Have you tried anger management or laying off the Skittles?
Saints11 Posted 19 August, 2009 Posted 19 August, 2009 From another thread, like **** did you average 94% doing history at Uni
Saint in Paradise Posted 19 August, 2009 Posted 19 August, 2009 J B has more friends on here than me, he has 2 I haven't got any :(
hamster Posted 19 August, 2009 Posted 19 August, 2009 You should be in jail. Reason being? I have never commited a crime. Scaring kids straight.
Clapham Saint Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 (ironic that if you hadn't started this thread, i probably wouldnt have manually checked your infraction points) lol!
norwaysaint Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 J Bizzle was a good poster, why ban him? To stop him whining all the time?
Atticus Finch of Maycomb Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 he was one of the few that spoke real sense around here oh, no, wait, he talked sh*t
Weston Super Saint Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 J Bizzle was a good poster, why ban him? To stop him whining all the time? he was one of the few that spoke real sense around here oh, no, wait, he talked sh*t I guess he got b-anned because he had an opinion. It might have been an ill-informed, racist, bigotted one, but hey, at least he had one, unlike AFoM, Norwegian Stain, Wilstshire C*nt, Spastic Stain, Tiggs D1ckhead etc etc, who tend to just agree with what Ponty has to say....
Scudamore Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 I guess he got b-anned because he had an opinion. It might have been an ill-informed, racist, bigotted one, but hey, at least he had one, unlike AFoM, Norwegian Stain, Wilstshire C*nt, Spastic Stain, Tiggs D1ckhead etc etc, who tend to just agree with what Ponty has to say.... To be fair Ponty is ALWAYS right...
aids victim Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 The mods on this place are on some mega power trip they ban people for no reason or explanation. RIP all those banend for no reason.
Baj Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 The mods on this place are on some mega power trip they ban people for no reason or explanation. Apart from the infraction warnings that tell them what post, what content, what thread, what time, reason for banning, infraction points and who applied the ban I completely agree. Bastards.
thesaint sfc Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 Baj, could you check webmasters emails please mate. I don't seem to have full member permissions
Jillyanne Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 Apart from the infraction warnings that tell them what post, what content, what thread, what time, reason for banning, infraction points and who applied the ban I completely agree. Bastards. Yeah.
thesaint sfc Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 Yeah. Thanks for your contribution to this thread Jill. You really do make this place a pleasure to read.
Ponty Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 I guess he got b-anned because he had an opinion. It might have been an ill-informed, racist, bigotted one, but hey, at least he had one, unlike AFoM, Norwegian Stain, Wilstshire C*nt, Spastic Stain, Tiggs D1ckhead etc etc, who tend to just agree with what Ponty has to say.... When are you going to front up your £5, WSS. I miss you being around the place so much.
Weston Super Saint Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 When are you going to front up your £5, WSS. I miss you being around the place so much. I guess I'm in the 'it's not value for money' camp....
Ponty Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 I find that hard to believe. Where else can you get so much angst off your chest without recrimination?
J Bizzle Posted 20 August, 2009 Author Posted 20 August, 2009 From another thread, like **** did you average 94% doing history at Uni How didn't I? it's not exactly difficult to learn the facts and writing technique for the exams and assignments is it? Saying that it doesn't count towards my degree as it is the first year. Also it's ok, i'm back. Looks like the mod that banned me can't count.
thesaint sfc Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 How didn't I? it's not exactly difficult to learn the facts and writing technique for the exams and assignments is it? Saying that it doesn't count towards my degree as it is the first year. Also it's ok, i'm back. Looks like the mod that banned me can't count. Well if WSS wasn't such a tight wade, none of this would ever have happened. The mod involved would have had enough budget to buy a calculator. This is entirely his fault, and everything else in society/the world.
Saints11 Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 How didn't I? it's not exactly difficult to learn the facts and writing technique for the exams and assignments is it? Saying that it doesn't count towards my degree as it is the first year. Also it's ok, i'm back. Looks like the mod that banned me can't count. Well from one historian to another you should know history is not a set of facts. Obviously dates, and people are facts but that leaves alot to interpretation. For example, the 'lazy Dictator' image of Hitler, or what was the cause of the Second World War, neither of these can be defined by one said event, we need to examine the signifiance of events and compare it with other actions, and draw a conclusion from that. This as you should know is called Historiography, and it is very interesting to see how academic historians disagree with each other when given the same set of 'facts' So you're telling me, when you write an essay you bring in all the histortiography on a said event, analyse it perfectly, and even make new ground and really ruffle some feathers?! Give over, if you were getting 94% you're work should be published!
Baj Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 Don't forget the 'uni' he's at. I think "Hitler was a bad man" and a picture drawn by a 5-year-old probably gets 85%
thesaint sfc Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 Don't forget the 'uni' he's at. I think "Hitler was a bad man" and a picture drawn by a 5-year-old probably gets 85% I'm on the fence with this one.
J Bizzle Posted 20 August, 2009 Author Posted 20 August, 2009 Well from one historian to another you should know history is not a set of facts. Obviously dates, and people are facts but that leaves alot to interpretation. For example, the 'lazy Dictator' image of Hitler, or what was the cause of the Second World War, neither of these can be defined by one said event, we need to examine the signifiance of events and compare it with other actions, and draw a conclusion from that. This as you should know is called Historiography, and it is very interesting to see how academic historians disagree with each other when given the same set of 'facts' So you're telling me, when you write an essay you bring in all the histortiography on a said event, analyse it perfectly, and even make new ground and really ruffle some feathers?! Give over, if you were getting 94% you're work should be published! God, you took that bite, of course I didn't get that. I was 10% lower than that, If I had 94% it would show I never go out and get ****ed off my ****ing tits 4 nights of the week. If I chose to stay in and read books like a **** then I would probably be able to get over 90%. I did average 96% in A levels which were a piece of ****.
norwaysaint Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 God, you took that bite, of course I didn't get that. I was 10% lower than that, If I had 94% it would show I never go out and get ****ed off my ****ing tits 4 nights of the week. If I chose to stay in and read books like a **** then I would probably be able to get over 90%. I did average 96% in A levels which were a piece of ****. It's that kind of graceful climbdown after being shown up for talking rubbish that makes you so popular on this forum.
Deppo Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 I guess he got b-anned because he had an opinion. It might have been an ill-informed, racist, bigotted one, but hey, at least he had one, unlike AFoM, Norwegian Stain, Wilstshire C*nt, Spastic Stain, Tiggs D1ckhead etc etc, who tend to just agree with what Ponty has to say.... Maybe they just share the same opinion as Ponty, you tool.
Saints11 Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 God, you took that bite, of course I didn't get that. I was 10% lower than that, If I had 94% it would show I never go out and get ****ed off my ****ing tits 4 nights of the week. If I chose to stay in and read books like a **** then I would probably be able to get over 90%. I did average 96% in A levels which were a piece of ****. Im glad we've agreed you talk ********, and no you were not 10% lower than that, you were not getting 84% :-) Pull the other one.
View From The Top Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 I guess he got b-anned because he had an opinion. It might have been an ill-informed, racist, bigotted one, but hey, at least he had one, unlike AFoM, Norwegian Stain, Wilstshire C*nt, Spastic Stain, Tiggs D1ckhead etc etc, who tend to just agree with what Ponty has to say.... Very true. Those mongs response to any opinion on immigration that differs from their own, often ill thought out position, is "you're a racist". Some excellent debates in The Lounge have been ruined by their student like "yet but, no but, anyway your a racist" posts. The chances are though that they'll never breed, which can only be a good thing.
RonManager Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 Very true. Those mongs response to any opinion on immigration that differs from their own, often ill thought out position, is "you're a racist". Some excellent debates in The Lounge have been ruined by their student like "yet but, no but, anyway your a racist" posts. The chances are though that they'll never breed, which can only be a good thing. Oh now your just being 'breedist' - hang your head in shame!
Smirking_Saint Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 Well from one historian to another you should know history is not a set of facts. Obviously dates, and people are facts but that leaves alot to interpretation. For example, the 'lazy Dictator' image of Hitler, or what was the cause of the Second World War, neither of these can be defined by one said event, we need to examine the signifiance of events and compare it with other actions, and draw a conclusion from that. This as you should know is called Historiography, and it is very interesting to see how academic historians disagree with each other when given the same set of 'facts' So you're telling me, when you write an essay you bring in all the histortiography on a said event, analyse it perfectly, and even make new ground and really ruffle some feathers?! Give over, if you were getting 94% you're work should be published! He was probably doing GCSE's and got confused
Smirking_Saint Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 It's that kind of graceful climbdown after being shown up for talking rubbish that makes you so popular on this forum. :smt041 lol
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 To be fair Ponty is ALWAYS right... But Corp Ho is righter. . . . . or maybe not.
Guest Dark Sotonic Mills Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 But Corp Ho is righter. . . . . or maybe not. If you changed that to Lighter, I might agree...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 But Corp Ho is righter. . . . . or maybe not. If you changed that to Lighter, I might agree... Bliddy hell! Almost anyone on here is lighter than me!
Jillyanne Posted 20 August, 2009 Posted 20 August, 2009 Bliddy hell! Almost anyone on here is lighter than me! Are you massive?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now