Jump to content

What a suprise


J Bizzle
 Share

Recommended Posts

Actually, professor, I didn't delete your thread, and according to your profile, you have 18 infraction points, bit odd how the forum didnt automatically ban you.

 

Want to take this opportunity to say goodbye to all your friends first?

 

(Ironic that if you hadn't started this thread, I probably wouldnt have manually checked your infraction points)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, professor, I didn't delete your thread, and according to your profile, you have 18 infraction points, bit odd how the forum didnt automatically ban you.

 

Want to take this opportunity to say goodbye to all your friends first?

 

(Ironic that if you hadn't started this thread, I probably wouldnt have manually checked your infraction points)

 

Who did then? I hope you ensured Robsk was infracted? I would have been. I had a ban because I explained my reasons to why muslims were not a race, they were a religion and DSM seems to think that I was racist by saying they were not a race and those points have not expired. Think they expire in January.

 

At the moment, I believe I have 4 infraction points after the ban after the gong thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

J Bizzle was a good poster, why ban him?

 

To stop him whining all the time?

 

he was one of the few that spoke real sense around here

 

oh, no, wait, he talked sh*t

 

I guess he got b-anned because he had an opinion.

 

It might have been an ill-informed, racist, bigotted one, but hey, at least he had one, unlike AFoM, Norwegian Stain, Wilstshire C*nt, Spastic Stain, Tiggs D1ckhead etc etc, who tend to just agree with what Ponty has to say....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess he got b-anned because he had an opinion.

 

It might have been an ill-informed, racist, bigotted one, but hey, at least he had one, unlike AFoM, Norwegian Stain, Wilstshire C*nt, Spastic Stain, Tiggs D1ckhead etc etc, who tend to just agree with what Ponty has to say....

 

To be fair Ponty is ALWAYS right...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mods on this place are on some mega power trip they ban people for no reason or explanation.

Apart from the infraction warnings that tell them what post, what content, what thread, what time, reason for banning, infraction points and who applied the ban I completely agree. Bastards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess he got b-anned because he had an opinion.

 

It might have been an ill-informed, racist, bigotted one, but hey, at least he had one, unlike AFoM, Norwegian Stain, Wilstshire C*nt, Spastic Stain, Tiggs D1ckhead etc etc, who tend to just agree with what Ponty has to say....

When are you going to front up your £5, WSS. I miss you being around the place so much. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From another thread, like **** did you average 94% doing history at Uni

How didn't I? it's not exactly difficult to learn the facts and writing technique for the exams and assignments is it?

 

Saying that it doesn't count towards my degree as it is the first year.

 

 

Also it's ok, i'm back. Looks like the mod that banned me can't count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How didn't I? it's not exactly difficult to learn the facts and writing technique for the exams and assignments is it?

 

Saying that it doesn't count towards my degree as it is the first year.

 

 

Also it's ok, i'm back. Looks like the mod that banned me can't count.

 

Well if WSS wasn't such a tight wade, none of this would ever have happened. The mod involved would have had enough budget to buy a calculator. This is entirely his fault, and everything else in society/the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How didn't I? it's not exactly difficult to learn the facts and writing technique for the exams and assignments is it?

 

Saying that it doesn't count towards my degree as it is the first year.

 

 

Also it's ok, i'm back. Looks like the mod that banned me can't count.

 

Well from one historian to another you should know history is not a set of facts. Obviously dates, and people are facts but that leaves alot to interpretation.

 

For example, the 'lazy Dictator' image of Hitler, or what was the cause of the Second World War, neither of these can be defined by one said event, we need to examine the signifiance of events and compare it with other actions, and draw a conclusion from that.

 

This as you should know is called Historiography, and it is very interesting to see how academic historians disagree with each other when given the same set of 'facts'

 

So you're telling me, when you write an essay you bring in all the histortiography on a said event, analyse it perfectly, and even make new ground and really ruffle some feathers?! Give over, if you were getting 94% you're work should be published!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well from one historian to another you should know history is not a set of facts. Obviously dates, and people are facts but that leaves alot to interpretation.

 

For example, the 'lazy Dictator' image of Hitler, or what was the cause of the Second World War, neither of these can be defined by one said event, we need to examine the signifiance of events and compare it with other actions, and draw a conclusion from that.

 

This as you should know is called Historiography, and it is very interesting to see how academic historians disagree with each other when given the same set of 'facts'

 

So you're telling me, when you write an essay you bring in all the histortiography on a said event, analyse it perfectly, and even make new ground and really ruffle some feathers?! Give over, if you were getting 94% you're work should be published!

 

 

 

God, you took that bite, of course I didn't get that. I was 10% lower than that, If I had 94% it would show I never go out and get ****ed off my ****ing tits 4 nights of the week. If I chose to stay in and read books like a **** then I would probably be able to get over 90%. I did average 96% in A levels which were a piece of ****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God, you took that bite, of course I didn't get that. I was 10% lower than that, If I had 94% it would show I never go out and get ****ed off my ****ing tits 4 nights of the week. If I chose to stay in and read books like a **** then I would probably be able to get over 90%. I did average 96% in A levels which were a piece of ****.

 

 

It's that kind of graceful climbdown after being shown up for talking rubbish that makes you so popular on this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess he got b-anned because he had an opinion.

 

It might have been an ill-informed, racist, bigotted one, but hey, at least he had one, unlike AFoM, Norwegian Stain, Wilstshire C*nt, Spastic Stain, Tiggs D1ckhead etc etc, who tend to just agree with what Ponty has to say....

 

Maybe they just share the same opinion as Ponty, you tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God, you took that bite, of course I didn't get that. I was 10% lower than that, If I had 94% it would show I never go out and get ****ed off my ****ing tits 4 nights of the week. If I chose to stay in and read books like a **** then I would probably be able to get over 90%. I did average 96% in A levels which were a piece of ****.

 

Im glad we've agreed you talk ********, and no you were not 10% lower than that, you were not getting 84% :-) Pull the other one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess he got b-anned because he had an opinion.

 

It might have been an ill-informed, racist, bigotted one, but hey, at least he had one, unlike AFoM, Norwegian Stain, Wilstshire C*nt, Spastic Stain, Tiggs D1ckhead etc etc, who tend to just agree with what Ponty has to say....

 

Very true.

 

Those mongs response to any opinion on immigration that differs from their own, often ill thought out position, is "you're a racist".

 

Some excellent debates in The Lounge have been ruined by their student like "yet but, no but, anyway your a racist" posts.

 

The chances are though that they'll never breed, which can only be a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very true.

 

Those mongs response to any opinion on immigration that differs from their own, often ill thought out position, is "you're a racist".

 

Some excellent debates in The Lounge have been ruined by their student like "yet but, no but, anyway your a racist" posts.

 

The chances are though that they'll never breed, which can only be a good thing.

 

Oh now your just being 'breedist' - hang your head in shame!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well from one historian to another you should know history is not a set of facts. Obviously dates, and people are facts but that leaves alot to interpretation.

 

For example, the 'lazy Dictator' image of Hitler, or what was the cause of the Second World War, neither of these can be defined by one said event, we need to examine the signifiance of events and compare it with other actions, and draw a conclusion from that.

 

This as you should know is called Historiography, and it is very interesting to see how academic historians disagree with each other when given the same set of 'facts'

 

So you're telling me, when you write an essay you bring in all the histortiography on a said event, analyse it perfectly, and even make new ground and really ruffle some feathers?! Give over, if you were getting 94% you're work should be published!

 

He was probably doing GCSE's and got confused

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dark Sotonic Mills
But Corp Ho is righter. . . . .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

or maybe not.

 

If you changed that to Lighter, I might agree...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...