saint lard Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/gosport/Pervert-bus-driver-is-jailed.5493286.jp 5 months is a disgrace. I had to phone the police on one occasion when some blokes climbed my balcony to get at him in his flat,they were making claims against him back then. The police arrived mob handed and gained entry without him being there,always thought it was strange that they never questioned myself over the events,even to ask for a description of the attempted intruders. His flat had cctv camers and copius alarm systems monitoring his flat and balcony,bit odd i thought. Wonder if the police had their beady eyes on him for a while. Just a tad disconcerting with having my 3 year old boy living right next door.If i had known,well...who knows... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 Sick C*nt. (not you ) So worrying that something like this can go completely un-noticed. Someone was murdered only 5 doors down from me a while ago, it's crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint lard Posted 31 July, 2009 Author Share Posted 31 July, 2009 (edited) he can return to his original abode once he has finished his sentence according to a recent telephone call from the local constabulary.....well that's just dandy. Unless it was rented from the council,which i don't think it is as they are privately owned or rented,as the council would probably choose to re-house him elsewhere. Edited 31 July, 2009 by saint lard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedAndWhite91 Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 Sicko, should be banged up for life, at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint in Paradise Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 he can return to his original abode once he has finished his sentence according to a recent telephone call from the local constabulary.....well that's just dandy. Unless it was rented from the council,which i don't think it is as they are privately owned or rented,as the council would probably choose to re-house him elsewhere. Don't get violent with him or you will end up inside for a lot longer than he got mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sotonjoe Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 "I've got this neighbour right ... " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jillyanne Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 Move out of a PO postcode, sorted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sotonjoe Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 And on a related note ... yuck Not the usual reaction from a wife upon finding out hubby is a paedophile.:confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 And on a related note ... yuck Not the usual reaction from a wife upon finding out hubby is a paedophile.:confused: husband Martin - who has since killed himself Not all bad news from that story though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sotonjoe Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 husband Martin - who has since killed himself Not all bad news from that story though. true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PompeyLass Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 Move out of a PO postcode, sorted. So there's none whatsoever in an SO postcode ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 So there's none whatsoever in an SO postcode ? Nope, it is well known the PO postcode stands for Pead O's. HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 Nope, it is well known the PO postcode stands for Pead O's. HTH I know it's not tms, but isn't paulsgrove the place where all paediatricians hang out, and that is a PO postcode: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/aug/30/childprotection.society so don't you go starting on us pompeylass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponty Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 I know it's not tms, but isn't paulsgrove the place where all paediatricians hang out, and that is a PO postcode: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/aug/30/childprotection.society so don't you go starting on us pompeylass Did you actually read that link before you posted it? Go back and have another look. I'm not sure Gwent has a PO postcode. The Paulsgrove estate incident was something different altogether. FFS, how many Doctors would live on a Council estate in Paulsgrove? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kadeem Hardison Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 FFS, how many Doctors would live on a Council estate in Paulsgrove? Dr. Sulaiman Al-Fahim? He's so rich that he's got a detached house there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sotonjoe Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 So there's none whatsoever in an SO postcode ? Perhaps you could get one of your inbred vigilante groups to let us know ... when you've stopped sucking your brother off that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 31 July, 2009 Share Posted 31 July, 2009 Did you actually read that link before you posted it? Go back and have another look. I'm not sure Gwent has a PO postcode. The Paulsgrove estate incident was something different altogether. FFS, how many Doctors would live on a Council estate in Paulsgrove? Gwent is a very little know part of Paulsgrove. By the chippy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 1 August, 2009 Share Posted 1 August, 2009 Dr. Sulaiman Al-Fahim? He's so rich that he's got a detached house there. That's only because the council had to pull down the rest of the terrace either side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 1 August, 2009 Share Posted 1 August, 2009 And on a related note ... yuck Not the usual reaction from a wife upon finding out hubby is a paedophile.:confused: This sort of thing is totally over and above any conception of 'wifely duty' through love etc. It's just plain wrong and she should have been informing the O.B. so that they could trap this pathetic piece of crap long before he got going. How does a paedophile work on his Mrs to get her to help him procure these young innocents? Even though he may have held some sort of power over her she surely knew this was wrong? Sick *****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 1 August, 2009 Share Posted 1 August, 2009 This sort of thing is totally over and above any conception of 'wifely duty' through love etc. It's just plain wrong and she should have been informing the O.B. so that they could trap this pathetic piece of crap long before he got going. How does a paedophile work on his Mrs to get her to help him procure these young innocents? Even though he may have held some sort of power over her she surely knew this was wrong? Sick *****. It is horrible isn't it. I remember a programme on TV years ago, about how paedophiles 'know' which kids to prey on, which poor little souls won't 'tell', they even recognise other paedophiles in the street apparently. Such a horrible, horrible crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 1 August, 2009 Share Posted 1 August, 2009 It is horrible isn't it. I remember a programme on TV years ago, about how paedophiles 'know' which kids to prey on, which poor little souls won't 'tell', they even recognise other paedophiles in the street apparently. Such a horrible, horrible crime. I wish that I could identify a paedophile on the street, at least I could warn my kids to avoid them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 1 August, 2009 Share Posted 1 August, 2009 I wish that I could identify a paedophile on the street, at least I could warn my kids to avoid them. Just a smuch i wouldn't want one living down my street, I also wouldn't want one to live down your's or anyone else's street ESB. This is why it can be risky to hound them out of town ala vigilante method. They can disappear. It's a toughie (not) but I really do think that they should be kept locked away and can understand why some would want them dead, although I can't bring myself to agree with the death penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robsk II Posted 1 August, 2009 Share Posted 1 August, 2009 You can identify them, apparently. Middle aged or older men, greasy hair, either sort of like Danny DeVito fat, or drawn out and leathery skinned Long coat or dirty looking jumper, shifty looking. Live alone. ALL paedos. Despite this being an understandably emotive issue, people should try to remain objective as possible in their assumptions and so on. People with that sexual inclination don't have an inborn ability to recognise each other or have a sixth sense telling them which children are good 'prey'. Those that allow themselves to offend in this way simply learn to have an idea via observation and so on, surely. Of course no-one wants 'one of them' living on their street, but nor do I want burglars, murderers, fraudsters, gangsters - c*nts in general on mine. It's a nonsense to paint all of them with the same brush. Like it or not, there are probably plenty of people out there with societally and legally unacceptable sexual inclinations, involving children or otherwise. Many adhere to social convention and are never a threat to anyone. It's the ones who don't have normal social understandings and behaviours that are a concern, and the ones who go as far as to be pre-meditated and so on that are the real risk. I for one fully believe it's essentially an illness, and while I accept it is not one that should be allowed to impact on others, I don't agree with the vociferous silliness this tends to provoke. Admittedly, I don't yet have kids, but when I do I hope to be sensible about risks, and not listen to scaremongering and reactionary rubbish. I think anyone who is a risk should be removed from a position where they can harm and exploit others, but the death penalty is a farcical concept. If we can identify mental health and other issues that lead people to kill, and try to understand and deal with that reasonably, in the case of murder, we should endeavour to do the same in other crimes too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint lard Posted 1 August, 2009 Author Share Posted 1 August, 2009 (edited) You can identify them, apparently. Middle aged or older men, greasy hair, either sort of like Danny DeVito fat, or drawn out and leathery skinned Long coat or dirty looking jumper, shifty looking. Live alone. ALL paedos. Despite this being an understandably emotive issue, people should try to remain objective as possible in their assumptions and so on. People with that sexual inclination don't have an inborn ability to recognise each other or have a sixth sense telling them which children are good 'prey'. Those that allow themselves to offend in this way simply learn to have an idea via observation and so on, surely. Of course no-one wants 'one of them' living on their street, but nor do I want burglars, murderers, fraudsters, gangsters - c*nts in general on mine. It's a nonsense to paint all of them with the same brush. Like it or not, there are probably plenty of people out there with societally and legally unacceptable sexual inclinations, involving children or otherwise. Many adhere to social convention and are never a threat to anyone. It's the ones who don't have normal social understandings and behaviours that are a concern, and the ones who go as far as to be pre-meditated and so on that are the real risk. I for one fully believe it's essentially an illness, and while I accept it is not one that should be allowed to impact on others, I don't agree with the vociferous silliness this tends to provoke. Admittedly, I don't yet have kids, but when I do I hope to be sensible about risks, and not listen to scaremongering and reactionary rubbish. I think anyone who is a risk should be removed from a position where they can harm and exploit others, but the death penalty is a farcical concept. If we can identify mental health and other issues that lead people to kill, and try to understand and deal with that reasonably, in the case of murder, we should endeavour to do the same in other crimes too. You knew him too ? Edited 1 August, 2009 by saint lard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robsk II Posted 1 August, 2009 Share Posted 1 August, 2009 Yeah, dirty ****ing paedo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 1 August, 2009 Share Posted 1 August, 2009 You can identify them, apparently. Middle aged or older men, greasy hair, either sort of like Danny DeVito fat, or drawn out and leathery skinned Long coat or dirty looking jumper, shifty looking. Live alone. ALL paedos. Despite this being an understandably emotive issue, people should try to remain objective as possible in their assumptions and so on. People with that sexual inclination don't have an inborn ability to recognise each other or have a sixth sense telling them which children are good 'prey'. Those that allow themselves to offend in this way simply learn to have an idea via observation and so on, surely. Of course no-one wants 'one of them' living on their street, but nor do I want burglars, murderers, fraudsters, gangsters - c*nts in general on mine. It's a nonsense to paint all of them with the same brush. Like it or not, there are probably plenty of people out there with societally and legally unacceptable sexual inclinations, involving children or otherwise. Many adhere to social convention and are never a threat to anyone. It's the ones who don't have normal social understandings and behaviours that are a concern, and the ones who go as far as to be pre-meditated and so on that are the real risk. I for one fully believe it's essentially an illness, and while I accept it is not one that should be allowed to impact on others, I don't agree with the vociferous silliness this tends to provoke. Admittedly, I don't yet have kids, but when I do I hope to be sensible about risks, and not listen to scaremongering and reactionary rubbish. I think anyone who is a risk should be removed from a position where they can harm and exploit others, but the death penalty is a farcical concept. If we can identify mental health and other issues that lead people to kill, and try to understand and deal with that reasonably, in the case of murder, we should endeavour to do the same in other crimes too. Of course your description was totally tongue in cheek. They don't all look like monsters. While agreeing with your sentiments and logic in the cold light of day I will say now that if my child became a victim I think all logic would leave my mind and I would probably be more than happy to do both the crime and the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint lard Posted 1 August, 2009 Author Share Posted 1 August, 2009 Strange thing is,he spoke openly that he had been arrested,and always denied there was any truth in the rumours,not unsurprising i know,yet he must of known what we were thinking and yet he was still insistant of being close friends,i certainly hope that was not because of our little boy,yes that is being slightly nuerotic i suppose. I bumped into him in a supermarket,however much i tried to avoid him,he asked where i lived,as i had moved out,i foolishly let him know not thinking for one minute he would turn up on the doorstep,yet he did numerous times.I never answered the door. He seemed completely ignorant of the fact that we had suspicions of what he was like,this was due too past dealings with him as his behaviour was quite erratic and even violent on occasions,he was so blase about it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robsk II Posted 1 August, 2009 Share Posted 1 August, 2009 I can understand that ESB. Totally. Can't guarantee, in any way, that if my kids were actually involved, I wouldn't act in an extreme way - but in a way, that's the perogative of the victim(s).. freedom of choice in no longer being objective to being subjectively involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 1 August, 2009 Share Posted 1 August, 2009 I heard they all live on Fancia Drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robsk II Posted 1 August, 2009 Share Posted 1 August, 2009 What? That's not funny, even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 2 August, 2009 Share Posted 2 August, 2009 I think anyone who is a risk should be removed from a position where they can harm and exploit others, but the death penalty is a farcical concept. Other than in death they remain in a position to harm others apart from when they serve their insulting sentances for the heinous crimes they commit against the vulnerable in our society. I too agree it is an illness, one that is terminal and inoperable and as such should be euthanized or kept in solitary confinement for the rest of their natural lives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robsk II Posted 2 August, 2009 Share Posted 2 August, 2009 If you accept that they are safe from harming others within the penal system, surely a better way would simply be to discuss changes to that? Death serves no purpose, and I maintain it is not our right to take a life. If they are a danger to others, then remove them from their potential victims until (if ever) they are not. If they are in an adult jail, they are no risk, so solitary serves no purpose and is unneccesary cruelty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 2 August, 2009 Share Posted 2 August, 2009 If they are in an adult jail, they are no risk, so solitary serves no purpose and is unneccesary cruelty. It prevents them from getting off by exchanging stories with their kind within the same system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now