skintsaint Posted 22 July, 2009 Posted 22 July, 2009 No, you're right he is 'crap in the air' and 'lacks pace', as for his finishing that's poor as well. My apologies. He is a very poor singer though I'll give you that hate clips like this, to be honest if u filmed every goal ive scored in sunday league and put it into a 3min clip I would look like the worlds greatest striker
offix Posted 22 July, 2009 Posted 22 July, 2009 Like AP said in his interview: if you don't want to be here, we don't want you!
Arizona Posted 22 July, 2009 Posted 22 July, 2009 To me it's all about whether he wants to be here. If he wants to be here, fantastic IMO. He could be brilliant in L1. If he doesn't then he can move on, and I wish him well. Same as DMG, Surman or Davis if he'd gone to Wham. I just don't get people claiming he's crap when he just blatently isn't. Underperforming and unmotivated maybe, but he has the tallent. The guy was playing in the Champs League last season and managed to get amongst the goals. He scored at a higher rate than DMG and for some weird reason John only seems to score with Saga on the pitch. We know he can score in a decent team, but our midfield was just crap last year. If you've got a crap midfield and a decent striker, my logic would be to improve the midfield. For others it seems the solution is to get rid of said striker. Maybe we need to balance the crapness of the team to remove some "dark chi". Who knows.
Greenridge Posted 22 July, 2009 Posted 22 July, 2009 To me it's all about whether he wants to be here. If he wants to be here, fantastic IMO. He could be brilliant in L1. If he doesn't then he can move on, and I wish him well. Same as DMG, Surman or Davis if he'd gone to Wham. I just don't get people claiming he's crap when he just blatently isn't. Underperforming and unmotivated maybe, but he has the tallent. The guy was playing in the Champs League last season and managed to get amongst the goals. He scored at a higher rate than DMG and for some weird reason John only seems to score with Saga on the pitch. We know he can score in a decent team, but our midfield was just crap last year. If you've got a crap midfield and a decent striker, my logic would be to improve the midfield. For others it seems the solution is to get rid of said striker. Maybe we need to balance the crapness of the team to remove some "dark chi". Who knows. Sums up how I see it also. PS skintsaint suggest you send your vid to AP pdq
Redondo Saint Posted 22 July, 2009 Posted 22 July, 2009 Yeah, but I also "remember" ART spouting 3,000 parts utter nonsense to every one useful piece of information, so I think the "infinite number of monkeys" clause probably applies here. On the Saga front, if we can get a psychologist to persuade him he's playing for a contract, keep him. If not, wave goodbye - in fact preferably send him on loan to them first, so he can up his value by playing for a contract before January, THEN sell him and watch him disappear again. Solution Found!
Redondo Saint Posted 22 July, 2009 Posted 22 July, 2009 Sums up how I see it also. PS skintsaint suggest you send your vid to AP pdq Me thinks you should send your vid to Sturrock...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now