mack rill Posted 29 August, 2011 Share Posted 29 August, 2011 What a f()cking sh1thole that ground is... just looked through that stadium tour pictures... It's good that you get an authentic matchday experience though, what with all those empty blue seats that greet you when you emerge from the rat tunnel... Well thats a surprise, Crabby havin all the shovel n givin it large about our home, And come the 17th he-all want to visit, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crab Lungs Posted 29 August, 2011 Share Posted 29 August, 2011 Well thats a surprise, Crabby havin all the shovel n givin it large about our home, And come the 17th he-all want to visit, I've run the Fratton gauntlet before and I'll run it again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 29 August, 2011 Share Posted 29 August, 2011 Well thats a surprise, Crabby havin all the shovel n givin it large about our home, And come the 17th he-all want to visit, This time we'll not be standing in the rain, listening to the sirens wail as your bestsest fans destroy any part of your town that they can get their hands on. You've covered the visitors section so we'll just have to listen out for those sirens this time as your local area gets 'improved' again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mack rill Posted 29 August, 2011 Share Posted 29 August, 2011 This time we'll not be standing in the rain, listening to the sirens wail as your bestsest fans destroy any part of your town that they can get their hands on. You've covered the visitors section so we'll just have to listen out for those sirens this time as your local area gets 'improved' again. It-all not appen again, them Nawty boys were well sorted by Madame Beak. Lots of Vaseline for nicotine exchanges, And after the Forecourt farce up your end maybe the f8ckin idiots from both sides will stay at home,,,,,You are rite you wont get p*ssed on But! just to make sure you get the full Fratton experience the s**thouse and food outlets are up to normal standards, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suewhistle Posted 29 August, 2011 Share Posted 29 August, 2011 I've run the Fratton gauntlet before and I'll run it again! I've only been once and that was for the testimonial for alan Knight (IIRC). Great experience: lumps of concrete chucked over the wall and kept in for ages. AK, bless 'im, was deeply embarassed and came over personally to thank us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 29 August, 2011 Share Posted 29 August, 2011 It-all not appen again, them Nawty boys were well sorted by Madame Beak. Lots of Vaseline for nicotine exchanges, And after the Forecourt farce up your end maybe the f8ckin idiots from both sides will stay at home,,,,,You are rite you wont get p*ssed on But! just to make sure you get the full Fratton experience the s**thouse and food outlets are up to normal standards, Just for those who have never donned galoshes and visited on previous occasions, will there be signs to explain the difference between these two parts of the ground? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mack rill Posted 29 August, 2011 Share Posted 29 August, 2011 Just for those who have never donned galoshes and visited on previous occasions, will there be signs to explain the difference between these two parts of the ground? that depends on how many of you stripes turn up, fill the away end and your gonna need waders, But at least it will be worm, as for refreshments,(you brave bastards) depends on how long before the last home game was,(we have the technology to reheat pies again and again) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldsaint Posted 30 August, 2011 Share Posted 30 August, 2011 I've only been once and that was for the testimonial for alan Knight (IIRC). Great experience: lumps of concrete chucked over the wall and kept in for ages. AK, bless 'im, was deeply embarassed and came over personally to thank us. Funnily enough I've only been there once and that was for a goalkeepers testimonial, John Milkins, 1969, scoreline Sh!tcity 0 Saints 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holepuncture Posted 31 August, 2011 Share Posted 31 August, 2011 It-all not appen again, them Nawty boys were well sorted by Madame Beak. Lots of Vaseline for nicotine exchanges, And after the Forecourt farce up your end maybe the f8ckin idiots from both sides will stay at home,,,,,You are rite you wont get p*ssed on But! just to make sure you get the full Fratton experience the s**thouse and food outlets are up to normal standards, Which begs the question, who is running the show? Has any of your super Supporters Conference ever bothered to ask the question? Lampit, who owns Fratton park; the russian mafia, virgin island tax dodge mafia or the gun running mafia? ta x Jacobs, Not Sure, Avram, Chinny, Storrie, Deepak... what a ****ing line up! looking at the birds eye view, and the information next to it... it would syuggest the gun runners are still well in control of things... as it states, areas 2,3,4,5 and 6 are under the control of the gun runnners - but no sale can be made without the express permission of barclays bank... it seems highly unlikely the russian mafia have got permission from the banks, for five individual mortgages, for around £6.795m, without anybody noticing - or even announcing it themselves... We know that gadymack is charging the club rent for the car park, and judging by the russian mafias other 'business' interests in the UK, they dont seem that concerned with property ownership... more concerned with buying as much positive profiling to cover up their disgusting past. And, on top of the £6.795m for the waste land around the ground, how much was the waste land of the ground valued at? £16m ish according to Chanrai! the russian mafia have just invested a staggering £100k in arena developments (to stop elf and safety closing it down all together) - which again suggests they are not particulary bothered about property, nor are they concerned with maintaining their crumbling £16m arena... So, well over £22m worth of land right there although it certainly cannot be considered an asset, it is quite clearly, in light of the £100k mega spend, a total ****ing LIABILITY... So, whos playing with the puppet? in the words of Corporate C*** , PMSL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mack rill Posted 31 August, 2011 Share Posted 31 August, 2011 That snap shot could of been taken at any ground in the country, Looks like a group of law abiding citizens taking in a footy match, and there side is loosing LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 31 August, 2011 Share Posted 31 August, 2011 and there side is loosing LOL How do you loose a football match? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 31 August, 2011 Share Posted 31 August, 2011 How do you loose a football match? Take it off the leash? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint si Posted 31 August, 2011 Share Posted 31 August, 2011 I see they're now signing 17 year olds from the Ryman league! Expect to see him on the bench for the rest of the season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corporate Ho Posted 31 August, 2011 Share Posted 31 August, 2011 What we did do was not spend any money. The only transfer fee was for Schneiderlin. This was for a maximum of Euro1.2m with almost nothing up front and based mostly on appearances. His wages were also tiny. All the others that came in were rock bottom free transfers, again on rock bottom wages. Also none of the loans incurred loan fees. None were high wage earners either. We brought these budget players in and let all senior players (we could) go out to reduce the wage bill. I honestly don't think we could have done much more to reduce the wage bill. You could say the same I suppose, except BTH on £38k a week kind of ****s that up for you. I personally didn't have a massive problem with what Lowe did. He had no choice after the previous chairman completely ****ed us. That regime did gamble and lost - similar to yourselves, but as soon as we lost we cut our cloth in order to pay our debts, tax and mortgage. There ends the similarity as you just continued to spend. Do you not agree that was the case? But you did spend money. You bought Scheiderlin. It may have been in installments as were the deals for the players we brought in but you bought him nonetheless. You also brought free transfers like Wotton, Holmes, Molyneaux & Ryan Smith. And if there were no signing on fees or agents fees involved that would be a first in football. We sold £43m worth of players, not to mention desperately trying to offload the likes of Nugent (who we loaned out anyway) and Utaka. Would you not call that cutting our cloth? As for bringing players in, did you really expect us not to at least bring in some replacements for the ones we sold for £43m and released on frees? TBH is on too much and it was a crap deal that should have had a relegation clause added but that's one deal. So we brought a few players in, it was hardly spending like there was no tomorrow. Can you not see that £43m in player sales and the SKY money should have been more than enough to fund these players AND pay off whatever debts we had at this time (or at least reduce them significantly) to where admin wouldn't have been needed and we could have survived comfortably on the parachute payments? It's the one that Saints fans always turn a blind eye to Which begs the question, who is running the show? Has any of your super Supporters Conference ever bothered to ask the question? Lampit, who owns Fratton park; the russian mafia, virgin island tax dodge mafia or the gun running mafia? ta x Jacobs, Not Sure, Avram, Chinny, Storrie, Deepak... what a ****ing line up! looking at the birds eye view, and the information next to it... it would syuggest the gun runners are still well in control of things... as it states, areas 2,3,4,5 and 6 are under the control of the gun runnners - but no sale can be made without the express permission of barclays bank... it seems highly unlikely the russian mafia have got permission from the banks, for five individual mortgages, for around £6.795m, without anybody noticing - or even announcing it themselves... We know that gadymack is charging the club rent for the car park, and judging by the russian mafias other 'business' interests in the UK, they dont seem that concerned with property ownership... more concerned with buying as much positive profiling to cover up their disgusting past. And, on top of the £6.795m for the waste land around the ground, how much was the waste land of the ground valued at? £16m ish according to Chanrai! the russian mafia have just invested a staggering £100k in arena developments (to stop elf and safety closing it down all together) - which again suggests they are not particulary bothered about property, nor are they concerned with maintaining their crumbling £16m arena... So, well over £22m worth of land right there although it certainly cannot be considered an asset, it is quite clearly, in light of the £100k mega spend, a total ****ing LIABILITY... So, whos playing with the puppet? in the words of Corporate C*** , PMSL! Not sure what point you're trying to prove. CSI own Fratton Park, that was proved by looking at the land registry ages ago. As for the Gaydamaks "running the show" - how exactly? Gaydamak certainly owns the land around the ground but the ground's not going to be extended any time soon so how are they "running things". They get a rent for the car park - whoopee doo. If (and that's a big if) CSI decide to redevelop Fratton then maybe they'll buy the land. Until then, why bother? Gaydamak's not going to do anything with it. the council won't approve planning permission for a supermarket if it impacts on the ability to expand the ground in the future otherwise he'd have sold it ages ago. It's an impasse. Neither group has the upper hand. So, what was it you were trying to prove? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eurosaint Posted 31 August, 2011 Share Posted 31 August, 2011 But you did spend money. You bought Scheiderlin. It may have been in installments as were the deals for the players we brought in but you bought him nonetheless. You also brought free transfers like Wotton, Holmes, Molyneaux & Ryan Smith. And if there were no signing on fees or agents fees involved that would be a first in football. We sold £43m worth of players, not to mention desperately trying to offload the likes of Nugent (who we loaned out anyway) and Utaka. Would you not call that cutting our cloth? As for bringing players in, did you really expect us not to at least bring in some replacements for the ones we sold for £43m and released on frees? TBH is on too much and it was a crap deal that should have had a relegation clause added but that's one deal. So we brought a few players in, it was hardly spending like there was no tomorrow. Can you not see that £43m in player sales and the SKY money should have been more than enough to fund these players AND pay off whatever debts we had at this time (or at least reduce them significantly) to where admin wouldn't have been needed and we could have survived comfortably on the parachute payments? It's the one that Saints fans always turn a blind eye to Not sure what point you're trying to prove. CSI own Fratton Park, that was proved by looking at the land registry ages ago. As for the Gaydamaks "running the show" - how exactly? Gaydamak certainly owns the land around the ground but the ground's not going to be extended any time soon so how are they "running things". They get a rent for the car park - whoopee doo. If (and that's a big if) CSI decide to redevelop Fratton then maybe they'll buy the land. Until then, why bother? Gaydamak's not going to do anything with it. the council won't approve planning permission for a supermarket if it impacts on the ability to expand the ground in the future otherwise he'd have sold it ages ago. It's an impasse. Neither group has the upper hand. So, what was it you were trying to prove? That you are a bunch of lying, cheating crooks ! You remain 'guilty as charged', now Ho (for your own good!) give it a rest !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 31 August, 2011 Share Posted 31 August, 2011 I think it must have been Tanya Robbins and the storyteller that put that article together. It's the only explanation for why there are two number '4s' in the picture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derry Posted 31 August, 2011 Share Posted 31 August, 2011 It's probably of no interest to the Pompey people on here, as they don't seem to register it, even though it has been posted many times on here. THE £7M PRICE TO SETTLE THE MORTGAGE WAS IN PLACE LONG BEFORE THE LEIBHERRS BECAME INVOLVED. It was one of the first things that the Administrator found out in his first week. It was what Aviva wanted to settle not what was negotiated. How do I know? Fry told me, also that £15m would more than cover all the assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 31 August, 2011 Share Posted 31 August, 2011 So no big money signings for the turd burglars, where's all this ruskie money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eurosaint Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 So no big money signings for the turd burglars, where's all this ruskie money? It's down at the laundry at the moment, they only have to take in their ticket to collect it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corporate Ho Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 So no big money signings for the turd burglars, where's all this ruskie money? Broke Russian money launderers who have to run every deal past the FL so would find it tough to launder anything - expenditure in transfer window - £4.2m Super duper morally upstanding we've got billions and billions to spend courtesy of Liebherr's daughter we won't sell our best players honest guv Saints expenditure - £2.5m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 Broke Russian money launderers who have to run every deal past the FL so would find it tough to launder anything - expenditure in transfer window - £4.2m Super duper morally upstanding we've got billions and billions to spend courtesy of Liebherr's daughter we won't sell our best players honest guv Saints expenditure - £2.5m I guess it reflects which club has a strong squad and sits second in the table and which club could barely scrape together enough players for 5-a-side in training. Hurry up and make your 3 posts for the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 oh no, pompey have beaten us in the transfer window, what a disappointment! Sob, sob. If only Nige had been watching Lewes we could have scooped the non-league youngster who is coming in to replace the professional youngsters that Cotterill shipped out as he doesn't rate yoof. Damn that Cotterill, he beats us everytime - first Benjani who has bigger and saggier t!ts than Sam Fox, now this nobody! How annoying. How was that money-making friendly at Betis? Now they've managed to make a few quid out of the original idea they can give Havant back their £2K... Or has Ben Haim already spent it on tacky chrome wheel trims and cheap-looking tats? Back of the queue Havant, and it stretches from here to Aberdeen - yeah, get behind the taxpayers, the hospitals, small businesses and that cancer charity - as Ho proudly points out, pompey have spent your money on sh(t players instead. Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 Broke Russian money launderers who have to run every deal past the FL so would find it tough to launder anything - expenditure in transfer window - £4.2m Super duper morally upstanding we've got billions and billions to spend courtesy of Liebherr's daughter we won't sell our best players honest guv Saints expenditure - £2.5m £4.2m eh? That would pay off the whole first installment of the CVA wouldn't it, you know, the installment that you put back a year or so because you didn't have any money.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holepuncture Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 Broke Russian money launderers who have to run every deal past the FL so would find it tough to launder anything - expenditure in transfer window - £4.2m Super duper morally upstanding we've got billions and billions to spend courtesy of Liebherr's daughter we won't sell our best players honest guv Saints expenditure - £2.5m oh no, pompey have beaten us in the transfer window, what a disappointment! Sob, sob. If only Nige had been watching Lewes we could have scooped the non-league youngster who is coming in to replace the professional youngsters that Cotterill shipped out as he doesn't rate yoof. Damn that Cotterill, he beats us everytime - first Benjani who has bigger and saggier t!ts than Sam Fox, now this nobody! How annoying. How was that money-making friendly at Betis? Now they've managed to make a few quid out of the original idea they can give Havant back their £2K... Or has Ben Haim already spent it on tacky chrome wheel trims and cheap-looking tats? Back of the queue Havant, and it stretches from here to Aberdeen - yeah, get behind the taxpayers, the hospitals, small businesses and that cancer charity - as Ho proudly points out, pompey have spent your money on sh(t players instead. Nice. £4.2m eh? That would pay off the whole first installment of the CVA wouldn't it, you know, the installment that you put back a year or so because you didn't have any money.... Exactomondo chaps... This is where Corporates lack of intelligence fails him. After countless pages of desperate defences of his dirty little shanty club, he blows all his arguments away by demonstrating that the club is once again behaving like a shameless criminal. £4.2 million is a disgrace and has you as one of the biggest spenders in the league... AGAIN (although last time it was biggest wage expenditure - that may of course still be the case). I hope you remember this post when the Russian mafia and Chinny s*** on the (delayed) first CVA payment in 2012... remember that you are bragging that you have spunked the amount of money that should be allocated to the CVA on mercenary players and bonkers wages Shame on you Corp Shame on you, former Head of Football Integrity to the National Football Association, David Lampitt... double shame on you for sanctioning this, it is utterly disgusting and up there in the moral echelons of Peter Storrie. Shame on the Russian Mafia, although it comes as no surprise, these kind of morons have little respect for people, businesses or life (cancer charity). Shame on you Portsmouth Football Club, although it comes as no surprise, these kind of morons have little respect for people, businesses or life (cancer charity). And dont worry about Saints and our expenditure, we spent a couple of mill from the £12m Chambo cash in the bank, and we go about our business professionally, ethically and with absolute discretion. We are also very proud of our talented squad of exciting youngsters (with a handful of home growners from our fabulous academy) and committed, dedicated and experienced professionals (most who have committed for the long run, some even state they want to finish their careers at our fanatastic club). SHAME ON YOU, YOU DIRTY SKATE BASTARDS COYR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey-deacons-left-nut Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 whats going on with twitchys court case? It's been going on for months! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corporate Ho Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 oh no, pompey have beaten us in the transfer window, what a disappointment! Sob, sob. If only Nige had been watching Lewes we could have scooped the non-league youngster who is coming in to replace the professional youngsters that Cotterill shipped out as he doesn't rate yoof. Damn that Cotterill, he beats us everytime - first Benjani who has bigger and saggier t!ts than Sam Fox, now this nobody! How annoying. How was that money-making friendly at Betis? Now they've managed to make a few quid out of the original idea they can give Havant back their £2K... Or has Ben Haim already spent it on tacky chrome wheel trims and cheap-looking tats? Back of the queue Havant, and it stretches from here to Aberdeen - yeah, get behind the taxpayers, the hospitals, small businesses and that cancer charity - as Ho proudly points out, pompey have spent your money on sh(t players instead. Nice. £4.2m eh? That would pay off the whole first installment of the CVA wouldn't it, you know, the installment that you put back a year or so because you didn't have any money.... Exactomondo chaps... This is where Corporates lack of intelligence fails him. After countless pages of desperate defences of his dirty little shanty club, he blows all his arguments away by demonstrating that the club is once again behaving like a shameless criminal. £4.2 million is a disgrace and has you as one of the biggest spenders in the league... AGAIN (although last time it was biggest wage expenditure - that may of course still be the case). I hope you remember this post when the Russian mafia and Chinny s*** on the (delayed) first CVA payment in 2012... remember that you are bragging that you have spunked the amount of money that should be allocated to the CVA on mercenary players and bonkers wages Shame on you Corp Shame on you, former Head of Football Integrity to the National Football Association, David Lampitt... double shame on you for sanctioning this, it is utterly disgusting and up there in the moral echelons of Peter Storrie. Shame on the Russian Mafia, although it comes as no surprise, these kind of morons have little respect for people, businesses or life (cancer charity). Shame on you Portsmouth Football Club, although it comes as no surprise, these kind of morons have little respect for people, businesses or life (cancer charity). Sorry scumlettes, I wasn't "gloating" about anything. I was merely pointing out to one of your own who said CSI were broke that we'd spent some money in this transfer window. In fact, we needed to as we only had 8 players at the start of it. If you want to talk about lack of intelligence how about looking at some of your own posters like the ones saying one minute that only us and Stockport wanted Benjani and the next minute claiming we're paying him £30K a week - anyone see the slight problem with that one? And as all our deals have to be ratified by the FL and in line with the requirements of the CVA and the buisness plan CSI submitted to them when they bought us do you really see a problem with us actually getting a squad together? As for the CVA, I find it somewhat disheartening to have to remind you that it's a legal process and as such, a schedule of payments has been agreed with the creditors. Yes, Chainrai pushed that schedule back a year because he didn't want to pay it because he's a scumbag of the highest order but if CSI don't meet the payment schedules we'll be closed down. So we assume the first installment will be paid as scheduled - as the creditors have agreed. So please God stop bleating on about "this and that would have paid the CVA instalment" because the people owed the money have agreed when they'll be paid. As for the cancer charities, they've been paid. Sad that it happened but it's been done now As for Holepuncture, what was the point of your beautiful arty post about Gaydamak still owning the land? You never did tell us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 As for Holepuncture, what was the point of your beautiful arty post about Gaydamak still owning the land? You never did tell us at the same time why not tell us about, about the Chinese consortium, the stadium starting, the fact that you were not in massive debt,the 15k s/t sales, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaz Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 Cutting your coat to suit the cloth the Pompey way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 recently saw a copy of The News from 91. There was a big piece about pompey needing fratton developed, blaming the council for lack of support, and the backpage was 'Saints say no to groundshare' - mainly because we had our own plans for near the airport.... So a serious question - Is there a club other than pompey that can demonstrate such a consistently poor financial history right back through four decades? That's more than bad luck - its several generations of 'mismanagement' - the place is a magnet for dodgy businessmen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suewhistle Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 Broke Russian money launderers who have to run every deal past the FL so would find it tough to launder anything - expenditure in transfer window - £4.2m Super duper morally upstanding we've got billions and billions to spend courtesy of Liebherr's daughter we won't sell our best players honest guv Saints expenditure - £2.5m Ah, you're beginning to get it, honest people with business sense spend less than... posters like the ones saying one minute that only us and Stockport wanted Benjani and the next minute claiming we're paying him £30K a week - anyone see the slight problem with that one? Yes, Pompey are well known for overpaying, particularly when someone is getting a kick-back or laundering money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 £4.2m eh? Oh goodie. So now we know what the Russkies have spent in the window, we know how much they have left in their budget to fund the Operating costs Did anyone bother to google how much they spent on their F1 sponsorship last season? You know their "disposable income for investment into sport? I'd have thought that at least Corpy would have looked it up. Oh well, never mind, I gave you the chance to find independent confirmation. So, now let's work out how far the remaining 3.8mil of their budget will go this season covering all those wages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 As for the CVA, I find it somewhat disheartening to have to remind you that it's a legal process and as such, a schedule of payments has been agreed with the creditors. Yes, Chainrai pushed that schedule back a year because he didn't want to pay it because he's a scumbag of the highest order but if CSI don't meet the payment schedules we'll be closed down. So we assume the first installment will be paid as scheduled - as the creditors have agreed. As for the cancer charities, they've been paid. Sad that it happened but it's been done now Meanwhile, the rest of the world 'assume' that it will get put back for another year, after all, it's there in black and white that you can do so, and has been agreed by the mugs that voted on it. As for the cancer charities, I believe St Lard is/was involved with one, and the last we heard from him they HAD NOT been paid.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sevvy Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 http://www.newsnow.co.uk/A/516849888?-11209 Lampitt,Pompey still have unfinished business, He talks a good talk, http://www.newsnow.co.uk/A/516840711?-11209 Not been posted any where so have a laugh, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eurosaint Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 Sorry scumlettes, I wasn't "gloating" about anything. I was merely pointing out to one of your own who said CSI were broke that we'd spent some money in this transfer window. In fact, we needed to as we only had 8 players at the start of it. If you want to talk about lack of intelligence how about looking at some of your own posters like the ones saying one minute that only us and Stockport wanted Benjani and the next minute claiming we're paying him £30K a week - anyone see the slight problem with that one? And as all our deals have to be ratified by the FL and in line with the requirements of the CVA and the buisness plan CSI submitted to them when they bought us do you really see a problem with us actually getting a squad together? As for the CVA, I find it somewhat disheartening to have to remind you that it's a legal process and as such, a schedule of payments has been agreed with the creditors. Yes, Chainrai pushed that schedule back a year because he didn't want to pay it because he's a scumbag of the highest order but if CSI don't meet the payment schedules we'll be closed down. So we assume the first installment will be paid as scheduled - as the creditors have agreed. So please God stop bleating on about "this and that would have paid the CVA instalment" because the people owed the money have agreed when they'll be paid. As for the cancer charities, they've been paid. Sad that it happened but it's been done now As for Holepuncture, what was the point of your beautiful arty post about Gaydamak still owning the land? You never did tell us I'm sure that none of these creditors would want payment on the original CVA terms and would much prefer to wait a further 12 months as this was 'agreed' ? When people call you thick Ho, you really do tend to confirm it on a regular basis ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 I think its funny the way Corp trys to defend his clubs spending as it all being authorised by the FL. But thinking back didnt they pretty much have a squad of players and they deemed half of them not good enough so they let them go? That took them below the required squad limit so the FL allowed them to bring extra players in. So while not against the rules their actions stunk and looked like they were flicking the V's at every opertunity. The problem many of us have with them is not what they actually did, but the way they did it. The moral high ground sits well with us due to the way our club conducted its self when in the poo compared to pompey who did things anyway they could to improve thier position at the expence of anyone but them. So keep on with your approach Corp. Defend your club for acting within the rules. If you actually believed the morals of your club were right you wouldnt see the need to defend it. I think thats why a couple of the other resident pompey fans get some respect. They act in a similar way to what we did when we tried to get out of the points deduction. The rules stated the parent company went under so there should of been no points deduction. The club argued it and most fans agreed with the technicality of it but morally felt it was taking the P*ss so found it hard to properly defend it. Mero and Mack support their club but find it hard to defend some of its actions so steer clear. Happy they still have a club but would maybe like to re-write some of its history. The more smug you act in how your club has fleeced so many the less respect you earn. So technically (at least until the court cases finish) you havent cheated, but morraly you know as well as we do your club is as bent as the Blue Oyster bar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Munster Posted 1 September, 2011 Share Posted 1 September, 2011 Oh goodie. So now we know what the Russkies have spent in the window, we know how much they have left in their budget to fund the Operating costs Did anyone bother to google how much they spent on their F1 sponsorship last season? You know their "disposable income for investment into sport? I'd have thought that at least Corpy would have looked it up. Oh well, never mind, I gave you the chance to find independent confirmation. So, now let's work out how far the remaining 3.8mil of their budget will go this season covering all those wages. In fairness, the Cheats are very talented at stretching their wage budget further than what appears mathematically possible. Just ask Tal Ben Haim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctoroncall Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 Super duper morally upstanding we've got billions and billions to spend courtesy of Liebherr's daughter we won't sell our best players honest guv Saints expenditure - £2.5m As you don't know about Saints and as you're stated you cannot be bothered to find out about things don't guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 in fairness to Lampitt he's been doing pioneering work in the area of salary-capping. If you can't afford the contract the club agreed just pretend Tal Ben Haim isn't yours for six months - ignore him, don't answer his calls. This is basically the player loaning the club his ludicrous wages, but the short term saving is enough to give potential new owners the impression that the club is trading solvently. Win-win! Which is another term you don't hear too often down that way. You'll have to pay up eventually but this simple action will reinforce the impression that you are either insane or a bunch of crooks who refuse to address your own wagebill, let alone debt. But don't let the owners see the next set of accounts, they'll have a fit. Or they'll shoot you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corporate Ho Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 Oh goodie. So now we know what the Russkies have spent in the window, we know how much they have left in their budget to fund the Operating costs Did anyone bother to google how much they spent on their F1 sponsorship last season? You know their "disposable income for investment into sport? I'd have thought that at least Corpy would have looked it up. Oh well, never mind, I gave you the chance to find independent confirmation. So, now let's work out how far the remaining 3.8mil of their budget will go this season covering all those wages. PMSL. Is that how your business operates Philly? You have a budget one year and that's duplicated the next year, and the year after that, and the year after that? What a strange, tin pot little business that must be. Meanwhile, back in the real world, other companies change budget from year to year. They take funds from one area of the business and use it in another where they want more focus at that time. Still, if you're saying that's it, I assume, with your wealth of business knowledge and understanding of budgetary allocation and control you must be right. £3.8m and lights out it is Oh, by the way, is Antonov not going to use the EIB loan to SAAB to fund us any more? What happend to that juicy little tidbit that you kept throwing out in your usual "aw shucks, I'm not ITK but here's some more incredible info I've been told by my contacts"? Meanwhile, the rest of the world 'assume' that it will get put back for another year, after all, it's there in black and white that you can do so, and has been agreed by the mugs that voted on it. As for the cancer charities, I believe St Lard is/was involved with one, and the last we heard from him they HAD NOT been paid.... Lampitt said back in January they've been paid. I posted the link. If that's not correct, why not get the media on the case and prove it's wrong. Do you really think he'd publically say they've been paid if they hadn't after the (absolutely valid) outcry? Or maybe we should believe a Saints fan on a mesageboard who I'm sure is completely impartial on the subject I'm sure that none of these creditors would want payment on the original CVA terms and would much prefer to wait a further 12 months as this was 'agreed' ? When people call you thick Ho, you really do tend to confirm it on a regular basis ! I'm sure they'd like their money back ASAP and I hope they all get it ASAP. My point was they signed on to alegal process which is still in place. That's not defending anyone, just pointing out the facts. I think its funny the way Corp trys to defend his clubs spending as it all being authorised by the FL. But thinking back didnt they pretty much have a squad of players and they deemed half of them not good enough so they let them go? That took them below the required squad limit so the FL allowed them to bring extra players in. So while not against the rules their actions stunk and looked like they were flicking the V's at every opertunity. The problem many of us have with them is not what they actually did, but the way they did it. The moral high ground sits well with us due to the way our club conducted its self when in the poo compared to pompey who did things anyway they could to improve thier position at the expence of anyone but them. So keep on with your approach Corp. Defend your club for acting within the rules. If you actually believed the morals of your club were right you wouldnt see the need to defend it. I think thats why a couple of the other resident pompey fans get some respect. They act in a similar way to what we did when we tried to get out of the points deduction. The rules stated the parent company went under so there should of been no points deduction. The club argued it and most fans agreed with the technicality of it but morally felt it was taking the P*ss so found it hard to properly defend it. Mero and Mack support their club but find it hard to defend some of its actions so steer clear. Happy they still have a club but would maybe like to re-write some of its history. The more smug you act in how your club has fleeced so many the less respect you earn. So technically (at least until the court cases finish) you havent cheated, but morraly you know as well as we do your club is as bent as the Blue Oyster bar. I'm not acting smug, I'm not defending the club, just trying to correct so much inaccurate crap that you ****s keep posting on here. If CSI don't pay the CVA payments on schedule I'm sure the FL will impose some sort of sanction on us, possibly close us down. But until then, it seems as though they have cash so let's wait and see if they choose not to make the payments on schedule. As for your fans "finding it hard to defend" your lot trying to weasel out of a points deduction, what a complete load of crap. This board was full of your fans saying it was an outrage and talking about legal action. If you want to talk about rewriting history, let's start there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingeletiss Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 PMSL. Meanwhile, back in the real world, other companies change budget from year to year. They take funds from one area of the business and use it in another where they want more focus at that time. Like your grotty club taking from the tax man, and charity organisations! Lampitt said back in January they've been paid. I posted the link. If that's not correct, why not get the media on the case and prove it's wrong. Do you really think he'd publically say they've been paid if they hadn't after the (absolutely valid) outcry? Or maybe we should believe a Saints fan on a mesageboard who I'm sure is completely impartial on the subject Maybe, in turn, we should believe the weird webbed one, who is without doubt is singular in his loyalty and views! I'm sure they'd like their money back ASAP and I hope they all get it ASAP. My point was they signed on to alegal process which is still in place. That's not defending anyone, just pointing out the facts. You still haven't got it yet, have you. It might be 'legal', but it sure isn't moral!, and I'm not even sure is was legal, as your chairman's friend, sorry, I mean administrator, fixed the figures on the original vote I'm not acting smug, I'm not defending the club, just trying to correct so much inaccurate crap that you ****s keep posting on here. If CSI don't pay the CVA payments on schedule I'm sure the FL will impose some sort of sanction on us, possibly close us down. But until then, it seems as though they have cash so let's wait and see if they choose not to make the payments on schedule. You are, you always do. As for your fans "finding it hard to defend" your lot trying to weasel out of a points deduction, what a complete load of crap. This board was full of your fans saying it was an outrage and talking about legal action. If you want to talk about rewriting history, let's start there The points deduction was, by law, wrong, morally right, some would say yes. Whereas, you should of been closed down for your blatant cheating, whilst continuing to trade, when clearly insolvent. Poor old corp ho ho ho, still trolling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFrost Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 What happend to that juicy little tidbit that you kept throwing out in your usual "aw shucks, I'm not ITK but here's some more incredible info I've been told by my contacts"? Sorry, you're trying to lecture other people on this? I'll leave Javier Saviola and Diego Maradona to explain that one. Your trolling gets funnier by the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Duckhunter Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 http://www.portsmouthfc.co.uk/LatestNews/news/A-Message-From-The-Owners-2522.aspx The owners have spoken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 PMSL. Is that how your business operates Philly? You have a budget one year and that's duplicated the next year, and the year after that, and the year after that? What a strange, tin pot little business that must be. Meanwhile, back in the real world, other companies change budget from year to year. They take funds from one area of the business and use it in another where they want more focus at that time. Still, if you're saying that's it, I assume, with your wealth of business knowledge and understanding of budgetary allocation and control you must be right. £3.8m and lights out it is Oh, by the way, is Antonov not going to use the EIB loan to SAAB to fund us any more? What happend to that juicy little tidbit that you kept throwing out in your usual "aw shucks, I'm not ITK but here's some more incredible info I've been told by my contacts"? Lampitt said back in January they've been paid. I posted the link. If that's not correct, why not get the media on the case and prove it's wrong. Do you really think he'd publically say they've been paid if they hadn't after the (absolutely valid) outcry? Or maybe we should believe a Saints fan on a mesageboard who I'm sure is completely impartial on the subject I'm sure they'd like their money back ASAP and I hope they all get it ASAP. My point was they signed on to alegal process which is still in place. That's not defending anyone, just pointing out the facts. I'm not acting smug, I'm not defending the club, just trying to correct so much inaccurate crap that you ****s keep posting on here. If CSI don't pay the CVA payments on schedule I'm sure the FL will impose some sort of sanction on us, possibly close us down. But until then, it seems as though they have cash so let's wait and see if they choose not to make the payments on schedule. As for your fans "finding it hard to defend" your lot trying to weasel out of a points deduction, what a complete load of crap. This board was full of your fans saying it was an outrage and talking about legal action. If you want to talk about rewriting history, let's start there But the point is the rules stated meant that we should of got away with it. So legally we were within our rights to challenge it or expect to "get away with it". Cant remember too many on the forum actually thinking we were hard done by when we didnt get away with it though. Losing the radio station and insurance company made Saintsfc exclusive to the parent company which allowed the FL to bend the rules and dish out point anyway. I remember most people thining it sucked but probably deserved as other teams had been hit worse in the past. Then your lot come along making fools out of the Prem and creditors and come away with what seems a pretty week punishment followed by bending the rules as much as possible while the prem and FL bend over and take it. So we feel we got treated harsh but probably fair, and feel your lot got treated with kids gloves and didnt get whats coming to them. Hopefully the court cases will nail those that put football to shame and some form of punishment will reflect on all that went wrong in the past. Think its a long way off your club having a clean slate though. Wouldnt you rather your club had been run through the mill and earnt the respect of the footballing world by re-building after it had made roads into paying its debts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corporate Ho Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 Sorry, you're trying to lecture other people on this? I'll leave Javier Saviola and Diego Maradona to explain that one. Jack, you don't normally come across as a stupid guy but as I've constantly posted links proving I never claimed either of these would happen maybe I'm wrong. Here's an idea for the mods. To save everyone going over old ground, maybe there should be a sticky created, something along the lines of "Things dumbasses keep claiming CH has said but actually didn't" We could have the Maradona/ Saviola/ Riquelme one, the one where I apparently claimed the Harbour stadium would definitely be built, the one about my "Transfer Gossip" posts being me believing Pompey would actually sign all those players, the one about me being serious about Fahim being 10 times wealthier than Abramovic, oh, the list could go on and on I remember most people thining it sucked but probably deserved as other teams had been hit worse in the past. Then your lot come along making fools out of the Prem and creditors and come away with what seems a pretty week punishment followed by bending the rules as much as possible while the prem and FL bend over and take it. So we feel we got treated harsh but probably fair, and feel your lot got treated with kids gloves and didnt get whats coming to them. Hopefully the court cases will nail those that put football to shame and some form of punishment will reflect on all that went wrong in the past. Think its a long way off your club having a clean slate though. Wouldnt you rather your club had been run through the mill and earnt the respect of the footballing world by re-building after it had made roads into paying its debts? We went into administration and got the points penalty. How were we treated leniently? You lot seem to think that because Luton got docked 30 points that we should have also. Never mind that the circumstances were completely different. We got docked 9 points because those are the rules of the league we were in. You got docked points because whatever you may say about "legally" etc etc SLH was almost exclusively SFC and your club agreed to abide by the rules of the private members club (the FL) that created the rules. It's laughable when you lot say that all you want is "justice". You don't. You want to see Pompey punished because we're your rival. Other clubs have gone into administration and paid creditors far less in the £ than we are but there's no hysterical screaming about them. Nor are you foaming at the mouth about clubs like Leicester and Ipswich who both went into admin and got their new stadiums effectively free. Funny that. As for the "respect of the football world", WTF are you on about. Most football fans think we "did a Leeds", spent too much and went bust. There is no football wide consensus that we're cheats. We didn't win the cup because we cheated, buying players we couldn't afford. If that were the case other clubs who spent more than us would have won that year. We won because we had the luck of the draw, plain and simple. You're not upset because you're morally outraged at what happened. You're upset because it was Pompey and you use it as an excuse to beat us with on here when, let's face it, NO-ONE ELSE CARES. Admit that and I might even find a bit of respect for you prima donnas. Cue the cries of "just doesn't get it" ad nauseum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFrost Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 Jack, you don't normally come across as a stupid guy but as I've constantly posted links proving I never claimed either of these would happen maybe I'm wrong. Here's an idea for the mods. To save everyone going over old ground, maybe there should be a sticky created, something along the lines of "Things dumbasses keep claiming CH has said but actually didn't" We could have the Maradona/ Saviola/ Riquelme one, the one where I apparently claimed the Harbour stadium would definitely be built, the one about my "Transfer Gossip" posts being me believing Pompey would actually sign all those players, the one about me being serious about Fahim being 10 times wealthier than Abramovic, oh, the list could go on and on Saying "I didn't say that" a thousand times after people have posted quotes of you saying it doesn't prove you haven't said it. You no longer come across as a stupid guy, you come across as a troll pretending to be a stupid guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Depressed of Shirley Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 Well Corpy, you are right about one thing. We all hate both you, your cr*ppy club, and city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corporate Ho Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 Saying "I didn't say that" a thousand times after people have posted quotes of you saying it doesn't prove you haven't said it. I didn't just "say I didn't say it, I posted links showing exactly what I said and not what was being claimed. No-ones posted links to me saying ANY of the "quotes" I highlighted above Seems you find that concept a little challenging. Now where's Phil to get us back on track about the takeover by talking about how hot his girlfriend is. Three posts and out. Bye girls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eurosaint Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 Dear Corporate Ho, For pity's sake, give it a f#cking rest ! Life's too short ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View From The Top Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 Ho tries so hard but is just so, so, so sh*t at it. Complete and utter loser who we all sussed long ago. Take some advice, have a chat to your friend at the club, who you see socially every two weeks or so, as his news and insight has always been so precise and he maybe able to help you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holepuncture Posted 2 September, 2011 Share Posted 2 September, 2011 Maradona/ Saviola/ Riquelme Harbour Fahim being 10 times wealthier than Abramovic, oh, the list could go on and on Cue the cries of "just doesn't get it" ad nauseum Ho tries so hard but is just so, so, so sh*t at it. Complete and utter loser who we all sussed long ago. Take some advice, have a chat to your friend at the club, who you see socially every two weeks or so, as his news and insight has always been so precise and he maybe able to help you. People like Ho never get that far in life as they cant accept reality, and decide to defend to the death their argument. The inability to recognise morality, principles, ehtics, and the inability to admit failure, mistakes, f*** ups et al will always leave him at the bottom of the pile. I reckon hes a thirty something with a basic telesales job at TLC... lots of pent up aggression from reading transcripts and people calling him a timewaster/nuisance/c*** all day... especially as his mum dosent let him use the laptop very often etc... so this is his outlet for his rage, and I think he genuinely believes what he says, although the gold fish memory will have him denying his own statements a year or two down the line! In fairness to the filthy skate, he is one of the more literate portsea scumbags I have come across, although there aint many! Amusing statement from Vlad, Dubov and the ex-Leeds chappy - bigging up the arenas incredible £100k investment, saying they hope the fans will enjoy the new flushes on the ****ters, not having leaky gutters etc... really showing some ambition, a real statement of intent! Also, do they really have 'Academy' status? That would really surprise me, as I thought it was quite difficult to get the license, also considering the fact they dont have a training ground, clotters sacking all the kids and 'graduates' (Matt Richie) in exhange for benjanis, kanus et al. Matt Le God? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts