Pompey Takeover Saga

[Jimmy_D]

Heh...

 

You realise just signing in from a laptop instead of a computer would still show the same public IP address right?

 

Your Corp Ho nick always has the same address (or at least has the same address for a while) so you're on a broadband connection but don't have a static IP address. A laptop connected to that broadband connection would have the same IP address as far as the forum is concerned, it's the job of the router behind that public IP to sort stuff from the public side to the local area network (ie seperate computers like your laptop and computer). This is known as Network Address Translation.

 

So either you've not only paid the £5 for a seperate account, AND the montly fees for sperate internet access just to get a seperate IP address to hide behind... or you're lying.

 

I know which I think it is.

 

Just stop.

It's painful to watch.

You already had no credibility here.

I didn't think it was possible, but now you have even less.

[Saint_John]

Something has changed with the entry for the Court Case tomorrow.

Any ideas ?

1/ why the change to "********" for T20107431 ?

2/ what does "s39,CYPA 1993 & Contempt of Court Act 1981" mean, I thought the CYPA was short for "Children & Young Persons Act" (??)

 

 

 

When the Court Case started (31 May) I posted the following

Court Case

Southwark Crown Court Tuesday 31st May at 10:30

Court 7 - sitting at 10:30 AM BEFORE: HIS HONOUR JUDGE TESTAR

For Trial

T20107431 MANDARIC Milan 48C23003310

LINKED TO:

T20097808 STORRIE Peter 48C23015506 Order made under Contempt of Court Act 1981

LINKED TO:

T20107415 STORRIE Peter 48C60134910 Order made under Contempt of Court Act 1981

 

Yet tomorrow entry now say :-

Trial (Part Heard)

T20107431 ******** ***** ***********

Orders made under s39, CYPA 1933 & Contempt of Court Act 1981-

LINKED TO:

T20097808 STORRIE Peter 48C23015506 Order made under Contempt of Court Act 1981

T20107415 STORRIE Peter 48C60134910 Order made under Contempt of Court Act 1981

http://www.courtserve.net/courtlists/current/crown/sthwk_T110706.02.htm

[Gorgiesaint]

s39 of the Childrens & Young Persons Act 1933 relates to the protection of the identity of juvenile defendants in court - how does that relate to this case? maybe another reason there is a media blackout

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children_and_Young_Persons_Act_1933

[Corporate Ho]

Heh...

 

You realise just signing in from a laptop instead of a computer would still show the same public IP address right?

 

Your Corp Ho nick always has the same address (or at least has the same address for a while) so you're on a broadband connection but don't have a static IP address. A laptop connected to that broadband connection would have the same IP address as far as the forum is concerned, it's the job of the router behind that public IP to sort stuff from the public side to the local area network (ie seperate computers like your laptop and computer). This is known as Network Address Translation.

 

So either you've not only paid the £5 for a seperate account, AND the montly fees for sperate internet access just to get a seperate IP address to hide behind... or you're lying.

 

I know which I think it is.

 

Just stop.

It's painful to watch.

You already had no credibility here.

I didn't think it was possible, but now you have even less.

 

What if I used my wife's iPad and only posted via 3G instead of using our WiFi account, or from hotspots?

 

Oh Jimmy, you thought you were being so smart and superior. You thought you had me. Oh Jimmy. Jimmy, Jimmy ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

 

Thanks for answering my questions too girls. Were they THAT difficult?

 

Here's another question for you. Was our PL spending funded by money from Arkadi Gaydamak or not?

 

Think carefully before you answer

[JackFrost]

Sorry Gummy, things have moved on since Chainrai's pet poodle AA manipulated the system to his liking. You're right that when the CVA was agreed Chainrai received the club for nothing AND was still secured against his £17m loan. I commented at the time that it was a disgrace he was allowed to get both. Apparently the FL agreed with my thinking. There was a lot of petitioning by a number of Pompey fans groups and seeing as the FL were well aware of Chainrai's intentions all along they thankfully managed to stop it. You may remember a lot of noise going on around the granting of the golden share to PFC. What the FL said was that Chinny could either get the club or retain his secured status but not both - and they wouldn't grant the golden share unless he agreed. He made a lot of noise about folding the club but the FL had him over a barrel. Without the golden share he wouldn't get any cash. So he agreed.

 

 

 

If I want to view this forum I don't need to sign in. BUT, if I want to look at the main board I do have to. However, if I signed on from the laptop I use when posting as the ITK Saints fan whose posts have been well received (PMSL) the mods would have spotted that they had a shared ISP address and I'd have been rumbled. I logged in as CH so I could see the posts on the main board about what was happening and any reactions to my own posts on there.

 

Simple really

 

 

 

Are these the same ITK contacts who told you the CSI deal to buy Pompey was off and they were going back to buy Bournemouth instead? What was it you had been "led to believe" thats everal meetings had taken place between them and a deal was close" wasn't it? Or words to that effect. LOL

 

 

 

Most of the board apparently!!

 

Now, tear yourselves away from your infatuation and obsession with Pompey's CVA for a moment if you can (a CVA that, including the deferred payments, has been agreed by the creditors involved after all) and answer me a couple of questions:

 

1. If CSI wanted a football club to launder money through why buy Pompey, a club with more focus on it's financial dealings from the football authorities than any other club in the country? Does that sound like the kind of option a gang of what you're calling international criminals would do? Why wouldn't Antonov do it through one of the banks he owns or through one of the many other companies he and CSI own instead which could be done much more easily with much less focus?

 

2. If CSI have no money (another theory that's been levelled on here) how do they manage to own and operate such a diverse range of high profile companies?

 

3. What are the "absurd wages" Jack Frost confidently states we've agreed to pay David Norris? Come on Jack, explain how you got this ITK info

 

4. Do you understand the concept of the "transfer gossip" posts I used to make yet and that it wasn't a list of players I was boasting that Pompey were about to sign but just a list of "targets" from various websites and papers?

 

LOL at you nit picking at the smallest points and opinions on here and attempting to create a mountain out of a molehill to discredit people on here.

 

I have never said I have ITK info on David Norris' wages and you know it sunshine. The alarm bells should start ringing when your club can apparently afford players other teams can't, who also don't have a CVA to pay. (That's if you have any intention of paying it and I severely doubt it)

 

Why should the club's policy on Norris' wages be any different to the ludicrous pay packets you've been splurging on Lawrence/Kanu/Nugent et al. to stay still? I don't have a clue what Norris wages are I'm only speculating, but he wouldn't be earning a pittance if Ipswich couldn't afford to pay him.

 

As for the concept of "transfer gossip" posts, I didn't see you make too many of those. All of your posts about signing Saviola and Al0-Fahim being ten times richer than Abramovich came from "your contact"

 

As for your new owners you don't become as rich as Antonov or Abramovich in Russia through legitimate means. You just don't. The other thing you ask is why doesn't Antonov launder money through some of his other companies as opposed to Pompey. Hasn't it occurred to you the reason might be because he already has? The FSA have banned his bank from trading over here!

 

But no, you go and lap it all up. Just like you did with Peter Storrie LOL

[JackFrost]

What if I used my wife's iPad and only posted via 3G instead of using our WiFi account, or from hotspots?

 

Oh Jimmy, you thought you were being so smart and superior. You thought you had me. Oh Jimmy. Jimmy, Jimmy ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

 

Thanks for answering my questions too girls. Were they THAT difficult?

 

Here's another question for you. Was our PL spending funded by money from Arkadi Gaydamak or not?

 

Think carefully before you answer

 

You went to all that trouble to post on a messageboard to try and wind people up with multiple accounts?

 

My, you are smart and superior

[JackFrost]

In other news Leicester have signed David Nugent

[Jimmy_D]

What if I used my wife's iPad and only posted via 3G instead of using our WiFi account, or from hotspots?

 

Oh Jimmy, you thought you were being so smart and superior. You thought you had me. Oh Jimmy. Jimmy, Jimmy ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

 

Thanks for answering my questions too girls. Were they THAT difficult?

 

Here's another question for you. Was our PL spending funded by money from Arkadi Gaydamak or not?

 

Think carefully before you answer

 

If it was iPad you'd have said iPad instead of laptop.

 

If you're going out to wifi hotspots just to wind up people on a forum that's even funnier.

 

And if you're telling the truth your ITK transfer gossip is as likely to be accurate as any other ITK transfer gossip on here.

 

But you're not telling the truth, you clearly thought just using a different computer would result in a different IP address.

 

Changing your story to fit in with what you've just learned might work in a spoken argument sometimes, but it utterly falls down when all the facts are laid out and recorded, as you've already found out with the epic slam down you were a victim of the last time you disappeared.

 

Now... I have a question for you. Do you think the media have finished with Pompey yet? Are you confident that we won't be seeing more stories about how it all went wrong yet again?

[Micky]

What if I used my wife's iPad and only posted via 3G instead of using our WiFi account, or from hotspots?

 

Oh Jimmy, you thought you were being so smart and superior. You thought you had me. Oh Jimmy. Jimmy, Jimmy ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

 

 

Pleb, idiot, fool, tosser - you really do make the bluefew look totally clueless.

 

As I said, you have fellow pfc fans posting here - they, at least have credance.

 

You are nothing, nothing, but a lying idiot.

[Secret Site Agent]

In for a penny and all that.

[Gemmel]

Sorry Gummy, things have moved on since Chainrai's pet poodle AA manipulated the system to his liking. You're right that when the CVA was agreed Chainrai received the club for nothing AND was still secured against his £17m loan. I commented at the time that it was a disgrace he was allowed to get both. Apparently the FL agreed with my thinking. There was a lot of petitioning by a number of Pompey fans groups and seeing as the FL were well aware of Chainrai's intentions all along they thankfully managed to stop it. You may remember a lot of noise going on around the granting of the golden share to PFC. What the FL said was that Chinny could either get the club or retain his secured status but not both - and they wouldn't grant the golden share unless he agreed. He made a lot of noise about folding the club but the FL had him over a barrel. Without the golden share he wouldn't get any cash. So he agreed.

 

:)

Edited 5 July, 2011 by Gemmel

[Tamesaint]

What if I used my wife's iPad

 

Whaattt - there is a Mrs Corp Ho !!!! She has my sympathies. I think this must be one of the most amazing revelations in this thread.

 

I presume that there are no Corpettes - surely people like him are not allowed to breed!!!

Edited 5 July, 2011 by Tamesaint

[dubai_phil]

Corpy

 

Simple really

 

 

 

Originally Posted by dubai_phil

I managed to find a trail from Russia into the Baltics that led my "contacts" at great risk to themselves to find the secret mock-up of Poopey's new owner's new Arena plans. This undercover mission called for enormous strength and endurance

 

 

 

Are these the same ITK contacts who told you the CSI deal to buy Pompey was off and they were going back to buy Bournemouth instead? What was it you had been "led to believe" thats everal meetings had taken place between them and a deal was close" wasn't it? Or words to that effect. LOL

 

 

Yep several meetings were held, even the Press & the Bompey forum reported on their Corp Hostility visit to Fitness last park. I merely passed those on to here.

 

How many people drive McLaren F1's in the UK? I also reported on the time and date that Mitchell was seen at a Restaurant in Bompey meeting the driver of an F1.

 

They weren't ITK sources they were the Press in the main and as quoted at the time a mates' WIFE.

 

Of course your beloved hereos never looked at a single football club other than yours. Now then, remind me, where does their lad play his schoolboy football?

 

Anyway, get back to dreaming.

[dubai_phil]

Corpy

2. If CSI have no money (another theory that's been levelled on here) how do they manage to own and operate such a diverse range of high profile companies?

 

 

To save you looking it up, CSI's owner has a "wealth value" of in the region of 400 million. So you have no concerns on them having the funds for spending on their project. That number has been quoted before.

 

It is strangely and completely co-incidentally with no direct or indirect relevance very close to a figure that also comes up when you google the loans/guarantees paid by the EU towards the rescue of Saab. There is of course NO inference of any link, proven by research that anyone can do on the CSI Group & related companies sponsorship in Motor Racing, Basketball & Ice Hockey - they show similar numbers and date before the Saab sideshow.

 

Corpy - there is NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that your owners have funds.

 

the POINT is that they have shown themselves to be astute (some say otherwise) businessmen. They simply are NOT stupid. They are in "your project" for fun but they aren't going to p1ss away their money with no chance of ever getting a return.

 

Now then. let's get back to basics.

 

CVA costs still have to be met - 16.5mil over 4 years. That is a drain of 4mil a year from your cash flow.

You are signing players (well done) but have only some 8,000 ST holders at the moment. I ain't done Maths since school and I ain't sure how that all adds up, but I do recall one interesting fact which is that another South Coast club couldn't cover the cost of around 4mil a year of Mortgage payments even playing kids.

 

How many times is it possible to spend those Parachute payments?

[pedg]

s39 of the Childrens & Young Persons Act 1933 relates to the protection of the identity of juvenile defendants in court - how does that relate to this case? maybe another reason there is a media blackout

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children_and_Young_Persons_Act_1933

 

Well I think we can be fairly sure it has nothing to do with Kanu!!

[Fowllyd]

What if I used my wife's iPad and only posted via 3G instead of using our WiFi account, or from hotspots?

 

Your sister has an iPad you say? Has it been specially adapted?

[Red and White Army]

Again, from the administrators report, which you obviously haven't bothered to read:

 

Receipts and payments account

 

Attached at Appendix 1 is a copy of our receipts and payments account for the

period 26 February 2010 to 27 November 2010, from which you will note that the

receipts total for the period is £27,830,711.23 and the payments total is £27,530,711.23,

resulting in a balance in hand of £300,000.

 

Happy?

 

Only an idiot confuses a cash flow statement with an income statement. One can be cashflow positive and still be making a loss... conversely one can be making a paper profit but running huge negative cashflow. You really have no idea what you're talking about.

[Torres]

If I want to view this forum I don't need to sign in. BUT, if I want to look at the main board I do have to. However, if I signed on from the laptop I use when posting as the ITK Saints fan whose posts have been well received (PMSL) the mods would have spotted that they had a shared ISP address and I'd have been rumbled. I logged in as CH so I could see the posts on the main board about what was happening and any reactions to my own posts on there.

 

What if I used my wife's iPad and only posted via 3G instead of using our WiFi account, or from hotspots?

 

IF either of these are true then that makes you, without doubt, the most absurd person to have ever used the internet.

 

 

I feel sorry for you. I genuinely do.

[St Jim]

In other news Leicester have signed David Nugent

 

And that leaves how many in their squad now?

[gaz]

 

But some of those are off, or will never see the first team.

[alehouseboys]

What if I used my wife's iPad

 

See...that's where it all falls apart. "Wife"...Ho-Ho-Ho.

 

As if.

[EastleighSoulBoy]

See...that's where it all falls apart. "Wife"...Ho-Ho-Ho.

 

As if.

 

We'd call that relation 'sister' but hey Ho!

[trousers]

If 'Corporate Ho' is making up ITK posts on the main board, can some please explain how I'm supposed to tell this apart from 99% of all the other ITK stuff that turns out to be complete and utter drivel too...? ;-)

 

The words 'needle' and 'haystack' spring to mind. Still, you know what they say about simple things pleasing simple minds...

[rallyboy]

In the forum world where deluded claims are common and fiction is often peddled as fact, one man retains his crown and stands head and shoulders above the crowd.

 

The punters pop more copper coins into Ho's little thong and he dances for us once again.

Just when I thought zero was the worst street cred score you could get, he helps himself to a points penalty.

Please stop, it was funny at first but now we are concerned about you.

Your silence since your outing was dignified, to return with all this James Bond stuff is just wrong.

[sidthesquid]

Now, tear yourselves away from your infatuation and obsession with Pompey's CVA for a moment if you can (a CVA that, including the deferred payments, has been agreed by the creditors involved after all) and answer me a couple of questions:

 

1. If CSI wanted a football club to launder money through why buy Pompey, a club with more focus on it's financial dealings from the football authorities than any other club in the country? Does that sound like the kind of option a gang of what you're calling international criminals would do? Why wouldn't Antonov do it through one of the banks he owns or through one of the many other companies he and CSI own instead which could be done much more easily with much less focus?

 

2. If CSI have no money (another theory that's been levelled on here) how do they manage to own and operate such a diverse range of high profile companies?

 

3. What are the "absurd wages" Jack Frost confidently states we've agreed to pay David Norris? Come on Jack, explain how you got this ITK info

 

4. Do you understand the concept of the "transfer gossip" posts I used to make yet and that it wasn't a list of players I was boasting that Pompey were about to sign but just a list of "targets" from various websites and papers?

 

I'll answer your questions for you -

1.Finding an institutionally corrupt business with a very high turnover in an industry with no regulatory control isn't generally that easy. A football club not only foots that bill, but adds a bit of credibilty & glamour (alright - not much in this case, but they don't live locally) to their business aspirations.

2. I'm not convinced they are loaded, though Dubai Phil assures us otherwise. I'm sure there is some money, but there apeears to be a lot of smoke & mirrors, loans & promises, in their transactons. And certainly more than a hint of dodginess about its origin.

3. Norris was reputedly on a decent crack at Ipswich & they wanted to keep him. Don't tell me, he took a huge paycut came to Poopey for the first rate facilities, the sell out crowds and the chance of the Prem. He came for one last big payday.

4. I really can't be arsed to trawl back through your old posts, but as I remember you were boasting mercilessly that these were probable signings at worst, if not a done deal, from your contact, not just paper talk.

I would concede that as a wind-up merchant you are right up there, but it has to be said, you are also a very annoying little pedant.

[Danish Saint]

I guess we now know, why it took him so long to reply in the first place. He was busy hacking the protocols of the internet in order to disguise his IP.

In my book, that would be easier to do, than trying hopelessly to defend the actions of Pompey.

Edited 6 July, 2011 by Danish Saint
Spelling

[Doctoroncall]

If it was iPad you'd have said iPad instead of laptop.

 

If you're going out to wifi hotspots just to wind up people on a forum that's even funnier.

 

And if you're telling the truth your ITK transfer gossip is as likely to be accurate as any other ITK transfer gossip on here.

 

But you're not telling the truth, you clearly thought just using a different computer would result in a different IP address.

 

Changing your story to fit in with what you've just learned might work in a spoken argument sometimes, but it utterly falls down when all the facts are laid out and recorded, as you've already found out with the epic slam down you were a victim of the last time you disappeared.

 

Now... I have a question for you. Do you think the media have finished with Pompey yet? Are you confident that we won't be seeing more stories about how it all went wrong yet again?

 

That is one hilarious story!

 

Here's another question for you. Was our PL spending funded by money from Arkadi Gaydamak or not?

 

Big Clue: Try looking at the list of creditors.

[100%Red&White]

Your sister has an iPad you say? Has it been specially adapted?

 

If the hapless-Ho had said "popped round the boyfriend's and used his computer to post from" his little game may have lasted a bit longer.

[JackFrost]

 

But some of those are off, or will never see the first team.

 

I don't believe Varney has even signed for them has he?

 

If you take out TBH and the youngsters I make the current number to be 12

 

It's all adding up for them to play the same sob story to the FL again come squad registration time, so they can then sign Carlos Tevez et al. on loan to get it up to the required amount of squad players

[Danish Saint]

I don't believe Varney has even signed for them has he?

 

If you take out TBH and the youngsters I make the current number to be 12

 

It's all adding up for them to play the same sob story to the FL again come squad registration time, so they can then sign Carlos Tevez et al. on loan to get it up to the required amount of squad players

 

Adding to that: 1 is a back-up keeper.

Edited 6 July, 2011 by Danish Saint

[OldNick]

To save you looking it up, CSI's owner has a "wealth value" of in the region of 400 million. So you have no concerns on them having the funds for spending on their project. That number has been quoted before.

 

It is strangely and completely co-incidentally with no direct or indirect relevance very close to a figure that also comes up when you google the loans/guarantees paid by the EU towards the rescue of Saab. There is of course NO inference of any link, proven by research that anyone can do on the CSI Group & related companies sponsorship in Motor Racing, Basketball & Ice Hockey - they show similar numbers and date before the Saab sideshow.

 

Corpy - there is NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that your owners have funds.

 

the POINT is that they have shown themselves to be astute (some say otherwise) businessmen. They simply are NOT stupid. They are in "your project" for fun but they aren't going to p1ss away their money with no chance of ever getting a return.

 

Now then. let's get back to basics.

 

CVA costs still have to be met - 16.5mil over 4 years. That is a drain of 4mil a year from your cash flow.

You are signing players (well done) but have only some 8,000 ST holders at the moment. I ain't done Maths since school and I ain't sure how that all adds up, but I do recall one interesting fact which is that another South Coast club couldn't cover the cost of around 4mil a year of Mortgage payments even playing kids.

 

How many times is it possible to spend those Parachute payments?

....

[OldNick]

See...that's where it all falls apart. "Wife"...Ho-Ho-Ho.

 

As if.

If you recall he did say at one time he doesnt post from home as his wife didnt like him using the computer, I doubt he would be allowed to use her ipad.

[bridge too far]

Mr TF informs me that, according to Skate forums, they're after Jason Puncheon!!!!

 

Oh and it's in the Echo and it's on the main bored

 

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/9123626.Saints__winger_eyed_up_by_Pompey/

Edited 6 July, 2011 by bridge too far
Should have checked main bored first!

[dronskisaint]

I don't believe Varney has even signed for them has he?

 

If you take out TBH and the youngsters I make the current number to be 12

 

It's all adding up for them to play the same sob story to the FL again come squad registration time, so they can then sign Carlos Tevez et al. on loan to get it up to the required amount of squad players

 

Ooooh - nearly enough for a six a side...if they all turned up that is...if they all have been paid that is....if they had a training ground that is....oh!

[Saint Lindford]

The names of John Carew & Marlon Harewood are cropping up on twitter from more then one person Carew supposed to be at the Marriott (now how many times have we heard this) as possible signings, NA claims not to have heard the latest rumours but does not dismiss them out of had, admits SC still wants another CB a left winger and another striker ontop of the two players signed today and the forthcoming Halford and herman

 

More delusion from one of the Few's msg boards.

[Channon's Sideburns]

Meanwhile just wondering what music for the Skates to run onto Nottarf this season...

 

[pfc123]

Only an idiot confuses a cash flow statement with an income statement. One can be cashflow positive and still be making a loss... conversely one can be making a paper profit but running huge negative cashflow. You really have no idea what you're talking about.

 

So why was the story run in The News, and confirmed by PFC themselves at the time? Sorry mate, YOU'RE the one who doesn't know what he's talking about....

[Danish Saint]

So why was the story run in The News, and confirmed by PFC themselves at the time? Sorry mate, YOU'RE the one who doesn't know what he's talking about....

 

Isn't The News printing anything that comes from PFC without critism? PFC might have confirmed it, but what did they confirm? That they had a plus in cash flow, or that they had a plus on their income statement?

 

Again, the two things are not related.

[Gingeletiss]

So why was the story run in The News, and confirmed by PFC themselves at the time? Sorry mate, YOU'RE the one who doesn't know what he's talking about....

 

Poopey's cheerleading rag, never a bad word against them, all critical posts deleted, and you expect them to be telling the truth...lol, as for your clubs officers giving you the gen, give over, you are having a serious laugh there!

[pfc123]

Poopey's cheerleading rag, never a bad word against them, all critical posts deleted, and you expect them to be telling the truth...lol, as for your clubs officers giving you the gen, give over, you are having a serious laugh there!

 

Oh right, so The News is Pompey's poodle. I think not otherwise it wouldn't get banned from FP as it regularly as it does.

 

Bottom line on this whole saga is that none of you will believe ANYTHING that comes out of PFC or it's fans. This thread has descended into a haven for anyone who has a pathological hatred of Pompey.

 

Some of the negative things about Pompey on here are correct. The owner spent money he only had all the time he was earning his commission on Russian stock market trades. We all know what happened in October 2008 to stock markets around the world.

 

He shouldn't have relied on that income to keep funding PFC player purchases and wages when what we desperately needed was a new ground. That was wrong and I accept that it was wrong to run a business in such an exposed way.

 

But the the main reason I waste my time on here is because I cannot let the regular TOTAL lies-and-rumours-peddled-as-fact (and lapped up in outrage by the rest of you) go unawnswered.

 

What about yesterdays little gem- "...and let's not forget they are not even servicing the CVA."

 

As PROVED from the administrators official CVA document, payments are not due to start until April 2012! Yes it may have been due to us not selling enough players to trigger an interim payment, but that's a clause that the creditors approved! And yet the above, at best misleading statement, is greeted with more outrage and mouthfoaming that evil old Pompey are up to their tricks again.

 

Some of you have more fertile imaginations that Enid Blyton. Most of you have another agenda- you want Pompey dead. Well get used to this: Pompey will NEVER die. Whatever happens to PFC, we're used to having our backs to the wall down here, and we'll come back, even if we have to do it from division 9 or wherever, so you're wasting your time expecting us to impersonate Cordurouy any time soon.

 

What does Adrian Chiles always say: "It's the hope that kills you......."

[OldNick]

so 2 more players have arrived and Halford later this week. They are going to be quite strong by the time the season starts.None are world beaters but all decent for our league and will be difficult to beat.

[trousers]

none of you will believe ANYTHING that comes out of PFC

 

^ This

[OldNick]

Oh right, so The News is Pompey's poodle. I think not otherwise it wouldn't get banned from FP as it regularly as it does.

 

Bottom line on this whole saga is that none of you will believe ANYTHING that comes out of PFC or it's fans. This thread has descended into a haven for anyone who has a pathological hatred of Pompey.

 

Some of the negative things about Pompey on here are correct. The owner spent money he only had all the time he was earning his commission on Russian stock market trades. We all know what happened in October 2008 to stock markets around the world.

 

He shouldn't have relied on that income to keep funding PFC player purchases and wages when what we desperately needed was a new ground. That was wrong and I accept that it was wrong to run a business in such an exposed way.

 

But the the main reason I waste my time on here is because I cannot let the regular TOTAL lies-and-rumours-peddled-as-fact (and lapped up in outrage by the rest of you) go unawnswered.

 

What about yesterdays little gem- "...and let's not forget they are not even servicing the CVA."

 

As PROVED from the administrators official CVA document, payments are not due to start until April 2012! Yes it may have been due to us not selling enough players to trigger an interim payment, but that's a clause that the creditors approved! And yet the above, at best misleading statement, is greeted with more outrage and mouthfoaming that evil old Pompey are up to their tricks again.

 

Some of you have more fertile imaginations that Enid Blyton. Most of you have another agenda- you want Pompey dead. Well get used to this: Pompey will NEVER die. Whatever happens to PFC, we're used to having our backs to the wall down here, and we'll come back, even if we have to do it from division 9 or wherever, so you're wasting your time expecting us to impersonate Cordurouy any time soon.

 

What does Adrian Chiles always say: "It's the hope that kills you......."

the CVA not being serviced was due to the fact your club did not really try to get into a position to do so.

I agree that the creditors signed up to it, but many were Pompey fans and so took the knock. So much ducking and diving by the administrator and playing with the figures to stop the HMRC having a proper say saved you.Morally your club is in the sewer,but i could not say that if I had the choice of how you have had all the good years and still come out alive, I would not wish for the same at SMS. We have tried to do it the proper way but that will not give us the keys to the PL, it could well be the clubs with the more unsavoury owners WHU Brum and yourselves who are battling to get back to the PL

[JackFrost]

So why was the story run in The News, and confirmed by PFC themselves at the time? Sorry mate, YOU'RE the one who doesn't know what he's talking about....

 

Because the News are basically Pompey's PR mouthpiece and their journalists are barely more clued up than anyone else.

 

When was the last time you saw a story in The News that was critical of the club?

[Pugwash]

What about yesterdays little gem- "...and let's not forget they are not even servicing the CVA."

 

As PROVED from the administrators official CVA document, payments are not due to start until April 2012! Yes it may have been due to us not selling enough players to trigger an interim payment, but that's a clause that the creditors approved! And yet the above, at best misleading statement, is greeted with more outrage and mouthfoaming that evil old Pompey are up to their tricks again.

"

 

You just don't get it, do you? Yes, the CVA has been AGREED. But it's not being SERVICED until the terms start being complied with, i.e. PAYING THE F*CKING MONEY.

 

Are you a troll or just dim?

[Gingeletiss]

What about yesterdays little gem- "...and let's not forget they are not even servicing the CVA."

 

As PROVED from the administrators official CVA document, payments are not due to start until April 2012! Yes it may have been due to us not selling enough players to trigger an interim payment, but that's a clause that the creditors approved!

 

You really don't get it do you, I mean, you really can't see the wood for the trees here. You didn't start to service the CVA, due to your inability to sell the players needed to raise that money, even if it meant selling at a loss. You compound this wrong, by then going all out, to sign yet more players on high wages, using money, which in reality, is owed to the creditors. You are still playing the cheating game, but in your underwater world, it's ok, because you are PFC, or whatever company name you are using to cheat with this year.

[alehouseboys]

Whatever happens to PFC, we're used to having our backs to the wall down here......."

 

They really do believe all that ol' crap down there...

 

Thick c**nts.

[sidthesquid]

You just don't get it, do you? Yes, the CVA has been AGREED. But it's not being SERVICED until the terms start being complied with, i.e. PAYING THE F*CKING MONEY.

 

Are you a troll or just dim?

 

I wondered that. I thought a troll, but surely a troll would at least try & sound superior or sarcastic about it. This seems like he genuinely believes it. Dim it is.

[Doctoroncall]

I wondered that. I thought a troll, but surely a troll would at least try & sound superior or sarcastic about it. This seems like he genuinely believes it. Dim it is.

 

...and it's incredibly entertaining and funny! Let us not forget he can also understand the the club's accounts.

[holepuncture]

You just don't get it, do you? Yes, the CVA has been AGREED. But it's not being SERVICED until the terms start being complied with, i.e. PAYING THE F*CKING MONEY.

 

Are you a troll or just dim?

 

We may as well ignore the pfc1234 skate as he will not accept reality on the basis of a clause/technicality. As the creditors fell for AAs plan, the CVA is technically being serviced as we speak, the fact that the club fell at the first ****ing hurdle and have not paid a penny towards it in the first year, dosent register with the skate fans... all is hunky dorey according to the few.

 

Anywho, **** the creditors, lets spend theyre money on some players instead:

 

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11688_7022986,00.html

 

£750k seems alot for 5 goals and a relegation in the Premier League - but Poopey do write the rulez on financial luncay...

 

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11674_7021670,00.html

 

but it looks like the Russians are ready to give TBH his £1.4 million of back pay!

 

That must be all the ST revenue gone now shirley?

 

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11674_7018216,00.html

 

Gonna have to pay compensation on this one too!

 

You dirty dirty skates... you are the dirty whore of the international crime ring and you ****ing love it