saint_bert Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 So have they set a time on how longs left?
saint_bert Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 So have they set a time on how longs left?
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Pompey gone by the time this gets to 35,000 posts - any takers? Less chance of BA reinstating cheap holidays for staff. . . . oh!
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Pompey gone by the time this gets to 35,000 posts - any takers? Less chance of BA reinstating cheap holidays for staff. . . . oh!
andysstuff Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 So have they set a time on how longs left? AA mentioned Tuesday or Wednesday on Talksport earlier.
andysstuff Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 So have they set a time on how longs left? AA mentioned Tuesday or Wednesday on Talksport earlier.
seaempty Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 So have they set a time on how longs left? "We need to get closure by Monday or Tuesday", according to AA
seaempty Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 So have they set a time on how longs left? "We need to get closure by Monday or Tuesday", according to AA
Gingeletiss Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 "We need to get closure by Monday or Tuesday", according to AA Absobloodylutly ! I agree, we need closure, closure of your cesspit of a club. Bring it on Mr G.
Gingeletiss Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 "We need to get closure by Monday or Tuesday", according to AA Absobloodylutly ! I agree, we need closure, closure of your cesspit of a club. Bring it on Mr G.
Saint_John Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Yep, there was a pretty big court case a year or so ago, and BC took around £18m from Gaydamak snr. Is Gaydamak going to take a hit for the good of the club and to the benefit of BC? Can't see it. I'd be fairly confident that the Gaydamak debt is to Daddy anyway and, if it's secured, then he's gonna want his pound of flesh. Common sense says that there's no way back as the Gaydamaks need the money and hate BC. Two birds one stone. Gut feel.....it's brinkmanship and a deal will be agreed. The only other factor I can think of is that neither BC or Gaydamak have any emotional ties to Pompey. If one did then you could see a bit of give. However.... Sept 2009 http://archive.globes.co.il/searchgl/Court%20orders%20Gaydamak%20to%20pay%20Kushnir,%20Chainrai%20$23m_h_hd_2L34nDZaqDbmnC30mDJ0mC34sBcXqRMm0.html The Tel Aviv District Court yesterday ordered Arcadi Gaydamak to pay NIS 100 million to Levi Kushnir and Balram Chainrai, a British citizen. Gaydamak did not file a statement of defense in the lawsuit filed by the two businessmen against him. Judge Avi Zamir ordered Gaydamak to pay each of the plaintiffs $11.4 million, plus interest from the date the lawsuit was filed in July 2008, and NIS 500,000 in court costs. AND June 2010 http://archive.globes.co.il/searchgl/Gaydamak%20avoids%20bankruptcy%20with%20settlement_h_hd_2L34oCJWoCbmnC30mDJOuEJOtBcXqRMm0.html Arcadi Gaydamak has reached an out-of-court settlement with Balram Chainrai and Kital Holdings & International Development Ltd., following which the Tel Aviv District Court cancelled Chainrai and Kital's petition to declare Gaydamak bankrupt. In March 2010, the court accepted Chainrai and Kital's petition and issued bankruptcy warning against Gaydamak in the amount of NIS 90 million. Gaydamak was ordered to pay Chainrai $23 million, plus interest from the date of the Supreme Court ruling against Gaydamak in September 2008. Gaydamak was also ordered to pay court costs. Payback time for Sept 2009 and June 2010 ?
Saint_John Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Yep, there was a pretty big court case a year or so ago, and BC took around £18m from Gaydamak snr. Is Gaydamak going to take a hit for the good of the club and to the benefit of BC? Can't see it. I'd be fairly confident that the Gaydamak debt is to Daddy anyway and, if it's secured, then he's gonna want his pound of flesh. Common sense says that there's no way back as the Gaydamaks need the money and hate BC. Two birds one stone. Gut feel.....it's brinkmanship and a deal will be agreed. The only other factor I can think of is that neither BC or Gaydamak have any emotional ties to Pompey. If one did then you could see a bit of give. However.... Sept 2009 http://archive.globes.co.il/searchgl/Court%20orders%20Gaydamak%20to%20pay%20Kushnir,%20Chainrai%20$23m_h_hd_2L34nDZaqDbmnC30mDJ0mC34sBcXqRMm0.html The Tel Aviv District Court yesterday ordered Arcadi Gaydamak to pay NIS 100 million to Levi Kushnir and Balram Chainrai, a British citizen. Gaydamak did not file a statement of defense in the lawsuit filed by the two businessmen against him. Judge Avi Zamir ordered Gaydamak to pay each of the plaintiffs $11.4 million, plus interest from the date the lawsuit was filed in July 2008, and NIS 500,000 in court costs. AND June 2010 http://archive.globes.co.il/searchgl/Gaydamak%20avoids%20bankruptcy%20with%20settlement_h_hd_2L34oCJWoCbmnC30mDJOuEJOtBcXqRMm0.html Arcadi Gaydamak has reached an out-of-court settlement with Balram Chainrai and Kital Holdings & International Development Ltd., following which the Tel Aviv District Court cancelled Chainrai and Kital's petition to declare Gaydamak bankrupt. In March 2010, the court accepted Chainrai and Kital's petition and issued bankruptcy warning against Gaydamak in the amount of NIS 90 million. Gaydamak was ordered to pay Chainrai $23 million, plus interest from the date of the Supreme Court ruling against Gaydamak in September 2008. Gaydamak was also ordered to pay court costs. Payback time for Sept 2009 and June 2010 ?
so22saint Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Is it really going to happen then? It all comes down to if the crook makes more money through liquidation or through the admin exit plan. That we don't know but all will be obvious Tuesday. Do you think they need closure Tuesday / Wednesday as this is pay day perchance?
so22saint Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Is it really going to happen then? It all comes down to if the crook makes more money through liquidation or through the admin exit plan. That we don't know but all will be obvious Tuesday. Do you think they need closure Tuesday / Wednesday as this is pay day perchance?
saint lard Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 (edited) However much i would love to see them liquidated and disappear,nothing more than they deserve,i cannot see it happening. More brinkmanship from AA and Sasha will bow down in the end.Lies and spin from day one all along. So near..yet so far. Atleast it goes some way to them admitting they are insolvent and have been for an age. Edited 22 October, 2010 by saint lard
saint lard Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 (edited) However much i would love to see them liquidated and disappear,nothing more than they deserve,i cannot see it happening. More brinkmanship from AA and Sasha will bow down in the end.Lies and spin from day one all along. So near..yet so far. Atleast it goes some way to them admitting they are insolvent and have been for an age. Edited 22 October, 2010 by saint lard
JackFrost Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 shall we have a sweepstake on when the last minute deal will be struck? I'll go for 11:59 Monday evening
JackFrost Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 shall we have a sweepstake on when the last minute deal will be struck? I'll go for 11:59 Monday evening
Colinjb Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 I quote from a mate who is listening to radio in Coventry. There is a lecturerer at Cov uni who is a Skate and he was interviewed. "He came on the city phone in and said it was unconfirmed breaking news that they had gone bust he has a source within the club, all clubs or city who had already played them would be stripped of there points from that match."
Colinjb Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 I quote from a mate who is listening to radio in Coventry. There is a lecturerer at Cov uni who is a Skate and he was interviewed. "He came on the city phone in and said it was unconfirmed breaking news that they had gone bust he has a source within the club, all clubs or city who had already played them would be stripped of there points from that match."
JackFrost Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Sept 2009 http://archive.globes.co.il/searchgl/Court%20orders%20Gaydamak%20to%20pay%20Kushnir,%20Chainrai%20$23m_h_hd_2L34nDZaqDbmnC30mDJ0mC34sBcXqRMm0.html AND June 2010 http://archive.globes.co.il/searchgl/Gaydamak%20avoids%20bankruptcy%20with%20settlement_h_hd_2L34oCJWoCbmnC30mDJOuEJOtBcXqRMm0.html Payback time for Sept 2009 and June 2010 ? This. The only way Pompey will be liquidated from what I can see is if Gaydamak is doing Chainrai up like a kipper.
JackFrost Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Sept 2009 http://archive.globes.co.il/searchgl/Court%20orders%20Gaydamak%20to%20pay%20Kushnir,%20Chainrai%20$23m_h_hd_2L34nDZaqDbmnC30mDJ0mC34sBcXqRMm0.html AND June 2010 http://archive.globes.co.il/searchgl/Gaydamak%20avoids%20bankruptcy%20with%20settlement_h_hd_2L34oCJWoCbmnC30mDJOuEJOtBcXqRMm0.html Payback time for Sept 2009 and June 2010 ? This. The only way Pompey will be liquidated from what I can see is if Gaydamak is doing Chainrai up like a kipper.
Crab Lungs Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 A rumour going around is that it was actually AA/administrators who asked Gaydamak to to re-assess his terms ("moved the goalposts") and Gaydamak told them to poke it - and quite rightly so.
Crab Lungs Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 A rumour going around is that it was actually AA/administrators who asked Gaydamak to to re-assess his terms ("moved the goalposts") and Gaydamak told them to poke it - and quite rightly so.
docker-p Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 At the end of the day, if they go belly up there is a certain amount of justice to it. There was no way a small club like Portsmyth could achieve and sustain the 'success' they have enjoyed over the past few seasons; not in the normal course of events. Theirs is not a story about a rare sporting triumph that makes football so compulsive. Theirs is a story about greed, arrogance, and the murky world of international finance. That the PFC fans couldn't see what was going on, or simply didn't care as the flocked to not sell out their toilet of a ground time after time in the premiership perhaps underlines why they will be the highest league positioned club to go bust. Good riddance.
docker-p Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 At the end of the day, if they go belly up there is a certain amount of justice to it. There was no way a small club like Portsmyth could achieve and sustain the 'success' they have enjoyed over the past few seasons; not in the normal course of events. Theirs is not a story about a rare sporting triumph that makes football so compulsive. Theirs is a story about greed, arrogance, and the murky world of international finance. That the PFC fans couldn't see what was going on, or simply didn't care as the flocked to not sell out their toilet of a ground time after time in the premiership perhaps underlines why they will be the highest league positioned club to go bust. Good riddance.
VectisSaint Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Who owns the land? Would have development potential if the football club went. The costs of decontaminating the ground would make any development unlikely to be worthwhile.
VectisSaint Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Who owns the land? Would have development potential if the football club went. The costs of decontaminating the ground would make any development unlikely to be worthwhile.
Clash City Saint Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 After supporting Saints for 40 odd years and having had my first experience of Krap Notarf way back in '76 when Micky Channon scored in the 89 min my early feelings were nothing but hatred for the blue few but having worked along side many Skates over the years I enjoyed the mutual banter that I've given and taken and have even developed friendships with some but after the sh*t me and my mates have had to endure on sites over the last 5 years and with them wanting us to fold when we were in the same position a couple of years ago I'm in the 'Fack 'em and good riddance' camp. My only regret is that they will still harp on about the two 4-1's and we'll not get the chance to avenge these results but I guess I can live with that and and there's always Eastleigh to avenge and embarrass them.
Clash City Saint Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 After supporting Saints for 40 odd years and having had my first experience of Krap Notarf way back in '76 when Micky Channon scored in the 89 min my early feelings were nothing but hatred for the blue few but having worked along side many Skates over the years I enjoyed the mutual banter that I've given and taken and have even developed friendships with some but after the sh*t me and my mates have had to endure on sites over the last 5 years and with them wanting us to fold when we were in the same position a couple of years ago I'm in the 'Fack 'em and good riddance' camp. My only regret is that they will still harp on about the two 4-1's and we'll not get the chance to avenge these results but I guess I can live with that and and there's always Eastleigh to avenge and embarrass them.
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Less chance of BA reinstating cheap holidays for staff. . . . oh! Sorry Duncan, that was a cheap attempt at a joke and made in a moment of excitement. Not intended against you, more an observation at how things do change.
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Less chance of BA reinstating cheap holidays for staff. . . . oh! Sorry Duncan, that was a cheap attempt at a joke and made in a moment of excitement. Not intended against you, more an observation at how things do change.
Faz Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 You are the owner of a Humberside Hotel with 17-20 guests of dubious financial credentials. Do you let them stay in the hope they settle their bill in the morning, or kick them out before a breakfast of grilled bread?
Faz Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 You are the owner of a Humberside Hotel with 17-20 guests of dubious financial credentials. Do you let them stay in the hope they settle their bill in the morning, or kick them out before a breakfast of grilled bread?
Right sider Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 You are the owner of a Humberside Hotel with 17-20 guests of dubious financial credentials. Do you let them stay in the hope they settle their bill in the morning, or kick them out before a breakfast of grilled bread? ??????????
Right sider Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 You are the owner of a Humberside Hotel with 17-20 guests of dubious financial credentials. Do you let them stay in the hope they settle their bill in the morning, or kick them out before a breakfast of grilled bread? ??????????
NickG Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 You are the owner of a Humberside Hotel with 17-20 guests of dubious financial credentials. Do you let them stay in the hope they settle their bill in the morning, or kick them out before a breakfast of grilled bread? ask for cash
NickG Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 You are the owner of a Humberside Hotel with 17-20 guests of dubious financial credentials. Do you let them stay in the hope they settle their bill in the morning, or kick them out before a breakfast of grilled bread? ask for cash
alehouseboys Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 You'll have to excuse me but I've been out, can someone please explain why TCWTB looks a little more angry and ugly than usual? ?????????? Hull v Blue Few tomorrow....ish
alehouseboys Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 You'll have to excuse me but I've been out, can someone please explain why TCWTB looks a little more angry and ugly than usual? ?????????? Hull v Blue Few tomorrow....ish
Verbal Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 You are the owner of a Humberside Hotel with 17-20 guests of dubious financial credentials. Do you let them stay in the hope they settle their bill in the morning, or kick them out before a breakfast of grilled bread? If it's in Humberside, those are the only kinds of guests you're going to get. Where is this going exactly?
Verbal Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 You are the owner of a Humberside Hotel with 17-20 guests of dubious financial credentials. Do you let them stay in the hope they settle their bill in the morning, or kick them out before a breakfast of grilled bread? If it's in Humberside, those are the only kinds of guests you're going to get. Where is this going exactly?
miserableoldgit Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 ?????????? Skate playing Hull tomorrow??
miserableoldgit Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 ?????????? Skate playing Hull tomorrow??
aintforever Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Yep, there was a pretty big court case a year or so ago, and BC took around £18m from Gaydamak snr. Is Gaydamak going to take a hit for the good of the club and to the benefit of BC? Can't see it. I'd be fairly confident that the Gaydamak debt is to Daddy anyway and, if it's secured, then he's gonna want his pound of flesh. Common sense says that there's no way back as the Gaydamaks need the money and hate BC. Two birds one stone. Gut feel.....it's brinkmanship and a deal will be agreed. The only other factor I can think of is that neither BC or Gaydamak have any emotional ties to Pompey. If one did then you could see a bit of give. However.... I don't buy that, the Chanrai sueing Gaydamak thing happened before Chanrai got involved in PFC. Why would Chanrai get involved with or put himself in a situation where he can be shafted by Gaydamak again? It doesn't make sense. Gaydamak and Chanrai are working together IMO.
aintforever Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 Yep, there was a pretty big court case a year or so ago, and BC took around £18m from Gaydamak snr. Is Gaydamak going to take a hit for the good of the club and to the benefit of BC? Can't see it. I'd be fairly confident that the Gaydamak debt is to Daddy anyway and, if it's secured, then he's gonna want his pound of flesh. Common sense says that there's no way back as the Gaydamaks need the money and hate BC. Two birds one stone. Gut feel.....it's brinkmanship and a deal will be agreed. The only other factor I can think of is that neither BC or Gaydamak have any emotional ties to Pompey. If one did then you could see a bit of give. However.... I don't buy that, the Chanrai sueing Gaydamak thing happened before Chanrai got involved in PFC. Why would Chanrai get involved with or put himself in a situation where he can be shafted by Gaydamak again? It doesn't make sense. Gaydamak and Chanrai are working together IMO.
Gorgiesaint Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 You are the owner of a Humberside Hotel with 17-20 guests of dubious financial credentials. Do you let them stay in the hope they settle their bill in the morning, or kick them out before a breakfast of grilled bread? I'm sure that the guests will be able to pay for their own rooms and breakfasts - after all they've been paying for their own lunches!
Gorgiesaint Posted 22 October, 2010 Posted 22 October, 2010 You are the owner of a Humberside Hotel with 17-20 guests of dubious financial credentials. Do you let them stay in the hope they settle their bill in the morning, or kick them out before a breakfast of grilled bread? I'm sure that the guests will be able to pay for their own rooms and breakfasts - after all they've been paying for their own lunches!
Recommended Posts