hypochondriac Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Boo. I got banned from pompeyonline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delmary Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 It shows how times have moved on. A year ago we were all arguing about Lowe, Wilde and Crouch. We now all moan and argue about the admins. I love it:D;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_mears Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 And also I got that PM from um pahars. He's a big loss to the forum and it's very sad that he felt the way he did. He seems to be one of a number that has left because of abuse not being dealt with properly. I also note that their is legal action going on with another Saints forum as well because of these dickheads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponty Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Thanks Ron - I thought the same, although I didn't notice it until this morning. I would like it's title reverted to the original because my name is on it and I don't believe the new title is correct. So Ponty this is an official request to please have the original title re-instated. Fans can then make up their own minds. A quick look at the Moderator Log shows me that this thread was renamed on the 27th of August. If two months isn't long enough for you to notice that the thread title was different then I'd suggest your outrage at the change and your level of caring about it is more about some perceived power play with the admin (or me, specifically - although I didn't change it) than it is about the fact your name is next to it. Um Pahars left the forum essentially because we wouldn't ban Nineteen Canteen at his demand. A shame but there you go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 He seems to be one of a number that has left because of abuse not being dealt with properly. I also note that their is legal action going on with another Saints forum as well because of these dickheads. there are some on the main board that think it is OK to dish all all sorts if you dont share their supa-dupa positive thinking 24/7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 A quick look at the Moderator Log shows me that this thread was renamed on the 27th of August. If two months isn't long enough for you to notice that the thread title was different then I'd suggest your outrage at the change and your level of caring about it is more about some perceived power play with the admin (or me, specifically - although I didn't change it) than it is about the fact your name is next to it. Um Pahars left the forum essentially because we wouldn't ban Nineteen Canteen at his demand. A shame but there you go. Ponty, I think this is being - in the literal sense - economical with the truth. When 19C first appeared, several of us pointed out that he was Sundance Beast. You responded by saying that you too were suspicious, and were looking into it closely. Subsequently, you claimed that 19C/Sundance was let back in on an amnesty. You can't have it both ways, as um pointed out at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View From The Top Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Ponty, I think this is being - in the literal sense - economical with the truth. When 19C first appeared, several of us pointed out that he was Sundance Beast. You responded by saying that you too were suspicious, and were looking into it closely. Subsequently, you claimed that 19C/Sundance was let back in on an amnesty. You can't have it both ways, as um pointed out at the time. Not to mention also being Flashman At The Charge, The Bear and The Speculator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponty Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Ponty, I think this is being - in the literal sense - economical with the truth. When 19C first appeared, several of us pointed out that he was Sundance Beast. You responded by saying that you too were suspicious, and were looking into it closely. Subsequently, you claimed that 19C/Sundance was let back in on an amnesty. You can't have it both ways, as um pointed out at the time. We, the admin, decided we were happy with the way we'd administrated 19C's position, a shame cos I enjoyed sparring with UP from time to time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 He seems to be one of a number that has left because of abuse not being dealt with properly. I also note that their is legal action going on with another Saints forum as well because of these dickheads. Blimey where's that then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitzhugh Fella Posted 25 October, 2009 Author Share Posted 25 October, 2009 A quick look at the Moderator Log shows me that this thread was renamed on the 27th of August. If two months isn't long enough for you to notice that the thread title was different then I'd suggest your outrage at the change and your level of caring about it is more about some perceived power play with the admin (or me, specifically - although I didn't change it) than it is about the fact your name is next to it. Um Pahars left the forum essentially because we wouldn't ban Nineteen Canteen at his demand. A shame but there you go. I can categorically state, Ponty that Um Pahars did NOT leave because the admin/mods did not ban 19C, and you are out of order for stating that. Have you got nothing better to do than tampering with other people's thread titles because it doesn't fit with your opinion. One of the reasons I took so long to notice was because I wasn't even aware of the lounge and only discovered it fairly recently. Had the thread stayed on the main forum I might have noticed the less than subtle editing a lot quicker. I would respectfully and politely ask two things of you. You retract your statement about the reason Um Pahars left and you either re-instate the original thread title or change it to something like Hypo suggests, because, as the originator of this thread I do not agree with the current title and it suggests I support the takeover. I don't think that is too much to ask. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mack rill Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 (edited) Er this Fred is not for you pony fiddling fools to ***** at each other. Its about us the blue few and our slightly exaggerated take over,( SOAP ) If we must mess about with the title what about ,,,,HCDAJF Pompey;),,,,,or HC Not DAJF Pompey Edited 25 October, 2009 by mack rill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponty Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 I can categorically state, Ponty that Um Pahars did NOT leave because the admin/mods did not ban 19C, and you are out of order for stating that. Have you got nothing better to do than tampering with other people's thread titles because it doesn't fit with your opinion. One of the reasons I took so long to notice was because I wasn't even aware of the lounge and only discovered it fairly recently. Had the thread stayed on the main forum I might have noticed the less than subtle editing a lot quicker. I would respectfully and politely ask two things of you. You retract your statement about the reason Um Pahars left and you either re-instate the original thread title or change it to something like Hypo suggests, because, as the originator of this thread I do not agree with the current title and it suggests I support the takeover. I don't think that is too much to ask. Thank you. Ok, I may have over-simplified the UP case, but that's only because I don't think it's fair to sprawl all of the details out on the forum. His opinion was different to ours and he left because he felt strongly enough about it. As I said, it was a shame but he wanted to go. Nobody can doubt that his differences of opinion with 19C were the root cause of his angst. As for the thread title - ah come on, no one thinks you sympathise with the Skates, do they now? I remember when the title was changed (and who changed it) and at the time it was clear that the takeover completing was far more disasterous for the Skates than it would have been had it fallen through. In effect, they were in more trouble because of it - and that's strangely how it's turned out. Don't you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Just change the title ponty to PFC takeover saga and then leave it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint lard Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Can the argument over why,who,when and where this thread was moved to be moved,the Muppet show the most likely destination methinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitzhugh Fella Posted 25 October, 2009 Author Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Ok, I may have over-simplified the UP case, but that's only because I don't think it's fair to sprawl all of the details out on the forum. His opinion was different to ours and he left because he felt strongly enough about it. As I said, it was a shame but he wanted to go. Nobody can doubt that his differences of opinion with 19C were the root cause of his angst. As for the thread title - ah come on, no one thinks you sympathise with the Skates, do they now? I remember when the title was changed (and who changed it) and at the time it was clear that the takeover completing was far more disasterous for the Skates than it would have been had it fallen through. In effect, they were in more trouble because of it - and that's strangely how it's turned out. Don't you think? Whatever Ponty - it is the principle of having your words altered. "Oh Happy Day - takeover completes" suggests the poster is happy that the takeover has occurred when my sentiments were the exact opposite. Again I am requesting it be either reverted or altered to Hypo's suggestion - surely that is not to much to ask to put this matter to bed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponty Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 In the interests of unity, I'll change it to Hypo's suggestion - it seems more apt anyhow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Saints Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 If you can't score against Hull, it means you're going down. Lower end Championship size club back to where they belong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 If you can't score against Hull, it means you're going down. Lower end Championship size club back to where they belong. dindane is brilliant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norwaysaint Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Whatever Ponty - it is the principle of having your words altered. "Oh Happy Day - takeover completes" suggests the poster is happy that the takeover has occurred when my sentiments were the exact opposite. Again I am requesting it be either reverted or altered to Hypo's suggestion - surely that is not to much to ask to put this matter to bed? Are you serious? I'd be amazed if even the dimmest posters on here took it that way. That's pretty pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 I just wish Um had taken FF's stance and signalled his intention to leave. I'd have been one of probably many who would have tried to change his mind. I never found him less than entertaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Back to the crux of all the hilarity, schadenfreude, call it whatever you want. http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/sport/football/article-1222768/EXCLUSIVE-Hope-ailing-Portsmouth-new-backers-wait-wings.html If you lot don't stop arguing I'm going to invite Rupert back! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonManager Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 What's this about Saga going to Pompey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 I just wish Um had taken FF's stance and signalled his intention to leave. I'd have been one of probably many who would have tried to change his mind. I never found him less than entertaining. I did PM him at the time but I think his mind was made up. He asked that we don't make it public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 (edited) blah Edited 25 October, 2009 by Thedelldays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 From an admin on pompeyonline posted on the 9th of this month! Big lol. Hi all, This was mentioned on the board earlier in the week, and I thought it was worth bringing up now that the takeover is complete as I thought it was a cracking idea. Basically, Peter Storrie should be given the freedom of the city. I know that it's not a great secret that I've been firmly in the Peter Storrie camp over the last few months, and without him, and the great work done by the club as a whole, we possibly might not have a club to speak about today, but please don't think that this is just a 'suck-up' job, I firmly believe this is deserved. I know Peter has had his detractors, but he's been an employee of the club, has had to perform a very difficult job and be the face of the club under difficult management and his highly thought of around the footballing fraternity, and that isn't for no reason. Also, consider the below; Milan was given the freedom of the city and, fair play to him for saving the club as well, but he took his money and went to pastures new Redknapp was given the freedom of the city. Enough said. The squad were given the freedom of the city, and most of them have gone off as soon as trouble started brewing. Peter has stuck by the club through this, despite receiving job offers from elsewhere, and has ensured we have a club to follow today and which is a fantastic position to really go forward. A lot of work has gone into the situation over the last year, when Sacha wasn't putting money into the club, the situation with Al-Fahim, bringing the Al-Faraj consortium in to where we are today with huge potential for the future, both for the club and the city as a whole. Peter has been a massive part of this and I think the award would be wholly justified and popular, especially considering the comments I've seen on here and the media. Not a great expert on how this could be organised, but this is something I'd really like to see if we could get through. So, would welcome comments! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiltshire Saint Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Who has changed the title of this thread? Which power crazed admin thinks it is ok to tamper with the personal musings of members of the forum? I think it is a disgrace and it makes me feel sick. What next? Will our posts be altered? Will our usernames be changed? Will the beauty and complexity that makes English language what it is be reduced to a series of factual bullet points for the purpose of admin power? It is this sort of thing that makes people turn to the BNP. If SWF cannot deal with the issue of thread titles properly and effectively, then maybe someone else can? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitzhugh Fella Posted 25 October, 2009 Author Share Posted 25 October, 2009 In the interests of unity, I'll change it to Hypo's suggestion - it seems more apt anyhow. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deppo Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Who has changed the title of this thread? Which power crazed admin thinks it is ok to tamper with the personal musings of members of the forum? I think it is a disgrace and it makes me feel sick. What next? Will our posts be altered? Will our usernames be changed? Will the beauty and complexity that makes English language what it is be reduced to a series of factual bullet points for the purpose of admin power? It is this sort of thing that makes people turn to the BNP. If SWF cannot deal with the issue of thread titles properly and effectively, then maybe someone else can? I think you've changed your username enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitzhugh Fella Posted 25 October, 2009 Author Share Posted 25 October, 2009 I just wish Um had taken FF's stance and signalled his intention to leave. I'd have been one of probably many who would have tried to change his mind. I never found him less than entertaining. I very much miss Um Pahars input on here, mainly because I usually agreed with most he said!!!!! and, he was an original poster. It is a great shame he left but he has his principles I guess.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 I very much miss Um Pahars input on here, mainly because I usually agreed with most he said!!!!! and, he was an original poster. It is a great shame he left but he has his principles I guess.... it would be a dull place if the likes of me were to stop posting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 I very much miss Um Pahars input on here, mainly because I usually agreed with most he said!!!!! and, he was an original poster. It is a great shame he left but he has his principles I guess.... Can you still contact him? Is there any chance you could persuade him to return? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 it would be a dull place if the likes of me were to stop posting I suspect that is up for debate! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 didn't notice he had gone! why did he leave? Can't say personally I miss his posting style Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Can we all grow up please!? There's a dirty little club to laugh at! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 (edited) another reason why people post less and less...is because of the likes of St Will....constantly..CONSTANTLY having digs at other posters and winding them up for daring not agreeing with him...he has started already again tonight.. nice one mods...you continue to let him every bloody week Edited 25 October, 2009 by Thedelldays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crab Lungs Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Er yeah, why did he leave? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spain saint Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 I suspect that is up for debate! I would miss your funny little avatars hypo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 I would miss your funny little avatars hypo! I aint going nowhere sunshine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitzhugh Fella Posted 25 October, 2009 Author Share Posted 25 October, 2009 didn't notice he had gone! why did he leave? Can't say personally I miss his posting style Nick to answer your question perhaps I would refer you to your first and third lines. Are the two points you take pains to make really necessary? I don't agree with most of what you say but I would notice you had left and I would miss your posting style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 I genuinely didn't notice - he was one to drift in and out and often didn't post of the football threads. Wasn't a dig. Didn't realise you didn't agree with most of what I say - I am hurt! And disappointed in your poor judgement! Why did he leave? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 (edited) Lol the admin on POL has apparently seen my earlier posting. Don't worry fishy friend, I will re-register soon and wind you up. Obviously I must qualify my post. I wish to post seriously on POL and give my views. Clearly my very presence on your forum is enough to wind up very highly strung skate fans. Therefore, I do not wish to wind you up by being immature and irritating. Any attempt to use my details in any way will not be greeted in a nice way and it will end badly for you I can assure you. Edited 26 October, 2009 by hypochondriac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View From The Top Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Lol the admin on POL has apparently seen my earlier posting. Don't worry fishy friend, I will re-register soon and wind you up. I'm sure he stands by everything he wrote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Will Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 another reason why people post less and less...is because of the likes of St Will....constantly..CONSTANTLY having digs at other posters and winding them up for daring not agreeing with him...he has started already again tonight.. nice one mods...you continue to let him every bloody week Yawn, you really are very dull. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Oi, ENOUGH ALREADY. STOP IT This thread is specifically designed to 1) Show that FF's ITK source was correct and 2) DP sometimes is able to say things that aren't completely sh*t. In addition, it is THE singular most important literary work in the recent history of Southampton FC allowing it's long suffering fans an outlet for and source of some of the greatest humour since, well Dave Allen Tommy Cooper and Not the Nine O'Clock News, hell, maybe even since the Young Ones. I have created an UP appreciation thread so that we may continue the battle versus admin in an appropriate place, this thread is WAY too valuable to be hijacked, Historians and our Children will read this and see the true story of the Story at Nottarf Krap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitzhugh Fella Posted 25 October, 2009 Author Share Posted 25 October, 2009 I genuinely didn't notice - he was one to drift in and out and often didn't post of the football threads. Wasn't a dig. Didn't realise you didn't agree with most of what I say - I am hurt! And disappointed in your poor judgement! Why did he leave? Well you are a happy clappy and I am a miserable negative glass half empty moaner! Hadn't you noticed. Why did he leave? I am not 100% sure but I know it wasn't over the mods not banning 19C - more, I think he had grown frustrated at the way this forum was administrated on a general level. His absence is I think detrimental to this forum because I thought he was a "big voice" and one worth reading. As are you Nick. Like I said I don't always agree but you are a civil poster whose views are honestly held. Long may you continue, despite the fact I always think you have been on the waccy baccy happy clappy, Saints can do no wrong jungle juice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 I genuinely didn't notice - he was one to drift in and out and often didn't post of the football threads. Wasn't a dig. Didn't realise you didn't agree with most of what I say - I am hurt! And disappointed in your poor judgement! Why did he leave? You didn't notice????????!!!!! You didn't miss his exclamation/question mark rashes????!!!! Or smileys that decorated his posts like blossoms on acid? By the way, thought you were sh!t on Question time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Well you are a happy clappy and I am a miserable negative glass half empty moaner! Hadn't you noticed. Why did he leave? I am not 100% sure but I know it wasn't over the mods not banning 19C - more, I think he had grown frustrated at the way this forum was administrated on a general level. His absence is I think detrimental to this forum because I thought he was a "big voice" and one worth reading. As are you Nick. Like I said I don't always agree but you are a civil poster whose views are honestly held. Long may you continue, despite the fact I always think you have been on the waccy baccy happy clappy, Saints can do no wrong jungle juice! Sadly, the mods have got the board that they always wanted. One where the majority of posters agree with one another, no big arguments erupt, and very little actual 'moderation' is required. Luckily, all the while you guys keep paying those fivers over, the money is also rolling in too. Happy days then for Boj and Pontius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 Sadly, the mods have got the board that they always wanted. One where the majority of posters agree with one another, no big arguments erupt, and very little actual 'moderation' is required. Luckily, all the while you guys keep paying those fivers over, the money is also rolling in too. Happy days then for Boj and Pontius. There's moaning and then there's out and out bitterness. What the hell is with you? You used to be funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint boggy Posted 25 October, 2009 Share Posted 25 October, 2009 i don't happen to like the new thread title!..............i thought PFC had purchased the over 50's travel company ffs!!!! change it back!!! :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts