Doctoroncall Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 No they don't. Are you sure, there were a few Leeds players who voted in the club's CVA. One actually voted against. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 How our sights have dropped over the months. First toast then no CVA and now last chance that HMRC contest it. Things may change very quickly but at present it looks as though Chanrai is going to own Pompey for nunpence and be able to push them forward to a PL return and get those riches. Chanrai IMO has given AA a roadmap that has so far worked. If points for financial regularities come into play that may well be a factor that Chanrai cant do anything about though, but if at the end of today they have Cotterill installed and those loan players from HR and Wenger they certainly do look chipper. That's as maybe (but very unlikely) But the really positive outcome from a lot of this is the contempt now that other fans and the media will hold the CHEATS in over the coming years. They will become as despised as Leeds, no matter what they try and do on the pitch. But don't worry, this thread isn't even a year old yet. The instant trip to court that is odds on from the meeting today will take 3/4 weeks to get a date. That will freeze any activity regarding manager/player contracts etc. It will burn more holes in Chanrai's pocket and assuming the Court Hearing then takes a week for a decision (and possibly an appeal) they are likely to be unable to do anything about the Playing Side of the business much before the end of July. And we ALL know what that means to a Football Club Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 That's as maybe (but very unlikely) But the really positive outcome from a lot of this is the contempt now that other fans and the media will hold the CHEATS in over the coming years. They will become as despised as Leeds, no matter what they try and do on the pitch. But don't worry, this thread isn't even a year old yet. The instant trip to court that is odds on from the meeting today will take 3/4 weeks to get a date. That will freeze any activity regarding manager/player contracts etc. It will burn more holes in Chanrai's pocket and assuming the Court Hearing then takes a week for a decision (and possibly an appeal) they are likely to be unable to do anything about the Playing Side of the business much before the end of July. And we ALL know what that means to a Football Club I do hope your optimism is rewarded. We dont know how far HMRC's will can be pushed. Their resources are thinly spread and with the state of the economy as it is i doubt they have money to throw about on this.Yes they are hoping to make a principle but Chanrai must have some brains to be so wealthy in the first place. I so want to be wrong,but so far nothing seems to have gone as we expect, and Pompey seem to be a different case to any in normal business practice and law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 How our sights have dropped over the months. First toast then no CVA and now last chance that HMRC contest it. Things may change very quickly but at present it looks as though Chanrai is going to own Pompey for nunpence and be able to push them forward to a PL return and get those riches. Chanrai IMO has given AA a roadmap that has so far worked. If points for financial regularities come into play that may well be a factor that Chanrai cant do anything about though, but if at the end of today they have Cotterill installed and those loan players from HR and Wenger they certainly do look chipper. You will persist in believing that the Skates have got away with it. The CVA might well be passed today, but that doesn't mean for one minute that they will get away with it. Instead of lowering my sights, I'm a believer that they will in fact be more burnt toast than they were previously. It seems that you have been bamboozled by all the smoke and mirrors. It will go to court and not only will HMRC win, but the repercussions for the Skates will be more dire than if they had the CVA turned down today. Further implications are still up in the air as to what the FL league do about the transfer embargo if the CVA is contested in court. Do they lift it, allowing the Skates to make these high profile loans and signings and then have several other clubs taking legal action because the Skates have gained an unfair advantage in the event that the courts find in favour of HMRC? And do you also ignore the barrier that stands in the way of Chainrai's masterplan, the points deductions in the pipeline for the tax cheating of Messrs Redcrapp, Storrieteller and Mandaric? As for Cotterill, is he really that idiotic that he would go to the Skates with all this sh*t yet to hit the fan, rather than Hull or anywhere else? If he does sign on as manager for them, then his tenure will not be very long. Perhaps he is that dumb, as he possibly isn't as well informed about their position as we are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 You will persist in believing that the Skates have got away with it. The CVA might well be passed today, but that doesn't mean for one minute that they will get away with it. Instead of lowering my sights, I'm a believer that they will in fact be more burnt toast than they were previously. It seems that you have been bamboozled by all the smoke and mirrors. It will go to court and not only will HMRC win, but the repercussions for the Skates will be more dire than if they had the CVA turned down today. Further implications are still up in the air as to what the FL league do about the transfer embargo if the CVA is contested in court. Do they lift it, allowing the Skates to make these high profile loans and signings and then have several other clubs taking legal action because the Skates have gained an unfair advantage in the event that the courts find in favour of HMRC? And do you also ignore the barrier that stands in the way of Chainrai's masterplan, the points deductions in the pipeline for the tax cheating of Messrs Redcrapp, Storrieteller and Mandaric? As for Cotterill, is he really that idiotic that he would go to the Skates with all this sh*t yet to hit the fan, rather than Hull or anywhere else? If he does sign on as manager for them, then his tenure will not be very long. Perhaps he is that dumb, as he possibly isn't as well informed about their position as we are. Wes my post was not meant to be aimed at you per say but in general. If they get the CVA and so Chanrai can then get a laundered business with no debt he can then go out as any other club owner and splash the cash. The creditors will have no comeback as they have taken their measly return and watch as Chanrai goes and makes a load more from a zero position. The points deductions may come into play, but I suspect we all expected them to be on -10 + now. Timing is everything and it all keeps falling into place for Pompey. Malwhinney retiring must have been a great bonus for them as i think he would have had much to say, (convieniently Leicesters man took over, and who owns them??? sweeping under carpet time perhaps) I hope Im missing the point and they will get their comeuppance but as time goes by it looks that I may not be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmel Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 I do hope your optimism is rewarded. We dont know how far HMRC's will can be pushed. Their resources are thinly spread and with the state of the economy as it is i doubt they have money to throw about on this.Yes they are hoping to make a principle but Chanrai must have some brains to be so wealthy in the first place. I so want to be wrong,but so far nothing seems to have gone as we expect, and Pompey seem to be a different case to any in normal business practice and law. Out of everything that's gone on, the theories and guess work of possible outcomes and point deductions etc, the only thing i am completely convinced about is HMRC stance in all of this. They want blood and they will get it. They are not going to roll over and die, they are not going to ease up and they don't care a monkeys how much it costs them to get a result. pompey took the ****, too many times, then they did it in court room with Vantis and they continue to do with aa. The world is watching and if for no other reason than to send a message of intent to every other club or business in the Country, HMRC will ultimately win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Out of everything that's gone on, the theories and guess work of possible outcomes and point deductions etc, the only thing i am completely convinced about is HMRC stance in all of this. They want blood and they will get it. They are not going to roll over and die, they are not going to ease up and they don't care a monkeys how much it costs them to get a result. pompey took the ****, too many times, then they did it in court room with Vantis and they continue to do with aa. The world is watching and if for no other reason than to send a message of intent to every other club or business in the Country, HMRC will ultimately win. I think that is fair and they have time and again thrown in a grenade just when they look safe. May it carry on, but we dont know quite what political pressure may be used in the background to stop them. The dirty world of dodgy business may have gone into many circles of hierarchy and power, and those transfer monies may have greased the palms of many in power not only in football and will not want it to come out. Conspiracy theory perhaps, but!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 At the moment they are unpunished and have got away with it. I don't believe or trust AA but who knows he may sort it out. When is the vote? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trader Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Out of everything that's gone on, the theories and guess work of possible outcomes and point deductions etc, the only thing i am completely convinced about is HMRC stance in all of this. They want blood and they will get it. They are not going to roll over and die, they are not going to ease up and they don't care a monkeys how much it costs them to get a result. pompey took the ****, too many times, then they did it in court room with Vantis and they continue to do with aa. The world is watching and if for no other reason than to send a message of intent to every other club or business in the Country, HMRC will ultimately win. I know from personal experience that HMRC (or Customs & Excise as it was then) do not let go once they have their teeth in. Pompey will not get away with this - HMRC are effectively the law, and if they say the figure owed is 32m then that's it, whatever AA says. He can appeal, but he won't win - he's effectively taking on the UK government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctoroncall Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Portsmouth FC may need three weeks for new CVA proposal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingeletiss Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 nick, you really do have a short memory! Have you forgot about the last court appearence, and what was agreed. AA is p1ss1ng in the wind, HMRC will have their day, and Poopey will get their comeuppence, believe in that. They are almost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidthesquid Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Would you care to elaborate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Good morning all! Here we are again... Eyes down for a FULL HOUSE.... CHEATING BASTARDS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Just going into a meeting, so hopefully will come out to goooooood news - everything crossed ; COYHMRC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warsash saint Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 If the club remains in administration at the start of the next season it faces having further points deducted from it. "That, and the large debts, would make it very hard to sell the club. And if we can't sell, then it would be a case of closing the club down. Thursday is a huge day, but I'm confident we'll do it," Andronikou added..[/url] I like this bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holepuncture Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 http://www.sportingintelligence.com/2010/06/17/exclusive-portsmouth-creditors-accept-cva-deal-club-to-exit-administration-170605/ COYHMRC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sevvy Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 According to the Sportingintelligence site they have 80% on board to agree it, Watch this space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 According to the Sportingintelligence site they have 80% on board to agree it, Watch this space Given the minimum attributed to HMRC was 21% can't see hoe he has managed to get to the 80% figure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquidshokk Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Clearly they are going to survive... tits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Given the minimum attributed to HMRC was 21% can't see hoe he has managed to get to the 80% figure? Ah well, I suppose his fees have increased the debt further.....haha TBH 80% + 21% is standard accounting practice at Nottarf Krap...you shouldn't be surprised Pedg. It ain't over until Susan Boyle sings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmel Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Does anyone know URL for the jounalist that twitters live from the creditors meetings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 while footballers everywhere are putting in at least 110%, AA still short changes us by only getting his total vote to 101%. I'm surprised he managed to get everyone to vote, I would have expected a few creditors to have more important things to do that support AA's effort to shaft them, he's obviously shrewder than we thought and the taxman will be no match for his superior skills. Or there might be a different version of these events later and it might look like AA has been talking b0ll0cks all along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Think it's @BBC_Matt on Twitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lumuah Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 So they have indeed gotten away with it. CHEATS. We can only hope that HMRC appeals take so long that it completely ruins their season, so that we have at least some hope of beating them in the 2011/12 season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony13579 Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 do we have any feeds from the meeting? bbc_matt is tweeting about cappellos choices... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 nick, you really do have a short memory! Have you forgot about the last court appearance, and what was agreed. AA is p1ss1ng in the wind, HMRC will have their day, and Poopey will get their comeuppence, believe in that. They are almost Ginge I have trouble remembering last week let alone that time ago. Time will tell, but the world seems to let them do as they wish and nobody apart from us seem to balk at the way a 138m debt has been allowed to accrue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 while footballers everywhere are putting in at least 110%, AA still short changes us by only getting his total vote to 101%. I'm surprised he managed to get everyone to vote, I would have expected a few creditors to have more important things to do that support AA's effort to shaft them, he's obviously shrewder than we thought and the taxman will be no match for his superior skills. Or there might be a different version of these events later and it might look like AA has been talking b0ll0cks all along. I read that any creditors who did not reply are counted as a positive.Lets hope all the forms found all the creditors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andysstuff Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Does anyone know URL for the jounalist that twitters live from the creditors meetings It's bbc_matt but he doesn't appear to be tweeting from there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Given the minimum attributed to HMRC was 21% can't see hoe he has managed to get to the 80% figure? it says roughly 80% ie 79% perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andysstuff Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Does anyone know URL for the jounalist that twitters live from the creditors meetings It's bbc_matt but he doesn't appear to be tweeting from there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katalinic Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 From a skate site: From a source close to the club! "CVA under threat. HMRC claim that it can only be approved if the club owes HMRC £21m but they claim to have paperwork proving that we owe £35 m. If AA declares the CVA approved HMRC will challenge it in court and officially lodge an appeal to have the club liquidated." http://www.fansonline.net/portsmouth/mb/view.php?id=276977 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merovingian Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Must be to do with image rights which at present is legal. HMRC are challenging this but as it stands are unable to claim it as part of current administration exercise. That's the understanding. How true at this juncture I am unsure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony13579 Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 In this building... we like the sound of blue skate in a liquidiser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonManager Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Apparently Tony Husband is on duty for BBC - anyone got a twitter feed for him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony13579 Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 BBC_Matt wrote @StimpySFC Possibly. I'm not there (BBC South's Tony Husband is, tho) but I may b asked to do turns for News24 & 5 Live. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Must be to do with image rights which at present is legal. HMRC are challenging this but as it stands are unable to claim it as part of current administration exercise. That's the understanding. How true at this juncture I am unsure I always thought that the additional £14M was the fines attached by HMRC for late payment - which they were in the right to claim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Well whatever happens next, the truth is this - for Nickh & NickG to seek solace in. THEIR LUCK WILL RUN OUT SOONER OR LATER. Laurence on Solent saying 81% approve....which is bull****. This ain't the end......haha :-D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidthesquid Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 This exaggerating is affecting their players now, quote: Ritchie said: 'I will give 120 per cent every week. Hopefully I will get the chance to prove myself' They just can't help themselves. I bet they think a six inch ruler is twelve inches long Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony13579 Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 portsmouth news wrote : portsmouthnews #Pompey creditors accept CVA. More soon at portsmouth.co.uk 8 minutes ago via TweetDeck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merovingian Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 If that is the case am sure they are on dodgy ground as there is a submission date for all claims and when they heard they maybe less than 25% decided to try and add this one on. AFAIK the administrator does not have to accept late claims and the figure is in dispute anyway by the Administrator. I'm no expert though so unsure of how ground lies with this stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrant Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 If that is the case am sure they are on dodgy ground as there is a submission date for all claims and when they heard they maybe less than 25% decided to try and add this one on. AFAIK the administrator does not have to accept late claims and the figure is in dispute anyway by the Administrator. I'm no expert though so unsure of how ground lies with this stuff It works both ways on that, though... don't forget AA said the debt would "bottom out at £78m", then all of a sudden this new load of debt turns up to reduce the HMRC percentage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony13579 Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/frattonlatest/Portsmouth-creditors-accept-CVA.6368898.jp#5318424 Pompey creditors have voted in favour of a deal to accept a minimum of 20p in the pound. This means the club has formally moved out of administration. However there is still a 28-day cooling off period for rejections to be raised. A total of 81.3 per cent voted in favour of the deal, in which they will get back 20p for every pound they are owed over the next five years. The CVA proposal means that within the next nine months the current business Portsmouth Football Club Ltd will be placed into liquidation and its assets and revenue moved into the new company. That company will be responsible for paying creditors. V-unhappy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 So they have got away with it then. Cheating bastards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 the gloves are off - go taxman go! Unleash the hounds of justice.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joensuu Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/frattonlatest/Portsmouth-creditors-accept-CVA.6368898.jp#5318424 V-unhappy So Thurday 15th July is the new date for the calandar then? Shame it's not the 8th of July, as it would have been fitting for the knife to be twisted on the anniversary of this thread... BTW, the most certainly haven't got away with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingeletiss Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Stunned at the acceptance, but still of the belief, that HMRC will come out the victor in the end. Oh well, next stop, the Crown court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 I assume by law that HMRC will now have to accept 20p in the pound, once the 28 day cooling off period passes? It just seems madness that players will get their £10m worth of wages next year but the state will get a pittance. Bazaar. At least the derby games will continue sometime down the line and we can get our revenge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seaempty Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 Today's hearing revealed that the Inland Revenue's claim went up from £17m to £37m. But administrators managed to reduce their claim to £24m. I don't like the sound of that - I'm hoping that wasn't mutually agreed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 So by means of 81% being quoted, and knowing HMRC voted against..... AA now considers their debt to be 19%???? Thought he said his version was 21%??? Accounting procedures of a monopoly board.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgiesaint Posted 17 June, 2010 Share Posted 17 June, 2010 So nothing unexpected happened this morning then. To those of you fretting, don't worry. At 81.3% apparently voting for, when AA acknowledged that HMRC had at least 21% of the vote, it shows that AA has massaged the figures. I actually wonder if this is the best result as it allows HMRC the quickest route back to court. We just have to hope that the transfer embargo stays in place pending the appeal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts