St. Neil Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 £657,023 a week on player wages, nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 £657,023 a week on player wages, nuff said. Hmmmmmm Does not compute 567k a week x 52 weeks = 34mil Yet they owe 138mil? So they have been unable to pay their wages for more than this season? Now then where was my Corporate Compliance Dictionary.... I think you guys are being VERY unfair with this regular siging your posts with the word CHEATS. They clearly aren't simply cheats.. They are quite probably FRAUDULENT CRIMINALS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suewhistle Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 A youth team player on 130k per annum?! I saw a similar list for West Ham and their young players, albeit with a squad number, were on 400 a week, £20,800 a year, which seems a bit more like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFrost Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 a repeat of the 'fit and proper persons' BBC South Today documentary is on BBC 1 NOW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FMPR Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 A youth team player on 130k per annum?! I saw a similar list for West Ham and their young players, albeit with a squad number, were on 400 a week, £20,800 a year, which seems a bit more like it. Gael Nlundulu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFrost Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 this thread is approaching 1 million views Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint lard Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 Just lifted this from one of their forums...... "Come on you taffs, beat those 'orrible leicester gits." "Leicester, the team that had a £30M stadium built then deliberately went into administration. (before points deductions were introduced) A lot of local companys suffered or even went bust as they only got 10p in the pound. Leicester then got promoted the same season, just behind us, then started spending millions on players in the Premiership. The dirty ba$tards!" Is it me or do they not get the irony in the above statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintkiptanui Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 Just lifted this from one of their forums...... "Come on you taffs, beat those 'orrible leicester gits." "Leicester, the team that had a £30M stadium built then deliberately went into administration. (before points deductions were introduced) A lot of local companys suffered or even went bust as they only got 10p in the pound. Leicester then got promoted the same season, just behind us, then started spending millions on players in the Premiership. The dirty ba$tards!" Is it me or do they not get the irony in the above statement.Don't post stuff like this, it makes me want to kill. They are utter f*ckin morons, they did exactly the same when mandick turned up, idiots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suewhistle Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 Just had a quick look through the p2p stuff to see what the scores were. Not one stream in any format showing the everton v pompey thread. heh heh, welcome to non-premiership anonymity (and income). You're going to have to rely more on your gate income now... Oh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dronskisaint Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 They haven't done a deal! Are there really people out there that STILL believe a word that the Android says? Lol @ his 'information embargo' I think he's putting together his insanity defence before the authorities swoop. The information 'embargo' is that he has none, has run out of excuses & has no sniff of a buyer....but who cares at £400 an hour to spin it out as long as he can. A match made in heaven:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 And the Skates go down on the ultimate whimper. Everton 1-0 Skates. Bilyaletdinov, right at the death. One last moment in the sun now before they shuffle off to oblivion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintkiptanui Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 The skates last minute defeat today means even with the 10 points they would have come bottom. Avram has done a great job:smt081 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 Saint kip you beat me too it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintkiptanui Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 As fast as my namesake Kiptanui. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOTONS EAST SIDE Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 8-0 to Chelsea, lets hope for the same score next week! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFrost Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 The skates last minute defeat today means even with the 10 points they would have come bottom. Avram has done a great job:smt081 Course he has, there obviously are 6 teams worse than them in the league :roll: I bet the skates are looking forward to meeting Chelsea in the final after today's results Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Marco Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 And now they belong to the FL. The PL no longer needs to discuss them. It is no longer their concern. Looking forward to see the different stance the FL will likely take Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 And the Skates go down on the ultimate whimper. Everton 1-0 Skates. Bilyaletdinov, right at the death. One last moment in the sun now before they shuffle off to oblivion. A nice leaving present from the PL, courtesy of Everton FC, even though it was a late delivery!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 And a big thankyou must go out to the Linesman at the Everton game today who brilliantly flagged for offside to deny the skates an early lead. There were only about 4 players playing him onside. Marvellous effort that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 And a big thankyou must go out to the Linesman at the Everton game today who brilliantly flagged for offside to deny the skates an early lead. There were only about 4 players playing him onside. Marvellous effort that See! Told you! It's a conspiracy! Everyone's got it in for us! A.Grant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 £800k per position according to Sky. Their prize money could not have been lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chopper71 Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 £800k per position according to Sky. Their prize money could not have been lower. Even if you gave them the 9 points back, their prize money couldn't have been any higher.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcjwills Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 8-0 to Chelsea, lets hope for the same score next week! What is the biggest margin in the cup final, ans what odd are for a score of greater than 5 goals to be scored by one team over the other Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 Even if you gave them the 9 points back, their prize money couldn't have been any higher.. Bit of a waste of 9 points, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 What is the biggest margin in the cup final, ans what odd are for a score of greater than 5 goals to be scored by one team over the other Bury beat Derby 6-0 in 1903. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latter day saint Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 Bury beat Derby 6-0 in 1903. that will do or would it be gready to ask for 7/8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingeletiss Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 that will do or would it be gready to ask for 7/8 No!..I'm hoping for double figures:smt081 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 No!..I'm hoping for double figures:smt081 Me too, but worried about Ancelotti's comments I hope the lads have recovered from their celebrations in time for the match next week... Just our luck if Chelski used up all their goal allowance for the season.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rpb Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 that will do or would it be gready to ask for 7/8 Beware - many thought United would get 10 against us in i976 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View From The Top Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 Me too, but worried about Ancelotti's comments I hope the lads have recovered from their celebrations in time for the match next week... Just our luck if Chelski used up all their goal allowance for the season.... No way. They REALLY want the double. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonP Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 more childish rubbish!! .. from news now http://mypompey.com/blogs/goldenboot/archive/2010/05/09/163-15m-shock-portsmouth-become-test-case-as-inland-revenue-pursue-vat-and-payee-on-image-rights.aspx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOTONS EAST SIDE Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 more childish rubbish!! .. from news now http://mypompey.com/blogs/goldenboot/archive/2010/05/09/163-15m-shock-portsmouth-become-test-case-as-inland-revenue-pursue-vat-and-payee-on-image-rights.aspxWhat can i say, if you have the intelligence of a cabbage, you only can talk to vegetables(pompey fans). They're so bitter and sad! lmfao!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fromdayone Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00sfs2h/Fit_and_Proper_Persons/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted 9 May, 2010 Share Posted 9 May, 2010 didn't learn anything we haven't already debated here from that programme, I suspect the BBC lawyers were all over it and the best stuff is on the cutting room floor. I presume Storrie denies the programme even exists and Grant will blame Husband for their final defeat of the season. It's not fair etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Munster Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 No!..I'm hoping for double figures:smt081 That would be excellent of course. But I'm a bit concerned Chelski may have shot their wad today. We all know what happened in 1974. TBH I would settle for Chelski scraping a lucky 1-0, or even a poor 0-0 a.e.t. with Chelski winning on penalties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingsbridge Saint Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 more childish rubbish!! .. from news now http://mypompey.com/blogs/goldenboot/archive/2010/05/09/163-15m-shock-portsmouth-become-test-case-as-inland-revenue-pursue-vat-and-payee-on-image-rights.aspx Comical. Refers to Saints fans as being uneducated but can't even spell properly. Gimp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fowllyd Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 That would be excellent of course. But I'm a bit concerned Chelski may have shot their wad today. We all know what happened in 1974. TBH I would settle for Chelski scraping a lucky 1-0, or even a poor 0-0 a.e.t. with Chelski winning on penalties. Um, didn't Liverpool beat Newcastle United 3-0? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
100%Red&White Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 I would settle for Chelski scraping a lucky 1-0, or even a poor 0-0 a.e.t. with Chelski winning on penalties. Having seen the way they dealt with Wigan (of the north) it's only fair they destruct the 'Wigan of the South*' in the same manner. *Cheats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_John Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00sfs2h/Fit_and_Proper_Persons/ When they first announced the program I wrote the following points (page 501 - 30 April), most of which were covered in the program. The only new things for me were (1) a "claim on record that Storrieteller has met the Invisible_Man", now there are a lot of people claiming he doesn't exist so that is NOW on record. Another lie from storrieteller or not ?, I believe the football authorities know the truth. (2) They didn't produce the email/memo or list Androids previous dealing with the High Court, why ?? (thread of legal action ?). (3) They did point out that all the "previous advisors" are still in the Directors Box at Wembley, which is good because it shows that nothing has changed at the club since they went into Admin. Generally a good program, well done Tony H, the only down side is that program was only shown in the BBC South area, but we can all arrange for it to be sent to the PL, FA and FL (+ papers) and ask for comments. For example, why in Athletics has Marion Jones records been removed for the record books when it found that she has been CHEATING (drugs) but the Football Authorities have only given the Football CHEATS a token 9 points that had NO bearing on their final league position ?. They have just said on BBC South Local News that they are producing a TV program about the demise of the Cheating Skates to be aired on Sunday 9th May at 3:15 (just before the start of their last match in the PL). I hope this is the start of the media telling the truth instead of the usual rubbish we hear. Hints to producers of the program, please mention :- - Who the real owner of the club was from 2006 ? Daddy. - How they repeatly Lied to the PL about who was the owner, and have not been charged by the football authorities, why ? - That it was NOT the financial markets that stopped the money flowing into the club but the fact that Daddy had his Bank Accounts frozen in Israel after he was charged with money laundering (trial due to start in May). - How this thread was started in July 2009 (from a leak from the Skates Finance Dept) to say NO MONEY WAS COMING from the Fake_Dr. Yet they somehow managed to get the PL to remove the first transfer embargo in August last year and sign 6 or 7 players in the final few days of that Summer Transfer Window on the understanding that the Fake_Dr was bringing in new money, but WE all knew on here there was no money. - How they had a "shadow director" for a number of weeks against PL rules but have still not been charged by the football authorities, why ? - How 3 people connected with the club are currently before the courts charged with Tax Fraud, but still the club has not been charged, why ? - They can also show this memo/email that the BBC have got which shows who was making the decisions at the time the Invisible_Owner was in charge. - They can also mention the Andriods previous dealings with the High Court. - They can also mention how they used players in the 2nd half of the season that they were never going to pay for and SHOULD NOT have been allowed to sign. Most people now view this as CHEATING, but they still have NOT been thrown out of the FA Cup and the 9 league points has made NO difference to their league position. - They can .... (please add) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 to throw them out of the cup would have been a massive gamble - an appeal through some dodgy legal route could have led to all kinds of complications, a points penalty was much simpler to impose, or withdraw if challenged. We now have a week until the firesale begins and the club slips into the welcoming arms of those reasonable people at the FL, they love a good legal battle. If AA and Grant start telling them what should happen as they did with the Prem, the FL will keep whacking the penalties on until they zip it. Hopefully the Prem will also pass on all files they have gathered on Pompey but have been too frightened to act upon. They have one final game, a farewell to the bigtime, and if AA's ridiculous plan for the future comes to pass, maybe a farewell to the football league for a generation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 I know no one responded to my boring figures post but It did highlight one thing... they do not need a new buyer... if the CVA is agreed and Chanrai is happy to wait or have his share split over 2-3 years, they can ride it aout and have reasonable funds for playesr and wages relative to the CCC. Ironically its the FL who have in effect given them this lifeline by approving the additional parachute payments which enables AA to structure a CVA over 4 years... ... The odd thing is still what happens with this so called liquidation of the old company and asset transfer to a new, and why that is necessary for a 'full forensic investigation'? (unless that ensures the new company is is in effect secure from any prosecution, but allows HMRC or CPS to pursue inividuals?...and what if any punishment they would get for doing this from the FL. Finally, that hint/story that the PL were 'doing a deal' is most likely the way they have agreed to structure the parachute payments eg getting the 16 mil in one hit for year one soon, to enable them to clear the football debt BEFORE new season (normally teh second half would not be paid until after Christmas, thus allowing Pompey to ensure they avoid a points deduction for that at the start of the CCC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrant Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 Ironically its the FL who have in effect given them this lifeline by approving the additional parachute payments which enables AA to structure a CVA over 4 years... Except they haven't, yet. It was initially rejected by a majority vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 Except they haven't, yet. It was initially rejected by a majority vote. I suspect it will be passed though.... eventually.... money talks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 I suspect it will be passed though.... eventually.... money talks... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/8671551.stm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingeletiss Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 Spat my coffie out. In the Echo, 'your views', a letter from Simon Hardy...'Chimes are tough here'!:smt038. I've tried to find a link, but have failed, worth a read if you have bought today's Echo;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgiesaint Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 Finally' date=' that hint/story that the PL were 'doing a deal' is most likely the way they have agreed to structure the parachute payments eg getting the 16 mil in one hit for year one soon, to enable them to clear the football debt BEFORE new season (normally teh second half would not be paid until after Christmas, thus allowing Pompey to ensure they avoid a points deduction for that at the start of the CCC?[/quote'] If that is case, surely if the FL allow this without any penalty then I would expect a rash of complaints and possible legal action from the other Championship clubs. Why should they start on one of Avram's level playing fields where they all have the same points but Pompey have been given cash ahead of when it was due just to keep them going. That's financial cheating again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 I know no one responded to my boring figures post but It did highlight one thing... they do not need a new buyer... if the CVA is agreed and Chanrai is happy to wait or have his share split over 2-3 years, they can ride it aout and have reasonable funds for playesr and wages relative to the CCC. Ironically its the FL who have in effect given them this lifeline by approving the additional parachute payments which enables AA to structure a CVA over 4 years... ... The odd thing is still what happens with this so called liquidation of the old company and asset transfer to a new, and why that is necessary for a 'full forensic investigation'? (unless that ensures the new company is is in effect secure from any prosecution, but allows HMRC or CPS to pursue inividuals?...and what if any punishment they would get for doing this from the FL. Finally, that hint/story that the PL were 'doing a deal' is most likely the way they have agreed to structure the parachute payments eg getting the 16 mil in one hit for year one soon, to enable them to clear the football debt BEFORE new season (normally teh second half would not be paid until after Christmas, thus allowing Pompey to ensure they avoid a points deduction for that at the start of the CCC? Frank you mean that 'forensic investigation' that the Android promised when he came in? The one that he has conveniently forgotten about?? ;-) Loved Andy Awful asking the question yesterday... 'Why is Android making the decisions now on wage capping?' Errrrrrrrrr...because no-one wants your cesspit of a club, pal. Enjoy Chelski....hahahahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miserableoldgit Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/8156276.Duo_fight_corner_for_small_firms_against_Pompey/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jez Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 I've heard Pompey have an open bus tour arranged for Sunday, regardless of whether they win the cup. When the lose 5-0, that'll be a great celebration for their relegation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidthesquid Posted 10 May, 2010 Share Posted 10 May, 2010 Did any one else notice that on the BBC South thing yesterday when Farmery started talking about Pompey being humiliated nationally and locally they used a shot of TCWTB to illustrate the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts