Pompey Takeover Saga

[Whitey Grandad]

FA Cup rules for those interested. Section 15 concenrs players' registrations and eligibility.

 

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompetitions/TheFACup/Rules

[slickmick]

FA Cup rules for those interested. Section 15 concenrs players' registrations and eligibility.

 

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompetitions/TheFACup/Rules

 

 

Unfortunately that doesn't cover the deal that Pompey had to adhere to.

[slickmick]

Copy of an email sent to the FA:

 

Dear FA

 

Recently Portsmouth FC were subject to a transfer embargo. Towards the end of the January transfer window this embargo was lifted to allow them to bring in free transfers and loan signings that did not command a fee. One particular signing was that of Quincy Owusu-Abeyie, on loan from Spartak Moscow. Today the Daily Mail is reporting that the Russian club are willing to pay a sum of £250,000 to take the player back and terminate the loan. Worryingly the article also claims that Portsmouth paid a sum of £500,000 to Spartak Moscow as a loan fee back in January. This to the average fan in the street comes across (if true) as blatant cheating and flouting of the terms agreed in lifting said transfer embargo. I would be interested to know if this article has any substance, and whether the FA are investigating these claims. As we know Portsmouth have been punished by the Premier League for their indiscretions, yet they continue to participate in the FA Cup, a competition which the player in question has made a significant contribution. If the claims in the article are true then there is an argument that the player should not have been signed and that Portsmouth should be expelled from the competition. I would again like to know the FA’s views on this.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

 

I doubt it will elicit a response but I'll be sure to post it on here if it does. As said above, the embargo was issued by the PL, so I'm sure that's their get out clause for not being bothered to act against the cheating bastards

 

Them slippery smelly fish fiddlers will squirm their way out of it. They always do.

 

They will probably say that the £500k upfront was projected wages/bonuses ect.

 

Cheats.

[Gorgiesaint]

Unfortunately that doesn't cover the deal that Pompey had to adhere to.

 

No it only states that any loan player has to have written permission to play in the FA cup - sure they wouldn't have been stupid enough to forget that.

 

Did check the PL website but their press releases are so far out of date it's unreal, would like to have seen what their original ruling was. Guess we'll have to see if the PL respond to COYR's email. What I did pick out is that the PL have to get their rules agreed by the FA at the start of each season so thats the link between PL & FA to make sure they play under the same rulesets.

[badgerx16]

No it only states that any loan player has to have written permission to play in the FA cup - sure they wouldn't have been stupid enough to forget that.

 

 

The key point is this :

 

"The Association will not give permission for players on loan or work experience to play against the lending Club. "

[Joey-deacons-left-nut]

To my mind the administrator not sending Ohara back at this time is reckless. Pompey paly Spurs in the league and then the FA cup semi. Both games Ohara is inelegible. Therefore you are talking a couple of weeks wated wages. That is money coming out of the creditors pot.

 

 

I don't think so. IIRC with loans you tend to pay a fee up front which will cover the players wages... if this wasn't the case they would have shipped all the loanees back sharpish..

[saint_mears]

To my mind the administrator not sending Ohara back at this time is reckless. Pompey paly Spurs in the league and then the FA cup semi. Both games Ohara is inelegible. Therefore you are talking a couple of weeks wated wages. That is money coming out of the creditors pot.

 

I suspect that the yids are paying oharas wages.

[slickmick]

The key point is this :

 

"The Association will not give permission for players on loan or work experience to play against the lending Club. "

 

 

But he's not played against the lending club.

[slickmick]

Copy of an email sent to the FA:

 

Dear FA

 

Recently Portsmouth FC were subject to a transfer embargo. Towards the end of the January transfer window this embargo was lifted to allow them to bring in free transfers and loan signings that did not command a fee. One particular signing was that of Quincy Owusu-Abeyie, on loan from Spartak Moscow. Today the Daily Mail is reporting that the Russian club are willing to pay a sum of £250,000 to take the player back and terminate the loan. Worryingly the article also claims that Portsmouth paid a sum of £500,000 to Spartak Moscow as a loan fee back in January. This to the average fan in the street comes across (if true) as blatant cheating and flouting of the terms agreed in lifting said transfer embargo. I would be interested to know if this article has any substance, and whether the FA are investigating these claims. As we know Portsmouth have been punished by the Premier League for their indiscretions, yet they continue to participate in the FA Cup, a competition which the player in question has made a significant contribution. If the claims in the article are true then there is an argument that the player should not have been signed and that Portsmouth should be expelled from the competition. I would again like to know the FA’s views on this.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

 

I doubt it will elicit a response but I'll be sure to post it on here if it does. As said above, the embargo was issued by the PL, so I'm sure that's their get out clause for not being bothered to act against the cheating bastards

 

 

Hope you don't mind, but I've put this on here http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A65585460?s_fromedit=1&s_type=10&s_sport=football

[Gorgiesaint]

But he's not played against the lending club.

 

Think we're talking cross purposes here. That certainly applies to O'Hara, but the conversation was about Owusu-Abeiye (sp) which the following applies:

 

j.Temporary (loan) Transfers

 

i.A player on a temporary (loan) transfer is ineligible to compete in the Challenge Cup Competition unless permission to do so is given by the lending Club in writing and a copy is received by The Association by 12 noon on the Friday prior to the date fixed for playing the Round. Any permissions must clearly state that the player has approval to play in The FA Challenge Cup Competition.

[slickmick]

Think we're talking cross purposes here. That certainly applies to O'Hara, but the conversation was about Owusu-Abeiye (sp) which the following applies:

 

 

Not sure if I'm missing your meaning here, but Owusu-Abeiye's lending club is Russian, so not much chance of him playing against them and I'm pretty sure they would have given him permission to play in the cup.

[badgerx16]

But he's not played against the lending club.

I thought you were referring to O'Hara.

[Joey-deacons-left-nut]

you guys are getting mixed up here..

 

Loan players cannot play in cup games unless permision is given by the owning club. So Pompey would have got permision for him to play in the FA cup as it's of little interest to the Russian club. O'hara was refused premission for the first FA cup games as he was coming to the end of his loan spell at Pompey and he may have moved either back to Spurs or another club where he would have been able to play. He extended his loan for the season so Spurs let him play against us as he wouldn't be going back to spursor another club.

 

 

HOWEVER, if those two clubs manage to come up against each other in league OR cup the player CANNOT play under any circumstances, no matter what the clubs say as it's an FA rule that covers all games and competitions

[COMEONYOUREDS]

Hope you don't mind, but I've put this on here http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A65585460?s_fromedit=1&s_type=10&s_sport=football

 

no not at all! Spread the word and then the FA and PL might actually take notice and do something! They are taking the **** and its about time someone did something about it!

 

comment by bleuarmee (U14151839)

posted 27 Minutes Ago

 

Sickmilck clearly doesn't understand the way free's and loans work. With a free there is generally a signing on fee and agents fees and with a loan there is always a loan fee. This is standard practice and the FA and Premier League would have been aware of this in advance of any decisions on transfer embargo rules.

 

Me thinks that Sick has too much time on his hands and wanst to make merry.

 

 

Lol. I think he's the one who's missed the point. The lifting of the embargo specifically said no loan fees

[Gorgiesaint]

Not sure if I'm missing your meaning here, but Owusu-Abeiye's lending club is Russian, so not much chance of him playing against them and I'm pretty sure they would have given him permission to play in the cup.

 

Yeah that would be pretty unlikely. There were 2 discussions going on at once, one about Owusu-Abeiye and whether Pompey breached rules by paying Spartak Moscow a £500k loan 'fee' when they weren't supposed to be spending any money and the other about Pompey's desire to plead to Spuds' better nature & allow O'Hara to play against them in the semi-final.

 

Anyway, they're still cheats!!

[rallyboy]

They weren't meant to be paying loan fees.

More importantly there were a couple of VERY unusual instances of players buying themselves out of contracts thus becoming available as an unregistered player for Pompey to sign.

On another day the passing of money from club through player to second club could be defined as 'a transfer', bypassing the ban.

I suspect they have been cheating the system, and AA has the evidence, it just depends on whether his boss wants him to reveal it.

 

So yes, it does appear that they are Cheats.

[Crab Lungs]

They weren't meant to be paying loan fees.

More importantly there were a couple of VERY unusual instances of players buying themselves out of contracts thus becoming available as an unregistered player for Pompey to sign.

On another day the passing of money from club through player to second club could be defined as 'a transfer', bypassing the ban.

I suspect they have been cheating the system, and AA has the evidence, it just depends on whether his boss wants him to reveal it.

 

So yes, it does appear that they are Cheats.

 

Rocha, Dindane and Tosic?

[Matthew Le God]

j.Temporary (loan) Transfers

 

i.A player on a temporary (loan) transfer is ineligible to compete in the Challenge Cup Competition unless permission to do so is given by the lending Club in writing and a copy is received by The Association by 12 noon on the Friday prior to the date fixed for playing the Round. Any permissions must clearly state that the player has approval to play in The FA Challenge Cup Competition. A registered Trainee or a player who is registered on a Scholarship for work experience may play for another Club, subject to written permission being given by the Club that he is registered to and provided that such permission is received by The Association by 12 noon on the Friday prior to the date fixed for playing the Round. The Association will not give permission for players on loan or work experience to play against the lending Club.

 

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompetitions/TheFACup/Rules

 

The Mirror have made the story up!

[St. Neil]

Doesnt this whole loans cant play for their parent clubs thing stem from Portsmouth anyway when they had Lua Lua on loan from Newcastle and he managed to score against them, Bobby Robson was not happy and it all changed soon after that.

 

Completely different competition but was surprised to see Hleb playing against Barcelona the other day in the champions league.

[Durleyfos]

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompetitions/TheFACup/Rules

 

The Mirror have made the story up!

 

Never!!

 

I don't even believe the date printed on the front of that rag, let alone anything printed inside.

[stevegrant]

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompetitions/TheFACup/Rules

 

The Mirror have made the story up!

However, in the same section of the rules...

 

iv. In the Competition Proper, players on "long term loan agreements", are not considered "loan" players for the purposes of the Rule, and are therefore eligible to play in the Competition.

[Matthew Le God]

O'Hara isn't on a long term loan. He signed in January.

[sunrise]

They say cheats never prosper, well it appears they're bucking the trend for the moment. I think it's the lull before the storm, as and when they are confirmed as relegated, then I think things are going to get a hell of a lot worse for them.

[Crab Lungs]

They say cheats never prosper, well it appears they're bucking the trend for the moment. I think it's the lull before the storm, as and when they are confirmed as relegated, then I think things are going to get a hell of a lot worse for them.

 

It'd be nice if they just died, to be honest.

 

They are stinking out football.

[stevegrant]

O'Hara isn't on a long term loan. He signed in January.

Any loan that is longer than a month when it is originally agreed is deemed a long-term loan.

[Joey-deacons-left-nut]

However, in the same section of the rules...

 

Yes, but that's saying they can play in the competition as a WHOLE. When they come up against their parent club they CANNOT play in THAT specific match.

[saintmonkey1979]

Any loan that is longer than a month when it is originally agreed is deemed a long-term loan.

 

I thought that 6 month loan deals were classed as short-term

[Joey-deacons-left-nut]

Right here it is

 

Is the player on Loan?

 

Yes. They must get Permision from their parent club to play in the competition

 

No. They can play.

 

Is the game against their Parent club?

 

No. They can play

 

Yes. They cannot play.

 

That's it. It's simple.

 

 

Like someone said these rules were brought in after Lua Lua put Newcastle out.

[Guest Dark Sotonic Mills]

1. A short-term loan is for a period between 28 and 93 days, including the start date and the finishing date. (All loans are for a specific number of days, and technically there is no such thing as "a month's loan".) The player cannot be recalled by his original club during the first 28 days (although it's possible that such a recall is allowed for goalkeepers in an extreme case), but can be afterwards regardless of the original period of the loan.

   
   

2. 
   

3. Short-term loans which subsequently become permanent transfers do not count to the limit of eight such loans during a season.

   
   

   
   

4. A club is allowed to sign the same player on short-term loan more than once during a season. However, the total number of days on loan cannot exceed 93. Furthermore, a club can extend the length of a short-term loan as long as the total length is not more than 93 days.

   
   

   
   

5. A long-term loan can only apply to a player aged under 23 on the 30th June before the start of the season. The loan must commence betwen 1st July and 31st December, and must run to the end of the season. A player on a long-term loan cannot be recalled by his original club unless he is permanently transferred to another club.

   
   

[Corporate Ho]

Why are you girls getting so worked up about a story (in The Mirror of all places) that doesn't contain one actual quote?

 

It's good to see that your complete and utter disinterest in all things Pompey is still in place though.

 

Good luck in the B & Q Own Label Tin of Emulsion Trophy though. Will you "paint the town red" if you win?

[Matthew Le God]

1. 
   

2. A long-term loan can only apply to a player aged under 23 on the 30th June before the start of the season. The loan must commence betwen 1st July and 31st December, and must run to the end of the season. A player on a long-term loan cannot be recalled by his original club unless he is permanently transferred to another club.

   
   

 

Which rules out O'Hara as he signed in January.

[Matthew Le God]

Good luck in the B & Q Own Label Tin of Emulsion Trophy though. Will you "paint the town red" if you win?

 

Don't mock it, you'll most likely be in it in 2011/12!

[Crab Lungs]

Why are you girls getting so worked up about a story (in The Mirror of all places) that doesn't contain one actual quote?

 

It's good to see that your complete and utter disinterest in all things Pompey is still in place though.

 

Good luck in the B & Q Own Label Tin of Emulsion Trophy though. Will you "paint the town red" if you win?

 

I really hope you lot get closed down or are impacted with the severest of punishments - I wonder if you'll still bring your condescending tone around here when you've got nothing to gloat about.

 

That said, you haven't got anything to gloat about at the moment, anyway...

[Corporate Ho]

By the way, good to see that parenting skills are being kept up in Southampton. I see even football hooliganism is a father son bonding experience for you lot now (ps, PMSL that you've got a hoolie called "Xavier")

 

Fourteen men have appeared in court charged with violent disorder following clashes between rival Portsmouth and Southampton fans.

Only one of the accused - Alan Taylor, 30, of Milton Road, Southampton - pleaded guilty at Southampton Magistrates Court yesterday.

 

The men, including Martin Bishop, 42, of Wheatlands, Fareham, are all charged over violence that erupted between fans before and after Pompey beat Saints 4-1 at St Mary's Stadium in Southampton last month.

 

Their appearances came as police investigating trouble released footage to The News of clashes between fans near the ground in Britannia Road following the game.

 

The shots, filmed from Hampshire Constabulary's fixed-wing aircraft, show an angry mob of hundreds of Southampton fans rush through the forecourt of Freeborn garage opposite St Mary's stadium after the match, hurling abuse at Pompey fans.

 

Police officers in fluorescent yellow jackets can be seen trying to stop the baying crowd from breaking through a metal fence and rushing towards their rivals.

 

Pompey fan Keith Strevett, 77, of South Road, Horndean, suffered a head injury after being hit by a rock thrown by opposing fans in Britannia Road.

 

And fellow fan Robert Graeney, 51, of Kimberley Road, Southsea, Portsmouth, suffered a cut about one in long below his left eye after being hit by flying debris.

 

About £30,000 worth of damage was done to property at the Freeborn garage during the trouble.

 

So far eight men have been charged after police released CCTV of 10 suspects wanted in relation to violence on derby day.

 

In total 23 men have now been arrested and charged as part of Operation Austen.

 

James Koral, 20, of Haddon Drive, Eastleigh, Michael Byles, 24, of Aldemoor Road, Southampton, Matthew Hinton, 19, of Hillside Avenue, Southampton and Ross Phillips, 28, of Swift road, Southampton, also appeared before Southampton magistrates yesterday.

 

Lewis Buckley, 24, of The Milburns, Romsey, James Smith, 34, of Brentwood Crescent, Southampton, Christopher Stevens, 46, of Stagbrake Close, Southampton, Xavier Whyte, 22, of Wilton Road, Southampton, Kevin Medway, 28, of Old Farm Drive, Townhill Park, Southampton, also appeared.

 

And Stephen Jordan, 49, and son Cameron Jordan, 21, of Middle Road, Southampton, and Marcus Bevan, 22, of Warburton Road, Southampton appeared before the court.

 

More than 260 officers were involved in policing the match on February 13, including mounted officers on horseback from Thames Valley Police, police dog handlers and the British Transport Police.

 

Taylor was released on unconditional bail to appear at Southampton crown Court for sentencing on April 22. The remaining 13 accused were released on unconditional bail to appear at Southampton crown Court on May 7.

 

I have to say I'm very disappointed there are no Stuart X's from Romsey on that list. I thought given his military training he'd have been a shoo in to be leading the charge

 

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Fans-in-court-over-Saints.6183960.jp

[Thedelldays]

not one from millbrook...they are getting soft round there these days

[View From The Top]

Ho, how's the takeover going? You know, the one who your friend with contacts high up at pfc, whom you see socially very two weeks or so, told you about. You remember the one? Arab billionaire I believe you said.

 

Jealous we were going to be. Pig sick I believe.

 

Any news on it?

[Channon's Sideburns]

Corpy, I'll enlighten you.

 

He's called Xavier because people from Southampton know their alphabet past the letter P.

 

HTH ;-)

[daveygwyatt]

Why are you girls getting so worked up about a story (in The Mirror of all places) that doesn't contain one actual quote?

 

It's good to see that your complete and utter disinterest in all things Pompey is still in place though.

 

Good luck in the B & Q Own Label Tin of Emulsion Trophy though. Will you "paint the town red" if you win?

 

Ho, hows the pompey fairwell tour of the premier league going? nice to see you even get to say fairwell to wembley too.... lets hope for amusment purposes your cheating club gets to continue its tour next year... you can say goodbye to all the championship clubs as you slip right past them....

 

on another note... I find it comforting to think we are at wembley in the PAINT POT TROPHY.... AT THE SAME TIME YOU LOT AINT GOT A POT TO **** IN!!

 

Enjoy yourfair well tour... you might get to take in 4 different divisions in 4 seasons or your corrupt joke of a club might just die sooner!!

[suewhistle]

Lucky guys, those Pompey fans: they're going to be able to complete the 92 club in only 4 seasons. They then get to do the BSL as well.

[Saints foreva]

By the way, good to see that parenting skills are being kept up in Southampton. I see even football hooliganism is a father son bonding experience for you lot now (ps, PMSL that you've got a hoolie called "Xavier")

 

Fourteen men have appeared in court charged with violent disorder following clashes between rival Portsmouth and Southampton fans.

Only one of the accused - Alan Taylor, 30, of Milton Road, Southampton - pleaded guilty at Southampton Magistrates Court yesterday.

 

The men, including Martin Bishop, 42, of Wheatlands, Fareham, are all charged over violence that erupted between fans before and after Pompey beat Saints 4-1 at St Mary's Stadium in Southampton last month.

 

Their appearances came as police investigating trouble released footage to The News of clashes between fans near the ground in Britannia Road following the game.

 

The shots, filmed from Hampshire Constabulary's fixed-wing aircraft, show an angry mob of hundreds of Southampton fans rush through the forecourt of Freeborn garage opposite St Mary's stadium after the match, hurling abuse at Pompey fans.

 

Police officers in fluorescent yellow jackets can be seen trying to stop the baying crowd from breaking through a metal fence and rushing towards their rivals.

 

Pompey fan Keith Strevett, 77, of South Road, Horndean, suffered a head injury after being hit by a rock thrown by opposing fans in Britannia Road.

 

And fellow fan Robert Graeney, 51, of Kimberley Road, Southsea, Portsmouth, suffered a cut about one in long below his left eye after being hit by flying debris.

 

About £30,000 worth of damage was done to property at the Freeborn garage during the trouble.

 

So far eight men have been charged after police released CCTV of 10 suspects wanted in relation to violence on derby day.

 

In total 23 men have now been arrested and charged as part of Operation Austen.

 

James Koral, 20, of Haddon Drive, Eastleigh, Michael Byles, 24, of Aldemoor Road, Southampton, Matthew Hinton, 19, of Hillside Avenue, Southampton and Ross Phillips, 28, of Swift road, Southampton, also appeared before Southampton magistrates yesterday.

 

Lewis Buckley, 24, of The Milburns, Romsey, James Smith, 34, of Brentwood Crescent, Southampton, Christopher Stevens, 46, of Stagbrake Close, Southampton, Xavier Whyte, 22, of Wilton Road, Southampton, Kevin Medway, 28, of Old Farm Drive, Townhill Park, Southampton, also appeared.

 

And Stephen Jordan, 49, and son Cameron Jordan, 21, of Middle Road, Southampton, and Marcus Bevan, 22, of Warburton Road, Southampton appeared before the court.

 

More than 260 officers were involved in policing the match on February 13, including mounted officers on horseback from Thames Valley Police, police dog handlers and the British Transport Police.

 

Taylor was released on unconditional bail to appear at Southampton crown Court for sentencing on April 22. The remaining 13 accused were released on unconditional bail to appear at Southampton crown Court on May 7.

 

I have to say I'm very disappointed there are no Stuart X's from Romsey on that list. I thought given his military training he'd have been a shoo in to be leading the charge

 

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Fans-in-court-over-Saints.6183960.jp

Bit rich coming from a Skate...

 

When you beat up your city after your famous 1-0 win, wasn't there something about a 14 year old football hooligan in the paper? But then again, that in Portsmouth is old enough to be a father of 3.

 

Oh and Ho, don't mock the JPT - You might be in it in a few years should AFC Pompey manage to get up the leagues quickly.

[Corporate Ho]

I really hope you lot get closed down or are impacted with the severest of punishments - I wonder if you'll still bring your condescending tone around here when you've got nothing to gloat about.

 

That said, you haven't got anything to gloat about at the moment, anyway...

 

Poor Crabby. So bitter.

 

We used to be on friendly terms Crabby. You used to PM me and we talked about ****ging girls from different countries, do you remember? Do you also remember the PM you sent me telling me what your dad said when you were watching a Pompey game on TV together? That he wished your fans could generate an atmosphere like the Pompey fans did?

 

Given you'd tell me things like that via PM Crabby I can only speculate what's turned you against me. And as my tone hasn't changed on here from when I used to post I can only conclude that slipping down the divisions and seeing Pompey above you has made you a bitter young Johnny Depp lookalike. Sad

 

 

Ho, how's the takeover going? You know, the one who your friend with contacts high up at pfc, whom you see socially very two weeks or so, told you about. You remember the one? Arab billionaire I believe you said.

 

Jealous we were going to be. Pig sick I believe.

 

Any news on it?

 

It happened. They were shown proof of funds. And then it turned out to be the scam by Chainrai that's still being played out.

 

Why do you keep repeating that "see socially" thing? It seems to really rattle your cage for some reason. Would it have been better if I'd said we see them for dinner or go round their house for a few drinks every couple of weeks? Better?

 

If Granty wants to grant me (see what I did there?) temporary PM privileges and drop me a line I'll let him have a few details about who I know at PFC which should be enough to covince him. It's up to Mr Grant.

 

Ho, hows the pompey fairwell tour of the premier league going? nice to see you even get to say fairwell to wembley too.... lets hope for amusment purposes your cheating club gets to continue its tour next year... you can say goodbye to all the championship clubs as you slip right past them....

 

on another note... I find it comforting to think we are at wembley in the PAINT POT TROPHY.... AT THE SAME TIME YOU LOT AINT GOT A POT TO **** IN!!

 

Enjoy yourfair well tour... you might get to take in 4 different divisions in 4 seasons or your corrupt joke of a club might just die sooner!!

 

Before trying it on I'd suggest you learn how to spell "farewell" properly or you look a bit of a knob.

 

We may well be relegated a couple of divisions but as long as the club survives I don't care. Been there before and enjoyed it at the time. Not like you arrogant bunch of schoolgirls who believe that because you spent a while in the top flight you "belong" there. You've got no more right to be there than anyone and clubs like Forest, Norwich, Boro, Leeds etc show that even if you get back there there's a good chance you'll be relegated again within a couple of seasons.

 

As for not having a pot to **** in, at least our FA Cup ****e5 on the one you're competing for (I assume most of you think it's a fait accompli that you'll win?)

[waggy]

Don't mock it, you'll most likely be in it in 2011/12!

 

Non-league clubs can't enter it

[daveygwyatt]

Poor Crabby. So bitter.

 

We used to be on friendly terms Crabby. You used to PM me and we talked about ****ging girls from different countries, do you remember? Do you also remember the PM you sent me telling me what your dad said when you were watching a Pompey game on TV together? That he wished your fans could generate an atmosphere like the Pompey fans did?

 

Given you'd tell me things like that via PM Crabby I can only speculate what's turned you against me. And as my tone hasn't changed on here from when I used to post I can only conclude that slipping down the divisions and seeing Pompey above you has made you a bitter young Johnny Depp lookalike. Sad

 

 

 

 

It happened. They were shown proof of funds. And then it turned out to be the scam by Chainrai that's still being played out.

 

Why do you keep repeating that "see socially" thing? It seems to really rattle your cage for some reason. Would it have been better if I'd said we see them for dinner or go round their house for a few drinks every couple of weeks? Better?

 

If Granty wants to grant me (see what I did there?) temporary PM privileges and drop me a line I'll let him have a few details about who I know at PFC which should be enough to covince him. It's up to Mr Grant.

 

 

 

Before trying it on I'd suggest you learn how to spell "farewell" properly or you look a bit of a knob.

 

We may well be relegated a couple of divisions but as long as the club survives I don't care. Been there before and enjoyed it at the time. Not like you arrogant bunch of schoolgirls who believe that because you spent a while in the top flight you "belong" there. You've got no more right to be there than anyone and clubs like Forest, Norwich, Boro, Leeds etc show that even if you get back there there's a good chance you'll be relegated again within a couple of seasons.

 

As for not having a pot to **** in, at least our FA Cup ****e5 on the one you're competing for (I assume most of you think it's a fait accompli that you'll win?)

 

LOL HO, now my spelling may not be up to much, i would be the first to admit that.... but I would think you find its your that looks a bit of a knob ( opinion from othesr welcome here )... with all the ****e you post on here... as for belonging in the premier league, i dont think that, football has its ups and downs, we will get back their sometime soon, and we will prob drop again. To be honest i am enjoying this season more than most in recent years we have finaly got our club back. the premier league will be nice when we get there but its not that important I and 20,000 others will support them in any league.... i wonder what your crowds will be like in the next few seasons!!! 6000-8000 i would suggest as you drop down the leagues... So it would seem that for the skates premier league is every thing.... start watching for your city to be full of other teams shirts very very soon..... great fans LOL

Edited 26 March, 2010 by daveygwyatt

[Crab Lungs]

Poor Crabby. So bitter.

 

We used to be on friendly terms Crabby. You used to PM me and we talked about ****ging girls from different countries, do you remember? Do you also remember the PM you sent me telling me what your dad said when you were watching a Pompey game on TV together? That he wished your fans could generate an atmosphere like the Pompey fans did?

 

Given you'd tell me things like that via PM Crabby I can only speculate what's turned you against me. And as my tone hasn't changed on here from when I used to post I can only conclude that slipping down the divisions and seeing Pompey above you has made you a bitter young Johnny Depp lookalike. Sad

 

 

I do recall, yes. We did used to be on very communicative terms. However, I do think the tone of your posts (not to mention your appalling 'attendance' arguments!) might have somewhat struck an internal flame within.

 

Coupled with your clubs complete disregard and disrespect for anyone or anything makes quite a ****tail with which to brew the hatred you so poignantly speak of.

[Puddings and Monkeys]

**** off back to your own board Ho - they're having a debate on there about how many you'll take to Wembley for the semi-final; general view is that it will be about 20K. Massive club Portsmyth eh?

[View From The Top]

 

It happened. They were shown proof of funds. And then it turned out to be the scam by Chainrai that's still being played out.

 

Why do you keep repeating that "see socially" thing? It seems to really rattle your cage for some reason. Would it have been better if I'd said we see them for dinner or go round their house for a few drinks every couple of weeks? Better?

 

If Granty wants to grant me (see what I did there?) temporary PM privileges and drop me a line I'll let him have a few details about who I know at PFC which should be enough to covince him. It's up to Mr Grant.

 

You are even more deluded than I dared to imagine if you think you have the capacity to "rattle my cage".

 

The term I repeat ad nauseum illustrates the bolloooxs that you've spouted throughout and how you think that you are getting little snippets of info', all of which turn out to be, guess what? Yes, that's right bollloooxs.

 

Still, watching your club die, slowly, is giving me months of pleasure and will continue to do so. That information doesn't need confirming by your "friend".

[mack rill]

Surely it`s brown sticky stuff?!

 

Nar we've already been up to our necks in that all season:-({|=:-({|=:-({|=

[Channon's Sideburns]

Nar we've already been up to our necks in that all season:-({|=:-({|=:-({|=

 

Just in time for this. Sing along everyone. ;-)

 

[mack rill]

By the way, good to see that parenting skills are being kept up in Southampton. I see even football hooliganism is a father son bonding experience for you lot now (ps, PMSL that you've got a hoolie called "Xavier")

 

Fourteen men have appeared in court charged with violent disorder following clashes between rival Portsmouth and Southampton fans.

Only one of the accused - Alan Taylor, 30, of Milton Road, Southampton - pleaded guilty at Southampton Magistrates Court yesterday.

 

The men, including Martin Bishop, 42, of Wheatlands, Fareham, are all charged over violence that erupted between fans before and after Pompey beat Saints 4-1 at St Mary's Stadium in Southampton last month.

 

Their appearances came as police investigating trouble released footage to The News of clashes between fans near the ground in Britannia Road following the game.

 

The shots, filmed from Hampshire Constabulary's fixed-wing aircraft, show an angry mob of hundreds of Southampton fans rush through the forecourt of Freeborn garage opposite St Mary's stadium after the match, hurling abuse at Pompey fans.

 

Police officers in fluorescent yellow jackets can be seen trying to stop the baying crowd from breaking through a metal fence and rushing towards their rivals.

 

Pompey fan Keith Strevett, 77, of South Road, Horndean, suffered a head injury after being hit by a rock thrown by opposing fans in Britannia Road.

 

And fellow fan Robert Graeney, 51, of Kimberley Road, Southsea, Portsmouth, suffered a cut about one in long below his left eye after being hit by flying debris.

 

About £30,000 worth of damage was done to property at the Freeborn garage during the trouble.

 

So far eight men have been charged after police released CCTV of 10 suspects wanted in relation to violence on derby day.

 

In total 23 men have now been arrested and charged as part of Operation Austen.

 

James Koral, 20, of Haddon Drive, Eastleigh, Michael Byles, 24, of Aldemoor Road, Southampton, Matthew Hinton, 19, of Hillside Avenue, Southampton and Ross Phillips, 28, of Swift road, Southampton, also appeared before Southampton magistrates yesterday.

 

Lewis Buckley, 24, of The Milburns, Romsey, James Smith, 34, of Brentwood Crescent, Southampton, Christopher Stevens, 46, of Stagbrake Close, Southampton, Xavier Whyte, 22, of Wilton Road, Southampton, Kevin Medway, 28, of Old Farm Drive, Townhill Park, Southampton, also appeared.

 

And Stephen Jordan, 49, and son Cameron Jordan, 21, of Middle Road, Southampton, and Marcus Bevan, 22, of Warburton Road, Southampton appeared before the court.

 

More than 260 officers were involved in policing the match on February 13, including mounted officers on horseback from Thames Valley Police, police dog handlers and the British Transport Police.

 

Taylor was released on unconditional bail to appear at Southampton crown Court for sentencing on April 22. The remaining 13 accused were released on unconditional bail to appear at Southampton crown Court on May 7.

 

I have to say I'm very disappointed there are no Stuart X's from Romsey on that list. I thought given his military training he'd have been a shoo in to be leading the charge

 

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Fans-in-court-over-Saints.6183960.jp

 

Corp you made this up surly,,,,,, None of these Nawty Boys are inbred knuckle dragger's from Leper island:rolleyes:

[dronskisaint]

Why are you girls getting so worked up about a story (in The Mirror of all places) that doesn't contain one actual quote?

 

It's good to see that your complete and utter disinterest in all things Pompey is still in place though.

 

Good luck in the B & Q Own Label Tin of Emulsion Trophy though. Will you "paint the town red" if you win?

 

I refer you back to your drivel re an overheard conversation in a bar between an agent & a player who wasn't even in the country that you tarted out as containing some kind of substance...did that contain a single quote?

 

The substance that yours did contain emanates from a®seholes, is usually brown & smells bad...run along now back to your fantasy world - your real one is continuing to die slowly, painfully & embarrassingly - to our ongoing delight!