exit2 Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 I honestly think they will go under, they can not and have not run as a viable business for months now. The long list of creditors is getting longer and longer every day, and the whole ownership thing is a mess. Like said above I cant see matey throwing any more money at it knowing he will not get a return and to be honest he wont. He is only owed £17m, if you pay £7.5 to the HMRC you are increasing your "loan" by nearly 50%, added to that other debts ie Sol Campbell, and wages you are nealry doubling it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommi Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 They will not go under, no way, it's simply not going to happen. An 11th hour deal will be brokered, I only hope we turn up on Saturday and give them a bloody tough game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faz Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 I honestly think they will go under, they can not and have not run as a viable business for months now. The long list of creditors is getting longer and longer every day, and the whole ownership thing is a mess. Like said above I cant see matey throwing any more money at it knowing he will not get a return and to be honest he wont. He is only owed £17m, if you pay £7.5 to the HMRC you are increasing your "loan" by nearly 50%, added to that other debts ie Sol Campbell, and wages you are nealry doubling it! As I said earlier £17m, plus HMRC is probably £10m by now, plus "Football Debts" £25m, plus £3m per month for the next 5 months, Plus Gheydamacks millions. Whoever buys them needs to take responsibility for £95m of debts. For a Championship Club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Keith Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 As I said earlier £17m, plus HMRC is probably £10m by now, plus "Football Debts" £25m, plus £3m per month for the next 5 months, Plus Gheydamacks millions. Whoever buys them needs to take responsibility for £95m of debts. For a Championship Club. youd surely buy newcastle instead if you were that daft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 That article says he is willing to make an offer, BUT doesn't make any mention of the taxman recieving one let alone accepting it. I thought Chanrai initially loaned £18.5M and then a wage bill payment which plus the interest (Palace were borrowing at 18%) must make his debt £25M already, meaning he would personally want at least £30M payback if he sold. With many other debts and costs the club is starting to get very expensive. If HMRC do accept a new payment plan from him, the Pompey debt would just increase making them less attractive to a buyer. They need donations not loans. Even with a payoff tomorrow I see no progress beyond postponing implosion for another few weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Keith Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 Ho Ho, wherever you may be ive laughed so much i let out some wee crawl out from your stone and put us all straight or is this really the end of the skates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 sorry my informer has not replied yet giving me permission. I think he has gone into hiding. He did say it was not looking good for them. most reports are so promising for them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy_D Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 SSN saying talks between them and HMRC will continue tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 SSN saying talks between them and HMRC will continue tomorrow. I reckon they're still nailed on for Admin at least. The storrie's are there for face saving purposes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Keith Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 SSN saying talks between them and HMRC will continue tomorrow. something along the lines of this i should think Storrie "we'll give you £0.5m now and you stop the petition" HMRC "Nope, wrong answer, try again" Storrie "we'll give you £1m now and you stop the petition" HMRC "Nope, wrong answer, try again" Storrie "we'll give you £2m now and you stop the petition" HMRC "Nope, wrong answer, try again" Storrie "we'll give you £3m now and you stop the petition" HMRC "Nope, wrong answer, try again" Storrie "hmm, wait there, i better make a few more phone calls" HMRC "thats ok, we're not going anywhere" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 SSN saying talks between them and HMRC will continue tomorrow. How long for Jacobs to realise that NO! means no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 Surely it's in HRMC's interest to force the club into admin, at least then they know someone is going to be trying to recoup their cash. I doubt they will accept a penny less than what they are owed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 Surely it's in HRMC's interest to force the club into admin, at least then they know someone is going to be trying to recoup their cash. I doubt they will accept a penny less than what they are owed. I have a feeling all of this meeting lark is all a p1ss in the mississippi. Tomorrow, after entering Admin, Storrie and Jacobs can declare they 'did everything they could'. Then disappear for the truth to come out much later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chin Strain Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 Surely it's in HRMC's interest to force the club into admin, at least then they know someone is going to be trying to recoup their cash. I doubt they will accept a penny less than what they are owed. How though? Nothing left to sell, especially if Chanrai gets the ground. Liquidation ensures that the problem doesn't get bigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 Radio 5 keep announcing Pompey are "close" to a deal. I wonder what the source of this is though! Doubt it's coming from HMRC so you have to wonder how genuine it is. Tomorrow could be fun anyway! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Fry Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 Radio 5 keep announcing Pompey are "close" to a deal. I wonder what the source of this is though! Doubt it's coming from HMRC so you have to wonder how genuine it is. Quite. They are essentially reporting the fact that Storrie has been on the phone to the BBC hacks making sure it sounds like he's doing lots and lots and lots for his beloved club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 How though? Nothing left to sell, especially if Chanrai gets the ground. Liquidation ensures that the problem doesn't get bigger. They must be able to loan out enough players to survive to the end of the season, then they will have the parachutes and maybe flog a few players. I suppose their problem is they have donkeys like Utaka on 80k a week, impossible to loan or sell. They couldn't even give James away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie66 Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 Radio 5 keep announcing Pompey are "close" to a deal. I wonder what the source of this is though! Doubt it's coming from HMRC so you have to wonder how genuine it is. Tomorrow could be fun anyway! Just wander how HMRC work until 9pm ? I suspect their Lawyers are a simple instruction....Pay up Pompey Pompey pay up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Marco Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 I still think they are fooked regardless of what their execs have been saying. The point here which they seem to be forgetting is that they are acting as if it is a court hearing where they will be told to pay what they owe. That time has gone, it was months ago. The harsh reality is only 2 scenarios can happen now to save them 1. They strike a deal with the HMRC which would have to include a vast amount of the money owed being paid instantly and the rest paid in frequent installments. So for example if the bill is £7.5m such as Portsmouth claim then they pay say £4m up front tomorrow and the other £3.5m over the next few weeks. They will not settle on a deal where Portsmouth pay a few hundred grand a month for the next 50 years etc, that is not going to happen. Either way this scenario means someone has to put money into it, again unlikely to happen. 2. The club come clean and admit the total fook up they have made over the years and ask for them to be placed in admin. If they cannot do that then the creditors can apply for that to happen. Once in admin the court case stops and they get the points deduction. So as someone else mentioned pretty much this is the scenario for the current owner. He has already got £17m in the clubs debts. Does he put in another £4m-£7.5m to starve off the court case for now and keep the club going for at least a few more weeks? But could then get put into admin at the next slightest payment due date i.e wages. Meaning he would lose potentially £21m-£24.5m in total. He has already said he will not put any money in. The why they have not gone into admin theory. Because the momment they do every single one of them loses out. The gravey train stops for the likes of Storrie. The owner loses everything. He will hold out to the last possible momment to do that because for him that is the worst case scenario. Make no mistake about it, he could not give a **** about the club, the fans etc.. he cares about his huge amount of money put into it. The momment they are in admin, gone and nothing he can do about it. Right now the HMRC are itching to take a Premiership club down. If it was a big club then i doubt very much they would be as hostile as they appear to be being. But a club like Portsmouth fits the bill. A smallish club living way beyond it's means. They will want to send a message out to English football that you are the same as everyone else and if you don't keep your finances in check or miss payments then you will go the same way. If Portsmouth go under we would notice, their fans would notice, but ultimatly in a year or two everyone would of forgotten about them. It is the Wimbledon effect. So the question is how much do the taxman see this as a moral thing? Are they taking their stance because they think it is time to set an example? A lot of the papers such as the times think this and i tend to agree. The judge in the case will be in there reading how much money little Portsmouth squandered over the past few years and how they ended up in the situation, i cannot see anyone feeling sorry for them in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Saint Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 (edited) Assuming they owe HMRC £7.5m I would, as a negotiator, be offering a payment of £1.5m now and stage payments thereafter pointing out to HMRC advisors that if the club was wound up or placed into Administration, as an unsecured creditor, they would be lucky to recoup 10%. Bearing in mind the tax owed is public money it would not be in the best public interest to take that action. I suspect such a deal would cause the winding up order to be withdrawn, particularly if other parties to the order have been paid up or similar deals struck. Problem for Portsmouth is the the financial issues will not go away unless significant cash is injected long term. Edited 8 February, 2010 by Weston Saint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/p/portsmouth/8505321.stm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/p/portsmouth/8505321.stm Don't believe that. Another tall Storrie. Why, when the public purse is so stretched would they accept rescheduled payments from a bunch of chancers who won't even pay the Stadium Announcer £60? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil Monkey Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/p/portsmouth/8505321.stm No quotes from anybody at all. Not even the often used, ambiguous term, 'Portsmouth sources.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/p/portsmouth/8505321.stm From that article: "Portsmouth say......." Yeah right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/p/portsmouth/8505321.stm It quotes Mark Jacobs saying that there are 2 or 3 interested parties and then lists a gazillion reasons why anybody in their right mind wouldn't touch them with a barge pole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 Must be hard for them to keep a straight face when dealing with Storrie with his charge pending Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/p/portsmouth/8505321.stm Sounds like this has come out of PFC then. Quelle surprise. I will take it with a pinch of salt for now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Marco Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 (edited) This whole payment thing comes from The Telegraph. Everyone basically followed the story. They say "The Daily Telegraph said Chainrai was ready to offer HMRC a financial settlement rather than appealing for more time to contest the winding-up order" But having a look on their website that report seems to have gone. Can anyone else find it? EDIT: This must be it http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/portsmouth/7190308/Portsmouth-seek-stay-of-execution-against--winding-up-order.html Edited 8 February, 2010 by St Marco Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Marco Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 So then that report from The Telegraph which was published today at 8pm has magically vanished from the website. Can't see it on the front page, can't see it in the sports section, can't see it on the football section. The only way you can find it is by going to the Portsmouth section on the website. Which is slightly funny because their piece from earlier today about Portsmouth having a 5th owner today is on the front page..... Which would lead me to think they probably are not to confident in it. From that report we get very little information. But we get these lines "Chainrai is ready to offer HMRC a financial settlement rather than appealing for more time to contest the winding-up order. A host of other companies that joined the winding-up order have already been paid off by the club, simplifying the process. It is not clear whether Chainrai has injected fresh funds or the proceeds from the transfer-window sales of Younis Kaboul and Begovic have been diverted. Club sources have indicated that there are at least two interested parties, and there is growing confidence that one may be in a position to begin conducting due diligence." I wonder who that club source could be? Sounds familliar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 So then that report from The Telegraph which was published today at 8pm has magically vanished from the website. Can't see it on the front page, can't see it in the sports section, can't see it on the football section. The only way you can find it is by going to the Portsmouth section on the website. Which is slightly funny because their piece from earlier today about Portsmouth having a 5th owner today is on the front page..... Which would lead me to think they probably are not to confident in it. From that report we get very little information. But we get these lines "Chainrai is ready to offer HMRC a financial settlement rather than appealing for more time to contest the winding-up order. A host of other companies that joined the winding-up order have already been paid off by the club, simplifying the process. It is not clear whether Chainrai has injected fresh funds or the proceeds from the transfer-window sales of Younis Kaboul and Begovic have been diverted. Club sources have indicated that there are at least two interested parties, and there is growing confidence that one may be in a position to begin conducting due diligence." I wonder who that club source could be? Sounds familliar? So, we already knew that the other involved was Grosvenor - so they've managed to pay off a maximum of £90k. Not quite £7.5M is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 telegraph story still there http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/portsmouth/7190308/Portsmouth-seek-stay-of-execution-against--winding-up-order.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Marco Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 Exactly. And what makes it sound bull**** to me is this line "It is not clear whether Chainrai has injected fresh funds or the proceeds from the transfer-window sales of Younis Kaboul and Begovic have been diverted" If you were talking with the club as they claim then would they not have asked that question? Would the person talking to them (obviously Jacobs) not have said yeah he has put some more money in or it has come from the player sales? It does not make sense because if the report was true and Chainrai had put his own money in he would want people to know he had because it would make him have a better image for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Marco Posted 8 February, 2010 Share Posted 8 February, 2010 telegraph story still there http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/portsmouth/7190308/Portsmouth-seek-stay-of-execution-against--winding-up-order.html yeah as i said above you have to go to Portsmouth's section to find it. You would think it would be front page right? At least at same level as "Portsmouth set for 5th owner" which is on front page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PES Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 Whats that coming over the hill?......SHABANI NONDA, SHABANI NONDA! (According to The Daily Hate) And his mate Erik Edmund could also sign on. Ok, fingers crossed for a good week for Pompey, Tomorrow warm up for Saturday by beating Sunderland (again), Weds sort out Her Majesty's Crew before the main event on Saturday when we put your rabble well and truelly in your place. Then we can focus back on Joining the 'Real' football league. Things are looking up, PUP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draino76 Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 Whats that coming over the hill?......SHABANI NONDA, SHABANI NONDA! (According to The Daily Hate) And his mate Erik Edmund could also sign on. Ok, fingers crossed for a good week for Pompey, Tomorrow warm up for Saturday by beating Sunderland (again), Weds sort out Her Majesty's Crew before the main event on Saturday when we put your rabble well and truelly in your place. Then we can our focus back on Joining the 'Real' football league. Things are looking up, PUP! Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeyyyyyyyyyy! Good luck with that. LMAO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PES Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeyyyyyyyyyy! Good luck with that. LMAO. All we need now is Lawro to put the icing on the cake with his home win prediction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 Whats that coming over the hill?......SHABANI NONDA, SHABANI NONDA! (According to The Daily Hate) And his mate Erik Edmund could also sign on. Ok, fingers crossed for a good week for Pompey, Tomorrow warm up for Saturday by beating Sunderland (again), Weds sort out Her Majesty's Crew before the main event on Saturday when we put your rabble well and truelly in your place. Then we can focus back on Joining the 'Real' football league. Things are looking up, PUP! victory against Sunderland, HMRC and us maybe a good week but its won't divert from the now inevitable decline over next couple of years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/feb/09/portsmouth-balram-chainrai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/156968/Portsmouth-s-last-chance-saloon-over-tax-debts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1249501/Portsmouth-look-settle-7-5m-tax-debt-order-save-club-administration.html?ITO=1490 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skintsaint Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 nothing like leaving this till the last minute.... they will get away with this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Marco Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 Have to say if they accept that offer then i would be shocked. That is like saying were pay you 10% of what we owe you today and then the rest later on. Personally i hope it happens as i want to go to the derby game and i think we would lose out by not having a rival anymore. But this whole saga has gone on for months and months now. The whole thing needs to be brought to it's conclusion. Like a film everyone wants to know how it will end. Heart says they will accept it, but head say's they will want a lot more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 Nothing much new in any of those press articles that hasn't been discussd on here, except for the gem that the skates are Portsmouth's 2nd largest employer with 600 over half of whom are part-time. So obviously the council isn't very big then, and nice spin chaps. My feelings - everything makes sense, HMRC would listen to the arguments and in normal circumstances would likely adjourn leaving the sword of Damocles hanging over them. However, they did that before and they got ignored. You can take the p1ss once, you can likely take it twice, but trying the same trick a third time? Needs a new angle if it's going to work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint in Paradise Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 Well as a UK Tax payer still ( very small though ) I will be very annoyed IF HMRC don't demand full payment now. No installment plans ever again they just cannot be trusted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Paul C Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 Nothing much new in any of those press articles that hasn't been discussd on here, except for the gem that the skates are Portsmouth's 2nd largest employer with 600 over half of whom are part-time. Also conveniently ignoring the 1100 or so people that work at IBM in PartSmurf and all those employed at the RN dockyards etc.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingeletiss Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/feb/09/portsmouth-balram-chainrai Could this '1.8m', be the leavings from last weeks outgoing transfers??, have they in fact, recovered the little brown bags from behind the chairmans desk, in which to make this alledged offer. If so, then it's not really an injection of new money!!!!. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 (edited) Also conveniently ignoring the 1100 or so people that work at IBM in PartSmurf and all those employed at the RN dockyards etc.. And all the related MOD type supply companies, Hampshire Police, National Health, or on the web.... Current members include FPT Industries, VT Group, Hampshire Constabulary, HM Revenue and Customs, Ministry of Defence, Portsmouth Housing Association, Warings Construction Group, The Listening Company and IBM. Or possibly the P&O operation.... Or of course he NOW refers only to The City, in which case he is ignoring their catchment area, and so he now states that their operation is really only of interest to a far smaller audience. Must be nice to be a few member in Havant and to be ignored Still, when did PCFC ever let the facts get in the way of a statement to the press Edited 9 February, 2010 by dubai_phil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingeletiss Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1249501/Portsmouth-look-settle-7-5m-tax-debt-order-save-club-administration.html?ITO=1490 Do the papers in fact, know anything. They say 'new owner Chainrai is locked in talks', correct me if I'm wrong, he has not as yet, passed the PL F & PPT, and until that happens, will not be reconised by said body, as the new owner. This is still a smoke and mirrors exercise IMHO, and hope that HMRC do not fall for this bullsh!t, the way some fans have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 Could this '1.8m', be the leavings from last weeks outgoing transfers??, have they in fact, recovered the little brown bags from behind the chairmans desk, in which to make this alledged offer. If so, then it's not really an injection of new money!!!!. Was there not a quote at the time that the PL had already forwarded the remainder to HMRC? That came to about 1.8M I believe (remember posting the calculation of such). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joensuu Posted 9 February, 2010 Share Posted 9 February, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/feb/09/portsmouth-balram-chainrai The discussions can't be going all that well if Storrie feels he has to appeal to public sympathy. Chainrai's role of muddying the waters is also made very clear. £1.8 million is not enough. The company could easily have raised the full £7.5 million had it sold more players. That's what any other company would have needed to do. Pompey have had ample opportunity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts