Channon's Sideburns Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 anyone remember this. ROFL :smt036 Ok...tell me if I'm wrong. BUT DOESN'T THAT RESEMBLE A BED PAN? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 todays caption competition 'I told Storyteller...he's getting this finger up his arse in Parkhurst if he stitches me up' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DS Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Christ, and I thought the first Ted Bates statue was embarrasing. Actually, come to think of it, that would make a perfect figurehead for the soon to be opened Milan Mandaric Stadium.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Just a thought... Maybe that's why he didn't spend much under Lowe? Nail on the head I reckon. Well done Rupert. Fook me did I just say that ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katalinic Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 If Redknapp has this written into his contract, then chances are many more managers are doing the same thing. Many have, but there is a difference between being bonused on something and actually manipulating situations via third parties, unbeknown to your employer, to ensure that a larger than normal bonus is paid. Unless the CEO is in on it of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancake Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Many have, but there is a difference between being bonused on something and actually manipulating situations via third parties, unbeknown to your employer, to ensure that a larger than normal bonus is paid. Unless the CEO is in on it of course. Or both CEOs, of course. For every selling CEO and manager, there is always a buying CEO and manager... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katalinic Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Or both CEOs, of course. For every selling CEO and manager, there is always a buying CEO and manager... Indeed Pancake..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidthesquid Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 If Chanrai gets to own Fartton Park outright, what sort of rent could he reasonably expect from Poopey in the Prem or CCC? I gather part of Palace's problem is that Ron Noades owns the ground a probably charges them a fair old wedge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crab Lungs Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fromdayone Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 So, if Chainrai owns the whole shooting match (minus Gaydamaks surrounding land)...... what exactly does Al Mirage "the owner" own?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 So, if Chainrai owns the whole shooting match (minus Gaydamaks surrounding land)...... what exactly does Al Mirage "the owner" own?? I guess its an attempt to hive off the assets and leave the debts behind in a rump company. Wont work with HMRC though - the tax debts would take precedence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Keith Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 So, if Chainrai owns the whole shooting match (minus Gaydamaks surrounding land)...... what exactly does Al Mirage "the owner" own?? the player registrations, thats about it. hence why he's asset stripping and trousering all the money, with no interest in paying any of the debts. or any of the staff, ahead of them going pop next week, now that he cant sell anymore players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Keith Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 lungs you *****oid, thats the 3rd day running someones made me spew coffee over my laptpop :smt036 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Loved this- 'The Saints, having gone into administration last term, are now bankrolled by a Swiss billionaire. Just to rub their local rivals' noses in it, this week they announced they will not bother with a sponsor on their centenary shirt, for purely aesthetic reasons.' http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/footba...rticle/226865/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Photoshop KING! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Keith Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 its all gone very quiet on the media front today about paying the wages :confused: or maybe they've given up reporting the same thing day after day, and is now no longer regarded as "news" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draino76 Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 I particularly like the Saints bib!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merovingian Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 its all gone very quiet on the media front today about paying the wages :confused: or maybe they've given up reporting the same thing day after day, and is now no longer regarded as "news" staff now paid, players to be paid later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimond Geezer Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 is this Redknapp cut a percentage of total transfer amount or a %age of any profits? Just a thought... Maybe that's why he didn't spend much under Lowe? I'm not a Lowe luvvie, but maybe the best thing he ever did for us was keeping the cheque book hidden from Twitchy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaz Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Or both CEOs, of course. For every selling CEO and manager, there is always a buying CEO and manager... Look how many players 'Arry has brought in from his previous club.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnyLove Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 I guess its an attempt to hive off the assets and leave the debts behind in a rump company. Wont work with HMRC though - the tax debts would take precedence. not any more they don't those laws changed hence why HMRC are deliverying WUO all over the place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crab Lungs Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 lungs you *****oid, thats the 3rd day running someones made me spew coffee over my laptpop :smt036 Didn't have time to knock up a more 'professional' version with the contours of the badge etc but I'm glad its getting a few lols Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Didn't have time to knock up a more 'professional' version with the contours of the badge etc but I'm glad its getting a few lols Any chance you could knock one up of 'Arry p1ssing all over a Poopey Shirt? haha.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crab Lungs Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 (edited) Any chance you could knock one up of 'Arry p1ssing all over a Poopey Shirt? haha.. That is entirely possible, though I would need to find the time. Currently working on a comic-style sketch called 'Storrie-time' for those of you who missed it the first time round.... this was especially for Corp Ho: Edited 3 February, 2010 by Crab Lungs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Saint Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 For small clubs, perhaps there is some merit paying a bonus to a manger based on the profit that he made from selling players that he signed. If a manager can sign a player for £1m play him for a couple of years and the sell him on for £10m then it is a good job done. However they should also have to pay back an equal percentage of any losses made. WHat is HR's record for players he signed - is he up or down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 For small clubs, perhaps there is some merit paying a bonus to a manger based on the profit that he made from selling players that he signed. If a manager can sign a player for £1m play him for a couple of years and the sell him on for £10m then it is a good job done. However they should also have to pay back an equal percentage of any losses made. WHat is HR's record for players he signed - is he up or down? Judging by his residence in Sandbanks..I'd say Up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingsland Codger Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Wonderful stuff! Your time and trouble is greatly appreciated. Keep 'em coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 BBC South just reported that no-one has been paid :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohwhenthesaints Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 BBC South just reported that no-one has been paid Jesus wept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnyLove Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Jesus wept. He did. but not for Pompey (everyone knows he supports Saints) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draino76 Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 (edited) February is a very short month too; with the last working day on the 26th. Just over 3 weeks to the next payday.....tick tock tick tock. Edited 3 February, 2010 by Draino76 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohwhenthesaints Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 February is a very short month too; with tha last working day on the 26th. Just over 3 weeks to the next payday.....tick tock tick tock. Well it's looking more and more likely that they won't make it past the 10th anyway so I doubt that they are worried. Maybe they're not going to bother paying the January wages at all if they think they are going to be wound up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Marco Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 So they have not been paid again. 5 days after they were supposed to be paid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Redknapp received a sum of around £100,000. He said: "I got a percentage of sell-on [fees] in my contract if I sold a player. [/indent]Ever wondered why Rednapp is always looking to buy more and more players? Speculate to accumulate. Or accumulate to speculate. As HR has now stated that in his contract, the tax authoriites should look at all player sales with a fine tooth comb. They could soon see if some payments were not made and then ask 'where did that money go, and to which accounts?' This does explain why we bought nobody when he was here. RL conducted trhe dealings and so little room for HR to move Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 The premierleague wont let them fail - too embarrassing for the league - they will get a hand out to get them to the seasons end.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 those in charge seem to have given up even pretending to run a legal business - no attempt at clearing debt, delayed wages, one big sneeze and the whole farce will fall over. Someone needs to ask them if they are still trading - that could be the first question in court next week. Ridiculous and criminal. The thread covering the legal cases and convictions that MUST follow might even threaten the length of this one.....and yet they continue to bring in players who will never get paid, but could still relegate rivals who are not running their clubs illegally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 those in charge seem to have given up even pretending to run a legal business - no attempt at clearing debt, delayed wages, one big sneeze and the whole farce will fall over. Someone needs to ask them if they are still trading - that could be the first question in court next week. Ridiculous and criminal. The thread covering the legal cases and convictions that MUST follow might even threaten the length of this one.....and yet they continue to bring in players who will never get paid, but could still relegate rivals who are not running their clubs illegally.it's amazing that the world and his wife were saying that we desreved the penalties imposed. Even chairman of other clubs, the other clubs threatened by relegation are saying nothing!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huffton Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/p/portsmouth/8495353.stm Now confirmed on SSN. Does he realise he won't get paid? How the hell can the PL allow this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scruftydog Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Obviously doesn't realise the meaning of "free" in the transfer bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 The premierleague wont let them fail - too embarrassing for the league - they will get a hand out to get them to the seasons end.... From the Premiership, if so why hold onto and redistribute money they expected to get ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 The premierleague wont let them fail They have no power to stop it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Isn't it strange that both times Benjani gets a move that the paper work got caught up and the PL passed it even though late. no doubt pompey have a sell payment due Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/p/portsmouth/8495353.stm Now confirmed on SSN. Does he realise he won't get paid? How the hell can the PL allow this?Another ex spurs player joins them, what a surprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 At least they will get a monkey petting zoo if MJ does purchase them :-( I can happily report that this is NOT the case. Apparently he's been down to one of those Seaworld Centres you have so that he can copy their idea. He fully intends to set up a Skate Fiddling pool for the locals. Meanwhile nice to see that Kanu ain't stupid.... http://www.tribalfootball.com/portsmouth-boss-grant-still-waiting-kanu-return-africa-619351 Seems he prefers staying in Angola than coming back to Nottarf Krap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gigersaint Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 The premierleague wont let them fail - too embarrassing for the league - they will get a hand out to get them to the seasons end.... I'm not saying that they won't, but can't see how they can. If Pompey manage to stay in business and in doing so avoid the drop at the expense of either Burnley, Bolton, Hull, or Wolves I'm sure each of those clubs will have something to say about it, especially when they have lived within their means. Any intervention to help Pompey financially or otherwise would open up a huge can of worms for the Premier League surely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 He fully intends to set up a Skate Fiddling pool for the locals. What is the point ? nearly every household in the PO postal code already has one except they are more commonly known, down there, as baths Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Meanwhile nice to see that Kanu ain't stupid.... http://www.tribalfootball.com/portsmouth-boss-grant-still-waiting-kanu-return-africa-619351 Seems he prefers staying in Angola than coming back to Nottarf Krap Well he isn't scared of being fined for 2 weeks wages he won't be paid anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Duckhunter Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 For small clubs, perhaps there is some merit paying a bonus to a manger based on the profit that he made from selling players that he signed. If a manager can sign a player for £1m play him for a couple of years and the sell him on for £10m then it is a good job done. However they should also have to pay back an equal percentage of any losses made. It used to be quite common in the game, the thinking behind it was if a Manager improved a player and therefore made the Club a profit, then he deserves a cut of that profit. There was a time when Managers were very poorly paid compared to the players and this was an extra bit of income. With the advent of Sky and Clubs being run more like multi million pound Companies, this has gone from the game, it will only be the "old school" type Managers, if any, that still have this perk (I doubt if Redknapp has it at Spurs). Whilst this was common practise, my understanding is that Storrie-Teller and Mandric also benefited from a % of any transfer profit.This is unheard of anywhere else and is a clear conflict of interest. Maybe the scout who recommended the player would have got a cut, along with the Manager, but for the owner and CEO to also get one, is highly suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergei Gotsmanov Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 What will they do to Kanu for being late back? Fine him a weeks wages I expect. Pompey legends of 2008; Player who won the cup for them with his tap in cannot be bothered to come back. Captain who lifts the trophy now suing them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dronskisaint Posted 3 February, 2010 Share Posted 3 February, 2010 Brilliant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts