Fitzhugh Fella Posted 6 January, 2010 Author Share Posted 6 January, 2010 If (or is it when ?) they do crash and burn you can bet your life that every ill informed Tom , D1ck or Harriet in the sports media will rush onto the airwaves and start pontificating about what a crying shame it is that this 'lovely little club' with its 'great fans' should come to such a fate . I'll tolerate almost anything in life but hypocrisy - and I can feel my blood starting to boil already at the mere thought of the stream of utter bullsh1t that awaits us . :mad: To be fair as Saints fans our historic enmity with them makes it difficult (if not impossible) for us to be objective but any truly honest appraisal must show that PFC prostituted itself for Russian 'Blood Money' in a manner that no decent football club should ever countenance let alone accept , it must also be said there's a violently aggressive element to their fanbase (more than most clubs have) that many on here can testify to personally and the stunning recklessness of their recent financial mismanagement must surely merit the severest repercussions in the wider interests of the game . I read many Saints fans on here kind enough to express the hope that Pompey survive in some form , while I respect and admire their generosity of spirit and I'm quite sure PFC will continue to exist that's not an opinion I feel very inclined to share . They've earned everything that's coming to them , and it really couldn't have happened to a nicer club . Buy this man a beer - he talks sense with reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Paying the wages won't lift the embargo. Only paying their footballing debts and proving to the PL/FA that they can pay for future payments and transfers will. Apologies for not being clear. I did know that. See my reply above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 O'Hara's extension refused because they would be required to re-register the player, and due to the embargo they cannot currently register new players. Not even free ones (Eugene Bopp....lolz) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamesaint Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 But that is being paid by the sky money. If they pay off their debts and have a fair bit to be OK long term then they will have the transfer ban listed. The Sky money is £7m. They owe other English clubs £10m. (according to the Guardian - see post 5691). Lens are also owed £4 million. So the TV money does not clear their footballing debts. The TV money however had already been promised to the people who lent them the money for previous loans. Rest assured. They are well and truly stuffed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamesaint Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 If (or is it when ?) they do crash and burn you can bet your life that every ill informed Tom , D1ck or Harriet in the sports media will rush onto the airwaves and start pontificating about what a crying shame it is that this 'lovely little club' with its 'great fans' should come to such a fate . I'll tolerate almost anything in life but hypocrisy - and I can feel my blood starting to boil already at the mere thought of the stream of utter bullsh1t that awaits us . :mad: To be fair as Saints fans our historic enmity with them makes it difficult (if not impossible) for us to be objective but any truly honest appraisal must show that PFC prostituted itself for Russian 'Blood Money' in a manner that no decent football club should ever countenance let alone accept , it must also be said there's a violently aggressive element to their fanbase (more than most clubs have) that many on here can testify to personally and the stunning recklessness of their recent financial mismanagement must surely merit the severest repercussions in the wider interests of the game . I read many Saints fans on here kind enough to express the hope that Pompey survive in some form , while I respect and admire their generosity of spirit and I'm quite sure PFC will continue to exist that's not an opinion I feel very inclined to share . They've earned everything that's coming to them , and it really couldn't have happened to a nicer club . Its the Harriets in the sports media that get up my nose .... or more specifically Sue Mott who often crops up on 5 Live and who,I believe, writes for the Telegraph. She will be in her element cooing over Pompey. She normally bases her football opinions on the comings and goings at Arsenal ("do you know" she once said on 5 Live "players in Theo Walcott's team before he came to Arsenal used to fight the opposition on the pitch") but I am sure that she will be able to manage a coo at the plight of plucky little Pompey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfc123 Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Buy this man a beer - he talks sense with reason. Buy him several to calm him down a bit. Jeez.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOTONS EAST SIDE Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Good piece by Oliver Holt of the Mirror! http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/oliver-holt/Oliver-Holt-column-Why-the-Premier-League-must-share-the-blame-for-the-Portsmouth-shambles-article278739.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidthesquid Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Please tell me that Mr Jacob's news isn't that Paul Allen fancies a crack at South Coast soccer after all..... I've enjoyed this thread so much I will be gutted if the fishy ones suddenly come up smelling of roses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 I don't get this bit: '...administration and a huge blow to the prestige of the Premier League' Who gives a toss? (apart from Saints fans and the blue lot, that is) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_5837689,00.html Mmmm!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 "Depending on the banking system". It's the same kind of excuse we've heard before, but for some reason i've got a bad feeling about this one - i.e. they could well get away with it this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulSaint Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Mark Jacob is a solicitor, he is effectively a professional liar. I reckon this statement was made to force the costs of the players up e.g. its no longer a fire sale, pay up if you want them. Oh and it might also stave off the protests until Gaydemark calls in the Administrator? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PES Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Please tell me that Mr Jacob's news isn't that Paul Allen fancies a crack at South Coast soccer after all..... I've enjoyed this thread so much I will be gutted if the fishy ones suddenly come up smelling of roses I doubt it, he's currently fighting cancer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnyLove Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Anyone else wondering why the money is in Mr Jacob's account instead of PFC's account? http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_5837689,00.html "The funds are already in my account and they have been authorised to go" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voteforpedro Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_5837689,00.html Mmmm!!! 'The fans should be assured that the long-term future of Portsmouth is going to be secured.' ...is going to be secured There is nothing here to suggest they are any closer to finding an investor or a way out. TBH it looks to me like they have secured another, small, short term loan, adequate to cover the wages of december, but no more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Every month they are falling deeper into the doggy-doos. I can't see anybody investing in them for football reasons. I saw today that West Ham might be available for £40m and even Leeds, after promotion, might be up for sale. Who is going to pay up to £100m for a club with nothing to offer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View From The Top Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Anyone else wondering why the money is in Mr Jacob's account instead of PFC's account? Because after Barclay's ditched them no one else would touch them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 'The fans should be assured that the long-term future of Portsmouth is going to be secured.' ...is going to be secured There is nothing here to suggest they are any closer to finding an investor or a way out. TBH it looks to me like they have secured another, small, short term loan, adequate to cover the wages of december, but no more. "The funds are already in my account and they have been authorised to go, so depending on the banking system the funds will be with the players on Thursday morning," he told Sky Sports News. "We're very confident this is the end of any trauma that the club has been suffering, not only in the last month or so but perhaps for the last couple of years. "We're very, very confident there will be an injection of funds and I'd just like to place on record how supportive the fans have been over the period since the takeover despite one or two recent issues. I was thinking along the same lines. One minute the moeny is in the bank, the next, there will be an injection of funds. Either he has it or he doesn't. Or maybe there will be another injection possibly at some point in the future. Or am I reading in to this too much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 I think what he meant was that HE has the funds to pay the players, and they are hoping they will get an injection of funds for any further outlays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torrent Of Abuse Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 I was thinking along the same lines. One minute the moeny is in the bank, the next, there will be an injection of funds. Either he has it or he doesn't. Or maybe there will be another injection possibly at some point in the future. Or am I reading in to this too much? It does read to me that they have managed to get a loan to pay the wages (perhaps they are very very very very confident because it can cover next month's too?) and there are active discussions afoot about more money. History would suggest any new money will also be a loan though - and I doubt anyone would seriously put money in as an investment - so aren't we just talking about piling debt on top of debt? how many decades worth of non-existent TV money do you think they are going to put on the roulette wheel this time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Marco Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Good piece by Oliver Holt of the Mirror! http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/oliver-holt/Oliver-Holt-column-Why-the-Premier-League-must-share-the-blame-for-the-Portsmouth-shambles-article278739.html That is 100% spot on and is what i was trying to say. The PL have acted like total chumps and are just to blame. They should of had a good knowledge of how the finances were going to be paid long before they even sat down to look at the fit and proper test with the first guy let alone the 2nd one. They ****ed up big time, not once but twice. And now they are trying to cover their ass by making it sound like Pompey have got a good deal! What they care about is the "prestige" of the brand remaining in tact. They could not give a fook about Portsmouth or the fans. If it drags on they will get relegated and then they will be fed to the wolves. All of which the PL will say they tried to help them. By doing what exactly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fowllyd Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Anyone else wondering why the money is in Mr Jacob's account instead of PFC's account? http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_5837689,00.html "The funds are already in my account and they have been authorised to go" Assuming it's true in the first place, it'll be because he's a solicitor and therefore is entitled to hold client monies in an account which exists for that purpose. It's much the same as when you buy/sell a property - the money goes to your solicitor's account, and they then pay off everybody who needs to be paid (including themselves, natch). I seem to recall that Pompey staff were paid from the same account last month. There's no mention in the statement from Jacob about where the money came from, or indeed where any putative additional funds are coming from either. All the bland reassurances have been heard before - I still reckon they're deep in the poo and not about to get out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Munster Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Someone is gonna lose a shyteload of money if we go into admin, and it's such a tangled web of contracts, loans and broken promises all round that no-one seems to know WHO will lose most. However, if it means that new investors start sniffing around and we start again with something near to a clean slate, I'll take the 9 point penalty, the ignomy of probably the record lowest points total, relegation, 12k crowds next season and you lot crowing forever more if it means the club survives in some form..... But your lot will still probably be above us 3 years from now, right? :wink: Thats not fair. Not many of us who come on here were laughing believe me. I never stuck the knife in because I'm old enough to know that what happens to you today could happen to me tomorrow. In fact, when most of you were crapping yourselves over the prospect of administration, I was one of the few who was telling you not to worry about it because it might be the best thing that could happen to you in the medium to long term. So far I'd say I was right about that....... Yes, you were absolutely right. But I think you'll be absolutely wrong with your prediction that P***** will still be above us 3 years from now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 lol...they did their own downfall vid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeovil Saint Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Anyone else wondering why the money is in Mr Jacob's account instead of PFC's account? http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_5837689,00.html "The funds are already in my account and they have been authorised to go" Maybe to keep it out of Daniel Azougy's account? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny c Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Good piece by Oliver Holt of the Mirror! http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/oliver-holt/Oliver-Holt-column-Why-the-Premier-League-must-share-the-blame-for-the-Portsmouth-shambles-article278739.html Clubs shouldn't have to rely on owners money to survive in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under Weststand Posted 6 January, 2010 Share Posted 6 January, 2010 Anyone else wondering why the money is in Mr Jacob's account instead of PFC's account? http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_5837689,00.html "The funds are already in my account and they have been authorised to go" Does this mean that they've now filled in their application to www.QuickQuid.com & its been approved. Also that troublesome file has now been moved, and allowed the funds to be ready to go! Seems to me that its just the latest loan to pay this months wages are in place, the rest is just the same Bulls**t rhetoric to which we've become accustomed. As much as I have a nagging doubt that they will get out of this, I just can't see how? In the current financial climate who, unless your a wealthy fan with a minimum 50-million to burn would be interested in throwing money down the black hole that is PFC. They have no viable assets & nothing to secure loans against. unless I'm missing something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Marco Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 Interesting that Storrie does not share the same view as Jacobs http://www.football.co.uk/portsmouth/storrie_fears_more_player_sales_300775.shtml If they have this money in the accounts that will secure "the longterm future which will provide a big cash injection" then why does Storrie fear they will have to sell more players this month? It also seems where he say's "They thought they were in a strong position to replace bank finance and bring in a major new investor that was going to come in and be involved. "But those two things have not happened and, although they are working on doing that, time is catching up with them in terms of the debts and the money that is needed to run a Premier League football side." which to me sounds like they still have not got anything sorted.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eastcowzer Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 Maybe to keep it out of Daniel Azougy's account? Of course by 'paying' the players today,(allegedly), Mr Jacobs will be able to concentrate his mind on where he will find the next £2 million for this months wages, due, officially, in 17 days time. How about ANOTHER short-term loan, that might help. ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 OK after a great deal of research I think I have found out a couple of their options. http://business.maktoob.com/20090000415930/Kuwait_parl_t_OKs_23_bln_debt_bailout_bill/Article.htm?utm_campaign=Day-Newsletter&utm_medium=Main-News1&utm_source=Day-Newsletter&utm_content= Obviously the reason Al Faraj doesn't show up in Saudi is he has obviously become a Kuwaiti and got the Government to pay off his overdraft OR http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6944560/Girls-aged-12-and-14-hold-up-bank-in-Ohio.html Now THAT was a cunning plan Baldrick, that's why Storrie teller went on a world tour Well, let's face it, both of those are more likely than somebody lending them 100mil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bug187 Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 Whenever I look on the 606 forums all I ever see is supporters of other clubs saying how they hope Pompey survive and wishing the best and praising their 'Amazing' supporters. Seriously.. wtf?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint lard Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 Part 4 of the Gadymak interview...... http://www.fansonline.net/portsmouth/article.php?id=1277#articlecontinues Lots of 'lets just look at the books shall we' and 'we would need to look at the books' Oh,let's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamesaint Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 Whenever I look on the 606 forums all I ever see is supporters of other clubs saying how they hope Pompey survive and wishing the best and praising their 'Amazing' supporters. Seriously.. wtf?? But everyone knows that its true. Pompey fans are amazing. Thierry Henry said so. Similarly 'arry is just a lovable ****ney chap who has done a triffic job wherever he has gone. As Chapel end Charlie wrote last night, expect the gushing obituaries from every Tom, **** and Harriet in the press once the blue few capsize. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hutch Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 Surely Portsmouth Football Club have already been replaced by AFC Portsmouth. My understanding of the definition of a PROFESSIONAL sportsman is someone who gets paid for participating in sport. I do hope they pay the players soon. I want them to hang on by the skin of their teeth for the rest of this season, and take the penalty points next season in the CCC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 Not sure if this has been mentioned before but those ever helpful suits at the PL have now decided that pompey need to also pay their tax bill and convince them pompey will be able to cover future expenditure before removing the transfer ban. http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/Premier-League-warn-Blues.5962475.jp You know its almost as if they wanted them to be relegated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joensuu Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 Looks like the Guardian has finally caught up with SWF.... http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/jan/06/portsmouth-al-faraj-fahim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torrent Of Abuse Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 I do hope they pay the players soon. I want them to hang on by the skin of their teeth for the rest of this season, and take the penalty points next season in the CCC. Seconded. I would also like the full details of their finances to become available, with all those other little associated penalties that the league like to apply for financial jiggery pokery (a la Luton). Question is: if Pompey were (just for instance) revealled to be part of a money laundering enterprise, would the story still be "Poor ol' Pompey" or would all that sympathy evaporate? I know it wouldn't be the fans' fault but... Mud sticks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 PFA blast Pompey.... http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12040_5837970,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 (edited) What "banking system" is Jacob's using to transfer money from his account to each player's account? If it's the relatively new UK 'Faster Payments' system then the funds transfer is 'almost immediate'...but not all banks particpate in that scheme for all customers yet, but most do. If he/his bank are using the older BACS / Bank Giro Credit system then that takes between 2 and 4 days to transfer money from one account to another, depending on the bank. So, if the money was sitting in his account yesterday AND it was yesterday that he submitted the payment requests to his bank then it could be up to 4 days before all players have received their slice. Depending on what funds transfer system is being used there's a big difference between 'paying' your staff and actually 'being paid'. Edited 7 January, 2010 by trousers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 Once upon a time I thought there was a law in football called "Bringing the Game into Disrepute" Can anyone explain how what the Skates have been doing for the past months is anything OTHER than this? Surely it is time for some bans or fines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 I assume that all the advisors are being paid on time even if the players and creditors aren't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 Once upon a time I thought there was a law in football called "Bringing the Game into Disrepute" Can anyone explain how what the Skates have been doing for the past months is anything OTHER than this? Surely it is time for some bans or fines When the Football League were throwing the book at SFC during our 'troubles' last year a few people wrote to the Football League about what was going on and got some half decent replies. Has anyone written to the Premier League directly asking for an explanation to this and other questions? Not that I'm naive enough to believe they would give 100% candid replies! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 (edited) More from the News http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/No-wages-again--and.5962541.jp The News has been told by sources Pompey have assets in the form of the playing squad valued at £50-55m. However, the sale of such assets to offset such an overall deficit could invariably cost the club it's Premier League status.Can their squad actually be worth 55 million? It sounds like the only asset they own of any value is the squad. How much of that 55 million could they get before they cease to have a team to put out? --- edit --- Also interesting to note that this is the first report based, one assumes on info from within the club, that the latest deadline for payment is the end of this week (but surely its all going through this morning!?). Edited 7 January, 2010 by pedg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheaf Saint Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 http://http://www.dailystar.co.uk/football/view/115874/Portsmouth-squad-up-for-sale/ Now I don't want anybody getting the impression that I regularly trawl The Star's website - a mate of mine posted the link on Facebook. If there is even the slightest degree of truth to this then it is very interesting reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hutch Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 Whatever the squad is valued at, a lot of that value is in players who have already played for 2 clubs this season, therefore their value cannot be realised now when the cash is urgently needed. Offload players to a new club now, who would then pay their wages for 6 months before they play? What do you think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 Whatever the squad is valued at, a lot of that value is in players who have already played for 2 clubs this season, therefore their value cannot be realised now when the cash is urgently needed. Offload players to a new club now, who would then pay their wages for 6 months before they play? What do you think. Not to mention that the players also have to agree to move and some, e.g. by some reports James, are happier sticking with high wages that might turn up than take a pay cut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 http://http://www.dailystar.co.uk/football/view/115874/Portsmouth-squad-up-for-sale/ Now I don't want anybody getting the impression that I regularly trawl The Star's website - a mate of mine posted the link on Facebook. If there is even the slightest degree of truth to this then it is very interesting reading. I couldn't get your link to work - here's the salient point: TROUBLED Portsmouth last night put their whole squad up for sale. #bodycopy a { font-size: 12px; } And Starsport can reveal that the cash-strapped outfit are so desperate for money they even asked the Premier League to guarantee a loan so they could pay their players. Portsmouth secured a lending facility to cover the outstanding £1.8m wage bill. But one of the conditions was that the League guaranteed the money – and they refused to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 (edited) I couldn't get your link to work - here's the salient point: TROUBLED Portsmouth last night put their whole squad up for sale. #bodycopy a { font-size: 12px; } And Starsport can reveal that the cash-strapped outfit are so desperate for money they even asked the Premier League to guarantee a loan so they could pay their players. Portsmouth secured a lending facility to cover the outstanding £1.8m wage bill. But one of the conditions was that the League guaranteed the money – and they refused to do so. All falling apart quite nicely then. Edited 7 January, 2010 by EastleighSoulBoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted 7 January, 2010 Share Posted 7 January, 2010 if they now want the league to guarantee loans have they run out of things to secure against? Is this the last loan they can get? This has been a VERY funny thread but nothing made me laugh out loud as much as when they claimed their squad is worth £50M!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts