Jump to content

Pompey Takeover Saga


Fitzhugh Fella

Recommended Posts

Is anybody on there actually a real pompey fan?

 

I think this one could be from a real pompey fan, doesnt seem like one of yours, unless it's a double bluff

 

Secured Creditor

Wednesday, February 22, 2012 at 03:44 PM

 

dont worry when all the s(ummers sisters get home from school in a minute they will soon FO the site to make use of their extra fingers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And this is why their crying because they don't have enough fit players doesn't wash with me. The article states that Stockford signed a professional contract last summer and played in the pre-season trip to the US.

 

How on earth does he not qualify as a fit, senior player?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this is why their crying because they don't have enough fit players doesn't wash with me. The article states that Stockford signed a professional contract last summer and played in the pre-season trip to the US.

 

How on earth does he not qualify as a fit, senior player?

 

E-mail sent to the FL asking the question. Also showing the irony that Richie and Pack, deemed not good enough for Portsmouth but are up for Football League awards. The second irony being Portsmouth FC being nominated in the Community club award, defrauded very same community out of tens of thousands of pounds and finally the Family club award showing those great family values of fraud and tax evasion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.portsmouthfc.co.uk/LatestNews/news/Southampton-Tickets-On-General-Sale-3127.aspx

 

There are around 900 seats still available to buy for the second south coast derby of the season.

 

Best fans my arse...

 

Makes you wonder how many they would have sold if they sold them a similar way to us for the game at Fratton.

 

Had ours been like theirs (walk to the ticket office and just buy a ticket, none of this apply ********) then I'm confident they wouldn't have even lasted a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Slater @mattslaterbbc Reply Retweet Favorite · Open

Pompey administrators: Our initial analysis of #pfc financial position has revealed situation is more serious than many expected...To put it bluntly, Portsmouth FC has a Premier League cost base but only Championship income.

 

HOW LONG HAVE WE KNOWN THIS FOR ON HERE?!?!:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Chainrai's debenture.

 

http://www.uhy-uk.com/assets/media/download/portsmouth%20reports/Final%20progress%20report.pdf

 

According to page 18, the debenture has a fixed and floating charge over all assets of the club.

 

Now, I may be being thick, but if the fixed charge over all assets doesn't cover the amount of the debt, doesn't this mean that the club is Balance Sheet insolvent? Isn't this a confession of Wrongful Trading?

 

Also, why would they be so happy about having Chinny as an unsecured creditor? It's as if everyone has forgotten the fact that the last CVA only just got voted through. Having another malcontent in the CVA voting pool, doesn't sound like a formula for success to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that more serious than 'we' expected. Now comes, If we don't fill the ground and bring in more income we won't last the season, then, If we don't get a buyer by the end of the season we will be in trouble, then, If the next parachute payment isn't released to us we will have to liquidate, then, if all the parachute payments aren't released to us we will liquidate, then liquidated.

 

I don't think there is much time left as the dire situation is sinking in fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, it hasn't been made clear which transaction that Birch is questioning. Is it the initial loan to Falcondron, the transfer from Falcondrone to Old Co or the transfer from the Old Co to New Co?

 

The first transaction happened in the British Virgin Islands and the other two would require digging through all of the Old Co docs that are currently with Baker Tilly who will be conducting an investigation into whether the old co director were conducting Wrongful Trading. This investigation can only happen after liquidation is finished.

 

So a complex case across companies and legal jurisdictions. Also, it's quite a gamble on both sides. To get an outcome, it'll have to go to court. Birch will have to think that it's quite likely that he'll get a result to make it worth the costs of doing it, especially if Chinny appeals. The worst case scenario is that they take it to court, using up funds that they can't afford to lose and then find that his claim is upheld. Equally, Chainrai's stuck with his sunk costs. Does he throw good money after bad to try to retain his secured creditor status for all of his debts? Vote down a CVA?

 

The really funny thing is that the Snooze commenters think that the debt would get wiped out, rather than just a reduction of the amount that was secured, with the balance unsecured. He'll still be owed £17m, but he might also be given a power of veto over any CVA arrangements too. It just keeps getting better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a reply from the FL

 

Thank you for your email.

As you may have noted, Portsmouth Football Club has been deducted ten points in accordance with Football League rules and regulations. For the latest official statement from The Football League please visit our website here http://www.football-league.co.uk/footballleaguenews/20120217/pompey-given-10-point-deduction_2293334_2614922.

The club is now in administration following an application by the directors to the High Court. The High Court has determined the appointment of Trevor Birch at PKF as administrator, having being nominated by other creditors including HMRC. The League will now work with the administrators as they seek to find a purchaser for the club.

Based on your email content we would also recommend you access information relating to the Owners’ and Directors’ Test.

The Owners’ and Directors’ Test is an objective assessment to determine necessary information in relation to the management or control of a Football League club by an individual. It is not a subjective test and therefore The League must work with the facts in hand and those presented in the test.

You may find an FAQ regarding the Owners and Directors Test useful http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/FAQ/FAQsDetail/0,,10794~2428071,00.html.

The Football League can clarify that at all times following its takeover of Portsmouth Football Club, Convers Sports Initiatives - and in particular Mr Vladimir Antonov - complied with the requirements of the Owners’ and Directors’ Test as set out in the regulations of The Football League.

Any football club that is in administration will be subject to a transfer registrations embargo. The principle being that where clubs are not able to afford their current playing squad they are not permitted to sign anyone else. In view of any embargo The Football League cannot allow a club to sign any new players, unless they are unable to field a team, i.e. name fourteen fit players for any match (11 starters plus 3 ‘usable outfield substitutes’ – which is usual Football League policy). However, we only take account of players with any first team experience and young professionals who haven’t played at first team level are therefore discounted.

 

At present The League cannot currently comment any further in relation to Portsmouth and any further statement will appear on our website in due course.

 

Thank you for contacting The Football League.

Regards,

Andrew Pomfret

Customer Services Officer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I'm curious: how can due diligence be carried out by TB, only for him to discover within a week that things are far worse than he expected?

 

The situation may have got considerably worse under the 'stewardship' of CSI. Up to the takeover, they were under FL instructions to be careful. After the takeover, CSI agreed to fund the £1m per month financial deficit [with loans from CSI].

 

Who knows what contracts were signed in that period?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fratton Park, BC would only get the value not the £17m in the charge.

All well and good, but as has been mentioned, sale-and-leaseback hasn't done much for other clubs, and of course you need an idiot willing to buy it first. With various charges, security, etc and the uncertainty over whether they'd actually get paid any rent by the tenant football club, I wouldn't touch it with a bargepole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like Lampitt was sacked.

 

Of course he was sacked. He is not needed now, the administrators are in charge and getting rid of expensive executives is always the starting point. IF new owners are found they will want their own people in charge anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because selling and leasing back the ground has been a great strategy for Bournemouth, Crystal Palace and others

 

:?

 

I get the impression this is all about who gets what and what the charges are worth in relation to CV/liquidation. I am sure there is no intention to sell/leaseback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now Lampitt has gone what will happen to him IF TB finds out that Lampitt

did something a director shouldn't do. Will Lampitt still be liable now that he

is no longer a director??

If Lampitt did anything he shouldn't have done legally, and it's discovered, he'll get done for it. It doesn't matter that he's not a director anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...