Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Sid James as Michael Fialka

Kenneth Williams as Rupert Lowe

Bernard Bresslaw as Michael Wilde

Charles Hawtrey as Leon Crouch

 

in Carry on on Saints

 

We'd spend a million quid making it then bring it out only on Laserdisk !

Posted
So, on which of the 21 days of exclusivity did Begbies become aware of the change in Pinnacle's financial backers and thus the need to cancel the exclusivity period and re-assess the 'proof-of-funds' situation (for all still interested parties)?

 

Given the exclusivity period was never 'canceled' the only logical conclusion one can come to is that Pinnacle didn't advise Begbies that their situation had changed. Or they did and Begbies glossed over the 'revisit proof-of-funds' clause.

 

I could be talking out of my hat of course

 

 

But, that would be gross mal practice on Begies part ......... I really cannot see such a Company neglecting their duties in such a way.......... they would leave themselves open to future prosecution surely ???

Posted
Exactly...even more reason for greater transparency and accountability this time around. I knew we'd find common ground eventually.

 

Your go.

 

he said he will invest and that is step forward- and beggars can't be choosers!

 

TBH if he spends the last of his money taking us over - we would still be better off than before

Posted

reading the posts about passing the proof of funds stage is interesting. As this is done twice. Once by the administrators legal team and then by the Football league legal team and it is not as simple as faking some documents. This is why I cant understand some aspects of this deal

Posted
reading the posts about passing the proof of funds stage is interesting. As this is done twice. Once by the administrators legal team and then by the Football league legal team and it is not as simple as faking some documents. This is why I cant understand some aspects of this deal

 

Probably no problem with proof of funds a couple of weeks ago.

 

From what I have heard listening to TL and MF on SKY the FL have moved the goal posts so what is now on the table is not what Pinnacle originally thought they were buying.

 

However I dont feel the SKY Presenters have been asking the Questions we the Saints Fans want being answered

Posted

However I dont feel the SKY Presenters have been asking the Questions we the Saints Fans want being answered

 

Agree.

Posted
Probably no problem with proof of funds a couple of weeks ago.

 

From what I have heard listening to TL and MF on SKY the FL have moved the goal posts so what is now on the table is not what Pinnacle originally thought they were buying.

 

However I dont feel the SKY Presenters have been asking the Questions we the Saints Fans want being answered

 

If you were buying the stadium, traning round, players et al for a £15m long term investment the 10 points would be little more than a short term annoyance. You might possibly try and negotiate the price down a bit, but not throw the toys out of the pram. The 10 points is smokescreen, an excuse imo

Posted (edited)
If you were buying the stadium, traning round, players et al for a £15m long term investment the 10 points would be little more than a short term annoyance. You might possibly try and negotiate the price down a bit, but not throw the toys out of the pram. The 10 points is smokescreen, an excuse imo

 

Both have said it is not the ten point penalty which is the problem it is what they are signing away but have not been pressed on what is the real problem

Edited by John B
Posted
I really cannot understand WHY Pinnacle/Lynam/Fry wheeled out Fialka yesterday ........... ?????

 

With just a LITTLE delving (by anyone) it soon became obvious that he would IMHO, have a job to get anywhere near £100 - £200M ............ even on a Monopoly Board ...

 

I mean, it was SO laughable, it wasn't even funny ..... and STILL Tony L kept on assuring us that "we will close the deal soon", or words to that effect

 

COMPLET BOLL*CKS

 

WHY WERE PINNACLE TAKING THE P*SS ?????

 

Agree, it's now becoming a little bit embarrassing what's going on. As I posted a few hours ago, this has my home town Aldershot, 1990, written all over it.

Posted
Agree, it's now becoming a little bit embarrassing what's going on. As I posted a few hours ago, this has my home town Aldershot, 1990, written all over it.
Yeah but at least there's some other intrest (swiss) and i dont mean that t-wat MJ! :smt078
Posted
Agree, it's now becoming a little bit embarrassing what's going on. As I posted a few hours ago, this has my home town Aldershot, 1990, written all over it.

 

Apart from Spencer Day is now a multi millionaire :)

Posted
Agree, it's now becoming a little bit embarrassing what's going on. As I posted a few hours ago, this has my home town Aldershot, 1990, written all over it.

 

Apart from Spencer Day is now a multi millionaire :)

 

Having the money 19 years too late doesnt really help.

Posted

The Fialka interview in the SSN studio he made out that he was the new owner. That he had done well in business and could now afford to buy a football club. Fialka is clearly yet another middleman, so why cannot the actual finance people come forward ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...