Guided Missile Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Hopefully TL will not read your drivel.... Probably not. He's too busy talking/writing drivel.... He's a Liverpool supporting chancer, feigning concern for the club, when his real concern is for a bull sh! t deal that has blown up in his face. Screw him, I'm pi $$ed off with this whole thing, as you can probably tell. Anyway, aren't you f***ing needed back at River Cottage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Response to the questions above: From Tony Lynam, 9:31pm 26.06.09 Spencer Thank you for your e-mail, and I will happily answer the questions posed as I fully appreciate that the continued uncertainty causes nothing but concern, least of all for the staff and players at the Club, and of course to the fans. . . . In direct answer to your question, there is a formal relationship between Michael and his colleagues for the purchase, funding and development of Southampton Football Club, which they remain committed to achieving. Let me also make clear that Michael will be the legal owner of the Club, and thus be responsible for the financial arrangements and commitments being made. Without jeopardising a signed confidentiality agreement with my client (the "Consortium"), Michael has committed to the purchase of the Club and only yesterday publicly stated that there will be funds available to rebuild the Club, and the prospects of pushing for promotion in the long term to try regain stability on and off the pitch. . . . Best wishes Tony Lynam Thanks Farmer/Tony for the reply to my question - appreciated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 So its Michael and colleagues, now. Is TL still willing to stand by his earlier claim that his client is worth hundred million pounds? The strength (or lack) of finances is playing on fans minds; yet, the post does not address the issue (the BBC havent said anything either to allay doubts). Time has moved on since Monday - yet we are being given the same updates with a bit of garnish. I want Pinnacle's bid to succeed but this is increasingly in hope than expectation. Nobody can deny the importance of unity but as someone said, unity comes only with clarity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 though my understanding from the BBC is that they had properly researched Michaels credentials, and were going to ensure that an accurate description was put in the public domain (quote) I certainly hope they do but so far have not seen any...has anyone a link to this? That puzzled me too....I'm not aware of any BBC article out there that has published this 'alternative' profile of Fialka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leehoudini Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Guided missile you are a ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 the FL have Pinnacle over a barrell and are basically blackmailing them. As you point out the law is the law and they CANNOT do that imo Pinnacle are trying to go softly softly with the FA on this, I say f uck them then, go as public as they need to, disclose proof of funds to remove any doubt in their ability to complete and drag the FA through the very legal process they are intent on restricting us from, oh and buy the club as well to keep everyone happy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 From Tony Lynam, 9:31pm 26.06.09 Spencer Firstly I want to address the wholly inaccurate portrayal of Michael Fialka. For the avoidance of any doubt, Michael and his colleagues chose NOT to seek publicity Best wishes Tony Lynam Colleagues ? Thought it was a single individual buying SFC. Another thing, where did the worth "several hundred million " come from ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisobee Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 GM, how can you call yourself a Saints fan and post thgis pile of **** and then immediately log off. Hopefully TL will not read your drivel and will try to conclude a deal, because the alternative as any sane person realises is oblivion. I think he meant to call himself Misguided Missile TBH. Something clearly went wrong in the registration process, probably the fault of Admin as always Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Colleagues ? Thought it was a single individual buying SFC. Another thing, where did the worth "several hundred million " come from ? your about 24 hours behind! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the colonel Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 TL refered to a single client in his original post on this website, which does not necessarily mean a single person, and within that same post he stated the 'client' be worth several hundred millions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Why are people so insulting towards GM? He was dead on the money with regards to Wilde and I was one of his loudest critics. I listen to what he has to say with interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 That puzzled me too....I'm not aware of any BBC article out there that has published this 'alternative' profile of Fialka On ST, Roger Johnson said that he/they had spoken to one of his business contacts, who "paints a very different picture" to what the Echo had written and said most of the money was coming from the London Jewish community. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexstar Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Would very much like to know what "the issue" is that we've heard referred to so many times. If it was late in the day and will be "faced by other potential buyers" it is unlikely to be the appeal issue, but I fail to see why it is such a problem keeping it quiet, now that the rest of the Pinnacle consortium is unraveling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Billy Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 A breathtaking pile of sh !t from a bullsh !tting chancer and his London based dreamers. What a bunch of time wasting w@ nkers And Spence, how can you call yourself a Saints fan and post this sh !t.... Tony, you're as joke, mate. Do the decent thing and get on the first ferry to Cork.... Ever thought of working for the samaritans GM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat from Poole Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 TL refered to a single client in his original post on this website, which does not necessarily mean a single person, and within that same post he stated the 'client' be worth several hundred millions. I'm fairly sure he actually said it was one person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wade Garrett Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Probably not. He's too busy talking/writing drivel.... He's a Liverpool supporting chancer, feigning concern for the club, when his real concern is for a bull sh! t deal that has blown up in his face. Screw him, I'm pi $$ed off with this whole thing, as you can probably tell. Anyway, aren't you f***ing needed back at River Cottage? I think I can just about work your position out on Pinnacle! I don't blame you for coming to your conclusions based on the information you have. However, I'm not sure you, I or anyone have the full picture here. One thing is for sure though. It all needs to be resolved very quickly or we are f*cked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Guided missile you are a ****. But in fairness that is what people said the last time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wade Garrett Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Why are people so insulting towards GM? He was dead on the money with regards to Wilde and I was one of his loudest critics. I listen to what he has to say with interest. I think it's more to do with his diplomatic skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 A breathtaking pile of sh !t from a bullsh !tting chancer and his London based dreamers. What a bunch of time wasting w@ nkers And Spence, how can you call yourself a Saints fan and post this sh !t.... Tony, you're as joke, mate. Do the decent thing and get on the first ferry to Cork.... Probably not. He's too busy talking/writing drivel.... He's a Liverpool supporting chancer, feigning concern for the club, when his real concern is for a bull sh! t deal that has blown up in his face. Screw him, I'm pi $$ed off with this whole thing, as you can probably tell. Anyway, aren't you f***ing needed back at River Cottage? Well, I've seen you post a lot of sensible comments in your time. Of late I have noticed an edge to your posts. This may be because you are frustrated by all this going on. I can understand your feelings because I'm feeling them too. So why do you have to start slinging insults around because that is normally not your style? At this moment in time there is no other alternative to Pinnacle. Who knows for sure if any others are going to step up to the plate when they see the full implications of what the FL want? I believe that you are a business man, if things don't go your way in your line of work do you shout and harangue like you have just done? Or do you quietly try to get the job done and if it can't then withdraw with good grace and style? You are, like all of us, entitled to your opinion. Not a criticism, just an observation as I'm seeing a different GM of late.! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatlesaint Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 imo Pinnacle are trying to go softly softly with the FA on this, I say f uck them then, go as public as they need to, disclose proof of funds to remove any doubt in their ability to complete and drag the FA through the very legal process they are intent on restricting us from, oh and buy the club as well to keep everyone happy Well i mentioned the European Court of Human Rights if everything else fails in an earlier post and it was knocked back by the so called experts on here. But if you think about it how many people is the actions of the FL affecting ? The supporters yes, the players who may have to up sticks and leave against their will (Kelvin anyway) - yes....but most of all the ladies and gentlemen who work for SFC and have not been paid !! If you take Pinnacle's/Tony's stance as being true and accurate then the Football League's blackmail is impacting on many many people and is wholly illegal......blackmail is illegal in all of Europe too you know !! The ECHR are not gonna give a flying **** about who the FL think they are, it is a flagrant breach of the law and there is nothing to say the Swiss outfit will not beat Pinnacle to the punch and then they take legal action against the League. A blue chip company worth billions against a bunch of old codgers who make uo their own rules ? No contest !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I think it's more to do with his diplomatic skills. He called Wilde many names which TBF most would now agree with but at the time he got an unbelieveable amount of stick. We should learn the lessons from the past. At least GM looks into people. His digging from yesterday left me concerned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Roger Johnson said that he/they had spoken to one of his business contacts, who "paints a very different picture" to what the Echo had written. Someone should ask Roger what his experiences are of one of the other potential bidders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Chalet Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I actually like GM's posts, he has a Woodward and Bernstein type appeal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I'm fairly sure he actually said it was one person. And here is the quote.... ''Ultimately I have in fact now entered into this "exclusivity agreement" on behalf of ONE client only. And myself, Matt and others involved are very pleased with that. Gone are the days of petty squabbles. Our one client has SUBSTANTIAL wealth - several hundred million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 GM Some strong posting, most of which i agree with. Perhaps lay off the personal tirades tho? And mass ****ing! It seems some on here have me in the same bracket as you, which is a tad worrying! http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=14129 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Well i mentioned the European Court of Human Rights if everything else fails in an earlier post and it was knocked back by the so called experts on here. But if you think about it how many people is the actions of the FL affecting ? The supporters yes, the players who may have to up sticks and leave against their will (Kelvin anyway) - yes....but most of all the ladies and gentlemen who work for SFC and have not been paid !! If you take Pinnacle's/Tony's stance as being true and accurate then the Football League's blackmail is impacting on many many people and is wholly illegal......blackmail is illegal in all of Europe too you know !! The ECHR are not gonna give a flying **** about who the FL think they are, it is a flagrant breach of the law and there is nothing to say the Swiss outfit will not beat Pinnacle to the punch and then they take legal action against the League. A blue chip company worth billions against a bunch of old codgers who make uo their own rules ? No contest !! But I think that is the point. I don't believe this is just about the 10 points, I think the FL is trying to take way our right to challenge them at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexstar Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 TL refered to a single client in his original post on this website, which does not necessarily mean a single person, and within that same post he stated the 'client' be worth several hundred millions. "Ultimately I have in fact now entered into this "exclusivity agreement" on behalf of ONE client only" And he also said several dropped out, so that implies 1 person to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Chalet Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Someone will buy us, at some point. Unless you have £15m burning a hole in your pocket then you can only expect to get what you are given. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popester Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 why doesn't someone give us some f**king facts - Is it one person or a consortium,what exactly is the problem with the FL - What is the f**king problem? Stop f**king about with our football team and our f**king lives. Tony - Are you a chancer ? If so - f**k off - If you are serious , then stop giving us the same old message - be honest and stop patronising us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block 5 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 And here is the quote.... ''Ultimately I have in fact now entered into this "exclusivity agreement" on behalf of ONE client only. And myself, Matt and others involved are very pleased with that. Gone are the days of petty squabbles. Our one client has SUBSTANTIAL wealth - several hundred million. Client can mean an entire country or one person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guided Missile Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 So why do you have to start slinging insults around because that is normally not your style? Not a criticism, just an observation as I'm seeing a different GM of late.! I've had enough of this club and its fans, to be honest. It's like seeing your wife getting raped. Meanwhile, internet Saints "fans" fawn over a potless Irishman and his equally potless London mate, while they fiddle with her bra. This dustbin lid is obviously a total nutjob, yet him and Frank Carson are given the time of day by supposed professionals. If neither of them have any money, what the f*** do they bring? Arse ache, that's all.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the colonel Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I'm fairly sure he actually said it was one person. TL quote taken from his first post: 'Ultimately I have in fact now entered into this "exclusivity agreement" on behalf of ONE client only. And myself, Matt and others involved are very pleased with that. Gone are the days of petty squabbles. Our one client has SUBSTANTIAL wealth - several hundred million.' Doesn't refer to a single person but to 'one client only', which I take as a consortium that is formed under a legal agreement rather than a group of individuals. But I could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I've had enough of this club and its fans, to be honest. It's like seeing your wife getting raped. Meanwhile, internet Saints "fans" fawn over a potless Irishman and his equally potless London mate, while they fiddle with her bra. This dustbin lid is obviously a total nutjob, yet him and Frank Carson are given the time of day by supposed professionals. If neither of them have any money, what the f*** do they bring? Arse ache, that's all.... This analogy made me literally laugh out loud! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 And here is the quote.... ''Ultimately I have in fact now entered into this "exclusivity agreement" on behalf of ONE client only. And myself, Matt and others involved are very pleased with that. Gone are the days of petty squabbles. Our one client has SUBSTANTIAL wealth - several hundred million. There are inconsistencies. TL is basically implying that his one client is a single individual - after all, you cant logically have 'petty squabbles' with yourself -you do the hell you want- but you can fall out if you are accompanied by several colleagues (look no further than our own sordid history reminds us) REad the rest of that infamous first post and TL talked about 'four individuals' -again they would constitute a single client- but they dropped out, leaving one individual -MF presumably- as the client. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block 5 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I've had enough of this club and its fans, to be honest. It's like seeing your wife getting raped. Meanwhile, internet Saints "fans" fawn over a potless Irishman and his equally potless London mate, while they fiddle with her bra. This dustbin lid is obviously a total nutjob, yet him and Frank Carson are given the time of day by supposed professionals. If neither of them have any money, what the f*** do they bring? Arse ache, that's all.... GM I respect your opinions as I do all posters on this forum...... But by making derogatory rascist comments like this, you are doing yourself no favours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Saint Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I've had enough of this club and its fans, to be honest. It's like seeing your wife getting raped. Meanwhile, internet Saints "fans" fawn over a potless Irishman and his equally potless London mate, while they fiddle with her bra. This dustbin lid is obviously a total nutjob, yet him and Frank Carson are given the time of day by supposed professionals. If neither of them have any money, what the f*** do they bring? Arse ache, that's all.... Thanks GM (I am not being sacastic here). The whole situation is thoroughly depressing and your invective has genuinely made me chuckle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I've had enough of this club and its fans, to be honest. It's like seeing your wife getting raped. Meanwhile, internet Saints "fans" fawn over a potless Irishman and his equally potless London mate, while they fiddle with her bra. This dustbin lid is obviously a total nutjob, yet him and Frank Carson are given the time of day by supposed professionals. If neither of them have any money, what the f*** do they bring? Arse ache, that's all.... I sprained my wrist once, trying to get my hand down a bra....not trying to undo it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 . This dustbin lid is obviously a total nutjob, yet him and Frank Carson are given the time of day by supposed professionals..... is it age that bothers you GM ? do you wonder how they have got 'this far' ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Response to the questions above: From Tony Lynam, 9:31pm 26.06.09 .....there is a formal relationship between Michael and his colleagues for the purchase, funding and development of Southampton Football Club, which they remain committed to achieving. Let me also make clear that Michael will be the legal owner of the Club, and thus be responsible for the financial arrangements and commitments being made. Without jeopardising a signed confidentiality agreement with my client (the "Consortium"), Michael has committed to the purchase of the Club and only yesterday publicly stated that there will be funds available to rebuild the Club, and the prospects of pushing for promotion in the long term to try regain stability on and off the pitch. Best wishes Tony Lynam Even the communiques dont make sense any more. Who is the client - Fialka or "the consortium"? If the consortium are providing the money how come Fialka will be the legal owner? If Fialka is borrowing the money from the consortium how the F is he going to pay it back and invest in the club? Way too many unknowns and inconsistencies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 But by making derogatory rascist comments like this, you are doing yourself no favours. Come on, A Jew and an Irish man walk into a football club...........?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Colleagues ? Thought it was a single individual buying SFC. Another thing, where did the worth "several hundred million " come from ? MF will be the owner - the club will be in his name, but the money is coming from another person. That is how i interpret it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I've had enough of this club and its fans, to be honest. It's like seeing your wife getting raped. Meanwhile, internet Saints "fans" fawn over a potless Irishman and his equally potless London mate, while they fiddle with her bra. This dustbin lid is obviously a total nutjob, yet him and Frank Carson are given the time of day by supposed professionals. If neither of them have any money, what the f*** do they bring? Arse ache, that's all.... Explain how they passed due dilligence and proved funds if they are frauds? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Rooney Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I've had enough of this club and its fans, to be honest. It's like seeing your wife getting raped. Meanwhile, internet Saints "fans" fawn over a potless Irishman and his equally potless London mate, while they fiddle with her bra. This dustbin lid is obviously a total nutjob, yet him and Frank Carson are given the time of day by supposed professionals. If neither of them have any money, what the f*** do they bring? Arse ache, that's all.... Now i understand why you release all your crap on here. Let it out GM Let it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guided Missile Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 GM I respect your opinions as I do all posters on this forum...... But by making derogatory rascist comments like this, you are doing yourself no favours. The problem is, Block Head, you're confusing me with someone that give a sh !t about your whiney arsed, liberal, mealey mouthed, ill informed, humourless, beard stroking, pipe smoking, slipper wearing opinion... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guided Missile Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Explain how they passed due dilligence and proved funds if they are frauds? No... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 (edited) MF will be the owner - the club will be in his name, but the money is coming from another person. That is how i interpret it. Great, an infinite regress. And on this interpretation TL genuinely thought that getting the prospective owner out in public who in fact is being bankrolled by another mystery individual or group would calm things? Incredible. Edited 26 June, 2009 by shurlock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wopper Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 The problem is, Block Head, you're confusing me with someone that give a sh !t about your whiney arsed, liberal, mealey mouthed, ill informed, humourless, beard stroking, pipe smoking, slipper wearing opinion... Keep pulling your plonker mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFC Forever Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 MF will be the owner - the club will be in his name, but the money is coming from another person. That is how i interpret it. Surely this would not satisfy the FL in respect of the fit and proper persons test.The league will wamt to know the financier behind it,not who is fronting it. If this is the level of our presentation to the league it is amateurish to say the least.No wonder the deal is dragging out and you cannot blame the FL. 2300 and still waiting for Tony's update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedro Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I have no doubts, after a social event tonight, that the Jackson consortium will win very soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts