Vignal to Stoke?

[trousers]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1193954/Liverpool-flop-Gregory-Vignal-Stokes-transfer-talk.html

 

Liverpool flop Gregory Vignal Stokes up transfer talk

 

 

By Sportsmail Reporter

Last updated at 4:27 PM on 18th June 2009

 

 

Lens defender Gregory Vignal has claimed Stoke and Porto, as well as home-town club Montpellier, are interested in him.

 

The 27-year-old, who spent last season on loan at Southampton, is out of contract this summer and could be set for a return to England.

[Tac-tics]

I completely forgot about that nob.

 

Hardly surprising considering Pulis loves signing ex-saints.

[oxfordshire_saint]

Also linked with Porto, WTF?

 

I know the Portuguese league is sub-standard, but he'd still end up playing Champions League football and that'd just be wrong....

[Northant Saint]

I thought he did quite a good job for us when he was here tbf.

[scott_saints]

Got to be one of the most tactically inept players I've seen play for us. Okay, he was reasonable on the ball but his positioning etc was sh1te!!

[saint_stevo]

better than Molyneaux tho

[cellone]

Thought he played well under Pearson. he's surley worth merit for that.

[Bailey]

Not as bad as some are making him out to be on here. Having said that, he's not that great either and the prospect of him playing in the Champions League with Porto is a strange one. I can't even see him having enough quality to hold down a regular spot in Stoke's team, yet alone playing against some of Europe's best teams.

[Northant Saint]

better than some we had on the books at the time...

[cellone]

Better than some we've had on the books for some time.

[Saint_clark]

Was awesome under Pearson, one of our best performers.

I admit he was f*cking shocking before that though.

[Deanovski]

i loved him quality pen taker

[Flyer]

Hes on trial at QPR now, a bit of a step down from the CL.

[Badger]

I completely forgot about that nob.

 

Hardly surprising considering Pulis loves signing ex-saints.

 

Can't we give Anthony Pulis a short run in the team so that his old man buys him back as well ?

 

Oh forgot.He's perpetually injured.

[SOTONS EAST SIDE]

Got to be one of the most tactically inept players I've seen play for us. Okay, he was reasonable on the ball but his positioning etc was sh1te!!

I think this statement covers 100% of the team, at most times during last season. DONT YOU THINK! :smt078

[VectisSaint]

Took a while to settle in, but was actually very good later on when we had a proper coach/manager in charge. We should have kept him last season was one of the ones we let go unjustly in my opinion, but then he wasn't Dutch or just out of school.

[Arizona]

Think Vignal was perhaps the best player in the second half of the season, along with John. Positionally he was pretty poor, but he was a commited no-nonsense defender and he took a mean penalty. If I had to list my top 10 highlights of that season, Vignal would feature on more than one occasion, including the number 1 spot. His late penalty right in front of me at my first ever away game in Glanford Park.

 

Not Prem class IMO, but good luck to him. I think his initial poor form owed more to Burley's tactics and playing behind Euell.

[dellgirl]

I thought under Pearson he played some quality football and was pretty impressed that he played with a broken arm as we were so short of decent players and didn't whinge about it I wish him luck wherever he goes.