Hypocrisy?

[Johnny Bognor]

Bungle, I think JB has a limited imagination and vocabulary. I've noticed that he latches onto what he thinks is a clever phrase and then uses it ad nauseam for weeks on end.

 

Let's hope someone gives him a dictionary / thesaurus soon.

 

 

Ah, the old "revert to attacks on spelling and grammar once the argument is lost" tactic. :rolleyes:

 

..... I suppose it beats attacks on sovereign countries though.

 

As for the dictionary, I have an Internet vocabulary for quick thinking and typing (with the odd typo or two thrown in) in order to make a valid point. In the real world, my scribes are more considered and measured so I will not be needing a dictionary / thesaurus any time soon. As you like big words, have Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis on me. There you go, the biggest word in the dictionary - does this make me better than you for using bigger words? Can I now claim the moral and intellectual high ground?

Edited 17 June, 2009 by Johnny Bognor

[Jillyanne]

Stop shouting like a fishwife.

 

You have experience of a 'fish wife' then, I myself do not. Therefore your post means absolutely nothing to me. I hope your 'fish wife' looked after you.

[Mole]

You have experience of a 'fish wife' then, I myself do not. Therefore your post means absolutely nothing to me. I hope your 'fish wife' looked after you.

 

"A fishwife or fish fag is a woman who sells fish. Such women were notoriously loud and foul-mouthed as in the proverb, To swear like a fishwife. One reason for their outspokenness is that their wares were highly perishable and so lost value if not sold quickly."

 

Do you now see why i used the term?

[bridge too far]

Ah, the old "revert to attacks on spelling and grammar once the argument is lost" tactic. :rolleyes:

 

..... I suppose it beats attacks on sovereign countries though.

 

As for the dictionary, I have an Internet vocabulary for quick thinking and typing (with the odd typo or two thrown in) in order to make a valid point. In the real world, my scribes are more considered and measured so I will not be needing a dictionary / thesaurus any time soon. As you like big words, have Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis on me. There you go, the biggest word in the dictionary - does this make me better than you for using bigger words? Can I now claim the moral and intellectual high ground?

 

I haven't attacked you're spelling or grammar.

 

HTH

[Johnny Bognor]

I haven't attacked you're spelling or grammar.

 

HTH

 

OK, fair enough, attacks on imagination and vocabulary.

 

Could it be that your superior use and knowledge of the English language is down to the fact that I am less fortunate than you?

 

If so, surely your socialist leanings would feel some sympathy towards those less fortunate?

 

Instead you chose to castigate the less advantaged. Could this be another example of why this thread could have been called 'Socialism' and the content would have been no different? i.e. Socailism = Hypocrisy

Edited 17 June, 2009 by Johnny Bognor

[Mao Cap]

OK, fair enough, attacks on imagination and vocabulary.

 

Could it be that your superior use and knowledge of the English language is down to the fact that I am less fortunate than you?

 

If so, surely your socialist leanings would feel some sympathy towards those less fortunate?

 

Instead you chose to castigate the less advantaged. Could this be another example of why this thread could have been called 'Socialism' and the content would have been no different? i.e. Socailism = Hypocrisy

 

Don't worry, I feel kind of sorry for you after reading the above crap.

[OldNick]

Probably because you and I and most other people wouldn't understand the finer points of news broadcasting and financing?

How can they have a decision go against them when they haven't made a decision to 'go against'?

God, your logic is famously flawed

Well it is quite easy, they have come up with an idea and so by actually putting it up for consultation they would be in favour. If the idea was to shoot the unemployed would they say 'oh lets put that up for consultation' No they wouldn't give it a second thought.It is just another thing to take peoples minds away from the main point that was to Tax by stealth people with landlines.

[Special K]

This thread will get locked like the other one imho and bloody should be. I haven't expressed my views for fear of being stamped down and criticised but the usual suspects just seem to keep on and on and on and on and on and on. BORING!

 

I agree.

 

"Keyboard" hardliners with a penchant for Mail-esque hyperbole against fact-forgetful bleeding-heart liberals with ineffectual "moral arguments" and a pathetic line in petty name calling.