Of course we all make wrong decisions from time to time. The question is, how long does it take us to recognise that we have made an error of judgement (if at all)?
Not mentioning any names (lol)
We have to go for the win, because we are not very good at drawing. Our game is more productive when we are positive, and now we have three in-form strikers, and a much better defence, thanks to Sizer.
'Being anti-Lowe' has been fueled by his ineptitude and antipathy to supporters - his customer base ffs.
However a positive has been to unite fans in adversity. Protests, marches and wreath layering have all raised adrenaline levels - which have fed into the team.
Keep this going.
We correctly criticise Lowe and Wilde for being out of touch with supporters, and are rightly sceptical of whether it would work, and see it as a cynical PR ploy. But it needs to happen imo if only to see the two amigos reacting to the likes of Alpine and Saint Robbie face to face. I would like to be there.
The lino on the Kingsland side seemed to give offside decisions only when the offending player had touched the ball, so players had to run unnecessary yards before the delayed whistle, while the other linesman blew immediately. Anyone else notice they were officiating to different rules? Who was correct?
We have four points to haul back on the team above us before we can congratulate ourselves. The lowest point will be if we fail to do this.
But hey, good work fellers, so far.
So the BBC should have pointed out that not awarding a penalty for Perry's handling was controversial, but Kennedy's was deserved. Ambiguous reporting.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Lowe had two choices (given he was already committed to the Dutch experiment) Wotte or Poortvliet in charge. With hindsight he made totally the wrong decision. And ten of the players who started the match on Saturday were at Saints at the beginning of the season.
How wrong can you be?
Was it controversial? Kennedy raised his hand to intercept the ball, surely.
Did Dave Jones or anyone else query the refs decision? I didn't see Cardiff players protesting. I thought it was a clear-cut decision.
Poor BBC reporting or fair comment?