Jump to content

LeBizzier69

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    1,279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

LeBizzier69's Achievements

  1. Didn’t look a pen…..seemed to get a toe to the ball and man then fell over??
  2. What a team of diving c*nts
  3. Reset coming, clear out of players, excitement for the season ahead. Sounds a bit like when we last went down.....at least this season it was unavoidable due to lack of real quality where needed, unlike last time when we were mismanaged (in my opinion) into relegation. A decent manager incoming and all will be forgotten. We've been the laughing stock so many times over the last 30 years that i frankly couldn't care less about the "earliest relegation" tag. Bring on next season. It'll all be fine in the end.....or is this the beer talking.
  4. One of the oddest things i've seen from a player in while......KWP busting a gut to get forward, and Dibling just walking 20 yards behind him....no support whatsoever. Bizarre.
  5. Substitute appearances don’t get much more half-arsed than his last night. Shame.
  6. Must admit to being some way past the point of caring when it happens.
  7. And continue donating his salary to building the tunnels!
  8. LeBizzier69

    Israel

    Oh good, all the news recently must be made up and the stance from 2 years ago is still in effect. All these posts for nothing. Cheers for clarifying.
  9. LeBizzier69

    Israel

    I’m not upset about it, we all have opinions and isn’t that what this place is for? My opinion is simply that if they’re a designated terrorist organisation in the UK then the BBC should refer to them as such. Others feel differently. I think I’ll leave this here unless I have anything other to say about good old Rupert.
  10. LeBizzier69

    Israel

    Hi there. No, I was asked if there were links to the beeb calling other terror groups terrorists…..by Weston Super Saint. So they’ve named those as terror groups (programme or not is really irrelevant if it’s the corporation stance) but not Hamas. Does that help?
  11. LeBizzier69

    Israel

    Cheers my man, I’m off to the footy. I’ll let you wrestle with that conundrum.
  12. LeBizzier69

    Israel

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000z95y https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/n3csvf6h Describing the 9/11 attacks as terrorist attacks. Isis as a terror group. Does that count?
  13. LeBizzier69

    Israel

    No. Next?
  14. LeBizzier69

    Israel

    “In which case, not just Hamas, but all other terrorist perpetrators should be exempt from being referred to as “terrorists” — including, rather remarkably, ISIS and Al-Qaeda. At least then the BBC would be able to claim consistency across the entire terrorist spectrum with a credible defence against the charge, implicit in the intervention by ministers, that the Corporation’s coverage of the conflict is not duly impartial. Alternatively, align the reporting of Hamas with how the BBC has reported other terrorist organisations and events. Consistency matters. As it stands, the BBC’s defence of due impartiality in this instance is sufficiently flawed as to be unconvincing.” Bias shown?? From earlier article linked above. Being impartial should be a given….. unless the said organisation is a proscribed terrorist group by our own government.
  15. I’ll take that as a compliment thanks. Maybe the BBC can take your lead and call Hamas a “niche terrorist organisation”.
×
×
  • Create New...