sadoldgit

On the plus side, at least the people who vote for them can’t pretend that they don’t know who what they are voting for. I don’t think that there is one member of their organisation who doesn’t transparently espouse repugnant views.

Couldn’t he be a genius with scary eyes who leads us into mid table mediocrity this season? The way I see it the squad is still short of a few key players. A lot depends on what SR does in the forthcoming transfer window and the next.

I was going to give up watching QT and didn’t watch it this week. However, after hearing how well one of the members of the panel performed I caught up with it yesterday. Zac Polanski was a breath of fresh air and punctured the Reform mouthpiece perfectly. We need more people like him and less like endless line of gormless immigration hate peddling mouthpieces that Reform churn out.

Why not anything in between? Surely the rest of the season is going to be either good, bad or indifferent?

I don’t agree that we are not an attractive proposition to anyone with experience. I think that those who are available at the moment don’t fit the bill. Eckert was given the u21 job because he had the potential to eventually move up to the top job. This has happened sooner than expected because Will Still didn’t work out. He will either turn out to be a good appointment or not. Either way it doesn’t mean that the job of manager/head coach at St. Mary’s isn’t attractive to an experienced manager.

Over one match?

It worked for Liverpool in the past.

We all make mistakes. My apologies again for getting the forum wrong.

Sickening to see the way that FIFA is sucking up to Trump. What happened to not being political?

I have just looked too and can’t find anything so will hold my hands up. I may have confused it with TUI or even earlier on this site, it’s not as if you don’t have previous with historical digs. I think we can both agree that I am not in your top 100 posters and never have been. What I did discover in your brief time on Sotonians were your favourite posters on this site from back in 2015. I won’t embarrass you with you first choice, but your second choice begins with T, which explains a lot 😉

He also hasn’t changed a bit whereas most people grow out of it.

I’ll go and have a look when I have time but is it possible that you may have deleted it when you were on the forum? Have you looked at your posts there? I’m guessing no.

He’s right.

Let’s get this right. I didn’t accuse youof following me around on Pap’s forum. I said that you had an issue with me there, which you did. You didn’t even remember being on there when I mentioned it previously. This was ten years ago and I can’t remember exactly what you took issue with, my posting style I expect, but I wasn’t your favourite poster in the short time you were there. It is no big deal, you are still a grumpy individual and still have a pop at me, so nothing has changed.

That is because, when I first mentioned their names and their connection to what most people understand as far right views, one particular poster immediately jumped in to defend them. I defended my view and so it continued. Bizarrely, he later claimed not to know who these people were. Yes, go figure! My argument was then as it is now, if you don’t support someone’s views, why defend them so vigorously? If the poster’s who use the term “Lefties” for anybody who criticises the Right slagged off Stalin or Lenin, you wouldn’t find me backing them up on here. The pile on crowd then joined him and it became a “thing,” a regular occurrence to label them as an obsession. This was before it became widespread news that both of the characters expressed odious, hateful views, though both had a great deal of support on social media. They aren’t alone of course. There are plenty of others out there like them and Andrew Tate. Of course these people have now become part of the mainstream. They should be nowhere near it and do get a lot of pushback, which makes it even stranger to find that there are people who still have a problem with anyone who has a problem with their views. If I had an obsession with them i would repost their views on a regular basis. There is no need as most people now know what they stand for. Both would be at home in the Reform Party and, given their standing in the polls, it is reason enough not to let these things slide. Another odd thing on here, there are plenty of posters on here who constantly call out Trump and his behaviour, yet there is only a couple of die hard Trump supporters who throw the TDS around at his detractors. Why is that not seen as obsessive behaviour by the usual suspects too? Talking of Trump, if I had an obsession with “far right” figures I would have known all about, and posted about, Charlie Knight. I knew nothing about this character until the day he was shot. Anyway, hopefully Egg’s findings have put paid to another bit of forum misinformation.