TwoPints

How do you know that? Why believe one article over another?

As buctootim has already told you. All I have done on here is quote an article from a financial news source. I haven't asserted anything but why would I doubt it?

Or both! Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

ooh! Double post! Let's see if I can help you out. The headline refers to 1300 job losses not 3000 and I specifically referred you to paragraph 5 so this suggests that maybe I had read the whole article? The article doesn't make any reference to these 3,000 job losses being attributable to changes in the way we bank ... I even quoted the paragraph to you which clearly stated "it intends to axe a further 3,000 jobs on top of its 2014 redundancy plan in light of the EU referendum result". I'm clearly not referring to those as I referred to 3000 jobs not 1300. Not sure how posting a quote from a news article can be referred to as making things up .. but keep your head in the sand. Let me talk you through the specific quote I was referring to again as you seem to have missed off the rest of that paragraph from your quote: "Though the latest round of cuts is not related to the Brexit vote, Lloyds has said it intends to axe a further 3,000 jobs on top of its 2014 redundancy plan in light of the EU referendum result, taking the total number of jobs set to go by the end of 2017 to 12,000." Nothing there about these jobs having been previously announced in July ... making things up again Johnny? Nothing there about the jobs being lost as a result of the way we bank. Lloyds have said that the 3000 jobs are being lost in light of the EU referendum result . It's not difficult to read and easy to understand. Donut.

Here it is: https://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/lloyds-axes-another-1300-jobs/ 5th paragraph.

See my post to Johnny. Same applies here. If the job loses had been attributed to branch closures as a result of efficiencies brought about by online banking, then I wouldn't have posted it on an EU thread... and as it happens, I was in a local HSBC branch just yesterday where a very helpful young lady managed to satisfy my needs!

It's unfortunate that your research doesn't cover up to date news. The 3000 jobs referred to in my post, from today's news, is in addition to the 9000 mentioned in 2014 and is specifically referred to as being as a result of Brexit. When I get a chance, I'll post a link to save you looking stuff up yourself and to give you more time to make up numbers about marmite.

You need to get out more.

Also... here's a little something I have read this morning: "Lloyds has said it intends to axe a further 3000 jobs on top of its 2014 redundancy plan in light of the EU referendum result".

So Tesco running out of supplies as Unilever want to increase prices by 10% due to the 17% drop in the value of sterling. Nothing to do with Brexit though, no siree and I see a 3p per litre increase on fuel today too. Also totally unrelated to Brexit though obviously... and we haven't even left yet. Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

Why do they have an image of Max Headroom on their stand? Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

Personally, I couldn't give a flying **** how much the squad cost. All that matters to me is the performance in the pitch. If we can get top 6 and have a chance at a cup for £10 with Kat pocketing the rest, that's fine with me. Makes no difference to me whether we spend £150m on players or not. Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

How exciting. Just ordered my colour copy

Telegraph editor says today's Harry Redknapp story is, for now, the last in their #football4sale series Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

I must admit, I'm with the club on this one. The film of Black was so heavily edited that its not really obvious what answers he'd given to what question. It doesn't look great but if that's the only evidence of wrongdoing and Black has given his side of the story to the club, then they're right to stand by him until the whole evidence comes to light. The way this Telegraph expose is panning out, I suspect things aren't as bad as the snippets of film released suggest. Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

Do you feel the same way about MLT who, I believe, admitted to trying to kick the ball out for a throw in as he had money on the time of the first throw in? Or is it just people you don't happen to like ? Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

I thought 'Arry had previously told the story about finding out afterwards that his players had bet on a game. Might be wrong though. Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

Nothing to this story really. I've been a bit sceptical since the Jimmy Floyd story negotiating a speaking engagement in the Far East. All look heavily edited and not releasing the full footage makes me think the stories might be somewhat exaggerated. Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

Just seen motd 2. Gary Cahill gets 5 minutes to talk about how the ref ****ed up and then the panel talk about it for another 5 minutes banging on about how he's hard done by. For Saints we get a Ian ****ing Wright laughing it off and the panel joking about it. So ****ing biased it's unbelievable. Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

This. We've been very very very fortunate that Markus bought the club. We could easily end up with a right loony. Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

So, who's squad, post transfer window, would you rather have, WBAs, Bournemouths, Sunderlands? Maybe Crystal Palace or Swansea? What do you think? Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

I thought it was fairly obvious that he was replying to you really. Could you really not see that? How odd. Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

In that same way we've extended VvD, Bertrand and Forster. No different really. It's just the way you happen to look at it and for some reason you seem to prefer the methods of a club that likes to finish below us. Each to their own I suppose. Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

Lol. Good shout. ?

This will be the same Everton that just sold John Stones, who was under contract until 2019, to Chelsea will it? Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk