Unbelievable Jeff

Thank you for replying. 1. So that £39 billion will be extracted now, or when the trade deal is agreed - of that there is no doubt. There is a good chance that even if we left on WTO that we would still pay those monies owed. 2. We can sign-off I believe, with a pre-defined date that trade deal will start (like signing a player outside of transfer windows), ie, we can sign but not implement. 3. Debatable - they are aware of the terms they are currently trading on, and as soon as any trade deals are agreed with countries/trade areas these can be taken on by businesses. It's not uncertainty like now. 4. Yep, we will, but I thought one of the Brexiteers biggest problems with being in the EU was that we couldn't stop these laws anyway - so no difference to now really.

And neither should they - in any sort of attack of this kind speed of response is of the essence.

He's been told by someone that he shouldn't like May's WA, but he can't work out in his head, why. That's the issue - I wish he'd just stop embarrassing himself and admit he doesn't know.

But what's that got to do with Brexit - if the Euro fails it makes no difference if we're in the EU or not. In that article it wasn't going down the pan, it was just weakening (much like our currency since we voted out). People do use sources to back up, but they explain what their problem is, and then back it up. All you did was post a link that talked about the one point that I said not to talk about. Just give me 3 bullet points, off the top of your head, in what you don't like about May's WA, that does not include the backstop. You've posted so many words saying that you don't want to, when you could have just put that effort into telling me YOUR opinion. It's the last time I'll ask - we can all see that you have no idea why you don't like the "worst deal in our history".

Calm down love, you were the one that started this, and then carried it onto the Brexit thread. Perhaps you can explain what I haven't grasped - as you persistently say, I'm a thicko, so maybe you just have to explain these things a bit better? Edit: Actually, after thinking about it, don't bother - this is the wrong place and wrong time to discuss petty grievances.

He's the one that criticised me because I said that babies dying is sad. If he wants to explain what I am allowed to find sad then I'll stop. Back to this, though, it's obviously awful news - looking at the precis on the BBC site I didn't realise that guns were do prevalent in New Zealand. Have we had any word on how many casualties there are?

Perhaps you can point me to what I missed then? It's OK, I'll wait for you to give me an actual reason from your own mouth why you don't like the "worst deal in our history". You've had loads of time, which is what you said you needed earlier in the day. It should be pretty easy to do considering how much you gate May's WA...surely? Perhaps you can answer my economics question from the other day that you've also been dodging as well, why the Euro going down the pan is a bad thing for the UK economy?

Is this faux sadness you're showing, so we don't all believe you're heartless, or do actually find this one sad? You never explained what our rules should be for finding things sad.

I'm not the one who said that there are no rules to what we should find sad, and then in the next breath is telling people what they should find sad. I know you don't like being caught out (people don't in general), but I think you should just admit you ****ed up on this one and back down.

Hey, don't have a go at me because you've got no feelings. It's OK to feel sad at things. I'm sure you'd have cared more if they were more 'similar' to you.

Are we allowed to feel anything at this - I know you like to police people's feelings on things? Want to know what rules you're setting out before I answer.

Backstop, AGAIN. Wes and his "worst deal in our history", and he can't even string a sentence together explaining why.

That means it's unlikely that West Ham will go down. The other way round it means that United are likely to go down.

That whole article was about the backstop you ****tard - I said to you "outside of the backstop". You're a ****ing idiot, who routinely embarrasses himself on his forum because you have no knowledge of law, economics or politics. Why don't you leave the arguments to those of us who do know, and use your time doing something useful.

Yep, I asked you. I assume you have no idea, hence why you've pointed me to a website and not written in your own words. I also said "outside the backstop", and the WHOLE of that article is about the backstop. You are beyond a parody. You are an idiot, a fraud, a parrot and a racist, and you have no defence because you have no intelligent, independent thoughts of your own. You, are a Brexiteer.

No, of course not...

I think we should join a customs union - the issue is the majority seem to not want that, hence the issue - and an issue with todays tech that cannot be solved.

Lol, yes, that is something that we discussed at length on this very thread, where you and GM were clearly getting confused between the WA and a Deal. The only reason we've continued to call it a deal, is because "No deal" is used so often (whereas it should be "No WA"). Perhaps you can explain the parts of the WA that you dislike (not taking into account the backstop as I think we can all agree that's not a good thing)?

Or Brexiteers saying that yesterday's vote isn't binding...but for some reason the referendum was?!

We may see a 'no-confidence' vote before the day is out...that'd be funny.

Main faction to honour leave, yet with 15 days to go they have yet to vote for the deal on the table...

Filled your nappy, now time for a nap is it?

I've never seen May's deal as a particularly big thing - it is for a transition until we've signed an FTA. The issue (as we've said repeatedly) is that the GFA does not support separate customs unions. It will be a problem with any transition, or any FTA that doesn't include a customs union.

He shouldn't have allowed either through - to put it on the table in relation to Art50, or allow it to be taken off the table. Good chance the amendment will be removed.

Looks like the DUP are ready to back May's deal - now just down to the ERG, and May being allowed to present the deal once more.