Unbelievable Jeff

The other thing that is leaving a bit of a nasty taste in my mouth about this is the fact that it is something that can be genetic, and judging by the fact that her Mother and Daughter also seem to suffer (by your own admission Soggy), it seems that it could be genetics that have caused them to be like that. Maybe you should have tried to help her.

As I said above, I don't understand the point of having this as its own thread - he's not understood, or even tried to understand why he has been derided for his takes on GB and CE. I would also like to hear the other side of the story, as I haven't seen any evidence of this, just one persons opinion of what happened - and they are not here to answer the (serious) accusations that are being levelled at them. To me, this seems like a "look at me" type thread.

Or don't add her to your mortgage.

With the "look at me" content in this thread, and your general demeanour and behaviour on this forum, you definitely should be able to spot a narcissist.

The other thing is, if anyone reads this forum that knows who Soggy is, the comments above also amount to libel.

You're still not getting it. You called people "rape apologists" for questioning the guilty verdict of Ched Evans. How can you be upset that people call you a "domestic abuse apologist" for doing the same thing with Boycott? By the way, surely the role of the CPS is to weigh up the evidence and decide if there is enough to prosecute a case? Hence they must have thought there was enough evidence to prosecute.

I am flabbergasted to be honest. I have spent the last few days wincing at what he's writing and muttering "just shut up and leave it" under my breath and then he does this. You reap what you sow.

What I still don't get is what deal we are trying to get with these threats of No deal? Unless there is an alternative to the backstop - that no-one has come up with yet - there is no better deal (IE the status quo) than what the WA gives us.

This could have been written on the GB thread, not sure why you've done this, but hey, you'll get blasted on this thread as well I suppose. However, I think there are two main issues here that you don't seem to get: 1. People who were questioning the evidence of a man prosecuted, and then found not-guilty on appeal, were called "rape apologists", yet when you question the evidence for GB the same cannot be applied. 2. Everyone who was on that thread realises this, hence why you've been given such a hard time. They don't want your life story, but they want to give you such a hard time that you spend your time and effort typing it out. It is a kind of punishment I guess, for you being so hardline about Ched Evans, yet so ambivalent, ne flippant, about the Boycott case. It's massively hypocritical, and smacks of bias. You've misunderstood why you've been singled out, and the easiest way to sort it is not by rambling on about your private life, but more by saying "Yeah, perhaps I shouldn't have called people that". But that is up to you. I'll let others have a say on it, but unfortunately you have done so much damage to yourself by contradicting your apparent morals when discussing cases that I'm not sure anyone can take you seriously anymore.

Love you too. Hugs and kisses.

Just take it somewhere else, alright love?

Following me again? #predictable #wantstohavemybabies

Yeah, you're both appalling humans. Take it somewhere else.

Yep. At least.

Do you know what they are though? Speaking on behalf of at least 48% of the nation - no other party can claim that - hence why I moved to them from the Conservatives.

No, not all of them. Look at the 21 who were expelled from the Conservatives. That's against all of their best interests. If only the rest of the Tory party (and their supporters) had their morals, rather than the moralistic cesspit they display on a day to day basis.

When's he said we're a stepping stone club?

"Mitsu" means 3 in Japanese, and "bishi" means diamond.

I'm not saying jobs are going to be lost because of delays to imports (although a few might)? I'm saying jobs are going to be lost because the economy will falter and people will be buying less. And of course Aldi are investing, as it's cheap to invest in the UK from overseas (due to the plunge in the pound) and once we leave the EU people will have less money and will need to shop in cheaper stores. It's why Primark have spent the last 3 years investing in their stores - it's to take advantage of the fact that everyone's going to have less money.

I don't know what that said, but I'll try to interpret. You're saying that when a country comes upon hard times, shops and businesses don't go bust, downsize, shut stores, etc? Is that genuinely what you're saying?

Have you got any hard evidence that you haven't? I'm going to let you off for the last two days, because you've been backed into a corner due to your previous poor arguments on this forum, but next time, before creating a thread to create a debate that you want to go a certain way, make sure you've read back through your back catalogue, okay.

When a country is in recession and jobs go, who do you think loses out? Are you THAT poor at economics that you don't understand the absolute basics of supply and demand?

Soggy has done more to build mistrust in the CPS over the last few years than the last 20 years of wrongful prosecutions.

You are throwing doubt on her injuries and testimony - that is defending him and his case.

https://news.sky.com/story/sky-views-second-brexit-vote-would-pull-boris-johnson-out-of-the-quagmire-11809091 Now that is interesting - WA or revoke Article 50. I'd be happy with that vote.