
Wes Tender
Subscribed Users-
Posts
12,508 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Wes Tender
-
Who cares what you think? You're not a Conservative, so there is no need for them to take any account of the likes of you who wouldn't vote for them anyway. You don't seem to have realised that it isn't so much about right and left anyway, regardless of your misunderstanding of what that means currently. This election will be heavily skewed by the stance of voters in the referendum, between Remoaners and Brexiteers as much as it is between left and right.
-
Phillip Hammond confirms that he will not be standing in the General Election. Good riddance. There is some real good coming from this Election already even before it is held, getting rid of the likes of him, Bercow, Letwin and other anti-democrat remoaner Brexit saboteurs who are not standing again.
-
I'm trying to recall you calling out Shurlock for the name-calling. I don't think you have, but as he is one of the worst offenders, I look forward to reading it the next time
-
Jeff certainly is. Put him on ignore (and please stop quoting the small-minded oaf.)
-
I refer to my earlier post. I am not wasting my time on re-running the referendum with you remoaner anti-democrats The only vote that counts now will be December 12th - Over and out.
-
Suit yourself if you believe that May was a brilliant negotiator and that nobody could have handled it much better. She negotiated like the remain voting vicar's daughter she is.
-
No it isn't
-
Sorry you anti-democrat remoaners. I am not wasting my time going over old ground again and again. Let's see what happens on 12th December.
-
Had a free trade deal been agreed with the EU from the start, then NI wouldn't have been a problem. The useless May allowed the EU to set the agenda to weaponise the NI border.
-
Our mindset? We are a part of the majority of the electorate who are democrats believing that MPs are our servants not our masters and that we elect them to do our bidding. If you're going to talk about disillusionment or disenchantment towards our political class, then that is plainly and simply because they have wilfully ignored the decision of a referendum vote. Thankfully many of those rebel Tories are either not fighting for their seats this time around, or will be looking for another job come December 13th. The same with MPs from many Labour seats in Leave voting areas. It isn't very credible stating that Brexit was a madcap idea when we haven't even left yet. It smacks of premature ejaculation.
-
You obviously haven't been following this saga very closely since June 2016. Boris has had to pick up the pieces from the bad situation he inherited from May. No doubt had he been in charge of the negotiations from the very beginning, we would be in a very different position now. May having lost the Conservatives majority in Parliament, Boris has had to fight every inch against a Remainer majority determined not to honour their election manifestos and a rogue Speaker bending the rules to thwart the Executive by granting Parliament the power to make decisions that historically would not have been in their gift. I wonder what sort of deal you would have expected him to achieve with the EU when legally he was denied the ability to walk away from a bad deal? You're the naive one here.
-
It really is quite a simple concept, Fry. I'm surprised that you cannot grasp it. Just because events brought about a situation that I believe would have been much better had Remainer May not negotiated our leaving so badly, doesn't mean that I didn't know what I was voting for. Many Labour and Lib Dumb voters are in much the same situation if they voted to leave and subsequently found that their party leadership then ratted on them by not honouring their election promises to respect the referendum vote. The leavers you mention in the Conservative Party were a minority in a Parliament packed full of Remainers representing constituencies of mostly leave voters. Consequently, they faced a situation of voting for a watered down surrender treaty or the risk of not leaving at all. Or do you just believe that they had always wanted this BRINO?
-
It is difficult to infer emotion from a written post and you demonstrate that it is possible to misinterpret it. I am not bitter at all. Disappointed at how incompetent we have been in our negotiations, but having waited so long for us to leave, I can wait patiently a little bit longer, because it will happen. The bitter ones are those who couldn't even wait five minutes after the referendum before bleating about how unfair it was and that it should be rerun until we thickos get it right.
-
You asked whether I knew what I was voting for in the referendum and I did. Regardless of what has transpired since because of the complete lack of negotiating skills of remainer May and the EU's desire to punish us because we dared to leave their protection racket and to create a giant hole in their finances, I have not a single ounce of regret. Leaving now with a clean break WTO Brexit is fine by me; I certainly would prefer it to the Boris surrender treaty.
-
Really? Most of the posters on here aren't on the right of politics and they're mostly very adept at name calling and childish insults.
-
It's quite straightforward. I will vote Conservative, as a vote for the Brexit Party here would let in the Lib Dumbs. I have just heard that Mims Davies is not standing again which is a shame, as she has been a good constituency MP, and a Leaver too.
-
I've just had a pamphlet land on my doormat from the Lib Dumbs. It has a photo of some young girl on the front cover and a claim that she will be Britain's next Prime Minister. B0llocks to them.
-
No need to pretend, I knew exactly what I was voting for. I'd had over 40 years to find out. Next you'll not like the General Election result and insist that nobody knew what they were voting for and that the election should be rerun.
-
It was an encouraging display in many ways. It was batten down the hatches in the first half, but mostly effective at keeping the score down to a reasonable level, and then in the second half we at last showed a bit more conviction in closing them down further up the pitch, enabling us to prove more of a threat going forward and getting some supply to the front. Although naturally Man City had numerous chances to have scored more with the number of shots they had, we also had three or four chances which could have narrowed the gap in the scoreline. Had Stephens scuffed shot gone in, that might have made the end of the game a lot more interesting. At least we can go into the league match on Saturday encouraged that if we apply ourselves we can do something similar again.
-
Look, your lot lost. How long will it take to penetrate? Accept it. It isn't best of three, or however many attempts it takes until you get the "right" decision.
-
What you really mean, is that is the most popular option of you remoaner losers. The poor undemocratic sops who want another referendum before the first one has even been enacted.
-
Corbyn demanded an election on no fewer than 35 occasions. Now when he has been offered one three times, he doesn't want one after all. Corbynated Chicken. Frit.
-
I understand that there has been a recent report that concludes that narcissists like you are generally happy with themselves. Of course they are. Happiness goes hand in hand with smugness and arrogance, doesn't it?
-
Were you talking to me, Soggy? I run my own business, thanks. People like me are ruining the country? I'm one of those constituting a substantial percentage of the electorate holding similar views, so suck it up, that's democracy for you. I accept that because you would happily ignore the result of the referendum that you are not a democrat, so pardon me if I choose to denigrate the validity of your opinions on the subject. Apparently a Conservative Government led by Johnson would ruin the country, but presumably you don't think that a Labour Government under Corbyn would? There should be enough there in that interview with a local pharmacist to ring alarm bells about the future of the NHS? Comedy Gold. The naive people are those who fail to realise that we have been royally shafted by the EEC/EU since we joined, but increasingly since we voted to leave. The future special relationship with the EU looks bleak indeed when we become a major competitor to them right on their own doorstep. You crease me up with your Guardian indoctrinated claptrap.
-
Channel 4, eh? That bastion of impartial, unbiased political reporting are interviewing a local Oxfordshire pharmacist in order to fabricate as many slurs as they can against Trump and the Conservative government, in the hope that gormless, naive idiots like you will believe it to be factual. When it comes down to expert opinion on the complexities of the implications for our NHS following a trade deal with the USA, just pop down to the local chemist for a knowledgeable briefing. I understand that in retaliation, the Express are to send a journo to interview a newsagent in the same village and ask him for his views on how the economy would fare under a Corbyn government.