Wes Tender

Before the match, the Solent team were speculating about whether J W-P had covered the greatest distance in the PL this season. Another great gut-busting performance again today, so surely it has to be a possibility. He has come on in leaps and bounds this season.

A great come back win. We were lucky not have ended up with only a draw or even a loss had SU taken the chances we gave them.

Why would they do that? He's been their stand-out player. Is he injured?

Come on Antonio, score twice

Villa go ahead

Thank God that Ings scores a penalty. What a shame he couldn't have scored the last one

Redmond, Bertrand and Romeu all doing well this half.

Adams!!!!

What has gone wrong with McCarthy??

Maybe a full St Mary's might have got a crap referee to have taken more notice of fouls for us.

Peter Banks usual crap referee

HAHAHA!

Adams!!!!

Hasenhuttl has to earn his corn with tactical changes and an inspirational half time talk. It seems plain that Vestergaard is the weak link in defence. He needs replacing or covering on that flank. Sheffield United are well drilled and tight and will be hard to break down. Being a goal up, they have no inclination to open up, and can rely on hitting us on the break at any opportunity. This is the type of team that gives us the difficulties at home. As it stands, get a draw and hope that Bournemouth beat Everton, and we go ahead of them, don't we? It would be a shame if we got that record of most home losses in a season, but thankfully it doesn't mean much given the number of away wins.

Agreed. Yoshida wouldn't have beaten for pace by Sharp IMO

Formatting issue? 😆 Yes, I can compute that when it comes to actual chains of events regarding Brexit, you are often wrong.

Ah, I see that you have re-considered your previous post, which I was just about to respond to, so I am aware of the parts of it that are rubbish, based on our former position last year. I can see why your brain is numb. You need to come up to date. We are no longer negotiating under May and the useless Robbins, so we don't now want anything to do with the SM and CU. Like all other countries who trade with the EU, we only want access to the SM, not membership. I repeat, Canada, S.Korea and Japan don't face those additional hurdles that the EU seeks to impose on us, so there is no reason that we should accept them either. Naturally I accept that the EU seek to punish us to discourage others from leaving. I also accept that they are shit scared that we will thrive as a serious competitor right on their doorstep, so they will seek to hamper our freedoms to liberate our trade output from their bureaucracy and away from their legal jurisdiction. We are no longer victims of a remoaner Parliament, tied by Benn's Surrender Act against walking away from a bad deal. Giving up on those three red lines would constitute a bad deal, so unless they are removed, we will be better off under WTO rules. Who cares whether one side blames the other of intransigence? You talk as if there is no blame on their side for some reason, but I gave good reasons for their intransigence above.

Do tell. What are these clever ways to get the best for the UK? I implore you to contact the Government and their negotiating team to advise them if they're missing a trick or two.

My money's there too. Rallyboy reckons that we lack decent negotiators, but Frost is doing a cracking job with the full support of Boris. Contrast his performance to that of the totally useless Vicar's daughter with her spineless remoaner negotiator Robbins. When told to jump by Barnier, their response was to ask, how high? As soon as the EU accepts that since we left the EU we must be treated like equals as an independent sovereign state, and that we should therefore be afforded equal FTA terms to those already afforded by the EU to Canada, S. Korea and Japan, the sooner a deal will be arranged. I don't recall the EU insisting that the ECJ have precedence over their legal systems, that they be allowed to fish their territorial waters, or allowed to interfere in their governments' decisions on subsidies and work standards

Exactly. Timmy appears to have overlooked that the size of the UK economy equals, what was it, the size of the 19 smaller EU economies combined?

Have the lunatics finally taken over the asylum? According to the nutty professor from the LSE, it is only a drop in the ocean among the scheme of things. As our economy is far smaller than theirs, it follows that it is an even smaller drop in their ocean, and in any event, why should we be giving aid to a belligerent China when we could be giving it to the genuinely poor nations, or preferably to our own poor.

You appear to have missed the other side of the analogy, which is quite a common occurrence when people talk about the consequences facing us, whilst forgetting the even more dire ones facing the EU. The EU are also pointing a gun at their bollocks too.

I sincerely hope not. Having it to the end of the season is quite enough to make a point. If it continues into next season, I reckon that there could well be booing.

It's all a poker game, to see who blinks first. The EU usually applies this strategy of brinkmanship, so it is encouraging for them to be faced down by negotiators for the UK who show all the signs that they will not budge on our red lines. The real deadline will probably be early October, but it does no harm to attempt to concentrate minds in the EU before then. The first cracks seem to be appearing on their side.

https://pjmedia.com/columns/matt-margolis/2020/07/20/the-associated-press-stylebook-is-now-officially-racist-n664984 A reasoned response to this gormlessly woke idiot john daniszewski. I decided that his name should not be in capitals, as he is a nobody, therefore not entitled to have capitals which would make him appear more important. Where he is apparently the Vice President for Standards, presumably they missed out the "falling" between "for" and "Standards".