NewYorkSaint

I'm an optimist and even I'm depressed. thought nothing that a couple of goals our way wouldn't fix. One thing I'll say. the hate poured out on Smallbone pregame not justified. He's been one of our best players, though admittedly not much competition for that honour.

C'mon boys. Fight and flair, please! Give me that I don't care what the result is.* *... though 2-0 would do nicely.

Mathematically, there's a reasonable chance this year that the we break the prior record for low points needed to survive (34 pts). With a big gap above the bottom four, it's just possible that 30-31 pts cd do it. So... all we need are 6 wins and 3 draws.... easy peasy!

how great was that?! best single thing. The evident level of commitment by Every. Single. Player.........

Plus his was the first touch setting up our goal...

I dunno. I loved that half. Wellington looks wonderful add. All to play for. We have two of our best players still to bring on....

Still waiting for tall Paul's opening goal. It's coming... it's coming....

It's a mystery ever since we signed him, why tall Paul never given a proper chance. For a team in desperate need of a great striker it made zero sense. So damn happy to see us now building our game plan around him. We deserve to be ahead. Huge second half coming up. I guess TP will be subbed pretty early. Would be unreal if he got his goal before that.

Armstrong's been doing his part in an occasionally impressive press, but I agree he shd give way to tall Paul or Archer. I'd keep Dibling on. How good would a clean sheet feel? I'm v happy to have Bednarek as captain. Feel he's been a seriously under-appreciated player. Always gives his all.

9 wins, 5 draws, 8 losses... it's hard to remember what it's like being on a winning streak, but stranger things have happened.

You really are a miserable bunch. I grant you it's a lot more fun online to take the piss... but not me. I still find myself looking forward to each game, torture and all, and get HUGE pleasure from the moments when we're playing well. And despite it all there have actually been a lot of those moments. I'm happy to be the counter-voice here who believes we're actually really close to a run of wins. If tall Paul comes on in the 60th minute and in the 70th minutes heads home a winner from a cross whipped in by Dibling or Fernandez or KWP... then I would like a little appreciation please. That event could easily be in our v near future. I think at this point, it's pointless to sack Martin. We're trying to compete in the world's best league with teams that have spent way more than us... and we're precious close to getting it right. There are so many games where we've been competitive and exciting to watch for large parts of the match. Of course, when you lose, the narrative gets completely rewritten as a shitshow. But watch how that changes if and when the results start to go our way. I think Sunday will be a thunderous game... and we'll edge Spurs out 3-2. Saints fan for life... through thick and thin......... Hold the faith!

the weird thing is that if all you looked at was the general run of play for the half, an independent viewer would say it was even stevens. We gave as good as we got... just as many sweeping forward moves... and, in the conditions, they made as many mistakes as we did. Am I wrong? And if I'm right, the narrative that our squad isn't premier league quality is false. Even missing 5 of our best players, we're competitive. Tis a game of fine margins. And so far, they're not working in our favour....

Genuine question. Which would you rather have happen to day? - a tough, battling 2-1 win, with no bad defensive error... and a nice goal that comes from playing Russball style from the back - evidence that seems strong enough for RM to stay in the job for the coming weeks. - a crushing 3-0 loss with at least one goal coming from defensive error at the back, and the final straw for RM so that he's sacked in the morning? Reply 👍for the first and 👎 to the second. I'm v curious to know.

So it seems that the reason VAR disallowed the goal is because the ref disallowed the goal on the field. BUT it seems pretty clear that the reason the ref disallowed the goal is because the linesman raised his flag. And I'm pretty sure the reason the linesman raised his flag was not for Armstrong but for Archer, the goal-scorer. So why the heck can't the humans involved just have a rational conversation? VAR to referee "Can you confirm? Was your disallowal because you thought Armstrong interfered with the play? If so, we won't overturn it. But if you were just supporting your linesman, you should know that Archer was onside." Surely that would be better than bringing the system into disrepute... and UNFAIRLY KICKING AWAY LITERALLY 28% OF A TEAM'S ENTIRE SEASON'S POINTS (on top of three prior bad VAR calls).

On the bright side, our 4th choice goal keeper made a beautiful pass in our penalty area between two pressing Brighton forwards to escape. A glorious miracle!