badgerx16

This is the current first team squad, in which I have highlighted those players that will almost certainly be ditched either due to wages, being on loan, or likely targets for vultures picking over the bones. ( Plus, I can see Perry retiring rather than play in League 1 ). Davis, Forecast, Poke, Bart James, Perry, Saejis, Thomas, Lancashire, Kyle Davies, Hatch, Molyneux, Liptak, Mills, Imudia, Skacel Surman, Lallana, Spiderman, Gasmi, Holmes, Smith, Mule, Wotten, Gillett, Thompson, Gobern, Pulis, White BWP, Saga, McGoldrick, Paterson, McLaggon

Do you still BELIEVE that Saints will finish out of the bottom three ? Or is it hope, faith, prayer, or voodoo you are using as a basis for your judgement ?

Damn, I've been cheering on the wrong team since 1969,

Wolves are on cruise control.

Only if the pitch was thirty yards wider.

If Notts County are concerned about not getting an installment payment for McGoaldrought - offer to send him back. That should shut them up.

6 - 1 Wolves

Well, that was sh1te.

And Wolves are a younger team than us

Who said that ?

How many of the starting eleven are from the academy ?

Maybe we can sue under the Trades Descriptions Act ? Or use the Sale of Goods Act to show that what is on offer is not of 'merchantable quality' ?

:smt082:smt082:smt082:smt082:smt082:smt082

Why single him out ?

Has Saejis come back on ?

Vokes against three defenders and the goalie, simple really :confused:

I remember it well; at exactly the time this was all happening, I was undergoing an emergency appendectomy Came round from the anaesthetic, expecting to hear the footy results, but instead the first thing I heard was ambulances on the pitch.

And now he's a dead 'stubborn sod'.

Would they have considered that he might have been hard of hearing; ( or even wearing an MP3 player, or a BlueTooth adapter, that affected his ability to pick up any request / order from the Police).

Basic principles of Law in this country ~: Innocent until PROVEN guilty Force must be justifiable and PROPORTIONATE .............................. What if he was wearing a 'padded jacket with wires hanging out of it', just like JC DeMenezes ? Another case in which the Met's ( completely fabricated ) version of events was swiftly spread to a favourable and sensationalist media to skew opinion in advance of the facts coming to light. Throwing him to the ground in that manner was an assault, pure and simple. In these situations they are given free rein, knowing there is little chance of any enforceable comeback.

Those would be the 'filthy pikeys' with the flourescent jackets, crash helmets, riot shields, and attack dogs.

Watch the video then read this quote from Peter Smyth, chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation; "On a day like that, where there are some protesters who are quite clearly hell-bent on causing as much trouble as they can, there is inevitably going to be some physical confrontation." He added: "Sometimes it isn't clear, as a police officer, who is a protester and who is not." ...................................... Well, this poor chap was obviously "hell-bent on causing trouble" and involved in a "physical confrontation"; and from his demeanour, and the VAST crowd around him, I can understand that the Police had a great deal of trouble identifying "who is a protestor and who is not". :^o:^o:^o

Reminds me of the Smith & Jones sketch, "Guilty of having black curly hair". The bloke was walking slowly, AWAY from the Police, showing no sign of aggression and obviously not doing anything that might be construed as provocative. This was an unprovoked, serious assault, even if his death is unconnected to the fall. Where is the 'barrage of missiles' the protestors were claimed to be 'hurling' at the poor, defenceless, plod ? Dress them up like para-militaries, they will act like para-militaries. Any excuse for a ruck.

Your son comes home, announces he is gay, and his new partner is from Poopey. No, maybe you are right after all.

Glad to be of service.