badgerx16

Death by a thousand cuts - they'll drag this out as long as they can, and if he gets a ban it will be timed to knock us back just as we are finding form . After all, we are the biggest cheats in football history, ever, and possibly in all professional sports. Fixing the World Series was nothing compared to a bloke standing next to a tree on a public footpath.

It was onside but might have been outside the area.

Don't fuck this up !

This game eill be lost because of their last wicket stand in the 1st innings and the last 2 in the 2nd.....129 runs.

Given our luck it will be an OG.

Sensible.

Fellows is one of our most overrated players.

The ball went past 4 defenders before reaching an unmarked Stoke player.

When does pessimism about a result become realism and acceptance of impending defeat ?

Judging by your post just now on the "Small things that annoy you..." thread, that's understandable; "The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men..."

{ Without too much thought.........} Apollo 13 ( I know the entire script by heart but still watch it several times a year ) High Society. ( Not usually a fan of musicals, but this is just brilliant ) Star Wars. ( Does this need explaining ? ) Casablanca. ( Watching it for the first time is the beginning of a beautiful friendship ) LA Confidential ( Well made, good cast, strong story ) A Matter of Life and Death ( An object lesson in film making ) ( and so many more ) Ask me agsin tomorrow and you will get a different list.

It's a pointed and pointless question. The strange thing is that the "Party of Law and Order" has constantly failed to find a solution to something that those in opposition continually succeed in challenging by using the Law. All those people that you despise so much are doing is using the system that is in place. It is the Government's responsibility, whichever colour it might be, to produce workable Legal solutions. If they do that, the opposition has no recourse.

I don't accept it. You are, as usual, spouting exaggerated waffle. If the Government passes effective legislation which the Courts, domestic and international, can support, ultimately no amount of vocal opposition and activism can prevent the policies being carried out. The issues lie with politicians being unable, or unwilling, to develop a legal workable solution, ( NOT Rwanda Mk2 ).

Do those organisations and individuals "... seek to stop any proposals which restrict immigration. " ? ( I would assume they have actually come out and said that they actively oppose such proposals ).