badgerx16

Imagine if in a few years time we are running a "The Farage years, will the new broom sweep clean ?" thread.

Told ya.

The current name in the frame is someone who had been at Saints on an intern placement from his course at Derby Uni, has also been at Forest, and is now at Villa.

Conceded 81 for the last wicket. We'll probably lose at least 2 wickets wiping out their first innings lead.

And the one name currently in circulation works for Aston Villa.

Nothing has been proved, particularly whether the alleged "spy" has any current association wifh the club.

Dear investigative panel, as you can clearly see from the match video, there is no way we could have gained any sort of advantage from alleged espionage.

Go Kyle.....

If somebody hands over their phone to show there is nothing untoward on it, can the panel then judge that stuff had been deleted, even if in fact it was never there ? It's not like the Police contacting the telecomms companies.

Even if it was potentially an option, they can't award a forfeit as Hull and Millwall would kick off about Boro getting an unfair advantage.

Do they have the right to demand them ?

Or alternatively, the independant panel find it is all a load of bollox.

How many potential batting and bowling points will we have thrown away before they are ruled inadequate ? How far adrift at the bottom of the table before anybody acts ? The problems are bloody obvious and run deep.

Unless the EFL can expedite a verdict.